This Aircraft Carrier Could Go Underwater... IMPOSSIBLE Submarine Aircraft Carrier - An 1 + An 2 

There is a real life counterpart to the Alicorn… the I-400 Class carrier submarine. 3 dive bomber aircraft.

@@SpheroJr3289 although I love the i-400, the alicorn would be way better, two years without surface, railguns, missile system, as guns, drones, electronic warfare, shield drones, up to twenty fighters with pilots that no valuate their life kinda much, nukes, and a plan to end this war in an elegant manner. Is like saying that a horses car is the counterpart of a F1 racing car

@@simplementepersona i-400 pilots probably didn't value there life that much over the empire, as a lot of Japanese soldiers did.

@@the_stinky_broccoli8998 neither do the alicorn crew... They were taking off when the submarine were still emerging and they were human shields, not to talk that carrying 20 planes which can take off in squadrons + drones that can take off while underwater makes it more powerful

@@SpheroJr3289 Honestly, I'd consider the I-400 to be more like the Scinfaxi-class submarines than the Alicorn, as it rather lacked a flight deck, and would have launched floatplanes (or planes with no way of landing safely, as the pontoons were actually removed during storage, and could be omitted for faster launches), while the Alicorn clearly had the ability to have its aircraft land back on it like a regular carrier, despite us never seeing any do so. They also share the similarity of also fulfilling more traditional submarine roles, as the I-400 had torpedo tubes, and the scinfaxi class being a ballistic missile submarine, while the Alicorn's mode of operation was more in line with a surface warship that happens to be able to submerge. Sure, the Scinfaxi-class presumably also could have its aircraft land back on it, but that's only because it used VTOL aircraft and UAVs (the latter of which may have forgone recovery), but it's still a matter of an alternative method of landing, as the I-400 did have the ability to recover its aircraft after they landed on the water.

Honestly, nowadays it's the opposite. DARPA plays Ace Combat and salivate.

Those damn Belkans are at it again!

It's called the Alicorn

Hrimfaxi Submarine. A Scinfaxi-class nuclear submarine developed by the Union of Yuktobanian Republics during the Cold War. It along with its sister ship, the Scinfaxi, was later destroyed during the Circum-Pacific War.

@@JensenKangalee and then it got nae naed by the ark bird

Anything larger than current high stealth/silence submarines will be flawed...and submarine hunters can even detect anomaly in earth's magnetic field hence detecting huge submarine... so such and similar vlogs goes out of the window... rescuing/salvaging sitting aircraft methods makes LEM/DARPA way flawed too... I have a classified design which addresses all and actively looking to pitch to precise channel in US. They could be reading this too :) ...

The Navy can take my taxes, this is cool as hell

Anything larger than current high stealth/silence submarines will be flawed...and submarine hunters can even detect anomaly in earth's magnetic field hence detecting huge submarine... so such and similar vlogs goes out of the window... rescuing/salvaging sitting aircraft methods makes LEM/DARPA way flawed too... I have a classified design which addresses all and actively looking to pitch to precise channel in US. They could be reading this too :) ...

-puts missile down rail cannon-

SALVATION!

CRISP WHITE S H E E T S

😂😂😂😂

lololpoopoopolo

Never had such genuine laugh with that kind of pun.

It was so on point lol

Unless you find a fingernail or finger in that sandwich

"Hold the mayo," Patrick said. SpongeBob suspects him. 😄

What would be the advantage to that over submarine launched cruise missile or ballistic missile?

Except it’s been done by four different countries before…

@@brentsido8822 well you can attac and anish attack and vanish. you caqn hit more targets than you can with course missiles. it allso will confuse the enemy, and like you have more options

Anything larger than current high stealth/silence submarines will be flawed...and submarine hunters can even detect anomaly in earth's magnetic field hence detecting huge submarine... so such and similar vlogs goes out of the window... rescuing/salvaging sitting aircraft methods makes LEM/DARPA way flawed too... I have a classified design which addresses all and actively looking to pitch to precise channel in US. They could be reading this too :) ...

​@@mi1400 Interesting

There is a G.E. plant about 45 mins away from my house near Cincinnati Ohio, they make aircraft engines there, it is quite the impressive looking facility (i have never been on premises but i sometimes see it from afar when driving

@@secondstartotheright No. They had 3, not 10, completed, all three were lost. They planned on building 18 of them but 15 were cancelled.

@@samwheat1302 Try captured/surrendered as war prizes. The USN scuttled them after doing a detailed study to prevent the Russians from trying to take them as their own prizes even though it was the US that accepted the surrender and had jurisdiction over the Japanese home islands and any remaining Japanese military assets, hence why Nagato was present at Operation Crossroads as a target. France also had Surcouf which carried a folding wing biplane for spotting and a large number Japanese submarines actually had small seaplane hangars for recon and spotting, as did a number of Royal Navy submarines such as the M-class. Most other nations had experimented with the concept and the Germans had several designs drawn up by late WWII.

@@secondstartotheright 2 survived the war. 1 was operational and surrendered to the US at the end of the war. The second was conducting Sea Trials when the war ended. The 3rd was still under construction. 1 of them was sunk off Hawaii after the US had gotten everything they wanted from it as far as intelligence and any engineering information they wanted before being sunk to prevent it from falling into Soviet hands. None saw action.

Japan in ww2 : first time?

The French actually did this, the Surcouf class. (Technically a cruiser, but the concept is there)

Supreme Commander vibes

The British did it with the M1. They're called big gun or cruiser submarines. And there's actually a lot of countries in the 1920s that made a lot of these battleship submarines.

Its not dangerous enough, can we add more nuclear reactors?

Agreed

_"That is, until Trigger Ruined it."_

Sink the aft, it will give the elevation it needs

Anything larger than current high stealth/silence submarines will be flawed...and submarine hunters can even detect anomaly in earth's magnetic field hence detecting huge submarine... so such and similar vlogs goes out of the window... rescuing/salvaging sitting aircraft methods makes LEM/DARPA way flawed too... I have a classified design which addresses all and actively looking to pitch to precise channel in US. They could be reading this too :) ...

_Scinfaxi_ is itching with the Burst MIRV

Lol japan made three sub carriers. They had plans on making 18 altogether to attack usa mainland

The planes will run out of fuel and need to land , has that been thought of ? 🤔 They better have a better idea or else back to the drawing board

The major problem is to start and land while the carrier is submerged.

I400 would like to laugh

I think you'll find its the crazy requests that managers and customers have that lead engineers, to have crazy concepts. Also most things sound crazy when you first propose them. Launching icbms from submarines underwater for example.

Phycological warfare

And a bed with CRISP WHITE SHEET.

Need nuclear Missile

railguns are terminated most likely replaced by hypersonic missiles

ONE MILLION LIVES!!!

I’m still baffled as why they didn’t just go with a vtol aircraft

SC2 UEF Atlantis II >

You do realize people have been using seaplanes for decades?

@@WALTERBROADDUS There is a profound difference between a pleasure craft that travels at 100 mph and something pushing mach numbers in terms of mechanical tolerances, experiencing regular high G loads and maintenance requirements. That is a lot to try and design around..

@@Enonymouse_ ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-b0-VdFcV9uc.html

the japanese and americans were using armed military seaplanes as far back as ww1 and ww2 and as far as jets go look up soviet WIGs and ekranoplan and for the american side of things look up the martin p6m Seamaster

@@Enonymouse_ you think planes dont get wet on normal carriers?

US: *"Oh I got your ass now..."*

R.I.P. I-400 class

You know now?

And Marvel Comics has its " Helicarrier" flying aircraft carrier.

like when certain teachers forget to teach the bit about why japan attacked..the usa attacked and sunk a defenseless hospital ship. it was retaliation. like your imagination though.

Then we imagined the splitting of the atom…..

The Japanese actually developed such a sub during ww2.

Japan will not attack us you fool.theres a load of reasons why,but to list a few key reasons,one they are allied,and two,they don't exactly get along with China,who does not exactly get along with us,and an enimy of my enimy must surely be my friend.in other words,Japan has more reasons to be allied than they do to be enimies

and aside from that,in WW2,we did do some deplorable shit to japan.up to and including dropping two nukes on them,that caused the created myth of godzilla.we have sence then made peace with them,and are proud to call them allies.after all,they was tactically smart enough to pull off the pearl harbor assault,they will make a powerful Ally in future wars.

*"SALVATION!"*

and suddenly the ocean starts singing in Latin

CRISP. WHITE. SHEETS.

"Hand over the nukes, and the anime"

_"That is, until Trigger Ruined it."_

As technology they worked. As weapons ...... they seemed to lack a mission. Properly employed , in the right place and time the I-400 could have been a great force multiplier. Their 4 plane air group couldn't throw much weight but has enough punch to do some really useful things. The ships worked. In my opinion, at that time, there were more important things to use those resources on. A neat thing for Japan to develop.

psychological warfare weapon, at best.

@@daleeasternbrat816 Its mission was to be a delivery platform for biological warfare.

I-400 did not launch planes against the West Coast. Do your research and resubmit your response.

I agree, it was not I-400 class, it was a 2-digit "I" class (smaller submarine that could carry 1 aircraft).

Dude -- Mobile Suit Gundam much? (In one anime from the franchise, the bad guys did have wheeled dreadnoughts that crunched their way through Earth's cities.)

@@seanbigay1042 Real world??? Video games. Don't get it twisted.

That's easy if they still have a Tsar Tank prototype.

@@seanbigay1042 Victory

I remember thst there was a popular mechanics cover from long ago which depicted such a thing, a ship like two wheeled war machine.

How much would you pay to be the one who gets to push the launch button?

@@txgunguy2766 i wanna be a space marine

*YEET*

@@kieranmilner1295 space guardian or nothing i fear.

Just remember...interservice rivalry being what it is if the Navy/Marines built something like that the army would come up with an equally silly notion to compete for funding. Something on the order of a hypersonic vehicle with a platoon of light infantry getting spit out in fire team sized capsules to decelerate and land???

lots of aircraft carrier concepts on my channel lately haha

Why not have both? Aircraft carriers in the sky, aircraft carriers on the water, and aircraft carriers underneath the sea. A triple whammy of aircraft carriers.

We already have flying ones, the tic tac ufo is just a small cigar shaped anti gravity carrier craft for smaller triangle and other shaped anti gravity craft. I served with the Navy and was right up beside and inside those ships, that’s why the recent ufo/UAP report pisses me off so much. I KNOW they’re lying again to just keep the coverup going and it pisses me off, but yeah they’re pretty cool once you start understanding what the black military world has actually been doing with aerospace projects that are ACTUALLY cutting edge, it’s miles past what most people think is even possible, if people only knew what we have RIGHT NOW, it would absolutely blow their mind.

Submersible is cheaper because you don't need to constantly use fuel to keep an aircraft carrier flying in the sky. Unless your taking about Space Battle carriers. That is 10x better than either one.

@@dustynmyatt2679 you my friend believe too much, the UFO phenomenon is pure theatre just another tool in the tool box, psychological warfare. Not designed for its citizens. It’s designed for the country’s enemies. Is it real is it not. Can we really attack them successfully etc.

Look up “zero length launch” fighters. They were designed as a counter strike response in Germany during the Cold War.

​Unfortunately they still required runways for landing, though if you had used the likes of the Anglo French Jaguar the runway wouldn't need much preparation.

Hoo boy... you just gave me chills...

Ace Combat ? Sorry, it's been a while 😬

Nostalgia hit me like a full speed truck

@@adamfrazer5150 Ace Combat 5

*PTSD Flashbacks*

salvation

*ONE MILLION LIVES!!!*

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Shortly to become crisp brown sheets...

I only played the Xbox version Is it the same game?

Salvation

@@christopherbays7719 No. It’s slightly less arcade-y with more in depth plane customization and more story, narrative and character depth.

@@christopherbays7719 Same universe though. Its basically the MechWarrior to xbox's MechAssault, if you get it.

I thought the dialogue was Amazing honestly. The opening with Nathan and Thibodaux was great

Except they have zero purpose when SSGNs exist. A submarine's entire purpose is to never be detected. SSGNs are already announcing their position when firing, but at least they can do so underwater and quickly reposition; all this idea does is get them killed. What if the sub is found? Does it dive to save itself, leaving the aircraft to die? Or does it get both killed by waiting? The only benefit they could have over cruise missiles is precision, but is "precision" worth it when you can only carry 1/10 the firepower of the standard ~dozen VLS tubes? Cruise missiles don't need maintenance rooms, fuel/ammo storage, crews and their quarters, or large launching platforms/runways. All they need is a VLS, and however many reloads you want stored in all that unused space.

@@Nighthawk2401 if we're going to go the VLS missile system then why don't you mention the Arsenal ships at all because those things were essentially aircraft carrier sized platforms with a small section for the minimal crew to live and maintain the engines and possibly run air defenses if it had them, and the rest hundreds to thousands of VLS tubes with actual guidance and firing solutions controlled by a second ship.

@@Shinzon23 A pretty cool idea, but also a little pointless. If you need 500 cruise missiles for land attack, use existing fleet supply vessels to rearm other VLS-armed ships at sea. Though at that point, it might be better to just let the air force handle it.

If large fully autonomous stealthy drones can be launched while submerged, why not.

@@davidbocquelet-dbodesign It's still just an issue of role. A submarine's strength in land attack is it's ability to go behind enemy lines and hit large industrial and strategic targets then escape before the missiles even start landing. Strike craft are meant for precision CAS, and stealth aircraft will always have to pick between stealth and weapon storage. You don't go far behind enemy lines to kill a few tanks, why not bring tomahawks to hit major targets? And once again, retrieval of aircraft is a pain the ass.

They actually already had that. Look up the Yokosuka MXY-7 Ohka

@@nong333 I know they had a human missile, but what I am implying is that the Japanese would want more of them, and the fighter said would be a good addition.

😂

🤣🤣🤣

"How big would you like to build your submarine?" Japan Empire: Yes "Okay perhaps you don't get it, how big would you want your battleship be?" Japan Empire: Yes

Nah, it needs more nukes on it

Jules Verne would stroke his beard.

The mispronouncing of such a legendary name and ship line makes me cringe so hard. Shame this channel could be so much better if he actually bothered to edit/fact check his own work.

@@zetamafia911 Not to mention aircraft "hangers". All this supposed aviation research and a primary schooler's error.

Don’t mess with the Nizmit!

Came looking for this comment.

ah you mean from Supreme Commander?

@@lordrefrigeratorintercoole288 Haha exactly. Dumping an entire storage capacity of bombers on an unprepared strong point or vulnerable force was always fun.

I think Mustard is the best channel

@@FoundAndExplained no bro you can't say that ..yes he have some quality videos but yet the level of detail and quality in your videos are still comparable ..also he uploads once in a 1-2 months.. so for me your channel is best

I believe he said "Nizmit". Not sure if that's worse...

@@virginiahansen320 worse!

"Grum Man" "North Rope" "Nizmit" I'm pretty sure he's doing this on purpose.

@@AubriGryphon north rope LAMO

Don't forget the *guy row* stabilized recovery system. I have a feeling the narrator and the script writer are not the same.

F35 are so bad that carrying brick would be more usefull....

That whole program needs to die. We're spending all our military budget on that one f'ing program (not to mention fuel and maintenance costs), while China diversifies their military, we try and put everything of ours into one plane...

That type of submarine wouldn't be effective because with square body they can't descent to a serious depth.

@@valian8985 how do you know? Any firsthand experience sir?

Not "officially"... :P

It's a classic!

Don't worry. When China or Russia makes theirs, we'll play catch-up...just like we always do.

Mustard already made a vid on it

aka "that time when the Japanese were so fed up with the Americans sinking their carriers, they made one that would sink itself"

All we need to do is create a functional and reliable railgun.

@@marrqi7wini54 Or 9.

*cruiser

*French* 🤭

Just made the same comment before coming across yours. I used to work for GD, and it has never been a part of GE.

@@Attaxalotl

1 question dr fae where do you get the animations do you make it or open source or do you buy it or is it a secret its ok

@Dark Shade015 she ? Nice tho those animations are dope

@@vectorpacer2063 I make all the animations myself :)

Correction : Nimitz Class not Nizmit class aircraft carrier

General Electric and General Dynamics are two completely separate companies.

*Alicorn surfaces*

Yes, though they where considered to be cruisers. Drachinfel has good videos on both (the French one is called "Surcouf" and I think the British ones where the M15?).

Exactly. I can easily forgive a few errors for these beautifully rendered videos of insane ideas people have had.

I feel like it cpuld work now

Martin's V-Bat and electric version have been unnoticed for so long with best drone desgin by leaps and bounds.

also Nimitz is pronounced NYM-ITZ... not NYZ-MIT lol