This Man Is BANNED From Casinos For Winning Too Much! 💰 

The religion cloak

Basil Brush. Noo-one ffucks with Basil. He'll break your legs. Steal your wife and break your heart. Why! Because he's the guv'nor. NOBODY FUCKS WITH BASIL.

Now off to watch some of your content :)

I watched those episodes a few months back they are well good 👊

LETS FUCKING GO GIVE ME MAY'S VIDEO NOWWWW

@@Arbzy ?

@@Algorithm347 he uploads videos of his card countering encounters once a month.

They even chase people down in cars even after they leave and get the cops to harrass you crazy shit lol

No need to ban Arsenal from the league because they haven’t won the league since that invincible season😂

Thankfully arsenal don't have to worry about that anytime soon

Arsenal win matches? ...That happens?!!!

@@ThatCoalSoul did just beat Chelsea 4-2

Cheers Tommy!

Thanks dude!

You can still count with multiple decks. You just need to calculate the extra decks into your count. If one deck has four 10s, then three decks have twelve 10s, etc. The hurtle is that they don't tell you how many decks there are. So you have to identify how many decks are in play based off of the size of the stack of cards on the table.

Continuously shuffling decks doesn't hamper counting though. In Blackjack, cards that are dealt are later discarded after each round. They remain out of play until the dealing shoe is empty or the dealer's hand is completely dealt. This means that it's always possible to keep a running tally of the probabilities of high or low cards appearing, regardless of where they are in the deck or how often it is shuffled.

Man will duppy a fat back stiwl

uhm... what? card counting in poker? that's not a thing...

You have no idea what you are talking about lmao. Poker is not in any way at all similar to blackjack apart from the fact they both involve cards

Every hand is reshuffled back into the deck in poker. There is no way to count cards in that game.

The main group that teaches card counting is called Blackjack Apprenticeship. You can find their channel on RU-vid. The videos are free and offer the motivated player a great head start. If you want more resources to master it you can buy a membership. It is a lot harder than it sounds to do for a living. It's a good side hustle but a full time job is not viable in my opinion without serious money management skills and nerves of steel. You will be harassed, kicked out, stepped on, abused by casino and police alike. It's not easy but the money is good.

Yeah but then the casino can have his details on a system and send to other casinos who will immediately back him off as he walks in the casino

Yeah it would short term solve the problem to long term create many more problems.

Why do people go to casinos tho waste of time and money

1. For fun 2. For a genuine opportunity to make money if you’re like Steven.

It doesn't work like that because casinos use underhanded tactics to hurt the players ability to make money. Once you hand over your I.D. they will typically place you in a third party surveillance/undesirables database and send your information over to other casinos in the area.

Unless you’re Steven

Unless you actually win money and have a good time

He’s not ripping them off though. He’s playing the game whilst being pretty good at it. If they already ID’s him on the door then why should he have to? They just didn’t want to pay out.

lol, what do you think casinos do?

Blud really Simps for casinos 💀

Arrogance and ignorance; not sure you even listened through as you’ve demonstrated you’ve no real-life experience or knowledge of the shady side of gambling institutions. You presume to know more than this “fake”, yet have no idea he is or watched his docu-series if you think it’s based on “movies”. He travelled between US based casinos and video taped many exchanges and documents his experiences; he was under $10K in every casino, and therefore under no legal requirement to qualify for crime related ID checks at each venue. Again, he declared to them that by state laws he was: *Below the legal threshold* ; he knew this and they tried to bullshit him. He says it repeatedly, on recording, and the gambling bosses in those instances don’t care because they want an ID on their database to blacklist an “advantage player”. As is evidenced by numerous encounters when they *eventually* concede to let him cash out without ID (previously assuming he didn’t know his legal rights.. I’m sure that shady tactic isn’t written into regulation, but that’s how it often operates regardless). They provided numerous false decoy reasons as to why they “require ID” but then gave in when he revealed he was informed on the state laws re. cashing out threshold. You’re simply naive enough to think these organisations all operate within the strictures of law when it’s evidenced they test those boundaries where they feel there is ignorance on the other side… You’re seriously claiming that the House routinely, if not always, intervenes with those who have a “slight gambling issue”? I mean, that is really comically naïve.