This feature from ITV's This Morning programme dates from the early 1990's and features an early TV appearance from James Dyson, showing off his first bagless vacuum cleaner.
Fast forward nearly 30 years later and he’s got £9.5billion, won numerous design awards, invented bladeless fans, air purifiers, hair dryers. Next for him is the ELECTRIC CAR.
I think it was an intentional reference to some Cosmopolitan thing. That aside, it looks like those two could have potential chemistry, just purely speculating though
Nope, it was in reference to Cosmopolitan magazine's earlier articles on the female g spot. Strange reference when comparing it to the interest garnered by a new design of vacuum, but deliberate nonetheless.
This was very interesting, thankyou! It was also kind of frustration how he makes out his cleaner was better when in reality it wasn't, the technology was, but the machines he produced were not. I don't understand why they put down the bagged system so much, I find it to be perfectly fine, unless you go sucking up icing sugar you don't loose enough suction to fault the performance. I noticed they said the bag is very clogged when 2/3 full, well Hoover reccomended you change it at that capacity.
yea my dad has a twenty year old one with HEPA filters(, "allergy" ) Still going strong with amazing suction and decent grooming but sadly I don't think the original Hoover brushrolls will ever be beaten on carpet grooming .
It was the Kleeneze Cyclon, then the G-Force, and then the DC01. Other notable dual cyclonic vacuums made during that period includes the Amway ClearTrak and the Fantom Domestic (basically a Thunder but with a white handle grip, white bumper, and clear bin)
+Numatic Collector DA01 was basically the DC01 before it got that designation. Kinda like there was the Fantom vacuum before they called it the Fantom Thunder.
+Numatic Collector What differences? I'm not being a smartass or anything; I genuinely don't know of any significant differences, except for the motors possibly being different.
Early Dysons had very weak suction because cyclone stole huge amount it. What people did not know is that bagged vacuums had way better suction. Even when the bag was very full they still had better suction than Dyson. This is true to this day and even more because bags are so good nowadays. Dyson is cool, but false advertisement.
Yes you’re right. I remember when Dyson cleaners were introduced with their no loss of suction claims, yet sometimes they had less than half the suction of a bagged machine.
