THIS is What a Tomahawk Cruise Missile CAN DO! 

On the 11th month, 11th day at the 11th hour we celebrate our veterans and their sacrifices! Happy Veterans Day!

It's an option. Things change

That killed me too. I knew. Heck, we saw the before and after satellite pictures of the area targeted.

@@hankclingingsmith8707 Death always comes. Bill Gates and Scrooge recommend decreasing the surplus population.

I don't think they hold a SCI clearance, at least when my last review for my T/S came back it had SCI, before that I was just T/S, and no one else in the Strike team had that SCI.

I remember the 1st Gulf War (1991) and people sitting in buildings in Bagdad saying they had seen Tomahawks maneuvering their way down the streets to their targets..And how could anyone forget the lit-up Bagdad sky at night?

Guidance by McDonnell-Douglas 😉

Robert or Bob was his first name

Okay what does your comment have to do with the video

Interesting that you got three thumbs up. I thought RU-vid was banned in Alabama.

Russian subs in Cuba. 90 miles away.

What species of troll?

So you're saying buy sliver stocks ?

Well going by the ease that Ukraine hits Russian ships in the Black sea, then the answer is yes. Much of the Russian defense systems seem to be built up on hype and it has the capability of ,( in theory ) however poor operator training and a lack of quality control in production reduces the systems abilities

yes yes and yes. There hasn't been a single report of a Tomahawk being shot down. There have been a lot of anti-missile defense taken out by Tomahawks. That is one of it's primary missions. It takes out the anti-air missile defenses, then the planes can attack safely.

Tomahawk like kamikazee and commercial DJI drones fly low. So it will be just as effective as drones. If Russia is already having problems with detecting and intercrpting Ukrainian drones, then they'll have the same problem with Tomahawk.

Hence the sending of swarms to overwhelm air defences. Attack first with cheap drones to empty the anti missile batteries and follow up with the real heavy stuff.

Amazing missile, that not only hits the Pentagon but deploys Aircraft engines and debris as an after the strike stealthing 😏

I believe it's a see through disc that rotates so fast that it slings water off of it in a heavy rain (or seas) so they can see.

Smokey and the Bandit...

Tomahawk ain’t got shit on that 4x4 powered by Aloha Snackbars. 😂

I doubt they used tomahawk missiles at people in little pickups dumb statement

Saddam hussein army was not one of those subichs you talking about for sure..

Upgraded to Toyota Hilux now...

Can it be disarmed and scuttled by the controllers after launch?

@@allhopeabandon7831 Can neither confirm nor deny this information. Simply because I don't know lol

@@allhopeabandon7831 No, they can't be terminated mid-flight if that's what you're asking? They aren't remote controlled in any way by the launch platform, but as they can be assigned new targets I assume they could have their new GPS coordnates below sea level somewhere effectvely ditching it into the sea or some other remote land area within it's range..

What does that boot taste like bro

​@@fortytwo244You're sure butt hurt about appreciating the sacrifice people made so you can sit there and complain about people being glad they're there to protect us and our allies. If you don't like America... move. Oh wait. That was totally edgy and funny. You're so handsome "bro". 🤡

I'm surprised they failed to mention that.

Many more than just one nuclear warhead if outfitted for such.

@@DrMarianus They travel at low altitude so no MIRV's.

@@DrMarianus Tomahawk is too small, and doesn't fly high enough for a MIRV.

@@jakehildebrand1824 Both systems have advantages and disadvantages, Tomahawks are almost impossible to detect, unlike a MIRV, which flies in a parabolic arc, which enables defensive systems to track it way before it lands. Tomahawks don't need to fly at supersonic speeds, which increases detection and they fly below defense detection systems. I did read that Israel has outfitted nuclear ordnance on its German submarine cruise missiles (11 of them). The info is online as well as Janes Defense, the major publication of each country's military assets. But no one knows for sure how many nukes because Israel doesn't reveal how many. The best military estimates are between 80 to 200 nukes. Nukes nowadays can be detonated at any altitude, even a few feet above the ground, unlike the past where they were required to detonate at higher altitudes.

Who's business is it hmmm

​@lesmalone9109 if you are the next door neighbor to a man who is selling drugs, do you protect him ?

Except to the extent that their biz. is terrorism

It’s also not the USA’s business either to be there….and yet we are.

The U.S has made a career out of being in everybodys buisness through Nato, hundreds of military bases world wide, Sanctions, Proxy wars, Regime Changes Etc so to say the neighbors need to mind there own business is extremely illiterate of you

The USA uses a slightly modified cruise missile for carrying nukes. The exact specs are, of course, highly classified. These carry W80 "Dial-A-Yield" (5 to 150 kilotons) nukes. The U.S has stated that it no longer uses, or will use Tomahawks for delivering nukes, although this could be changed very rapidly in the right (or wrong) circumstances.

@@allengreg5447 he pointed out that they are capable of carrying a nuclear payload, not that they are actively used to do so.

There Dutch not Russian

@@adrianbalboa5353 My mistake on the nationality of the sailor. But, at 1:30 that is a Canadian ship. Canada has no Tomahawk missiles. Also, watch your grammar. "There" is in reference to a place or position. I gather your intention was referring to "they are" or they're. These are elementary errors and questions your level of education.

My dad served in our RCN during WW2...

and you believe the government shill like Cartwright hahaha go get some help

the launch tubes are water cooled. so, no.

Томогавк - это старый хлам 80 годов,он не отвечает современным требованиям и возможностям военного времени!

That's heavy man!

I live in LA. Did you work at the Raytheon plant in the San Fernando Valley?

With all due respect, Raytheon did not invent the Tomahawk cruise missile or build them in 1977. I worked at GD Convair San Diego, starting in full scale development, flight test, to full scale production until the program was sold at the end of the cold war.

​@@deanminer2340You might want to reread what he said and pay attention. He didn't say what you are claiming. Not trying to be an a$$...

Yes some of the dialogue didn’t match the video.

Good to know. I love our Military people . Thank you for your service

Immune to the tech at the time of building. It's going to change over time.

@@jasonpolsinelli6932 no such thing as total immunity.

I previously worked within the Private Security & Intelligence communities myself but would never tell you or anyone else for that matter the level of clearance I had as was the nature of the work I did within the Security Sector. You're exposing yourself to a world of hurt if you're not staying updated with the newer cyber security threats. If you knew what I knew in regard to what a determined person or group was capable of online, you would retract that from your initial statement and just be happy that you were privileged enough to know what you know... Just saying 'Fred Smith' nobody is safe from a determined actor especially those with exceptional skills in their field of whatever it is they are paid to do. You have a great day now but think about why the knowledge in your head required it as TS and then remember that RU-vid is a global platform where many of these commentors are also foreign actors being paid to observe and report on people like you that claim to have knowledge that could be of use to someone. That old OpSec 'Loose lips sink ships' was the phrase back in WW2 If I remember correctly, you never know who or where they are, but they're listening in or watching for little titbits of information that could potentially lead to a convoy being sunk on the other side of the world, if you get my meaning. As someone that held a TS and potential SCI you should know how easily it could be for people to find your identity, given the information you've told us already, I've been able to find information regarding your crewmates. From what you've said here I can see you were in the CIC as Navy doesn't and never did have 'database managers' as a specific role, having a TSC means you were within a senior position too as Operations Specialists only required Secret clearances. Given the specific timeframe too; I've found a number of potential matches already as to who you are or more specifically who you served with, which would then if I cared enough could go on to contact them and approach them as a lot of you would be in your senior years since the Fife was 'dispatched' by USS Russell DDG-59 back in 2005. I don't want to bore you with being more dramatic than I already have been, I've pretty much made my point but just to demonstrate: 1) You were probably a Surface Warfare Specialist within S-3 2) I assume you are acquainted with the nicknames (I see why the nicknames were needed though having people with the same first names could get confusing): "Koop aka Don, Lenny aka Leonard, Red aka Kevin, Grambo aka Kenny , Dirtbag aka Jesse, Seapup aka Chris, Odie aka William, Stretch another William, Batmite another Chris, Diamond aka Otis. Could go on, but point is proven. 3) I also presume you were assigned to her during or shortly after the AN/SQ-89, LAMPS III, VLS and CIWS upgrades at the SMP drydock and spent most of your time served in Japan. Based upon your first sentence regarding time served and role played onboard the Fife. You're potentially one of the names listed above or you knew them personally or because of your mentioning of having a TSC I can make an educated guess that your initials are J.H. From what I know of the USS Fife and her history I thank you for your service as an Australian, your ship alongside our own Navy patrolled the South China Seas monitoring the 8th Operational Squadron which was part of the Primorskiy Flotilla (Pacific Fleet) operating out of Vladivostok during what I can only imagine a 'scary' time in recent history as the 8th Operational Squadron of the USSR made up 32% of the USSR's entire Naval capacity at the time. Within the Sea of Okhotsk there were 800 warships at the time. Also, I mean no disrespect in this comment, simply trying to educate you in what information can be found online when someone knows how to use the internet as a tool rather than a convenience... As you should know having TS Clearance you were probably involved with DSNET2 and DSNET3 (now known as JWICS and SIPRNet) I was 4 years old when you finished your time onboard DD-991 and I remember seeing her sunk in 2005 and have my own relatives still serving in our own Navy. During my brief search I noted several deceased who served within the same timeframe you mentioned and I'm sorry for your loss if you were close to any or all of them. 30 years later and we're back in another Cold-War with the same antagonists. Using the same threats of Nuclear War. Only difference being the nuclear weapons now have higher yields and we can fit up to 15 warheads per ICBM. Russia even claims to have a nuclear torpedo capable of creating a Tsunami. The players remain the same, but the technology has improved.

Your lack of geographical knowledge is showing.

@@peterlangan1181 maybe just their direction, destination may be right being Atlantic to Europe

Next Ocean to the right.@@MrMambott

Is that because they both have the same surname?

Imagine if Tom Cruise had a middle name "Ahawk"

The F/A-18 can carry the AGM-84 SLAM with a range of 170 mi. Good stand-off range.

@@gsmollin2 Tom Slam

Tom cruise doesn't fire tomahawk missiles, tomahawk missiles fire tom cruises.

You need it with Biden !

true meister. you not a tree, you can alway choose to live somewhere else. you ought to give it a try. it would be an eye opening. be grateful what you have. just like the guy, he was complaining, he has no shoes till he ran to the guy, he had no feet.

Bless them, for bringing so much war 😢😢😢

well, being an eye of the god requires wars what can you do about it. there are so much going on behind the scene that you and I have no clue.

@@matk2283 true. Neither did the dead innocents on all sides.

Economic enemies warrants No Action.