This Particle Breaks Time Symmetry 

"but inverted. You owe us a million dollars"

The other half is still fine... Because you destroyed half of physics.

I would prefer someone broke CPT symmetry instead of not, or leaving it uncertain. If we break it, it means our current theories will need to be changed, and as such we get a more accurate perception of the universe.

@@zacyquack Of course, breaking the symmetry isnt a choice. If it is possible to break, we can't just ignore it to preserve our current theories. We MUST understand the universe.

Well... 'you showed us, that a lot of assumptions about reality might be wrong and needs to get re-examined. Thanks a lot mate. Her's a medal and a coffer of money.' As it should be.

ohhhhh yes!!

Well, yes, and no.

That they are dead?

@The Monster Under Your Bed if Marie Curie was a renowned scientist before then, it makes sense that women were in physics

No, they should be very cool

Nah bro veritasium got the idea for this video from tenet. You just see it inverted

@@thefluffyrobot 🅿️e®️h🅰️🅿️s.

he even mentioned another Nolan movie, inception

No he didn't, but should make a movie about the mirror world!

@@SomenathGarai yes he mentioned inception

Some of his videos, like this one, I feel like he doesn't even understand what he's saying. Felt like he was just reading wiki definitions and giving their examples

@@gagemcmahon9485 Just type latest standard model of particle physics. You'll understand this video with ease 💯

Yay! Here we are!

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@@gagemcmahon9485 well he has a phd in physics so he definitely knows more stuff than some people

Women can never be ready on time!

Poor man got cucked by physic :v

Again? Remember the last time you tried doing that? I think the cat still has nightmares from being stuck in that box.

@@TheCrystalBlood What cat?

@@tyralexander He's referencing Schrodinger's Cat Experiment

I tried to not laught at that, but then I saw your comment and burst into laugther lmfao

I don't get it.

@@therandomcommentor6228 it's similar to the phrase "the party's over"

​@@nothayley if you actually pronounce that, then it becomes funny lol :D

It sounds like Doofenshmirtz talking

Ah feynman

Not bad except that nature is SO much more complicated than a chess player learning new moves. The way chess pieces move and the rules of chess are exponentially (and "exponentially" the biggest understatement of all time) easier to discover than nature.

​@@BladeRunner-td8be You could also make the same argument with glitches in video games. When Pokemon Red/Blue came out, I don't think anyone had any idea that you could just, somehow manage to scroll down past your inventory to find some strange item that executes your Pokemon data as code. But technically, it's still within the rules of the game's programming. Thus, I wonder if there are "glitches" in the very universe we live in.

@@benedani9580 A glitch is when a program doesn't behave in the intended way. If the universe has glitches, it would mean it doesn't behave in the intended way. What is the intended way?

I am the 70th like

GP: "how can that be?"... M2: "I don't know man, I didn't do it"

Get out

Ouch!...that was so bad it hurts! :-D

noooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!

whiz 85 im crying 😂

Yeah, they chill out often ;)

Bill Nye is a low temperature scientist

that's what I thought he meant but I looked it up and it's actually a field, as I suspected.

Bill Nye is a lie...biological binary genders-4-life. Idc how much money you throw at a real scientist, truth is truth and lies are lies.

maybe their body temperature lower than normal

@Merc E.Z. The science literally disagrees with you. Go do some googling. Nye didn't make up those claims off the top of his head, he's just basing his views off of the scientific work he's engaged with, the same he does with any other topic.

whats TENET?

@@iwbmo are you Patrick cuz you living under a rock

YES

Thanks for telling me about this movie

@@ulrikahaggard9923 this movie hasnt been released.....

Now, put it in the trashcan.

Gear multipliers and magnetically charging mercury

Maybe Black Mesa, That was a joke, Fat-chance, haha.

@@RohithCIS *that was a joke, haha, fat chance

*THROWS CANA ND RUNS*

Gareth Dean ahahah gareth that's been a lot of time without seeing you around

+

Hey dude. It's been a while. :)

The PBS Spacetime comment squad

+Vampyricon Lmao I guess

i mean every single scientist will be thankfull to you to have shown a path to a truther truth

@@captaineflowchapka5535 reminds me of the faster-than-light neutrinos "discovery" few years ago ... there were lots of interesting debates until they found it was just the systematic error it looks like all the low hanging fruit were already taken in physics

@@LiborTinka It’s probably better that we keep picking the lowest fruit, rather than pick the higher fruit and have no idea where the others are.

A truther truth 😂👍🏻

It won't really break any laws it would just mean that the same laws would have to be written again with considering the fact that cpt symmetry is not a thing which a lot of physist assumed back in the day while making these laws like Einstein. The symmetry only makes physics easier that's why it will be a hell a lot of work to complete all the theories of the past for unsymmetrical systems.

Interesting, how did you manage to type the comment then cuz you need a cursor for that. How do you see what you type?

@@yashaswikulshreshtha1588 I use dictation and I just talk back or voiceover based on the device it reads me things on the screen.

it must be soo interesting being blind i often fantasise about it! visible light is only one part of the energy spectrum anyway and can limit a person's perception of reality so i imagine eye blindness removes reality blindness lol. like when you think about it youre conscious of two dimensions at once because you interact with this physical dimension while perceiving it in a 4th dimension (imagination) at the same time. people without eye blindness only do this on occasion while you use it pretty much constantly so i'd assume are a master of it by this point!

@@theendisnai I don't recommend it lol. However I've learned to deal with it and there are some things that are better like understanding a person in the characteristic just by hearing them so you can look past there facade. Unfortunately I get discriminated quite a bit. I wasn't even allowed to finish my PhD because I lost my eyesight The school denied me even though I only had a year left.

@@actualRocketScientist I'm pretty sure you could sue

herrreinsch this gave me a chuckle. Thanks.

herrreinsch No need to mention it.

The resolution here is that, as it stands, we believe that if you mirrored something, flipped its charge, and reversed time, it would otherwise be experimentally indistinguishable from the point of view of the fundamental laws of physics. If this is not the case, it would seriously threaten the integrity of some major theories we use to this day to explain, on a fundamental level, the fundamental interactions of forces, [wave-]particles, and space-time.

Only rick and Morty fans can understand this

Joe Mama LMAO

His video violated Hair Direction Symmetry

but does it change direction in the same time forwards or backwards??

@@chasebh89 Nope, the part of the video where his hair is parted to the left is much longer than where his hair is parted to the right, meaning that you could notice a difference between the video being played forwards or backwards. Q.E.D., his hair violates Hair Direction + Time Symmetry.

@@_modernmage one more step in figuring out whether his hair proves we live in a mirror universe

His collar stripe also flips

An Asian and a woman, not a good mix in racist male supremacist world of 60s. They would feel ashamed if they gave a prize to a non European or a woman.

@@l1mbo69 the two other guys got the noble for it. Not her. She got Wolf prize 20 years after this discovery.

@@kingp1n817 They gave the prize to two non-europeans, but not to the woman who deserved it.

@@BaalTomekk Yeah, they were really scared of women I guess

She absolutely deserved it...they should award it posthumously (they should amend their rules to allow posthumous awards).

me to brain stretched

and a great salesman, I want to buy most of the things he is sponsored

😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

the letters are backwards but in forwards order. "!niɒǫɒ ƚi ɘnob ɘv'uoy ,oɘbiv ǫninɘpo-ɘyɘ ylɘluloƨdA"

How quaint. :-) Anyone got a mirror?

close your left hand

Jonathan Newsome how you guys type these texts???

As with many laws, there can be multiple interpretations.

@Ryan Vigus i think you missed the point he was making. He wasn't doubting the validity of physicists and the laws they discover. He was just criticising the use of terminology such as "it broke this law of physics", inputting that it's more accurate to say "we misinterpreted this law of physics" because no law of physics can actually be broken

@@MrFlameRad You are mistaken in believing that there are any laws at all

Doesn't it bother you that he talks about that as if a particle had destroyed a laboratory and killed thousands of people. Really, this things happens from time to time, it's no big deal. And he repeats the same thing lots of time in a very fast speed and in the most complicated manner he can to make it sound more complex.

That is GOLDEN speach there

@@Handsome_Thanos it has a mass number of 42, which is between those of calcium and scandium :)

@@angelinephilo2005 wait... the modern periodic table isnt based on mass number but atomic number.

@@utsgotnoguts that's true but i was trying to think of the logic behind the original comment actually it may be that veritasium has an atomic number of i (imaginary unit) and mass number of 42.0

@@angelinephilo2005 what would an imaginary atomic number look like?

@@j.hawkins8779 maybe having a proton with negative mass

You have the entirety of human knowledge at your fingertips. Learn about it Edit: yeah i definitely came off as more arrogant here than intended y'all, sorry for that. I must've been in a mood. To be clear, all i meant is that anyone with internet access has the means to learn just about anything they could think of. Historically, access to knowledge has been a resource of only a few, so we're beyond privileged to have that access now. As for the grammar, i mean, i tend to fat finger everything i type so idk what to tell y'all about that.

@@Boog1137 no u

500th like 👍

Omg same!

@@Boog1137 Which includes social skills, just saying.

Add Lisa Meitner (nuclear fission) and Rosalind Franklin (DNA) who also made discoveries that their male colleagues were given more credit for AND received Nobel Prizes for

Honestly, and I say this unironically, most noble prize winners are somewhat undeserving of the prize anyway, as science is the sum of all of its parts, discoveries, changes and paradigm shifts. It's like Eurovision song festival winners, it's not a matter of the 'best song' winning. There is way more politics involved with these prizes as one might assume. Keep in mind Henri Poincare , Josiah Willard Gibbs (on par with someone like Lorentz ) , Ludwig Boltzmann , Wilhelm Sommerfield , Lise Meitner , Emmy Noether , Edwin Hubble , George Gamow , Robert Dicke , James E Peebles , Stephen Hawking etc. etc. never ever got a Noble Prize, despite being just as deserving of one, arguably more than any/some of the winners. Long story short, Nobel prizes themselves aren't that great of an indication of someone's true contribution to science. (It reminds me of how a lot of people who actually have a PhD in anything, aren't at all the people with the absolute highest IQs. In my mind this reveals how our scientific communities are broken when it comes to the potential progress, assuming intelligence itself plays a significant role.)

@@TheSecondVersion _"... Rosalind Franklin (DNA) who also made discoveries that their male colleagues were given more credit for AND received Nobel Prizes for[.]"_ By the time Watson, Crick, and Wilkins got their Nobel, Franklin was dead, and the Nobel rules do not allow posthumous awards.

@@TheSecondVersion On the bright side, most people agree since the 60s that she should have gotten the Nobel Prize as well, including being invited to a meeting of Nobel laureates and, something which is a much bigger accomplishment, Lise Meitner has an element named after her.

No Wu, Wu pissed on my rug.

Because the weak force may not be...

FAAAAAAAAAAAAKE

...is this just a bot?

aaay aaay not real

STOP IT FAKE VERITASIUM!

haha read it the same time and got jump scared

same

Veritasium you are fake

Don't click on those links, they're fake.

(and the javascript makes no sense)

Aadithyan Jr hilarious

Puntastic

And they give absolute zero f@*&s

this joke was close to being 0 K ... (i'll follow you out)

Temperature scientist jokes. So hot right now

And yet, Sheldon Cooper is being forced to take vacations.

Yunis Rajab i

Bagana Lmao, man

they need more. screw your superstitions.

Yunis Rajab yo

Nice. :)

And thus, having proven 'reverse emergence' is possible, the 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics has finally been broken!

Nothing more humbling than being bested by atomic particles... FML true for me too.

how about...revergence?

moises bessalle; That's actually really good, I like it a lot. :)

*It's called common sense*

OHHH SHIIIII that was fine!!

Whoa! That's really cute! Thanks for pointing it out.

Or maybe everything else was flipped

Just find his iron ring. Always on his right hand.

I cast "Disbelieve Reality"!

Indeed. I'm very disappointed in Veritasium for this omission.

I dont think its fair to judge Veritasium for this, considering that he did give her credit, it was the past people who didnt give her credit, he is respecting and giving her credit which is exactly what should have happened in the first place.

mr mustache yes, it was people from the past whom didn’t give Chinen-Shiung Wu the Nobel Peace Prize because women weren’t taken as seriously back then. Hedy Lamarr is another one of these women that comes to mind... However, if Veritasium wanted to truly Honor Chinen-Shiung Wu, when bringing up the significant impact of her discovery to be able to win the Nobel Peace Prize, he then SHOULD have AT LEAST mentioned that she wasn’t even the recipient w/no credit given to her back then. Instead, he left it pretty ambiguous, letting everyone assume or THINK that History was all fine and dandy with a healthy respect towards Women or Minority Scholars. Unfortunately, that isn’t so. Things like this NEEDS to be mentioned. If not, we will never learn from our past mistakes and never will think to ask, who else have we not given the proper recognition for their major scientific discoveries? What other major scientific breakthroughs would we ALREADY would have known if we didn’t just blatantly dismiss a scientist/inventor/Scholar? All just because they happened to be a woman... Again, look at Hedy Lamarr or Joan Curran! But to be fair to me, I DID say that despite my criticism, Veritasium did a really well put-together presentation with a production quality that can rival major TV Studios! 😁👍

Its just a prize mate. Im sure what mattered to her is the expanded collective knowledge we have about the universe.

Erick Lujan the Nobel Prize is not the point mate. Her not getting the proper recognition and validation by the Scientific Community at the time is! Sure, there are now videos about Chien-Shiung Wu so we can NOW know about her and what she did for Science. However, when talking about her or other Women in Science, we should also point out that those considered to be the Scientific Authorities have had a VERY long History (even happens today) of not recognizing, completely dismissing, and/or over even outright taking credit for Scientific discoveries or breakthrough made by Women and Minorities. IMAGINE how FAR ahead with WiFi Technology we would be if the Military and Scientists took Hedy Lamarr seriously? Instead, they all just thought of her as their era’s THOT and brushed her aside.... Could you imagine if she or other female Scientists was instead encouraged to come up with more ideas and discoveries? I’m pretty sure our advancement in Science and Technology would be that much faster! If we don’t call it out these injustices in Science or any other fields, then no one knows it’s a problem (again, even in some cases today), that definitely NEEDS to be fixed. If we don’t, you know the saying, “Silence ensures History repeats itself.” ~Erin Gruwell I highly suggest checking this article from the Smithsonian Magazine about Women In Science to begin get an understanding why this is a problem. You’d be surprised to learn how many Women were written out of Science history! www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/unheralded-women-scientists-finally-getting-their-due-180973082/

Uroš Sedmak bravo

Wu and her students showed weak force breaks parity Time and charge have to balance for symmetry So you won't know-oh-oh if you're in the mirror world, oh, oh, That's why it's a mirror world

if only the mainstream radio got flooded with science lyrics lol

+Uros Sedmak. Ha Ha, that's a good one...

Then 1D didn't break up, they're just increasing their entropy

I want a holo-deck and teleportation. :-)

Chaos is a ladder

Lord Waluigi he’s not an animal (in ‘spirit animal’ context). He’s a person with a similar ideology to yours.

Chaos is a ladder :)

bruh.....AT THIS POINT IMMA QUOTE "vision" "I'm saying there may be a causality. Our very strength invites challenge. Challenge incites conflict. And conflict... breeds catastrophe."

I appreciate you for sharing your knowledge

It means the "reality" is not what you think it is. Our basic assumptions are wrong :)

MeowAlien にゃあエイリアン Mirror you don't understand the other half. That means zero understanding.

mooe20 pretty sure it misunderstood the video more than they did

I like watching these videos while high and his red eyes really fit in :)

Yea basically is like saying that your image in the mirror turns on the same direction than you instead of the oposite, is just something that was not supposed to happen and it would challenge you your conseption of of the world or at least about how mirrors work

TheGinginator14 DORMAMMU! I’ve come to bargain.

DORMMAMU I'M COME TO BARGAIN

Eggnog Trashed "What is this, what is happening?!?"

Coincidentally, there is a Dr. Strange that teaches biology at my university.

You're thinking of choas. Two different ideas. Edit: I was mistaken.

The mess of RU-vid comments only increases over time. Ami rite

+Minick64 complexity arises before for it ultimately collapses into an state of activity-death.

Dr.StickFigure You are back

Mininick64 the longer you leave these comments, the more disorder you create. Chaos aside.

Isn't that scam?

Dead as Dreams and is a nazi

Yes but this was not known until the 60's.

Totally a white president Proof that sound effects break time symmetry.

yeah, it spooked me

Then why don’t you test them? (genuinely)

Violating CT (under CPT invariance) is the same as violating P which, as Derek explained, has already been observed. Similarly, violating PT is equivalent to violating C, which happens in the weak nuclear force too

ya and your god is absolutely right/correct

EXACTLY

A R G O N Λ U T I'm fairly certain Corkas_ was saying that was an advantage.

Careful there Argonaut, you almost dropped your fedora. Science is not the body of knowledge, science is a process for testing ideas. At least when conducted honestly. It is when a hypothesis that is expected to come true (for all the body of knowledge would put forward) but does not, as is presented in this video, that the value of science becomes strongest. Unfortunately, when science is not done honestly, we have experiments repeated until the hypothesis is confirmed, and then that data set alone being published. Regardless of how many times it took.

I don't think that's quite right. The essence of Science is knowledge, in the sense of knowing what is and what isn't, or the difference between fact and fiction. Science is more like a tool. If it produces the "wrong answer" it's human error, like how the scientists in the video keep trying to save their preconceptions instead of genuinely trying to understand. It's why I hate things like theories. They look to me more like people trying to force their ideas onto the universe instead of searching for truth. And that kind of human arrogance is why we have the dogmatic pseudo-religion of "because science," and why education tries to indoctrinate children into believing things that aren't proven instead of focusing solely on what we know. I think it ultimately dilutes science over time. edit: Kind of like what firebornliger said, yea. I was just replying to OP, sorry.

All fundamental physics have conditions that time , charge is symmetric throughout universe

All conservation laws depend on symmetries. For example in special relativity, the reason why an object with no resultant force acting on it has a constant velocity, is because the universe shouldn't care about where we set the origin of the 4D coordinate grid (metric) we use to map the objects motion (Lorentz invariance), and as such nothing should change - the conservation of (four) momentum depends on this being true. Since the frame of reference we choose to define as absolute rest (for say an experiment) is arbitrary, the laws of physics (the equations we use) must be invariant under changes in the velocity of our reference frame. Thus your 4D velocity is constant (c). So special relativity depends on CPT symmetry for its axioms to be valid (so that there is a way to reverse time and the laws of physics upholding). It also turns out that quantum mechanics depends on this being true for bosons and fermions to be distinguished, but at a fundamental level CPT violation would destroy basic assumptions like that the universe doesn't care about which charges are positive and negative - which if true means that charge is not fundamental, or even that the assumption that forces are definable by symmetries is not valid (which basically all physical theories assume).

@@V1ND1E Would violation of CPT violate the equivalence principle too?

Meh, high school physics is terribly taught and presented. It's extremely difficult to do well on high school physics exams using just high school knowledge, because they make the matter unnecessarily complicated. Undergrad physics covers most of the same material generally, but does it in a much better way. If you have the calculus, the Feynman Lectures are perfect for this, and are available online. Else, you could always get a freshman non-calculus textbook.

I had a perfect score in high school physics, doesn't mean I remember much after all these years. So if you want to know what is going on today your best bet is to learn it today.

Me too.

@veritasium plz reply your opinion

damn thats actually deep tho

Everything's relative after all, lol...

The 'right hand rule' you learned is actually a handy way to explain _pseudovectors_ to people: see, the 'spin' in the vid has basically the same behavior of a vector *L* = *r* x m *v* , with *r* the position (say of a point particle, for simplicity) and *v* just the velocity d/dt ( *r* ); as you put *L* in front of a 'mirror' (i.e., change _vectors_ *V* by - *V* ), both *r* _and_ *v* swap sign, so *L* - or spin - doesn't change sign at all!

As +thstroyur pointed out, the right hand rule is always related to pseudovectors. A good way to think about this is that pseudovectors require a sign convention. They're like vectors in the sense that the have both a magnitude and a directional axis; but, they're unlike vectors in that there's nothing intrinsic that picks an orientation along that axis. However, the _relative_ orientation of pseudovectors is meaningful; so, it's useful to create a convention by which we can just assign orientations in a self-consistent way. And, that's what the right hand rule does. Everything would work just as well if we chose the left hand rule convention and applied it universally; but, we didn't.

Ah! So it's sort of like how we arbitrarily assign "i" and "-i" (the positive/negative direction along the imaginary axis), in that if we replaced every instance of one with the other (conjugating everything) nothing would break. Or how we always draw circles determined by (cos(theta), sin(theta)) in the counterclockwise direction simply because of how we orient the axes on our paper.

Not too related to your comment but it reminded me of a funny moment in hs. We were learning about the right hand rule in class and one of my friend raised his hand and asked the teacher "what if you are left handed?" Man... the amount of face palms that day xD Can never forget that moment LMAO

XD Not really; they knew where the spin was pointing (say 'up') - then all they had to do was measure if there was an excess of particles coming upwards or backwards, boom! P was broken

Rickard Rocks was w

mirror world makes the better doughnut holes, ironically enough

whats the mirror world? how do you know itll act differently there?

The joke Your head

Thank You.

because this is actually hell and you are supposed to suffer. same deal with usb ports

@@nathan5160 No, that is not correct. You can't "flip" the charge of a device, even with alternating current. The electricity still has the same movement relative to charge. Electricity is the movement of electrons. Electrons cannot be positive. Charge parity means that if metals had free protons which moved like electrons, you could recreate any electrical device utilizing the same phenomena with opposite, positive charge.

@@onetwothree4148 flipping all charges means making electrons positrons, and protons antiprotons, etc. So we cant physically flip the charges no. But we expect it to work the same way even if charges /were/ flipped. of course because charge by itself isnt a real symmetry of the universe theres no saying what would really happen.

@@DDvargas123 actually opposite charge would not be a positron. The difference between electrons and positrons is more complicated than that, and that's not really what charge parity is about.

Janko Dedic why?

Janko Dedic Break the laws of physics with these simple steps. Click here to know how.

"Simple"

7 things he showed scientists shocked them. You won't believe the 4th one.

Before anyone does anything silly the Veritasium in this comment thread is an identity thief.

the concept comes down to parity, and how the universe is not as symmetrical as we once thought; in regards to the parity of time, you can tell whether we're moving backwards or forwards through time (thus violating parity of time) through the interactions of the quarks in the strong force, since this interaction takes longer to occur in one direction through time rather than another. Apply this asymmetry to the other forms of parity in the video and voila you have the general conception of the topic at hand.

Try pbs spacetime videos.

summery: *summery* is ACTUALLY spelt 'summary' England is you city huh?

oh thats just typo

India

It also doesn't really refers to order, but to the distribution of heat. A gas that freezes becomes a perfectly ordered crystal, but in doing so it releases heat that can't be stopped.

Actually, I have run particle simulations myself where the entropy decreases momentarily. What you mean is that the entropy *on average* does not decrease.

^or the entropy of the universe does not decrease.

Nope, as I said; particles in a simulation are in their own little universe and the total entropy can be seen to decrease momentarily. It is the average entropy which does not decrease, and that's only if you define "average" properly.

Damian Reloaded Please don't. I only recently had a very similar discussion. "Order" in relation to entropy has a very particular meaning. Entropy characterizes, in essence, probability distribution of microstates given a particular macrostate. To anyone familiar with information theory, this should be very intuitive. To everyone else, not so much. Entropy does not describe distribution of heat in any way, the usual picture shown is just somewhat misleading.

I was wondering this myself, as he didn't specifically say she won it. So I looked it up, and yep, 2 colleagues of her's received it. Very unfair, but for 1957 it's what you'd expect.

It wasn't because of racism and she did recieve the wolf prize for her contributions. You should read up on the story.

Harr darr I was not implying racism. That Nobel Prize was given to the other two Chinese scientists after all. But Wu deserved it.

Probably, but the story is much more complicated than just "she deserved it", she was no doubt considered for it, after all she did get the wolf prize.

Sexism not racism, Marie barely got her prize as well

This is a misnomer, spin. Torsion is a better and more accurate term, but the analogy still stands when torsion is used instead, so it doesn't matter to the video.

Idiot

To clarify, torsion is the name of the spacetime geometric topology, associated with curvature, that describes physics in a popular unified field theory (replacing General Relativity).

@@ThoughtsofMlne Everything is based on geometry, ultimately, in a proper UFT. Therefore, as long as you can show an association between physics and geometry, you are on stable theoretical ground. I can't answer your question in this tiny space, but you can go to upitec.org and take in the actual papers that describe the UFT. In short, classical physics is too restrictive in what is allowed, and some think this is by ignorance or conspiracy. Be that as it may, a lot of new predictions, some which have already been examined and borne out by experiments, will require the classically trained mind to expand to be open to the new possibilities. Enjoy!

The direction of the spin is shown by an arrow not the spinning object itself

jk lol

SAD moment.