This Is How the Moon Formed 4.5 Billion Years Ago! Explained in Under a Minute 

😂

lmfaoo

theya re always where they need to be

Not funny it's a simulation

​@@jim88 noshitsherlock

LoL 😂 this is the latest trend is to shout out to an invisible camera crew. But everyone is doing the same, all the idiots that is, you put your hand up for that one.

​@@omedits569No shit Sherlock is really old too, your a real Dinosaur.

no, the universe is miraculous.

Mmmm delicious cookies

There’s quite a few ideas out there with how the moon came to be… none are proven and some outlandish ones are more likely than others.

How did you come up with that diagnosis?

Read the Bible it explains it all. ❤

Omg 😸

@@jim88 Nvm, it is way of making SMBH. But ,... first cheese!

Wallace and Gromit approve of this message.

Cheese isn't free but that tricks STDs are😆😆😆😆😆😆🤭

I know, right! That was the first thought that came to mind. Looking up at our skies and seeing this flaming hot molten moon. Now that would be quite the sight. Yep, definitely scary.😁 So glad I can still use imagination to picture something like that 😆🤪😁❤️

​@@gailcapshaw5772 and bigger.

Also, the terrifying effects on Earth's surface, like massive tidal waves, capable for instance, or carving the Grand Canyon.

​@@gailcapshaw5772I'm an author of a space sci fi series. I think I am going to add a volcanic moon to a world and have something like this. It's so epic! Just looking up at that would be awe inspiring and eerie

Theia and gaia (earth) were sisters! One had to die for the other to prosper but luckily a part of Theia survived and we call it the Moon 😊

wat

This guy been doing his research

your not a dinosaur -_-

Reality being stranger than fiction

Pfft… this can’t be true… if you’re a T-Rex 🦖 then who is typing for you? Huh?

Good question.

what about them?

The majority formed independently from the initial accretion disk and were captured.

​@@cyanidejunkie Possibly. However don't forget to consider orbital mechanics. In order to capture an object into an orbit it must decelerate at just the right moment otherwise it becomes a flyby.

@@wheelerzg76 thats a goid question, until then......

Would have*

There are other models but this is the best one.

​@@fudgedogbannana i prefer the Gen day 4 model

@@chriscuomo9334 The scientific model described in the video is supported by a bunch of data that matches the computer simulation. Genesis day 4 relies on a book with statements like assuming stars are smaller than Earth and one day they will fall from the sky and land on Earth's surface.

@@granadosvm no. No data supports that absurd idea. Go get your eleventh buuster shot. The data says you need it

What's yours, genius? The moon is comprised of the exact same shit as Earth. You don't get that from a captured object, it HAS to come from the exact same place for that to happen. Hence, collision. Dumb.

Probably not. Whenever Jupiter entered the solar system, it completely altered the orbits of every single planet. We were likely somewhere pretty close to Venus early on.

@@Duncle0 Jupiter was the first planet to form in the solar system. Its mass may have changed over time tho. Planets do not "enter" star systems. theres nothing to move Jupiter other than the sun and the n-bodies. Unless an entire star system collides with another, planets don't just drift into star systems like how you are implying. Planets orbit stars, which in turn orbit other stars or anything with a big enough mass that is closer than the next thing with a big enough mass

@@longlivetheking1065 Rogue planets exist brother, and billions of years ago they're would have been a lot more of them. It also makes sense, the solar system out of literally nowhere had a massive gravitational change that changed orbits, the only mass powerful enough to do this was Jupiter. Makes even more sense when you think about the fact that most of the rogue planets discovered have been around Jupiter's size.

Herbig-Haro Object.

It's not true so don't give too much thanks.

​@@lloydlineske2642 ..."it's not true"??? Please, Enlighten us.

@@notalone4015 It's not all scientists that think this happened. If you look up what would happen to the earth if the moon hit it you would find out that it would destroy the Earth and leave an asteroid belt. So how could an even larger object hit it and everything and it wasn't obliterated? That doesn't make sense.

@@lloydlineske2642cuz the mars sized celestial body barely skimmed the earth

They do more than just imagining stuff and calling it a day. They also gather proof and information before making a conclusion

" I think there for I am " someone will know who said this.

I thought they said it was like the death star on Star Wars hollow with aliens watching our every move.

no,they are just smarter and does not semplify things like you do

​@@lemonseedsinabag information not proof but ok

Giant asteroid?

Probably would’ve gotten a moon burn.

Proof that camera man is older than earth

Why not "Rosemary with violin?" 🤔🤨🧐

@@nekkoskrilla6750 Hi Nekko, that's a good question! I started my youtube channel kind of by accident in desperation to help my students during one of our lockdowns when we couldn't have in person lessons. So it started out as a teaching/instructional channel for my students. "Violin with Rosemary" means taking music lessons with Rosemary. For instance, my students would say I'm taking violin lessons with Rosemary. My website encourages people to come learn violin with Rosemary. Now I mostly just make videos for fun when I'm inspired and have the time to do so, which isn't very often these days since I'm so busy teaching 🙂Hope this long winded answer makes sense and isn't too confusing🙃Have a nice day🌷

@@violinwithRosemary, yes ma'am, you certainly answered my question. Thanks! I'm a fan of your name, Miss. Rosemary is actually my mother's name and the reason I have a 🌹 tattooed on me. Too bad we didn't have the pleasure of meeting in real life because I have yet to meet another Rosemary. I haven't even met a Rose either come to think of it. It was nice "talking" with you, Rosemary. Have a wonderful evening, young lady.

@@violinwithRosemary, I just checked out a few of your videos and I tip my hat to you. You're extremely talented, R! Keep up the great work & stay awesome!

@@nekkoskrilla6750 Nice chatting with you too Nekko. I haven't met another Rosemary either, I guess it's an old fashioned name and not very popular anymore. That's lovely that you have a tattoo in memory of your mother. I'm glad I was able to answer your question. Rosemary with Violin would be a good channel name too! Have a nice evening 🙂

Which formed in similar ways.

​@@williamjordan5554 no

​@@kaizatengoku3893"no" since you think you know better then science show me your PhD

And cultures aren't known to be scientific are they?

@@mirfan-2020you don't need science for anything

@@Gene2tek Says the guy who use a device developed using science to type the above moronic statement.

We don't.... And it didn't happen. so there's that. The earth and the moon have different make ups. So it didn't come from earth. Edit:9/23 Right now I'm seeing two different theories forming and getting the most backing in online articles. 1 saying the largest argument for the moon is the impact. So +1 for you guys. And the second is saying that if there was an impact as you are suggesting it would have shattered the earth. Forming back together it would be too hot so couldn't possibly have been the case. So -1 for you guys. Right now the verdict is still out, but I mean a year ago we thought the universe was just 18 billion years old. Webb says it's either Infinite or at a minimum double that age. So basically right now we don't know. But as soon as we are leaning more towards one or the other I will report it.

Because we named it. 🙄

@@lloydlineske2642 please seek mental help.

@@lloydlineske2642 You are a liar. Rock samples that the Apollo missions returned from the moon show that the natural satellite's composition is uncannily similar to Earth's, much more similar than such models would predict for versions of elements called isotopes.

@@fredbohm4728 I think before you use harsh words like liar you need to know what you are talking about or you sound ignorant. "March 13th 2020 - Nearly half a century old belief that the Earth and Moon are composed of the same material has been proven false by a new study published this week. About 4.5 billion years ago, the Earth’s only natural satellite, the Moon was formed. The most-accepted hypothesis among astronomers and space scientists is that the Moon was formed by the collision of two proto-planets, namely, Theia, a mars-size rock and the newly born Earth. A substantial part of the collision debris fused to form the Moon. This theory of Moon formation came to be known as the Giant Impact Hypothesis. As per the hypothesis, the composition of the Moon must be a mixture of Theia and Earth. This was suggested to be false, by the samples taken from the Apollo Mission back in the 1970s. The analysis of these lunar samples revealed that the Moon and Earth have the same composition, due to similarity in the oxygen isotopes. Since then, it has remained a mystery! Where did the remnants of Theia go if the Moon was formed from a collision? Although the Giant Impact Hypothesis explains several geochemical similarities between the Earth and its only natural satellite, the extreme similarity in oxygen isotopes has been difficult to reconcile with this scenario. Now, the latest study, published in the journal Nature Geoscience, has revealed that the Moon is indeed composed of different rock materials than Earth’s." I'll accept your apology now. The report says they are different. Says there is no case for this other planet. Also use your head for a moment. If moons are formed this way then why would Mars, a smaller planet, have 2 moons? How would Pluto have a moon? You think those are formed from surface impacts? Okay then explain how Jupiter and Saturn have so many moons. There is no surface in Jupiter to impact. That's simply not how moons are formed. Just so you know there are only two ways moons come into being. They are either created shortly after the planet and are created in the same way. They are from the gas and material that didn't make it to the planet. So they get caught up in it's gravitational force. Over time they gather into one place and create a moon. Or they are an asteroid or comet like object that gets caught in the gravitational force of the planet. Something big enough to create something left over as big as the moon would be too large and would have shattered our planet. Which is the probable cause of the asteroid belt past mars. If you have any other questions I'd rather you just ask than sounding ignorant. Thank you.

Rubbish 👁️👽👁️

Each year the moon moves 1.48 inches further away from the Earth.

As the Moon’s gravity pulls on Earth, it produces tidal forces that make the oceans bulge and cause Earth’s rotation to lose momentum. Slowing Earth’s rotation in turn speeds up the Moon’s orbit, which must expand to conserve the total momentum of the Earth-Moon system.

superdave31 The Earth was spinning much faster than it is today. The same tidal forces that produce tides around Earth, slowing the spin, also apply gravitational drag on the Moon, raising the orbit. It is rather disturbing to think of our Moon 17 times closer ! Solar eclipses would be very frequent. I'm pretty certain that even mountain peaks would be eroded flat by the enormous tides.

🤣

How so? There is evidence that backs this up.

@@reactive435 do you mean moon moving away 3.8 cm each year from earth orbit ?

@@mrt3895 no, theres evidence such as how earth and moon both have similar materials, that earth's core is much bigger than it should be, and theres even a possibility that there is remnants of this planet under earth's surface.

@@reactive435 and does the data collected suggest the moon was full of volcanic activity and emitted light before it cooled down ?

To be honest theories are the closest we can get to fact in science. Even the most basic scientific theories could have defects.

@@galacticquasar9944 True. But it doesn't hurt anything to clarify theories over facts.

@@yodaco it’s more important to discern between a hypothesis and a scientific theory.

The problem is that the scientifically illiterate then try to argue that a "theory" is just an idea, that is up for debate and that other crackpot ideas are equally valid.

​@@pulaski1Siri is just an idea

It was put there. After a collision and a shit load of time the moon formed and has drifted away from earth very slowly. As humans we have only known it to be where it is as humanity is still very new. Its still drifting away and in around another billion years or so it will escape our gravity and be gone forever.

The earth is flat, right?

Absolutely! It was put here and has occupants.

64.3 million moons Answer and Explanation: If the Sun was hollow, it would hold approximately 64.3 million moons! Our Sun is huge, but it isn't the most massive star. Scientists estimate that about 10 percent of known stars are more massive than our Sun.

🏍️ I agree. It's essential to everything yet ridiculous lucky to be there. There are no deep craters no matter the diameter. It rings like a bell when struck. No better observation station.

They enjoy blowing smoke up your ass majority people don't know so they pride themselves on that fact

Exactly. All theories are someone’s best guess

@@legendofzoloxolo1425 Uhhhhh, no.

Do police need to witness a murder to know what happened and solve it? No. It’s called evidence. We don’t have to be at an event to know it took place. Scientifically illiterate moron.

Have you ever heard of geology?

simple answer , Iron content .PS: No actual sound was ever heard , but seismic waves created from the landing as well as a very well placed later hammer blow both created the waves that flowed in a frequency that on Earth inside an atmosphere would have sounded like a bell or a hollow metallic object , however the moon is not hollow , it is both a loose coagulation of regulus as well as zones of very solid rock and iron . None of this even takes all of the other minerals into consideration . the moon is much more complex than we could imagine .

​@@timc333 how the hell can you make these statements of yours with so much certainty 🤔 You have NO MORE credibility than the person who says it's hollow 🙄

@@Romeo7414GD I don't recall asking for your approval ?

@@timc333 just stating the FACTS 🤷🏾‍♂️ Unlike your "THEORIES" 🙄🙄

@@Romeo7414GD Actually you stated no facts . I don't know you , so your comment is simply unsolicited and hateful , you are looking for a fight where you will get none , I need not to prove anything to a 12 year old who is staying up way past their bed time . I did the research and as well saw the data with regards to our satellite , you are free to do the same or free to continue to attempt to pick fights . When you come with your proof that I am wrong then you may show it otherwise your no better than a CHINESE TROLL BOT .

It does not.

The moon is not hollow firstly sound needs a medium to travel through the monn doesn't have one

Iron content created seismic waves upon hammer impact that flow in a frequency that would sound like a bell or a hollow metallic object , yet the moon is not hollow , but gathered both loosely in the form of regulus as well as much more condensed zones of rock and iron , that does not even take all the other minerals into the picture , much more complicated than one simple answer .

@@justanotherrandomtogruta3737 Sound travels through solids very well, place your head against a wall etc. and tap the wall with your fingers, you with hear it.

@@pinballrobbie if you on the moon sound can't travel why there nothing between your ear and the moon to make sound travel All it was was seismic waves that scientists turned to sound

We ARE much better off if we don't know what a scientist (THINK?)

It’s molten core makes up only like 15 to 20 percent anyways so it doesn’t make it to the surface to make a difference.

it doesn't nor do they have the proof to say otherwise

you're confusing your fony belony religion with facts

It wouldn't explain the similar composition then

Yea that sound better than two earths clashing to make a moon

30%

​@@philcoombes2538 ♾️ %

@@MrModikoe Only 30% of Terran humanity identifies as Xtian...look it up...

🙏

😂😂😂😂😂

???

Scientific theories aint just guessing

Maths and physics prove you wrong !

@@thalesnemo2841 ... "Maths and physics prove you wrong"...? WTF? My original comment was a quote taken from this short video. If you'll put on your glasses, you'll see the quotation marks.. either that or you have special needs and there's no hope for you. Thanks for demonstrating your limited intelligence.

@@notalone4015 You have a Dunning-Kruger prize to collect !🤣🤣🤡Have a parent drive you!🤣🤣🤣😄😄😂😂

Lol

Nope. Pluto has such an odd elliptical orbit that is off axis to the main 8 planets that it is likely a rogue planet captured by the gravity of the sun and inner planets.

The computer models show a collision would have been on an angle that does not match the very perpendicular to the surface. Otherwise as you can imagine, instead of the Earth and the Moon, there would be here another asteroids belt.

models showed that the earth was practically liquified on the collision