Greetings from Torrance! That machine was borderline evil. Ever been on a session where you either want a quad or just be put out of your misery? I have gone an hour before and everything in me said to quit, but it kept teasing me with full houses and 3 of a kinds. Even when the quad came out, I couldn't celebrate. Was just too exhausted. You have my sympathies on this session. It truly was...."EMOTIONAL DAMAGE!!"
Okay Andrew, I know you like Circa and the strip and downtown casinos, but that was brutal. I suggest earnestly to try some local casinos!!! I do truly believe they pay back better. I want you to win so bad!!!
The question you bring up is worth looking into. Does a change in cadence result in a different result? I'll get back to you after I find out! Yours for the best outcomes..........glenn
Hey Andrew, you have a pretty consistent leak in your game where you are overvaluing 3 to the straight flush over a pair like you do at the 12:48 mark. Keeping the pair is substantially better, yielding 4.06 credits back to the straight flush yielding only 2.83 in 8/5 bonus. That's a $6 mistake at the $5 denomination every time it's made and can add up pretty quickly, I've noticed it in other videos as well. Keep up the great videos!
216 the 578 hearts is the correct hold, at 731 the correct hold is the pair of 10s not the inside straight flush. 1249 pair of 6 is the correct hold not the 3 card straight flush. Yes Andrew that was one very long video but was interesting too. LOL Better Luck
Just wondering if you ever. Tried “Quick Quads” video poker? I know Bob Dancer has made a bit of a name for himself playing it. I have played it a few times in Laughlin and at South Point in Vegas. Enjoy your current video series! 😎🤘
I have been on a total dry spell lately as well. I attribute it to the economy being tits up and the machines aren't getting as much play as they used to. Then when granny hits her quad she cashes and gets her free hot dog at the snack bar. The casino I got consolidated there VP machines so the less machines the tougher to get the 96% payback variable per person.
Hi, JoAnna from South Philly...Always watch you but on my TV so don't make comments. Know the Poker Guys are gonna be in AC in June but would like to know which casino or casinos you're going to be at so I can make plans to come down the shore. Thanks so much!!
Andrew, man I’ve been playing VP for 30 yrs and I love your videos. I’m pulling for you! Your doing something I’ve always dreamed of. My tip, if a machine takes 25% and quickly returns it back then cash out and get a new Machine. Best wishes
@27:09... highly suspect you had the quad aces right there I suppose the 'experts' would tell me that it's 'wrong' to do, but I'd only ever hold *ONE* _jacks or better_ card whenever I was dealt 2 _jacks or better_ cards of different suits (and, of course, I'd only hold the ace in Double Double) just doesn't make any sense to me to hold two _jacks or better_ cards when they're different suits because by doing that you're effectively nullifying any chance of hitting a royal flush, ..and in the case of what I time-stamped above, holding two might've cost you the quad aces
@@brianlarsenis ... meh still doesn't feel right to me I mean, completely locking yourself out of the chance to hit a royal flush AND diminishing your chances at hitting a quad all in exchange for a slightly higher chance at breaking even with a 'jacks or better' ? I can't do it
@@Rdking80 ... sure, I don't doubt that 'mathematically speaking', holding the two differently suited _jacks or better_ cards is considered 'playing it safe', but ..idk, I guess if I really wanted to 'play it safe', I just wouldn't put any money in the machine to begin with and when I've seen quad aces and royal flushes come up, probably half the time they just popped up unexpectedly out of nowhere after holding only 1 or 2 cards (ie. *not* 3 to a royal flush or 3 to a quad)
@@Rdking80 ...and to be perfectly fair, though; ..whenever I played, it sure wasn't $25 a hand or $250 a hand or $500 a hand lol so, yeah; ..I could afford to take risks
You're basically shooting for a pair minimum, to get your money back and have an opportunity at another hand. The randomness of slots might work better for your logic.
you did not get any flush, four cards to a flush, and never got the fifth, when you should have 20% odds. I watched a video from North Korea and their slot work on the same system....
