THIS is How You Know Ancient Egyptians had a Lost Ancient Technology… 

... Much Love!!!

missed you man !! glad your back on my recomended page

They made them for the glysburg cycle. 12,065 year cycles. The Diehold Foundation. Series 4. It explains everything. Even the eye of the Sahara. Think of the time lines

Jimmy? Goto the Richate structure. The eye of the Sahara was ground Zero for Ra. Read the Egyptian history again. The king who owned the temple Ra, was the god king. He moved the eye of ra to the fertile Nile. Why? To protect the valley of the kings, erect the first large pyramid to house the Eye of Ra. A weapon. It destroyed the Richate in the battle for the the elder eye of Horace another weapon. But Orion’s Belt was the ultimate with younger Horace with both eyes. Until a weak leader listened to Apophis and disconnected the Orion’s Belt. And left ra alone. In steps Seth to correct the problem. Operation Hercules goes into Egypt takes the bulls with out incidence. Leaving Apophis another city to take.

Have you seen Mike Haduck's videos on stone shaping? I don't think it proves the Egyptians they claim did it, I think they were built much earlier. But he shows how stone can be worked.

Thanks for the info

Great info, it is good to hear from someone who works with stone and knows the details of how it is and what is never told about the stone itself.

so granite doesnt have much structural inherent strength?

@@xisotopex correct, it’s unreliable. All natural stone that I cut including granite comes with a layer of fibreglass glued to the underside. This is to stop it caving in on itself where there is a gap in cabinetry and where someone may apply weight. For example if I had a 20/30mm thick 2.5m long x 0.4m wide benchtop and had 2 guys pick it up flat from each end it’d almost certainly break somewhere, if it was 0.6m wide it might hold together, probably not though. Marble is the same, but softer, limestones one of the worst/most difficult to keep intact. We lift everything we can with vacuum lifts, & if we can’t, we carry on edge never flat. If I could grab a hammer and just lay into the face of a piece I could smash into small bits easily, it’d just break on the veins. Cutting and shaping without fault is very hard but breaking it is generally very easy.

@@Jack9N Thanks for sharing your experience!

Interesting

We have no idea how long the Pyramids and Sphinx have been there. And we have no idea what the region looked like when they were built. It was probably a beautiful grassland with buildings and all kinds of advanced technology we haven't discovered yet.

Have you been hit with those theories yet, that they used the sun and a lense like a magnifying glass to melt the stone into shape? After working with granite for 20 years, I heard it all, but its all bs. This is clear work of power tools on a scale we can't fathom, because our technology is based on a "pully" system.

How do you feel about the theory that most ancient megalithic sites like this were built with poured/moulded stones made out of geopolymer, created using plant matter that can naturally soften even the hardest stone? I’m not personally convinced one way or another, but I (and I’m sure many others) would appreciate your input.

@@olo_smooth_olo5606 it was already proven to be lush forest. The water errosion on the spynx base estimates it at least 12,000 years ago cause thats the last time there was that much water there

I can only imagine with all the original color on the structures, definitely would be a sight for sore eyes!!

Lots of green trees & grass . No desert sands.

Blazing white pyramids. green pastures, lost tech.

@@capricosm8086 - Yes, especially since these pyramids were built more than 7000 years ago when Egypt was still green. They were actually built at least 10,000 years ago. The Sphinx is even older.

Yes, the casing stones had an almost mirror-like sheen. In addition, they had symbols on them that were not Egyptian hieroglyphics. That's part of the reason they are no longer there. A much older human civilization is responsible for most of the megalithic structures found around the world. Especially in Africa and South America. We truly are a species with amnesia.

I forgot to say that thats about 71.29 million years.

But that’s cutting one stone at a time. I’m sure they were doing hundreds at a time.

​@@123100ozzyyeap, and with no rest, no sleeping all a long line of slaves waiting for their shift to cut. Ridiculous.

@@Nick9Three I didn't calculate the multiplicity of possible quarries cus it's basically vestigial in the final result. Even at thousands of stones being quarried and moved in one single day (which is impossible by any standards) it would take around thousands of years.

​@Nick9Three , so, to get 20 years, you will need 3.56 million cuts a year.

A huge part of the base of the Great Pyramid is connected to the bedrock. The technology they must have used surpasses ours easily

@@olo_smooth_olo5606 nonsense, we make stones flatter than those by the millions. every machine shop has them.

@@victorhopper6774 ya and they last like 100 years tops and need constant maintenance. Also the size is not even in the same park

@@r3fus32d13 Tbf, main reason of todays building lack of logetivity, is due to steel bars that are used for reinforcement.

@@olo_smooth_olo5606 this is kind of a unfair matchup since our infrastructure are geared differently...

I believe it was aliens who built these unexplainable monuments. There are too many patterns of the same methods used.. also look at the handbag, the pinecone of the Gods throughout the world.

To the untrained eye it's easy to miss or write it off as a unimportant detail until the implication of its meaning sets in, then all hell breaks loose with the opposition and outcomes the ridiculous...

@@vipr1142 how ridiculous lol...

@@steve-o6413 Why is it ridiculous? I think you are ridiculous to think this idea is ridiculous. There are many unexplained things that we have no clue at all how it was made. I believe aliens built alot of the unexplainable monuments, like the baalbek, pyramids etc. To make humans become civilized, to make people build the first civilizations around these places. Im asking you again, why is it ridiculous? That its was an ancient civilization that covered the whole earth is as plausible as aliens in my eyes. But I guess, you are just unaware. Man got burned alive for introducing science back in the days, guess its better to be ridiculed 😂

Cast stone. See the lectures of Joseph Davidovits on geopolymers

You can see the chip marks in the limestone, that has the chip marks from tools 6:13 into the video. They used bronze, and the bronze work hardens to that of a medium carbon steel, so I can believe them working sandstone and lime stone but eventually bronze will start to breakdown and fall apart after it work hardens to much, so they must of gone through a lot of bronze picks and or chisels, however I find it very doubtful they used bronze to work pink granite since granite is a lot harder which is and 8 on the mohs scale of hardness, 10 being as hard as diamond and 1 being as hard as talc, so granite is an 8, and high carbon steel is an 8, but work hardened bronze is 6 to 6.5. so the bronze would not cut into the granite to chip it away. This means they used something else. What, no one knows ?

They used laser probably aliens helped to build and cut the stones.

It's not actually a mystery, just trying to get views. There are many, many ancient ways to cut stone. The pyramid builders probably used a sort of rope saw.

@@NonEuclideanTacoCannon wrong the rope saw theory was debunked by experiments with granite that it was impossible because they made nearly no progress at all. They used advandced technology christopher dunns tests with boreholes and cutted stones in egypt showed they used definetly some very advandced technology.

I've seen a few videos that show the tiny grooves in hard rock bore holes found in Egypt are not striations but continuous, like the grooves on a phonograph record. This practically shouts the tool used cutting these holes was cutting into the stone at such a rate it did not repeat itself but continuously kept cutting "down". This takes strong pressure, and a hard, durable cutting head to do, something we can barely do even today with all our modern equipment...there is a great lapse in our understanding the technology ancient Egyptians used here. However, the even greater mystery, to me anyway, is not the boring machine itself, but the necessary technology needed to build such machines. Not only are all these machines missing, but the machines used to build these machines is absent as well, as is the supportive operating manuals, be they papyrus scrolls, clay tablets, or even inscriptions on temple walls. All this technology, along with the widespread industry and its associated tools needed for it have vanished...like someone said "Pack all this up and take it away so that it can never ever be found." That, or, perhaps, the time period when all this technology was being used was somewhat earlier than what we consider as classic "Egyptian"; pre-dynastic or, "Zep Tepi. That is an epoch prior to when the first Egyptians started keeping records, like the Abydos King. In geology, there is single layer of rock one can see, can touch separateing rock typically less than 500 million years old from rock well over a billion or more years old. This is called The Great Unconformity; where the geology exists it can be found on continents the world over. It represents many millions of years of rocks long lost to erosion, vanished into grains of sand water washed or wind-blown away. It is not impossible for my mind to likewise consider something much the same exists here when it comes to the activities of humans in Egypt...and many other places the world over: there are gaps in our history so great that all evidence has been lost to history, we are only left with a few of examples, shards, of all that went on way-back-then. Perhaps we are not yet looking in the right places; the oceans, coastlines were much lower thousands of years ago. Developing the technology to build the tools to comprehensively explore coastlines now 300 to 400 feet below the ocean might be something established academia does not want to explore? There are many places we might look but have yet to do so: where did the Nile flow, say, 12,000 to 50,000 years (or ever further) ago...methodically explore the river bottom there for artifacts, or, the now drowned river delta of the ancient Nile, or, those drowned river delta's from rivers no longer extant that once flowed into the Mediterranean further West from the Nile in what is now Libya. What we don't look for we will never find. List@@cheesyspace

​@@frankwolf3860problem is this. If you do have machines to cut blocks. Why on earth would you end up with millions of completely rough hand cut blocks in the places that are unseen?. Why would anyone spend millions of hours to roughly hand cut stuff while you have machines for the job? You should see all of the blocks at least with somewhat level or flat sides not just some that you want to look good?. It makes no sense?

Right like our fiction books. In the future someone can read that and think it was real life.

Just like you can write a false past on the stone to make it appear ancient and pre-cataclysmic.

There is no telling how much information we lost. In part because, as you say, later dynasties were eager to take credit for something they didn't build, but also at the hands of the Egyptian government, keeping some of these sites under tight locks for decades. We will never know if they removed artefacts or not.

@@victorespino5650 I think that we are suffering from the opposite of that, actually. I think we are reading ancient science books and think they are works of fiction.

@@victorespino5650 The Book of Dave, from Will Self is a excellent story about this.

History is written by the winners or those in charge. That goes for any civilization or government.

I like how you say "YOUR country". I'm an American, and while I've always found archeology (particularly in Egypt) fascinating and super fun to learn about, I've never been on the level of Egyptology as people like Jimmy. Since the times of old, there have been people from all around the world that have felt such a calling from Egypt that they become obsessed with going, seeing, exploring, learning. I haven't seen that level of obsession with anything besides dinosaurs. There's so much we don't know, and if we ever hope to, we need these people to keep asking questions. And in my mind, I agree with you completely: they are Egyptian just as you are. It is where they belong, want to be, and where we need them. Much love 🙌❤

@@Cello69. Like the library of Alexandria, they'd tell us the library was burned with all it's content, but i guarantee the valuable things are in their possession, everything else was burned by the elites of that era.

@@yobro6053 - you’re probably right.

I'm really curious, what general opinions of this topic for everyday egyptian folks? Aware of all this mystery? thanks

But how would you answer the question that that these pyramids were not built over a lifetime but over a span of say 20-30 years.

@@diehardparamveer If we’re going to challenge the strongly held beliefs of the Egyptian authorities, the timeline for construction is one of those beliefs. Anyone who claims to have all the answers, doesn’t. Starting with Christopher Dunn’s books and what he has theorized, I think is the most critical step. Measuring, analyzing and gathering the data with our eyes.

@@diehardparamveer For a start most of the pyramid is made of limestone, not granite. Second they just used a lot of man power.

Your Hungarian stonemason friend is guessing, he has no idea what they were doing thousands of years ago mate. Its guesswork.

@@diehardparamveer A team from the National Research Center who are doctors used x-rays and found that the age of death for those workmen were from 30 to 35. Pretty much of a lifetime for those workers.

Yes, cutting is one thing but the ability to measure, record and then coordinate the fitting of one block to another requires 3D modeling.

@@M13x13M that's why I find it interesting this isn't mentioned too much with JPHs theory of how it was constructed (which I think his theory is basically the only theory worth considering, it is logical, well thought out and incorporates little details that remain on the pyramid). But no mention of how he used a computer to 3D model this, but the builders would not of had that luxury. It just blows the timeframe out substantially you would think, as there would have been so many times you would have to reshape stones to fit like that.

that's called formwork, yes formwork

Jesus

@@SOLIDSNAKE. I doubt it.

There's not even any record that any of those civilizations built said structures and in many cases didn't even know they existed.

Same thing with the Maya. The older stuff is more precise, and the newer stuff is rough. Mayan city-states seemed to have a cycle of peaks and falls. War, famine, and natural catastrophes would chip away at their cumulative knowledge, until you see late Mayan sites are poor imitations of their golden age. What's scary is we know next to nothing about the civilizations that predate the Mayans who probably suffered the same cycle of peak and decline until they too just disappear or are absorbed by a civilization on the rise.

The mummies from all over the world have the same DNA. The same people made them. Out of cement.

The ancients found a better world, packed up their space ships and left. 👽

Maybe the older structures have been petrified by the YD cataclysm? A global cataclysm remember. Maybe these materials were once wooden, concrete, metal? And were covered with ash and sediment causing them to undergo rapid petrification and were turned the into stone. That's what limestone is.. petrified rock. These "Impossible drill holes" the crazy angles, the scoop marks in the ground, the really tight fitting of blocks, and tube drills!!?? they must have been a softer material and what we're actually looking at is an imprint of what WAS there. What we need for rapid petrification is acid, heat, silica , sediment, and then rapid cooling ..all of which we would be carried in the clouds of a a ocean impact/volcano

i would say think about the age of their civilization which was over 3000 years in the making thats a whole lot more than any recent continues civilization if we where to exclude the chinese that is. recently like the last 200 years we went from horse and buggy to flying to the moon on space ships and over another 200years nobody would even still know how to build a proper buggy wheel hell even current day it would be hard to find a person who can still make you a wooden buggy wheel but they are out there but are a dieing breed as are many other professions which would lead to the loss of that knowledge . just look at the history of the romans and how they managed to build all those aqua-ducts and the colosseum it took ages to get back to that level of masonry does that mean that they had different or more advanced tech than us ? i think not they just got more provisioned with the tools and resources that they had at that time

Yes, that’s because he’s not a alien.

@@garinoakley Could've been aliens or could've been a technologically advanced civilization that got wiped out in the cataclysm. I personally tend to go with the latter (because Occam's razor) but I wouldn't rule out the former.

@@EBDavis111 You argument totally convinced me, thank you for opening my eyes with razor-sharp wit and mountain of evidence.

@@EBDavis111 Indeed.

lol i didnt' understand the word you said, but i get it

@@watchtube1412 the universe said it, I just type it out

A flex so hard, that some ppl nowadays believe that the ancients got help from eliens. xD

Yes this structure represents something most impossible. You would be interested in the Moon, Earth ratio conveyed in the measurement of the Great Pyramid (and Stonehenge) and also the fact it is a perfect scale model of the Northern Hemisphere of the Earth. There are hundreds of impossible anomalies. Pi, Phi, and the Golden section is closed in it's basic measurements, and every 2 seconds, the Earth turns the exact distance of one of the sides of the Great Pyramid. The engineers obviously knew of Geodesy and the exact size and shape of the Earth. Let's not even get into the transport of hundred ton stones hundreds of miles when these people supposedly were naked butt cloth wearing simpletons. So you have a structure that marks the Equinoxes with it's 8 sides, numerous important mathematical concepts, the size AND shape of Earth and the moon, its coordinates are literally the speed of light, it points to Orion, and this is barely scratching the surface because it was likely generating energy

@@olo_smooth_olo5606 I think the nephilum built it(man/angel hybrids) …Sumerian tablets hint on outside influence.. I don’t know why the Bible doesn’t bring up this stuff… Like they knew the rock would last for a long time, and wanted us to look into it, as if it’s a clue in an escape room. (Earth)

The granite was split along natural fractures. Then the critical fit edges were ground down flat, sometimes using the edges it would mate against.

i see you never had worked with granite to say such idiotic remark @@archstanton_live

they actually had sand paper back then - the egyptians invented it! :) - you think they couldn't polish by hand?

do you know the sand in Egypt is very fine like flour , please think again @@shokizm1

​@@archstanton_livethat does not explain all the perfect fitting of each stone block. Let alone moving them into position. Not even for a millisecond.

Aliens definitely

Maybe those aliens are us or we are them. Maybe why they are observing us, to see how much we have evolved. Religions sure don't have the answers.

It's always satisfying when I see actual experienced professionals confirm these things. Thanks brother

@@yinzspectations yes, a tile setter is a pro at bronze tools and building pyramids

@@NoNoseProduction Someone whose profession is to set tiles made out of granite and limestone can darn well tell you how difficult it would be to do the same job, with pieces ten thousand times bigger. Duh. Doesn't take a degree in rocketry to understand that...

@@NoNoseProduction haha yeah . I’ve pruned a bonsai before so I know it’s hard to cut down a massive tree .

@@NoNoseProduction 🧐Damn bro , this subject hit a nerve? You spent the time reading his comment and then my response and then used time outta ur life to write a sarcastic walk-off comment? Lol tou'che my freind, I like your style 😎. You remind me of a younger me. With that outta the way. He's obviously a professional and a master at his craft. So leaving his opinion that it couldn't have been done with bronze tools is (arguably) credible insight on the topic and I let him know I appreciated it... Not. .. you know crowning him King Champion Pyramid Builder Guy with Secret Knowledge and Stuff .... but hopefully you got the hit of dopamine from telling us mere mortals that were not worthy as you tower above us on your Golden Throne of Supreme Knowledge 😉 🙈🙉🙊

I was thinking the same thing. There are pictures of stone benches that have sagged into near semi-circles over the years implying that stone is really an exceptionally viscous fluid. Maybe the stones "sagged" into each other because of the tremendous weight. I mean, it's 4500 years of sagging.

You could always invent time travel then go back to find out the secrets they were using. If that was ever possible that would be one of my stops.

That doesn’t make sense to me, if the granite was made pliable it wouldn’t be possible to make curved or bevelled edges, also each and every mould would have to be unique in the case of polygonal stone as they are all different shapes, and it still doesn’t explain how they transported the granite in the first place.

Yes it's a form of concrete.

At the end of one of the Avengers movies a scene depicts a large number of people using the power of "OM" mantra in front of a pyramid. One theory is that the ancient Egyptians used sound to move the heavy blocks. Anyone who has gone to a bass-out car show has witnessed how powerful low frequency can temporarily deform solids (metal, glass).

😂😂😂

Lol right? Or their toilet paper rolls we call “copper chisels they formed the pyramids with” 😂😂

I agree

Good point

Yeah. The complexity was intentional as to show off & say "look what I can do".

It's hard to say. Just because we don't have evidence of one thing, means we should jump to the conclusion of a theory that has just as much evidence.

im also pretty sure they made their own little mausoleums on there own or with a few friends and those cuts were just as precise

Building skyscrapers today is not easy, so they had just as advanced technology as we do today but it was different.

​@@adde-j6q it's easy to say "mastered" without knowing what that means. They were obviously masters at what they were doing, but the mind boggling thing is that not one archeological discovery explains how they did what they did with the tools they had.

Interesting point let's discuss.. Did aliens visit everyone or teach all the races the same thing

@@adde-j6q what's even more mysterious is the time it was built. you cannot 'carbon-date' stones. These could have been built before last ice age as well (13,000 BC)

I think that would actually imply there has been a lost world wide civilization .

That's where you are wrong. There was a global civilization, much like ours today. Some forbidden information I stumbled upon, stated that Earth had advanced civilizations 5.5 million years back in time, and we Humans are basically newborn babies. Also at our current state, we are nothing more than primitive animals compared to the ones before us:)

Ron Ryser. I don't think you can assume this with certainty, since the faces are buried, they could be concave so the edges are precise and true, but I would suspect you are correct!

That's because they are essentially poured concrete

@@JBlades88WV That sounds good, but what did they use for "forms" to contain the pour and still get it so perfect?

@@bebo5558 that's a good question, I'm sure they didn't have plywood. Maybe they used reinforced wooden boards and planks. I really don't know for sure, but it's fun to speculate. It's very mysterious, mind boggling, and quite astounding how these megalithic structures were built all over the world thousands of years ago. Clearly a lot that we don't know about our ancestors. Some kind of lost pre cataclysmic technology, whether it was domestic, extraterrestrial, or divine, I really can't say.

@@bebo5558 if man did make these maybe they had really good tools and diamonds tipped saws. Diamonds were probably a lot more plentiful years ago.

Those Ancients mastered smelting in general, not just with copper. They were the 1st ones to make steel for goodness sake

The funny part is that we use copper in all our motors and call it horsepower. If we ever go under would they be confused and think we actually used horses lol...

If you cut two blocks out of a mountain and brought them to a site they would fit perfectly together, u just have to make cuts at the quarry in sequence to the installation at the building site and all would fit perfect

Nonsense. They used sand as an abrasive for the limestone.

@@breakingames7772 it's not quite so simple.

But how far back would you go if you could? When would you have to go to in order to see it in process?

@@bradschoeck1526 At least 16,000 years, the Egyptians didnt build this they inherited it.

@@icedout2322 And they are trying to hold onto the propaganda that they built it all.

@@icedout2322 Thank you, finally someone pointing that out. Compare the quality of the cuts and buildings to the hyroglyphs the egyptians made on them. The hyroglyphs are obviously subpar, not the same artist nor quality. And the idea that the pyramid is "just a tomb" is ridiculous. You would think that there would be huge statues of the king who passed, and of his queen and family etc. everywhere too. But nope. Look at the obelisks' quality and its hyroglyphs. It doesn't match up. The Egyptians call the pyramids in their own language "triangle". Really now? I went there and had some talk with the folk, most very friendly if they don't want to sell you something lol. If you gain their trust and talk to them in a remote corner, most will admit that the "triangles" weren't build be them. Why would you destroy your own monuments by taking them apart and build Kairo with its stones?`A question no one answered me so far. It's like deconstructing the eiffel tower here and there to build a railway.

@@darkschneider8508 if you want to find out more look into Edgar Cayce he does a little dive into the civilization that created them , not much but a little, its where I got the 16k time frame. You really have to read what he says and infer a lot of his readings and not just read what comes up immediately. to delve into it you need to read over a bunch of stuff not just the obvious references. Ive got some really old books on him ive accumulated over the years and they are very insightful.

And? So what if they were not found there, they should have been found SOMEWHERE. There has been hoards of copper (not pure copper) tools and stone tools found in Egypt over the centuries since archaeology began to be of greater interest, so it stands to reason that if better tools did exist once that we would have found examples of them by now.

@@mnomadvfx age is the key... it is much , much older than they say and no tools survive thousands of years... metal corrodes, only stone remains... which is why we naively call it the Stone Age because thats all that remains...

I don't think some one take the tools...I do believe when Cataclysm happen tools had to be melted in the process of destruction when blast hit the region, when I'm referring to tools I'm referring to Gold Coils or wires Circuits etc which Egyptians inherit at the arrival on the region and the remains of the gold artefacts reused in more "undeveloped fashion" probably melted to create sarchopags and other objects but the question is from where did Egyptians have so much gold? And the answer could be they find the tools and reworked them in their own perspective .

Having also worked in construction my whole life the one lesson that I have learnt is to never take your eyes off your tools on the job site😂

@@dannyboywhaa3146 As a decently well-established skeptic (but not the arrogant, in-denial type), I have to admit this is the only thing that makes sense to me as an engineer. What they've found can't do it. The tools that survived are not enough, and if they had anything better, why haven't we found it? Either on location or somewhere else? The only thing that makes sense to me is that the tools used to create it did not survive at all, and the only way THAT makes sense is if the tools used to create them were lost to time long, LONG before people think they were used. I struggle with this notion often when I've got free time to let my mind wander, or any time I see a video like this. I had thought we'd had everything pretty well explained by now. Yes, moving heavy shit really ain't all that hard. But crafting on this level? Gives me the creepies.

Maybe they knew how to make sulfuric acid which will easily dissolve stone.

I think flint tools are the best explanation for cutting in hard material back then.

How about several generations of thousands of laborers? Did you ever tried that when cutting rocks? 🤡 ''I spent an entire afternoon trying to shape a piece of stone, and it was really hard so it seems impossible'' jesus christ people are slow.

Yep

What makes it hard to really hit the nail on the head is the amount of misinformation and fake writings etc. There's a lot of conflicting information about what was already there when Khufu was around(discovered by them) and what was actually built by them. It has always annoyed me, but there are some interesting finds that speak of certain things but even they are to be taken with a grain of salt i.e the Inventory Stele or Stela.

@Ghost Ghost! nope. The leading egyptologists always said if they were older their would be other older structures around. I OFFER YOU GOBEKLI TEPE!!!!! The water erosion marks on the sphinx proves without a doubt it was built a long long time ago. The sphinx also faces a constellation that it would have perfectly lined up with over 10 thousand years ago.

@@bobspizza7444 Yes, Graham Hancock talks about this extensively. It really seams (haha) that our civilization goes back thousands of years more then we are taking for fact this day. The sphinx lined up with the constellation Leo. That's why it originally was a lion. The time when the sphinx was lining up with Leo, was 10000 years ago.

Today, down here in Texas, we use huge band saws to cut large blocks of limestone, and granite. The local granite quarry has not cut and delivered as many stones as Egyptians did. And it only took 70 years to remove half of the granite mountain that they quarry from. In another 50 years, the granite mountain will be ground level. They must of went through many granite quarries to provide that much stone.

Like living on a globe,hurdling through space?😂

@@espears6606 Not sure what you mean here

Good percentage of People are too dumb/ ignorant to comprehend things like this and the government likes to keep the sheeple dumbed down too. Lots of people make dumb comments. Obey consume repeat.

Maybe we were created by whatever built those structures, and then they left.

It's all part of "One World Order"

You are right!!!! I agree. Every action leaves a trace.

@@janeg7475 - I believe we should clarify.. Every technology "known" to we the "current humans" may leave a trace . that is really all we know or can state......

I definitely think they inherited these buildings or perhaps there was a short overlap between civilization and knowledge was rapidly lost.

There is an alien space craft there, and the world of Islam is not ready for that !

I've heard there is a ship under there too. Wonder why they don't just use some kind of sonar device to get an image of what's below... unless they already have and yeah the world governments won't allow it to be known because it would warp our tiny little brains. My guess is that the most powerful in all countries have been met by these same aliens for years (we have had 70 years at least of photographic evidence all over of their crafts flying around and now military evidence and accounts) and had to strike a deal not to reveal their secrets or existence until they decide, not us. Probably the deal is they get to experiment on us and our planet doesn't get invaded or blown to pieces, plus certain governments get special tech from them. Don't ask, don't tell, said every alien, I mean every government ever... I also think the ancient Egyptians were eventually either wiped out or allowed to travel far from Earth by the same aliens who gave them the technology to do these astonishing things and yes, it's a water and sound frequency they used all over the place possibly along with building portals to far off places in space. Amazing technology. Good job aliens. 👏 Let's hope full disclosure is right around the corner because WE are ready.

Alien spacecraft? Lol! All the stone structures in Egypt are not stone at all. They are made from poured concrete... hence the super tight tolerances and lack of tools. Wood molds were responsible for forming the shapes. The evidence is all there but if this idea is accepted,.... there goes the mystique.

@@jpbsv Wrong.

@@jpbsv I like the theory of lost technology for melting or pouring stone as a solution to the ancient Egyptian construction, but there are stone quarries with partial or damaged pieces still in place.

Thermal expansion and settling over time is bound to have made these gaps tighter than they were during construction, I'm not convinced this is anything especially impressive.

@@DesmondCreighton I am curious about that as well. If they would essentially be “lapping” each other to a tight fit, slowly over time. Especially if sand or something was in between them when they were set.

@@DesmondCreighton Even if the thermal expansion of these 30+ ton blocks of granite contributed to the precision we see in the stone today I think you're still underplaying the work done here. In order for these structures to keep their integrity through high temperatures, environmental effects, and the lack of upkeep these had to be made extremely well. Furthermore, as depicted in the video, no bronze tools are capable of making timely and close-precision lines in these massive stones, much less the transportation of said blocks that very likely are heavier before being made to "specification" to fit to the other blocks. Noticeable gaps and ill-made cuts don't just disappear with time, especially with erosion.

and you were probably right. but where did you get such an idea from?

@@skepticalfaith5201 Probably from the idea that there were ancient civilications that were in some ways more advanced than us that were destroyed by the younger dryas extinction event that people suspect was some kind of comet that made the sky look like it was on fire and caused a number of large floods around the globe resulting in both the technologies and cataclysm to be recorded by nearly every "post-cataclysm" civilization as creation myths and such. It has some relatively interesting connections that support it, but I have done essentially no actual research on the topic, so I am 100% not qualified to say if it's even plausible. Though I 100% would actually like it to be true, because it conveniently explains a LOT of things about the ancient world. Some would say that it's way too neat to be true though. I'v also seen some people connect it to our supposed ancient underground civilization that also appears in lots of myths. It'd probably be easier to survive a comet in huge bunkers or something.

Yes, it’s ridiculous that they keep saying Egyptian . As an Architect it’s so obvious to me that the style is completely different therefore different cultures.

@@eclipseslayer98 The Younger Dryas could easily have been a comet steered at Earth by the Annunaki equivalents just like they say in the old texts, I mean people talk about using "small" asteroids as strategic weapons with full deniability right now.

@@Veldtian1 I have essentially zero interest in any idea regarding the Annunaki due to most people presenting exceptionally illogical ideas. Like the one about us being an engineered slave race for them. If they were so advanced, they could easily create robots that could do the job that wanted FAR easier, FAR faster, and would NEVER rebel. So and advanced species using slave labor could only mean that they would be exceptionally stupid. Though that would explain how they'd be so easy to over-throw. But then how did they advance in the first place? Did someone else help them for the shits and giggles? Eh, my sour opinion of the Annunaki aside, I have done practically zero research on "them" and what they're suppose to be, so I'm not so closed minded as my comment might suggest.

yeah, everyone seems to assume ancient humans were idiots, clearly that is not the case, it was not aliens, they were just as clever as modern man at problem solving.

Strange how there is little investment into theories about alien technology when it comes to the ancient wonders that were created in Europe but when it comes to Africa, the Middle East, The Americas and (to a lesser extent) Asia there is a _lot_ of stock put into theories about aliens. Almost makes you wonder if there is a form of cultural chauvinism that drives this sort of thinking 🤔🤔

Nikola Tesla*... he was a Croat-Serb not Russian

@@chrismechanic2000 some don’t believe they were here at all. 🤷‍♀️ Some more of “nothing to see here”.

@@jessl1934 Not really, more to do with the age (the pyramids were ancient to the Romans) and scale of the monuments. The Europeans had iron as well by the time they were building large scale things. Only idiots and charlatans promote Alien theories anyway.

there is no mystery there is no lost knowledge about the construction but there are incredibly ignorant people

Next comment down and u find ur answer

Thermal expansion and settling over time and seismic events no doubt made these gaps tighter than they were during construction, I'm not convinced this is anything especially impressive.

@@DesmondCreighton i thought the same. Surely their weight alone, would flatten them whrn they were being moved around. But definitely minor earthquakes would create a tight fit.

The key shocking factor of the Mesoamericans: they didn't even have metal tools.

@@RByrne Maybe for the ones that are stacked on top of each other, but not for the blocks that are side-to-side.

What kind of nerd convention is going on here?

your hands are the ones with yellow nail polish on right?

@@solooutlawz2685 today or tomorrow

@@UnchartedX awesome

A thumbnail of your thumbnail lol

Imperial Ton = 2,240 pounds UK, 2000 pounds US Metric Tonne = 1000Kg

Granite weighs about 175pounds per cubic ft. or about 80kgs. So these 50 ton blocks would have to be around 625 cubic ft or around 18 cubic mtrs. These blocks sure dont look like they are 625ft wide and tall now do they... or to put it into more of a perspective. Thats roughly half the height of the statue of liberty. Or about as tall as the entire sphinx's head. Don't believe everything on the internet.

@@bigmandarr cubic ft is not the same as ft. 5 cubic ft is not the same as 5ft.

@@ethankg9094 I did most the math in cubic metres and just googled the converstion. its still 18mtrs and a cubic mtr is 1x1x1m so its the same in height,length and width. so 18 cubic mtrs is 18x18x18m

The X stands for multiplying. So 1 x 1 x 1 = 1 and 18 x 18 x 18 = 5.832 cubic meters. So 18 Cubic Meters are about 3,5 meter x 3,5 meter x 1,5meter.

could be but the real mystery to me is how did they cut those stones

@@peacetoall1858 if i have to guess same as today but it wasnt egyptians rather much older and much more advanced civilization

You know that granite and dolorite is made of different crystals? There is no resonance frequency as every crystalline structure has its own property.

@@xxtoxii9615 I guess anything is possible. I mean there is scientist that studied the erosion on the Sphynx and said the structure was ten thousand years or older as the erosion was made my water which was around at that time. If true, that would put the Egyptians out of the picture and prove your point right. Though an even older civilization cutting stone in that manner is an even bigger mystery.

@@DilbertMuc They can still be shaken.

The logistics alone for a project the size of the great pyramid would be mind boggling! Nothing happens without first creating a logistical plan. Also the precision of the stone work could not possibly have been achieved with hand tools! If they were using hand tools, they would still be building the pyramids today! Ha!

@@GroberWeisenstein As long as you say so.

@@GroberWeisenstein the Egyptian civilization that we are aware of did not have the materials necessary to shape the hardness of the stones used. The majority of the stones do exhibit surface tooling that is not even remotely close to the limited hand tooling that the archeologists insist was used. At least Petrie had the professional integrity to admit that the stones exhibited sophisticated machine tooling that was superior to anything that we have developed so far. The unifirm plates, vases, pitchers, and cups that were extracted from granite, schist, and alabaster that look like they were milled on a lathe by a completely unknown technique. Subsequent Egyptians were unable to duplicate the items and instead could only create pottery that was far more inferior and less impressive. Be for real.

Egypt has a lot of interesting historical mysteries ! Everyone wants to know "Who built the pyramids?" It is said that one of the pyramids is built at a spot in such a way that any time of the day - that pyramid ( The Pyramid of Giza ) does not cast a shadow. What kind of mathematical calculations were needed to build such a pyramid at that exact specific spot to accomplish that ? How did the pyramid builders know and survey and find such a place ?

10:22 shows your the one with no qualifications. Next time you comment watch the whole video. 😒

I understand thinking out of the box but this part 15:37 tells me that it was not that.

I think he's mislabeling it by calling it "high technology" when the word he's looking for is "arcane technology". They recently found a papyrus written by a contemporary of the pyramid building that didn't fill in all the gaps but actually the peculiar conditions. there were tens of thousands of workers, treated very much like modern construction workers, they flooded the nile and used boats that used rope instead of nail to haul the granite. the jist of what i got from this is that the boy scouts is barely a shadow of what rope and knot technology was

That doesn't explain the cutting just how they may have quarried chunks of the stone, there's a story of Hannibal marching his army through the alps and splitting a large bolder that was blocking their path using the method you describe.

Good job thinking out of the box

Big fire for that 50 ton block . .

ive always thought the same thing, i think they dont do it cuse of it being a historical monument. but separating 1 stone have to be possible somewhere..

I was thinking the same thing...

Stones in the serapeum are flat to a tolerance of 500th of an inch

@@olo_smooth_olo5606 where did you find that out?

@@peeinacan1 Original Egyptologists discovered this using benchmark techniques available at the time. Jimmy has a video about this. Modern lasers and benchmark techniques have verified older measurements recorded. Benchmarking began in 1800s methinks. Maybe 1700s with the flat plate.

You were wise beyond your years.

It's also nice that they also knew how to screw-up, that makes me feel better...😊

It doesn't have to have been cut fast, maybe it was a large diameter cutting wheel, cutting slowly as you generally cut harder materials slower, that was used that deformed slightly and went off center. Either way it's still interesting

It helps to have 10s or 100s of 1000s of slaves working 24/7 for decades at the prime of their lives / strength and who become experts at the work within a few months because that is all they do. Yes they were cutting fast, at least faster than 2 old men who've never held a saw before, incapable or choosing not to put much muscle into it to conserve energy. I don't think the ancient Egyptians would allow such slow, unmotivated work like we see in the video clip of the two men with the saw, water, and sand (and they just learned / experimented with those techniques that 1 day, the Egyptians had centuries of experience with this, they probably knew the exact amount of sand and water and how often to add more down to a near or complete science after a few decades of doing this). People try to make the pyramids seem larger than life and that there has to be some mystery technology or even alien involvement in their construction. I don't see why this is necessary at all. Shitloads of slave labour, eventual expertise at the craft, using young men who only do this all the time, rather than old archeologists picking up a saw for the first time in their lives and going extremely slow because they're old and out in the heat and may pull a muscle or have a heart attack going faster, lol, like that example was such a poor representation of what ancient Egyptian slave labour work probably looked like. The slaves would not have been allowed to work that slowly and unambitiously, they'd be whipped or worse and when the choice is between working to exhaustion and pulling a muscle or something, when you're a young man and just want to survive another day, yeah, you're gonna work harder than two old archeologists. Perhaps the cutters worked in teams of 4, so 2 work at cutting for 30 minutes straight, then take 30 minutes off, do that for 12 hours, then a new team who has had 12 hours of rest takes over for another 12 hours... Why all of this isn't clear as day to literally everyone, I had no clue. They proved that you CAN cut the stones with the saw, sand, and water, and they figured that out in one day and got 4 inches. Add centuries of mastering and experimenting with different amounts of sand and water and possibly some kind of oil/lubricant too, and what's so hard to believe if two old men with zero experience managed 4 inches in "a day" which probably was 6 or 8 hours of actual work, rather than 24 hours since those dudes look like they'd have died if they actually worked for 24 hours straight on that stone. 24 hours straight of young men, knowing exactly what they're doing, with centuries of knowledge of how to do it taught to them and years of hands on work doing it, I think they could manage more than 4 inches in a day, probably several feet could be accomplished, and you don't just have one team, they'd have had 100s or 1000s of teams doing this for literally decades straight. The stone cutting to me isn't hard to believe at all. The precision is very impressive, but I bet there was a lot of trial and error there too, they didn't get it precise on the first try, at least probably not usually, but if you mess up then you can re-use the same stone, making a new cut several inches above your old cut, and try to get it straight enough the next time around. Rinse and repeat, don't need a whole brand new stone, you use the one that is there and take just a small amount off to make it fit as precisely as has been dictated, and not every stone is PERFECT like he shows, many clearly are not this precise, so its not like that precision was mandated for every single stone, perhaps it just worked out that way often enough because they did demand near perfection, so often enough you'll end up with perfection. None of this is that difficult for me to wrap my mind around, I think people just drastically under-estimate the abilities of ancient people, slave labour, and what decades of construction and centuries of experience / knowledge handed down about 1 single culturally important thing can achieve. We think of construction in terms of months or a year or two today. The Egyptians were thinking in terms of decades. They easily could have spent a whole decade pre-cutting stones for the pyramids / major structures, and continued the cutting work endlessly once actual construction began as well, plus the final fit/finishing cuts at the actual construction site to correct the stones that weren't cut within the margins that were mandated. They likely had their best and most experienced stone cutters at the actual site of installation, and less experienced ones were doing the cutting however many miles away the quarries were. To me this all simply makes sense. People just love a mystery and want to believe something larger than life or some technology better than we have today was at work, totally discounting what 100,000s of experienced people, experts in one, ancient thing, with ancient tech, can acheive, over the course of many decades... Modern people can't wrap their minds around all of this, and prefer to think there has to be more of an explanation and possibly ALIENS HELPED OMG SO COOL RIGHT?!?!

i think you could say it was done by a bunch of exhausted slaves. cant prove it wrong either!

@@shaund4155 Well, it had to be fast because with today's technology, of diamond blade cooled with water, to cut 2.3 millions blocks (for the great pyramid only), they would probably be still working on it...

Watch k2019. They think the rocks were poured like concrete. Seems possible but the heating to 2700 degrees Fahrenheit with a sun lense seems silly.

@@archstanton2818 That’s not even close to an explanation. I mean I could imagine this technique (although highly unlikely) for the stone "plates" on the floor around the pyramid, but not for the big blocks

And some of the seams are made when the stones make an L shape right angle. How the hell!? Not only does it meet perfectly with the stone below it, but also the stone next to it on the other side of an angle.

@@archstanton2818 There is a surprising number of geopolymer scientists that believe this was entirely possible, although I'm with you on the giant magnifying glasses. There's also a guy who believes the stones were all floated into place with air bladders. A huge water tube of sorts ran up the sides. I would think the water pressure at the base would have been far greater than a wooden sluice could hold, not to mention the need for pumping water to a height of 400 feet.

@@archstanton2818 except that’s not how granite works. Also to heat something with these dimensions up to that temperatures you need a lense the size of a football field, please at least do the math or you know do an experiment to prove this is even possible. Otherwise this is no different from saying it was aliens with lasers and stuff idk.

Preflood demonic built structures. No made by humans.

In Cambodia also in Champa structures...

@@TrollextheTroll demons built it? 😂 What evidence you have for this?

So called 'cyclopian' architectural styles are common for such defensive fortifications for the basic fact that they are insanely difficult to break - to say nothing of weathering the impact of Japanese geological problems so very well.

@@mnomadvfx some stones have the same vitrification as the walls in Peru

My brother is a learned CNC machinist and it's hard to argue with what you say, but… The excellent accuracy achieved in the construction of the pyramids is not the only point that we cannot properly explain. Aside from cutting perfectly accurate granite blocks, we still don't know 100% exactly how they were moved and built together, let alone many mysterious chambers (some built at crazy angles) of unknown purpose. So even if it is true (which I believe to some extent) that the ancients were able to achieve perfect precision with hand tools and experience, we still have many other questions that we need to answer which we simply cannot with our present knowledge and what it is also still the most intriguing issue in my opinion.

As someone else familiar in the field, I have to say that these cuts really remind me of EDMs. Remember that the Baghdad battery is a thing and Egyptians hieroglyphics depicted technology similar to lightbulbs, so I wouldn't say that it's far fetched to assume they'd use electricity to cut too. Of course, seeing as how this is stone and not steel, I can only assume they were using some powerful currents if they were "EDMing" it. But if Egyptians really were descended from the Atlanteans who could apparently fly, then I could see it happening; flight and power generation evolved in our same era after all...

There is no doubt in our capabilities as humans and our ability to create tools....etc. On the other hand I did a quick math calculation: if the grand pyramid consisted of around 2.5 million stones and took around 25 years to construct 1. (2,500,000÷ 25= 100,000 stone blocks per year 100,000 block ÷ 356 (days) = around 275 blocks per day 275 ÷ 24 ( hours) = around 12 blocks per hour. It means it took the ancient Egyptian around 5 minutes per stone block ( working 24 hours per day, every day for 25 years) to extract, chisel and put on location🤔. How many people did it require to do that work, how were they fed, 25 years of agonizing slavery under the blazing sun and didn't even think of revolting?!!! A lot of questions, a lot!!!

And they use two old egyptologists who have been cutting stone for approximately a day to prove how slow it would be. People are so close to using logic here, but fall just short.

Technology has increased, however man is still a mental dwarf

Was the last sentence still sarcastic?

@@GeneTakovic225 kinda.. thats what everyone says. I wonder how the egyptians built the pyramids. rock, lots and lots of rock. and professionals

@@dudeman579100 Buoys. Lots of water and buoys. Major part of the workforce in quarrys cutting with sand saws

I see what you did there haha.

Lol...this made my day

'nailed it'

To soon 🤣🤣

So wrong but so accurate lol

A lot of people know how my friend. They have even been re-created but if more people knew this there wouldn't be so much money to be made because its not very interesting

@@joncook6167 you are both missing extremely important points. the fact that these pyramids you are discussing are on the dollar bill in North America which has no connection to Africa especially not Egypt. At least to our knowledge. You see, these elites or 1%ers are in fact decedents of the families who ruled Egypt and their goal is to conquer and divide. control the masses by controlling our beliefs and what we know, because there is much more to the world and our history than we are led to believe, these unexplainably built pyramids are 1 of billions of examples that could be made. and divide us using the unknown and our differences to make us look at one another differently and this competitive society we live in only fuels this agenda. wake up people we must take back control of our lives and remove Satan from our realm so that the people may not suffer any longer and we can transform hell into heaven

/facepalm

or those who know are not telling.....

@@joncook6167 I know how to teleport. But i will not show you!

I thought there was some research showing these were not cuts, but actually poured like concrete.

@@InterestingClass you can't pour granite like concrete and if you say you can you need to cite some 'concrete' evidence. lol....

Weird how no one says anything about the weight or erosion that could of made them seem more perfect then they truly are

@@thegettokidZz they arent made of granite. This video is false. It was an ancient form of limestone concrete.

@@user-dk2ol7pq6r Oh wow, must be cool to build satellites out of stone, moron. He isn't talking about cutting metal and grinding or machining it down to micrometric precision, he is talking about rock cutting.

I'd argue that those things aren't hallmarks of intelligence anyways, but yeah... he's right

They had the same sized and same evolved brains that we do. Given their resources, they clearly put them to better use.

@Bang Upyourbumhole nope

Tango Nevada - Clearly. Sometimes.

@@dorianphilotheates3769 I would say clearly, regularly. The vast majority of humans today would be helpless with no electricity and the Social Structures we have to help people survive.

That's my guess too. A preflood civilization that had ways of doing it. It definitely makes you wonder just how much we don't know about history.

nonsense, grinding stones has been around for tens of thousands of years. they likely got the idea from smashing grain in the same spot and just refined it over the years.

Very good answer

@@nickv.353 kinda like what the flock doesn't know won't hurt them, in fact it will make them easier to control...

Got to agree, The Egyptians just didn't have the tools to do the job so the obvious conclusion is it was done by a previous unknown civilisation and utilised by the Egyptians. Imagine if you will, that New york or London or Paris was abandoned, and our civilisation ceased to exist, and 100 years later aboriginals sailed from aus and claimed it for themselves, 4000 years later they would be trying to figure out how aborigines with boomerangs managed to build the empire state building or the Eiffel tower or Buckingham Palace.

@@iamrocketray Yes, agree with you! And another point is - Why isn't there records(Hieroglyphics) of the construction? A civilization this advanced and zero documentation?

Go talk to the Kemet people in their videos here. Tread lightly.........

You're right

@@iamrocketray that's so chilling to think about.. Like who built it what capabilities did they have

Not many know that. I would have gone to my grave not knowing about that little trick had it not been for a RU-vid video pointing it out, which got me to looking and wow. That's just so cool! I'm 67 now and it is good to know the world still has some jewels of surprise for me.

Wait wut

@@Chuck8541 If you see it from the side, in the right light, you can just make out the slight "dent" of the lines. I've noticed it in a few ground level photos. But you are right, until that pilot took a picture of it from above on the equinox (or solstice; I can never remember which), no one had ever noticed before.

Yeah of course it's got 8 sides, I mean why wouldn't they make that structure even more complicated and impressive? Haha, everything they did was stupidly difficult. It's like "Hey, the people of the future might doubt our badassery one day, so let's flaunt the hell out of our skills with this one. Really blow their minds with it so they don't go on believing we were just early-man idiots smashing and chiseling away with dolerite and copper tools and sawing 2.5million 2.5ton blocks at 2mm an hour for 20 years." Well they tried to tell us.

You can only see it on the equinox from up above which is even more crazy.

What facts? He's just rambling on and on saying nothing but "We are not able to do it even today". Fact is these things were done with basic geometry knowledge, a l ot of manpower and a lot of time.

@@BrightInsight Jimmy, my friend. Have you entertained the thought that some of these may have been petrified during the YD disaster? For me that explains these impossible drill holes etc. It may originally have been working with a soft material.. it might be an explanation to all this crazy stone work, the drill holes, the angles,the insane weight and the Scoop marks... if so.. how old are these things!? Or did they under go rapid petrification thanks to the conditions of the younger dryas disaster? Would love to hear your thoughts on this. Maybe we are actually looking at imprints ..a shell of what was there .."so close you can't fit paper into them" maybe cause they might be petrified and it's just an imprint left over.. Interesting thought experiment if not anyway

@@dieterkohler2206 Denial is a hell of a drug.

Or use buoyancy!

💯💯

You don't do your ablutions where you dine.

Well put.👍

Research "Tartaria". We have been lied to.

I do and as a layman appreciate all of your skills.

No advanced technology needed. It was poured concrete formed to look like it was cut, no different than a civilization 2000 years from now examining our concrete roads and sidewalks and being in awe at how we "cut" and "moved" such large sections of stone.

@@sorcerykid There is a solid theory there was a use of amalgamates to form many of these rocks, especially those used in the Pyramids. However the granite stones and other harder rocks used in Egypt and elsewhere are the stickler here. Grinding up or crushing hard rock is just as difficult as cutting it.

@@sorcerykid sorry wrong granite rock is not a type of concrete

There is no magic here, even with a possible sound levitation method for heavy rocks like Hutchison etc demonstrated and Liedskalnins may have. It is normal physics, just an extreme form of use of it.

@@Macgyrl64 I disagree. I know people making concrete products that are hard to distinguish between natural stone. You can have laborers breaking it up, transport tons per shipment and then form and cast it in place. Thousands of years later it's near impossible to tell the difference. But if you take a BB and place it under a stone block and allow it to bear the weight, it will crack the stone. Therefore cutting the stone block in multiple perfect facets seems impossible compared to casting it in place.

the stones were molded.... Scythian's Suerian's, Inca's etc knew it....

Ive seen some of the Ethiopian stonework.Lalabelia area is out of this world. The angel carved church carved from top down in one huge granite mountain. Amazing.

Shhhh. It's supposed to be "olive colored" peoples designing and executing these miraculous works. Can't let black people have a dignified history and legacy. Goes against white supremacy.

@@andrasm.5119 If the stones were molded, then they would have to melt the stone. In addition, there would be molds left over. There would also be all kinds of scraps of leftover bits of melted and rehardened rock like they have every time they use concrete. In addition, melting the rocks makes no sense. How do the Egyptians carry liquid rock up to the top of a pyramid? That's harder than carrying solid rock. In short, it is nonsense and there would be a ton of evidence left if any part of it was true.

Gary! You are a barely human ape gawking at the shiny and pretty things. Have you seen donuts? THEY'RE AMAZING!

Yeah the ones that are made of diarite and granite, but yet have clay lids, that anyone with common sense can tell that's something not right. If they can machine bowls made of granite!,andisite,diarite, with that level of precision only to put clay lids on them does not and I repeat absolutely does not make sense.

Yes, I agree. Putting the pyramids and other immense structures aside, the vases you both mention are mind-boggling. Even today, I think you'd have to reinvent the design of a tooling lathe to duplicate these incredibly precisioned artifacts. And that's only if we actually could...

@@chrisgross4720 it makes sense if the high quality items were treasures from a long forgotten past and then they just added clay lids to these treasures in a Mad Max post-apocalyptic way.

It's literally something we cannot recreate today. This should have been the biggest news in the world when those bowls were discovered. Every news network should have been asking what the repercussions of a lost technology once existing on Earth is. But no. No one cares besides people like us. It's sad

@@chrisgross4720 Why do we put metal lids on a glass jar? I don't find using a different material for the lid and the base of a container that odd at all.

that's bc the blocks were made by using a mold and then poured and hardened. Only possible way

The simplest evidence for this is that _no mummies have been found in pyramids. Ever_ . There's a fascinating kind of slight-of-hand used in reporting the finding of mummified remains. Reports will associate mummies with pyramids by talking a lot about the pyramid, then talking of mummies found _near_ said pyramid. To date, none have ever actually been found to house tombs at all. And yes, the power generator theory is pretty intriguing. Beauval's work on this is extensive.

@@Kaotiqua The Giza plateau is A NECROPOLIS, as in one giant burial ground full of tombs and only tombs. Why exactly would they be anything other than tombs when they're Built exactly like the majority of other Old Kingdom Egyptian tombs? It's not a f*ck power generator lmao 🤣 There is absolutely zero evidence to even come anywhere near that claim.

@@CleanupKrew7 you're missing their point. The pyramids themselves didn't seem to have mummies in them, while many other structures the Egyptians we know housed these mummies. The power generator theory comes from the theory of "antiqitech", which involves drawing charge from the atmosphere using positive and negative charges and an obelisk or high point (the tops of the pyramids were capped in a conductive metal). This type of technology is what Nikola Tesla was working on when his work was confiscated by the government. It involved a large copper disk set underground in the water table, involved ionization, and a tower to conduct the charge. Given the sphinx is most likely a water feature, the theory the pyramids were used to draw a small electrical charge isn't totally out there. I'm not sure I believe this theory but its incredibly obvious that the pyramids are far more mysterious and impressive than we often think. Their location, construction, mathematics, surrounding structures, and the accuracy in which these were all achieved is hard to believe.

The word pyramid is derived from the Greek words PYRAMIS and PYRAMIDOS. The meaning of the word Pryamis is obscure and may relate to the shape of a pyramid. The word Pyramidos has been translated as "Fire In The Middle".

Yes, i believe that the pyramides were used as big tesla coils to give electrcity just by mixing different liquids to boost the power. They could use that for the lightbulbs they found pics of and many other things like cars and such. Well, just a theory so who am i to play king :D

Yeah GleepGlorp came along and wizarded the stone into shape

Well they had bronze alloys which were a bit better than the copper ones. And while the arithmetic is still impressive for manhours, but I wouldn't discount that they didn't also just throw endless money and men at the problem with skilled masons working reasonable hours but the slaves doing more akin to 12-16 workdays(and switching shifts) doing ballpark range cuts but at a fast rate that would be shaved down to precision later. That would cut that potential 2 yr job to a fraction, maybe 'only' several weeks or months My theory is that they would used a forced sped up version of nature's method of cutting stone, pressured water(obviously not modern style). It could be almost passively done overnight, set up several stations(perhaps bronze heated pressure cookers, or simply rushing mills run by slaves/oxen to funnel water to a small powerful jet stream) to cut more than a few at the same time, and can be directed to create smoother surfaces(like real river stones). And natural running water would be much more abundant there than today, likely also used to also transport the limestone blocks with their natural buoyancy/repelling or simply in boat cradles

@@AntiAnathema 50 ton rocks on boat cradles at that time? Bruh... you smoking?

Just because you can't figure out a way doesn't mean other people can't or couldn't.

yeah, that woul be correct if ONE guy alone was working on it... With a team works on each block, they can do multiple sides at the same time And by the way, ALL thoses blocks are "so perfect" only on some sides (the ones you see) EVERY block you see is roughly squared on the back... If you have the technology to perfectly and easily cut the stone... Why use that technology only on half the sides and use stone tools on the others ? That alone prove that they didn't had mysterious tecchnology... They just spent A LOT of time on a few parts to make it perfect where you see it PS : inside of the pyramid, the stones you can't see at all are just debris and filling... Only 1% of the stones used are perfectly squared... exactly as you'd expect if making them square takes a lot of time and effort...