They Let Me Take South America AND Africa?! 

@@Lumbus42 fr?

​@@Lumbus42british raj?

​@@Lumbus42french indochina, chinese treaty ports, dutch east indies, british malaysia, american philipines.

Portugal and Spain moment

​@@Clarence23rdcompared to other continents (north america also contains central america) they didn't have a lot of colonies. not to mention the person said almost untouched

What does that mean

​@@LandrySmith-ip8zito have 100% chance to take an opponents capital on an attack you need to have roughly 2.62 times the amount of troops they have in their capital

@@mrjeb1208 so like if I had 100 troops and the enemy had 25 would that be 100% chance

@@LandrySmith-ip8zi I believe so yes

@@LandrySmith-ip8zi easier math is, if they have 100 troops, you need roughly 262 troops to have a 100% chance of beating them

I though the same

Based

@@champion4223 and the award for most basic comment ever goes to champion4223 (joke don't get too mad)

@@Willdoom-kl2mo np, I don't take offence to much

cap 🧢

Ill be offended for you :) its 2024 this is how it works, you dont have a choice ​@@champion4223

Looks like WAR board game. Really cool, but without the super troops and such

me to

Which game is this name ?

@@abdaljaankakar8605 Risk (on steam and in real life)

@@unnamedkillaz8677 "risk" is the name, on steam

relatable

He's really cool right?! Even though I don't watch strategy games this guy is just something else!

He's good, but he still has a lot to learn about this game. His speed and lack of knowledge of the maps show sometimes, but it's okay cause he gets better every match. He has an amazing strategical mind, so he can definitely become a Grandmaster in Risk. I've been playing Risk for years and I'm so happy that CG started playing it!

Not great at risk but he's getting better :)

I wouldn't call him great. He missed an obvious cap run at the 24:28 mark that would have cost him the game against a better opponent. He could have won that turn, but failed to see it, allowing Red a chance to win. He's very fortunate that Red is terrible at the game.

why should anyone

Blizzards are 100% random with the only rule applied to them is they cannot isolate any territories from the rest.

@banana12216 I think he made an africa, water joke

yeah this doesn't account for the possibility of other players having captured territories. What your saying doesn't work if someone has NA, someone has SA and Africa, and someone has Asia. in that case, the person in Australia tends to win after the other players try to break bonuses.

You must not have watched many games of Risk if you think this is one of the best games you've ever witnessed. These players, including CG, make several blunders and bad decisions throughout the game. CG got the win, but missed an obvious cap run at the 24:28 mark that could have cost him the game against a better, more experienced player. He's very fortunate that Red was so terrible at the game. Go watch Kylted or Digitalic if you want to see what high level Risk play is. That said, CG isn't bad, just inexperienced.

@@james_ford86just let the poor guy enjoy the video

What is the name of this game?

​@@Bread75355Seems to be Risk.

@@Bread75355 Risk Global Domination, sorry for the late response. I was on vacation.

North America's only weakness compared to Africa is the 3 points you can enter from aren't all touching. But especially in Fixed, the 2 extra troops are almost always worth it.

Ty

It's risk

Th board game risk was made in 1956, so it came first.

@@rohanleblancsloan9651 was about to say this, my family tradition is playing risk on xmas, been doing it well over 20 years now

I noticed the same thing.

Roblox - war and peace

Risk bro 😂

😮😅😅😅

😅😅😅😅

😅😅😅😅😮😊😅😅

😅😮😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😊

😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😮😅😅😅😮😅😮😮😅😅😅😮😊😅

You clearly don’t play risk! 😂 Going for Australia is definitely not the best bet. You could have a 20 guard and a noob will roll a 21 on 20 because they think exactly like you do. Australia is only good if you can get it first turn, with a guard big enough that it’s safe. Otherwise you get noob slammed and place 6. Australia is only good in very specific situations, SA or Africa, then once the time is right taking the other to hold both is far superior to Australia. Not your typical keyboard warrior. I’m a GM on risk currently sitting at 28000 rank points. So this advice comes from a lot of previous experience when it comes to fools slamming Australia as they think it’s so powerful

@@liamjames2956 Not too sure about all that. I'm fairly certain that the presence of capitals makes Australia far better than in normal gameplay. If you place your capital in Australia, it becomes +4 for a 1 point hold, and if somebody else also places their capital there, it becomes +6. The ratio of troop gain to holding difficulty is by far the largest of any continent. I've even had one crazy game where everybody placed their capital in Australia, and I won it rather quickly. For the rest of that game, I had +10 for a 1 point hold. Needless to say, Australia felt pretty OP during that game. Basically, those "very specific situations" you're talking about are in any game with capitals, and in absolutely every situation where you want to turtle. So about 50% of all Risk games. I've gone Australia in almost every Risk game I've played in the last ten years, and rarely ever lose. Then again, maybe it's a difference between playing in person vs online.

@@ClashBluelight Australia can easily be card blocked by 2 territories in the late game so and since its only a +2 per turn it doesn't make it worth losing out on easy cards in the late game prog.

@@Nothlng_Here Like I said, when played with capitals or with the intention of turtling. If you want to be aggressive, don't start in Australia.

No it should have bee game over when cg went into aus. If blue didn't blunder China they had already shown that they were trying to block green in. That position and cap location was completely losing.

Yeah it SHOULD work like how you say but it doesn't. When you get a big stack the game uses a faster dice calculation and in testing if you have a large stack hitting a bunch of 1's, not using the blitz slider will lose you a troop basically every time you hit a 1. Slidering in this same scenario will have you lose almost no troops. The mechanics of the slider aren't easy to figure out or test but the majority concensus from the community is to use the slider on every hit. I think this is incorrect, though. I don't think using the slider affects small rolls like 8v3 at all. And in the case of hitting large cap stacks it pretty much forces you to get a bad roll. Barely taking the cap means losing twice the troops you killed. Not slidering means you have much more troops so you have a more realistic chance for a good roll (going even or even losing less) but you can also lose as much as triple the troops you attacked if you get a bad roll. Basically it's jank, and the community wants it fixed, but at the moment slidering does actually matter.

If you attack 20v1, that 1 might get 3-4 kills. But if you slider it down to 3v1 that 1 will get 0 or 1 kill. Does it make sense? Not really unless you think of it as "If there's more enemies in sight, I'm less likely to miss my shot"

if you attack a 1 with a 3, that 3, you either be left with a 2 or 1 dependin on the dice so you lose some, if you attack with more you lose more

Risk

Reae description

Fr he coulda won the turn after red ran out of time but instead was focused on playing like it was World Domination

@@Gardolind Missed the easiest cap run anyone ever handed another player. He would have lost because of that too, if Red was a better player. But Red was terrible, which is why CG still won despite his massive mistake.

Risk Global Domination. It's in the description of every video I've ever made on the game.

Thanks

Check the description.