Charlie I haven’t been scared in a while since nothing is really that’s scary anymore and unpredictable but oh boy” AI spooky spooky lunge” you got me 😭😂
i'm not afraid of AI, i'm afraid of the industries and corporations and politicians that will not even hesitate to use something like this for their own selfish and power hungry gain. it's not the AI that's scary, it's knowing that it is inevitably going to fall into corrupt hands and we are all hopeless to stop it
Probably too late for that if the general public has access to it now theres no doubt they have been using it for much longer, im worried about stupid people and conspiracy theory types that already cant tell the difference between real and fake images online already lol
@@chrismauck6572 genuine question: what in the world are you talking about 😂 like I'm laughing but I'm genuinely confused, I can name a couple criticisms for this comment but I'm completely lost as to where you found hypocrisy in it lmao
It's genuinely amazing and kinda hilarious just how spooked I got by him literally just moving towards the camera with his hands out and not even shouting, just talking slightly louder than normal 😂 it was just so unexpected
Careful, don't say this so loudly! They might make a Charlie voice AI and use holograms to replicate his jump scares. He'll be super imposed into B tire horror movies for decades to come.
Actually a horror character in video game is actuallly an AI and they can jumpscare a player, do you think someone who would control them while they are on single players?
I don't usually comment on things but seriously dude your opinion on releasing "new tracks" using AI generated voices of deceased musicians really hits the nail on the head here. We'll never be able to trust "unreleased" tracks again.
Especially Juice Wrld bro, now I can't trust "unreleased" music. It's very upsetting and alarming because the person replacing deceased artists voices and making money off of it which that's ridiculously bullshit.
That is the most likely to be taken first, unfortunately. Because while artists (I do consider musicians to be artists, just to clarify) are exceptionally skilled to do what they do, it's also abstract thought. It can't be exactly replicated, but the ground rules for art and templates are easily accessible. Where as something super technical and precise like something for the medical field need to be made for more niche fields to perfect. I hope I'm making sense. It just feels abysmal in the creative field.
If you watch an anime named “Carole & Tuesday,” one of the main overarching stories included in the world building is that they live on Mars and A.I. is the main thing creating music. Such an interesting take on it though, and this allows for the main characters to stand out as being actual singer/songwriters. Interesting how things are moving that way!!
Wouldn't really hold up considering how many people have voices basically indistinguishable from each over. Especially if you get 2 artists with basically the same voice. The idea that one person gets the rights to a certain sounding voice just because they are more famous sounds pretty horrifying tbh. The only thing you could realistically trademark is the name. Considering how much hype goes to specific brand names just because they are already popular, we would likely reach a point where an artists name is treated the same. Just as the difference between a Louis Vuitton bag and a cheap knockoff. There is no objective difference in quality, but one already has prestige and as such people are willing to spend more on it. The same with music, an artists sound might be no better than something created by an AI, but simply having the artist involved would rake in more views/money due to their pre-existing popularity.
as someone who wanted to be a musician this just sounds to me like ''another job i will never have'' edit: also this is gonna destroy voice actors one day
Now this AI is not smart on its own it's just a blender it's has a lot of pictures database so it's blending the pictures you requested with the style that it's trained on so it can easily give you any style it's not creating new style it just using what it's found not Google
AI is improving faster than it can be regulated and it's genuinely terrifying to me. My art has already ended up in an AI generator and the idea of other people potentially using my work for their own benefit after I'm dead is something I try not to think about.
I was reading the comments as usual and saw the comments about it and then I saw it and I actually jumped 💀 I knew it was coming, just didn’t know when 😂
It sucks to realize we are on the tail-end of a golden age of art, where each and every piece of practically every single artists work was nothing but their own personal imagination (except in rare cases of plagiarism). Even the art in a random advertisement seen on the side of the road was a tiny window into some stranger's life. It's a shame how the human part of art has seemingly been deemed unnecessary these days.
@@bigkspicy8257 As someone who literally spends their entire life trying to make music and work on my music chops it kinda sucks that you think just because some pop music is gonna be sung by a computer that it invalidates the hard work and soul that millions of local and DIY artists put into their work but whatever, keep thinking that everyone is a soulless cash grab I guess
@@GioGioPietromica425 I don't think that it invalidates "real" music. I know that the people who truly care will continue making things like always. What I meant is that we lived in a golden age where even the most crappy low effort art gave us a tiny morsel of human connection, and that golden age will probably end now. "Real" art will still be real, but those who don't care will abandon art for efficiency and just automatically generate something instead. Don't get it twisted, I really value what you do, I'm only bummed that it's becoming increasingly rare.
@@bigkspicy8257 I don’t think it is becoming increasingly rare, we live in a point where more kids want to grow up to be musicians than ever, I mean why do you think the stereotype of SoundCloud Rappers exists? There are millions and millions of people who make music that is never seen or heard by anyone, and they do it mostly for themselves, at the end of the day musicians aren’t getting increasingly rare, you just aren’t seeing them
As a Voice Actor I am scared for my Career Not only because of AI, but because of the Master Class Jumpscare that Charlie showcased, I could never pull that sheer amount of scary off
Better make it yours, before it takes you down, coming from someone who had their job token by AI over a decade ago, learn to use it, and start offering the service and make money from it, now. You got the ear for what's good, you are still at advantage.
Took a class on AI last year about the history, literature, reality, and potential future of AI and it’s absolutely fascinating seeing just how quickly and accurately things have been advancing
YES you literally said what was on my mind before you said it. I am fully convinced that the new Linkin Park track is AI & that all recent releases of deceased artists are AI.
How do I know this isn't an AI created script? But this does bring up a good point that eventually AI are going to be able to make whole videos and audios. It is going to be difficult to distinguish between what is human and what is machine made. I agree Charlie.
Exactly. This shit could bring about a Utopia, or it could bring horrible, unimaginable shit, and it all depends on humans. And we all know what humans will do.
Mave is a new AI kpop group. There’s more solo AI and groups which is getting pretty scary. Thinking of how hard a person have to train and how many hours they put into creating music and then there’s AI which does it in seconds
Most musicians write and make music for themselves, with an audience being more of a secondary factor, just because a computer can sing good or whatever isn’t gonna stop any singer I know from wanting to sing or keep writing music. I mean shit dude as a drummer I have been dealing with the thought of drum machines replacing me since I started playing But it turns out just creating art for yourself is a lot more fulfilling than worrying how other people are consume other art
A friend that is Mute is super happy because of it. She could upload old recordings of her and now she essentially has her own voice back thanks to it, even if she isnt speaking it herself
Thats a dope use of the tech, AI will always be used for bad as well as good and I think people should spend more time focusing on the good that the tech can do. Looking at the bad is important, but looking at it too much makes people lose sight of what the technology was really made for and all the good that it can do.
See, this is what AI and technological advancement SHOULD be used for. To help the physically & mentally disabled, the mentally and physically-ill, the addicted, the unlucky, the lonely & isolated, and the impoverished. To give them more opportunities or better chances at life. But nooooooo, corporate capitalism HAS to ruin it for everyone else....
I tried thinking about positives on the music industry regarding this technology, and couldn’t come up with any, but I did come up with a pretty big W for this technology, devices that bring back voice to those who’ve lost their vocal cords due to injuries and what not, through older videos of them talking.
The scariest jumpscares are the ones coming from an unorthrodoxed source. In this case, Charlie's usually monotone and unexpressive look that birthed a jumpscare had me shook more than any horror game I've ever played
As a (somewhat new) artist whose still practicing getting better, I have two MASSIVE worries: 1: I worry the imperfections in my learning process will be misconceived as AI, and people will write my work off as fake 2: I love doing art, but worry that it’ll demotivate me when someone can literally type “in the style of Kini_the_Fox”” It’s scary what artists are being subjected to right now
When Charlie yelled "AI" and lunged towards the screen as if to grab my soul through the screen and rip it out of my body, the sheer fear made me believe that he actually did it.
i think a scary thing to think about with AI is that anyone can fake recorded phone calls or evidence in a case that requires hearing their voice or seeing their face. it would be almost impossible to trust any recorded evidence as it could have been tampered with using AI. i hope it doesn’t get to that tho
I think true artists cannot be replaced by AI. Sure AI can make a drake song, but it could never replicate a whole Kendrick Lamar album that would come off as personal or as emotional as his albums usually do.
Its interesting to note that some artists ARE making Singing-Ai versions of themselves and giving them separate personalities to sing with. For example, Porter Robinson made his own vocaloid recently called po-uta that has been released to the public. I think the angle of singers releasing software with homebrew traits/vocal tics for people to use might be a benefit in our future if people choose to go in that direction. It might be the future where beloved characters are made and bought to be crafted by the audience themselves -- i hope that would be a nice case scenario.
AI Vocal Synths wont replace real singers bc companies PAY their voice providers and, unlike the other type AI Singers, these vocal synths are consent by the ppl who voiced them, also its considered as an instrument to the ppl who cant sing.
Dude, Charlie. That jumpscare killed my grandpa. I almost died from the true shock that entered my heart when you unleashed that small bit of horror into my soul
It's also a huge threat to in the voiceover industry. Companies want voice actors to sign over the rights to their voices so they can continue to use them despite only paying them for one recording session.
Anything that hurts entertainment industry workers, the worst most wokest people on Earth, is good. I hope AI totally destroys acting as a profession. Learn to code, bitches
MY-PHILOSOPHY:"INNER-STRENGTH" I have found that simply "loving myself" (inner-child) is a powerful tool against most types of social-dependency/vulnerability. ............................. "Evil" is the antithesis to the virtue: 'humanity'. Humanity is the characteristic that defines the human spirit. Humanity is symbiosis across humans and society. 'Humanity' exceeds 'social-darwinism'. ............................. NEURO-PERSONALITY ............................. "SENSORY-FEELERS" ARE LARGELY RESPONSIBLE FOR SPREADING DISINFORMATION AND HATE TOWARDS ENTJ/INTJ (AGAINST "THINKERS" IN GENERAL)-BOTH IRL AND ON THE INTERNET; DESPITE THOSE NEURO-PERSONALITY TYPES BEING A BLESSING TO SOCIETY AND ALL OF MANKIND! THEY DESERVE BETTER! 😤 'ESFJ', 'ESFP', ISFP and 'ISFJ' are a pathogen to humanity, and 'then' Cluster-B (depending on their neuro-personality). THEIR "FEELINGS 'IS' THEIR REALITY", THEY ALSO HAVE A MALICIOUS-MIND BY DEFAULT (low 'mirror-neurons' results in "SOCIOPATHIC-FEELER"; full of pathological hate, and highly chaotic). WHAT'S MORE, DESPITE HAVING MALICIOUS INTENT THEY ARE ALL EMOTIONALLY-WEAK AND PRONE TO COVERT/VULNERABLE-NARCISSISM (ISFJ especially; they impersonate and spread hate towards genuine INFJs). ............................... Also... To intelligent readers (who do 'not’ have a ‘pathological disregard for rationality and reality'). I recommend researching 'narcissistic personality disorder' (NPD) / 'cluster-B'; and know that they are the 'root of all evil' (especially 'ESFJ/ESTJ-narcissist'; Myers-Briggs reference, look it up)! European 'ESFJ' are the worst personality type, and they are responsible for inventing 'racism' and colonization! It is in their neuro-psychology!!! They are extremely 'manipulative' and often use 'looking pretty' to distract others from the witch's mind-games / mind-r@pe, e.g. gaslighting, playing the victim/damsel in distress, creating "flying-monkeys", and 'bribing' others (with money or BJ) to attack, or at times, kill someone for her. When caught, she will use her minions as scapegoats. European ESFJ are notorious for this especially in a racist context, e.g. Emmett Till. xSFP and ISFJ (2W1) are the most complicit, narcissistic-enablers. ISFP also tend to be 'oblivious-codependents' (look up the definition). Like ESFJ, XSFP's "feelings 'is' their reality." Most are covert/vulnerable-narcissists. ISFJ often perceive things only on the surface level (even by sensor standards), are suckers for a “pretty face", and their neuro-psychology makes them the ideal narcissitic-codependent and pawn to the ESFJ (blind-loyalty, surface level perception, susceptibility to covert-narcissism). Lastly, ISFJ are notorious for impersonating other people's identities IRL and on the internet; while ESFJ-9W1 superficially appears like an ENFJ, they have different 'neurology' and psychology. Both XSFJ are superficial by nature and perceive reality at face-value/surface level. SUMMARY Evil personality: 'ESFJ' (ALL), ESTJ (Cluster-b), ISFJ-2W1 (covert-narc/enabler). ESFJ-9W1 superficially resembles ENFJ; different 'neurology' and psychology. [Secretly] Evil and narcissist-friendly gunts/flying-monkey: ISFP (ALL), ESFP (ALL), and ISFJ (2W1 enable ESFJ). ☝️ALL of them are secretly emotionally-disturbed, hence their need to create conflict as a distraction (at other people's expense, truly evil). Spread the word! Thank you. ___________ Research ref: Raudha Athif, Ghislaine Maxwell, Marilyn Monroe, Karen, ESFJ-narcissists, ESFJ-neurology, Gaslighting, Amber Heard, Fake feminism, Rising of a shield hero (Malty-'ESFJ'; XSFX spread disinformation online. ISFJ is the main culprit, i.e. ISFJ largely perceive things on the surface level, and with malicious intent ISFJ impersonate others). Please research 'Brood-parasitism’- XSFJ natural psychology. ///End ///
Maybe...I'm not sure how it all works but what if a voice actor could have more say on the rights? For instance, they can be like 'hey I will sign this in case I ever get sick/have cancer and it stops me from my work. Past my death my voice is off limits and I have the right to sue you" lol again i don't know how it all works. I can imagine this being useful for someone say like...Celine Dione (she has SPS now) for instance. She can write the music and then the AI company/team can make her AI voice sing it for her. She can give it a listen and give it the OK to have it play during a concert or for an entire album. Then they could do something like a hologram concert with the AI music. AI just needs a lot of restraints to maintain an ethic standpoint. But we'll see where that goes....given the whole AI generated art....it's pretty concerning lol.
Robots can NEVER become even AS good as a living being let alone being better. People seriously underestimate themselves and art in general. You can NOT make a soul.
I’m completely terrified of ai, imagine what could be done by some disgruntled person who hates you and knows how to use ai. They could certainly ruin your life with some audio and video editing powered by ai now.
I'm completely against it too, this isn't like any other innovation that is beneficial, it comes with so many cons to it that it's just not worth developing
What happens when you use this in say, Haiti? This is what I’ve been thinking since July 2021. I could use it to fool gang leaders into taking eachother out.
On the flip side AI is also being used to detect fake videos and images. And there is safeties being made into AIs to give hints that its AI made so that it could be checked. Like how ink printers leave those dots to know what printer it came from
The terror I felt when Charlie jumped at the camera was enough for me not only to soil my britches, but also to have now developed a fear of the internet, and I am now free from my crippling addiction to tiktok. Thanks Charlie : )
imagine if celebrities actually abuse this and use the “it was ai generated” every time they say the most evil thing you ever heard lol, it would be so scary and so goofy at the same time
I can kinda imagine in like 20 years time, when most of us are gonna be in our 40s and 50s, nostalgically talking about the days when real humans made music and performed on stage 😭
I usually have your vids playing as a background thing on a second monitor. Your "....AI!!!!" at the start legit startled me and I spilled red wine all over my sweater. Worth it for the amount of laughter after and from the rest of the vid. Thought you might get a kick out of that if you ever read this.
As someone with a beautiful voice but nearly zero range or stamina, I can use AI voice sampling to compliment my work. Especially when you consider the way that a lot of modern music (think lofi, vapor wave, synth, edm, etc...) uses voice samples, I think this could be used for good. Labels will definitely prey on it like they do everything else, but I think artists need to move away from labels and work more independently anyway.
Worse things to come from AI; massive spikes in unemployment when technology advances enough to make human work in certain fields completely obsolete. In a society where the general rule is “no job = no basic human needs”
Yeah There are people who are making full let’s play series with the USA presidents playing Minecraft now and it’s amazing but the people who use this AI tech for bad is what I’m scared of since it’s most likely going to happen and cause huge problems in the future
Artists pour their heart & soul into any piece & leave it behind as a piece of them to remember/relate to, a legacy of existence. Feels like anything made after they pass, but especially AI generated is sad & unfair to their memory.
Visual artists, animators, musicians, and writers are all impacted by ai and not in a good way thanks to Corporations and human greed. Not saying there is no benefit to ai but still if it isn’t used right it can do more harm than good.
Agreed. I was blown away by the sheer amount of unreleased work there was from the likes of juice wrld, xxx, lil peep, etc. makes me think… is a lot of that ai? Wouldn’t be surprised if there’s still “new” tracks being released under their names to this day. Releasing music posthumously in itself I think is strange. But now with AI? It’s too much. We need regulations
12:30 On the subject of financial benefit to the companies, I'd argue that people at companies would not be the only ones to benefit from the models. Regular people are already supporting these models, and some of their excuses are about the convenience and the fact that they're free. More small creators are becoming hacks.
not just that, think of drawing art, artist that like drawing, those are already getting replaced.. Art The Word in general and IA is scary at this point
Fun fact: people who develop these AI's actually belive they will make dystopia and they don't belive in rights to anything Basically they are not ok in the head
@@eliescobis9922 alr let's imagine ai replaced all people then who's gonna pay taxes, buy products and etc? There'll literally be countries of bums😂😂 so i think it will be regulated somehow by the governments
So, as a game developer/programmer with no skills in art, music or with my voice (and no, not because I'm not "talented" but because I have not dedicated years to practicing those skills and I recognize this.) I think all these AI programs are really exciting. I think it would be great if I could have an AI model trained to fill in all the parts I can't do myself/with my current team. There are also AI models (like GPT) that can write code, and probably write it better than I can or they will be able to soon, and I think it'd be great if a game designer/artist/sound/whatever also had the same kind of tools to help them just fill in the pieces the pieces to help them get from the idea they have to the final product they want to create. I think in an ideal world (and we do not live in an ideal world so pipe dream fantasy ahead!) with this technology everyone would have an AI model that they've trained and continued to train to suit their specific needs and that their AI model will be a part of their marketability/portfolio. Because in reality you could in theory train them to do anything, a basic overview of how most of them work (to my limited understanding) is this: you pass the data or inputs into the AI based on the task you're trying to do (note: I am not talking about training the models, this is what the user puts into it) the data could be anything, pictures, video, audio, text or even data you've already processed into specific types I believe. That data is then taken through what I've often heard described as a "black box" process, the TL;DR is that the AI model figures out the result based on how it was trained and then returns the output it "thinks" is correct to the user. The slightly-longer-but-still-limited version is that it uses a neutral network where the first layer is your inputs, the last layer is your outputs or results (could be just two nodes for true or false or a bunch of nodes like are probably needed to make an audio filter to make you sound like someone else) and the middle nodes are where the training comes in and where some of them diverge into different types I believe but keeping it short there will typically be multiple layers of these middle "black box" nodes that the model will create connections between and at each node it makes a determination and fires off to another node and eventually arrives at an output node (again: this is a simplified exploration and I am not an expert or even particularly well informed on these in my opinion). You train them by feeding them a bunch of data where you already know the results and after it tries to figure it out you "reward" it if it's right and "punish" it if it's wrong and you give it a very large number of a variety of test cases and let it run for hours or days, however the results yield diminishing returns for example the model that beat the world champion at go only trained for 3 hours but it probably wouldn't have gotten much better if it trained for another 10 hours or a few days even (at least compared to how much it costs to train them which is a lot, the cost is going down but it's still prohibitive to the individual I believe) and this stage is usually where the problems and missteps occur. personally I think it's because people are relying on the "magic black box" too much and just throwing it raw input and expecting the computer to come to a logical conclusion. The problem is computers don't do logical conclusions they do *efficient* conclusions, for example I heard about one recently where they tried to train a model to be able to tell a wolf apart from a dog so that a drone with a camera could fly over an area and distinguish wolves from dogs, and after awhile it seemed to be working great except for a picture of (I think) a husky in the snow it kept thinking was a wolf. So one of the people working on it set it up so that it would highlight in green all the pixels the model was looking at to make it's conclusion (because it won't use all the data every time) and it showed pretty much every pixel of the background that did not contain the canine itself was highlighted instead, because the AI found the most efficient way to tell the difference was that typically wolves are outside and dogs are inside and for the majority of it's training data this was apparently true.
I think the scariest thing about all this aside from Charlie's Jumpscare, is the fact that the music Industry might go this route. Considering that a lot of artists today already use autotune to fix their pitch, it would be a lot easier for them just to use AI over correcting a singers voice.
I don't think AI will necessarily be a bad thing. Imagine listening to music that is PERFECTLY generated based on your listening preferences. It would be literal insanity, yes. We probably cannot be prepared for such a future of... extreme euphoria. Imagine having listened to hundreds of thousands of songs in your lifetime on Spotify, and in 50 years you will have the option to let AI generate music for you based on such a huge dataset... your subconscious would merge with your conscious mind or some shit lmao
@@TechSupportDave if you're someone who enjoys music you'd know that having a music that's basically a mix of everything good you like would be the worst thing for a music enthusiast, these guys are out here chasing new sounds, sounds we cannot think of, sounds an AI won't be able to create by reproducing what is already being done.
@@thechugg4372 eh ultimately everyone enjoys things for different reasons. Personally what I'd want from AI music would be to someday hook a composing ai to various sensors like a heart monitor, photoreceptors, motion detectors, ect. And then based on the data feedback from my biometrics and environmental data I'd like the AI to generate a constantly shifting soundtrack of ambient background music for my everyday life. A constant ever changing melody tuned to every perceptible shift in my body and environment.
@@RoIIingStoned your 1 out of 7 billon plus people and out of those people artists as a whole make a good portion of them your opinion is nothing here and you are one man compared to millions who care
i’m hoping this changes the music industry drastically but it relies entirely upon the listeners to decide they won’t want label AI music, and up to real artists to independently work hard to keep focus and i feel we could have a real live/local music renissance if we go the right direction
This is going to be really terrifying for future content creators, imagine “making” a content creator say something horrible and they’re gonna have to somehow prove or convince their followers that it’s AI and not them
Yeah, this is going to be commonplace in the next few years unfortunately - what happened to Pokimane via deepfake AI is just the start. I also suspect corporations like RU-vid/Google and Amazon/Twitch will attempt to screw over genuine, human content creators EVEN FURTHER in an effort to outsource cheap & reliable AI/bot content creators that are capable of streaming and "interacting" with each other & their viewers 24/7, sort of like what's mentioned in this video.
hell, I'm a professional and been using AI for 3 weeks straight and got some really convincing imagery out...even in video form. Its nuts man and things will definitely change in some weiiiiiird ways.
The voice AI is actually so scary. Could you even be able to trust voice recordings once it advances even further? I feel like people could fabricate a lot of shit very easily
The only reason you are scared is you don't realize how hard it actually is to replicate the human voice. Sound isn't as simple as our monkey brains think, and the specific angular transformations due to rotating phase mean that if they need to prove it's real or fake, they can.
personally as a musician/producer/live mixer. ai should be band in production of music. music is an art. art by definition is human expression of intelligence and skill. the music industry is already at a low with loop tracks and sample packs being majorly used because people just download these 8-16 bar loops and add a beat and bass to them. it’s not talent or skill at all in the slightest. i understand using them to get an idea. but just genuinely using a loop as ur main melody is basically cheating. it’s like sketching a picture and then claiming u drew it all, all by yourself. it has some talent but not enough to be considered art. and ai is worse for this. it’s not even human. in 3-5 years. what i do as my future career will practically be pointless. by the time i finish uni. music will start using ai on major pop tracks. to any other producers out there reading this. good luck with your future. hopefully ai doesn’t take over
The example with Linkin Park is just perfect. Hearing Chester's voice in Lost and Fighting Myself was extremly emotional, but creating AI generated songs with his voice would be an absolute violation of both his and LP's artistic integrity.
Ikr, I used to like them but then they disrespect a man who self checked out? No, no. You don't do that. I won't support ai music, especially if it's exploitive. Like, the video art itself is very obviously AI generated, but the vocals are definitely the real person, according to Charlie.
@@mev9752 No no not they ARE, they already HAVE… watched a clip on RU-vid from a Korean (I think?) program show where AI created songs inspired by certain artists and reconstructed their exact voices, I specifically remember them doing Freddy Mercury and Kurt Cobain and I think they even made them speak another language (in this case Korean). It’s scary how much it sounded like actual Queen and Nirvana unreleased music, while at the same time not surprising considering how much music is pattern-like, borrows from itself, and can be interpreted/understood via music theory. Mind you this was all before the pandemic, imagine today…
i see it as a benefit for these reasons; if i ever wanted to hear a specific artist singing a specific song or genre (cause maybe i feel their voice suits it). i think that would be really nice. cause for me, music is for the soul. i love music. i love bopping to nice sounding music. if its good, its good. but ofc, itd be bad for the artists if it messes with their livelihood.
The part about people using this technology to fake people's voices and frame them is honestly much, much scarier. Some easily angered or offended idiot could get petty revenge by doing this sort of thing.
I thought the same, and this could distort information even more. Already we are dealing with misinformation in text, now if fake videos circulate it could be worse.
@PepsiMan2333 You do realize that states have no incentive to invest that sort of time and money. If someone fakes a video of you commiting a crime, it's only going to be analyzed like that if you have the money to hire both the lawyer and the CS team to do the analysis & get it admitted into court.
As a musician, I actually find this to be very interesting. I feel in order to make something like this work, artists who are using other artist's vocals, should ALWAYS GIVE CREDIT to the person whose voice they're using.
I agree, but what happens when I blend 100 different artist's voices together to make a new voice? We better figure out some rules fast, because I don't even know how you would make a legal argument against that.
@Big K Spicy I feel like it wouldn't be much different than what Porter Robinson does with his voice on his music, same with Madeon. We already have Vocoders and Autotune, and other such plugins to change up how vocals sound on their music, like T-Pain. Only difference is T-Pain can actually back it up with a legitimately good singing voice. At the end of the day art is art, and I feel like instead of AI taking over completely, which it may way, waaaaay in the future, like we may not even be alive by then, but before then I believe we'll see a time of harmony with actual musicians and AI, sorta like how Rap and Rock music were popping off together in the 90's (what a time the 90's were)
Can you imagine a computer producing infinitely-generated Simpons episodes until the end of time? Perhaps a nuclear war wipes out humanity, but the computer survives the bombing unscathed. It continues to generate Simpsons episodes even though there is no one left to watch them. The Simpsons outlasts the species that originally created it. The madness stops only when the sun becomes a red giant, swallowing the earth and the computer along with it. The Simpsons finally ends after 7,593,252,124 seasons.