Hit me up on social media! ► Buy me a coffee: www.paypal.me/... ► Email: ringwaymanchester@mail.com ► Instagram: / m3hhyofficial ► Facebook: / m3hhy ► Twitter: / officialm3hhy
Another point of information, this time from a prctical point of view, is that the signal is all quite deeply woven into the interlocking of the signal box controlling the line and former junction. Re-arrangeing the interlocking is a safety critical task and not a trivial one. The reason it remains lit is the lamp proving and how lamp proving is interlocked with the previous signal in the direction of travel. If the signal is unlit, the lamp proving interlocking forces the previous signal to danger. It is a better option simply to replace a blown lamp every so often than to get close up and personal with all the interlocking to remove it permanently.
There would, of course, be the option to replace the lamp with a resistor that would maintain the lamp proving, without having the signal lit. If it's never going to be pulled off, then I would have thought that would solve any problem. Of course, being railway, it's probably not that simple!
@@gharwood1356 if its a standard BR lamp it has two filaments for failure, and each one is differently rated due to the fault circuit. So its just as easy to leave the lamp lite for every and a day. This not the only place on Network Rail where signals just stand there guarding a single line that may never see a train again.
@@gharwood1356 not only is it "not that simple" being the railway, but making that signal and junction interlock different from others will just mean that the unions demand extra pay simply because "it's different". Any slight change on the railway and the unions are up in arms. That is one of the reasons that parts of the railway still operate like its 1970 and are very resistant to change. No wonder other country's are far ahead if us in terms of railway.
As a signaling engineer it can be just that easy... I have put in a few resistors to substitute for signals to the interlocking until it can be changed... Although those are normally in place for a few months only as part of a series of stages leading up to an alteration to the interlocking
@@underwaterdick Bullshit. "No wonder other country's are far ahead if us in terms of railway." That because they invest in railways, fuck all to do with unions.
Just a correction. That signal was in use less than 30 yrs ago. Trains from the waste recycling operation at Sharston that needed to go in the Stockport direction would first run down in the Altrincham direction and into the loop just before Skelton Jct. The loco would uncouple come off the loop, onto the main line for a few yards, and then onto the 'disused' Warrington line and stop just beyond that signal and wait for the green. It would run wrong line on the main line to the other end of the loop, reverse in and couple up again. It would then either reverse it's train out of the loop and over the crossover onto the right line for Stockport direction or out of the loop and run wrong line back to Sharston where there is a crossover next to the signal box at Longley Lane.
I agree. A silent sentry looking into the dark thick trees of the old abandoned railroad corridor. As it dutifully guards its switch. It's a lonely task that it never fails.
The reason this one is maintained is simply because there exists a viable physical connection from the main route and considered not acceptable to just clip and padlock the points and then block out the signal relay at the signal itself. Notice the catch points that protect the main route as well, those would be interlocked with the signal itself and I bet the motors for that are maintained too.
Fantastic seeing the old line. In 74 I worked at Timperly station as a young boy on the platform. I got friendly with the signal man in the Skelton junction box and spent many happy hours working the box with him. God forbid theses days but in between trains he’d go into the Moss Trooper pub for a pint 🙄 Shame it all got closed down 😫
It's... Probably for the best that the people staffing critical safety infrastructure _are not_ permitted to pop out down the pub for a pint. Especially since they tend to draw _Nice_ wages and have noteworthy amounts of trust and responsibility placed in their hands. I don't think that insisting they remain sober and at their posts for the duration of their shifts is an unreasonable ask.
Comments are gold. Wherever there's a railway video there's 100 experts on the minutiae of that line's history down to a resolution of about a half inch.
There’s hundreds of signals like this on the network. I’ve seen signals still illuminated when trees have grown up and around the line, up and beyond 6ft tall. There’s quite a few round Carlisle and in the Midland region. It’s a shame that a lot of the ripped up railways weren’t left in a mothballed state like this one was.
@@EM-yk1dw why? There was never any prospect of those lines reopening. Mothballing redundant railways is a waste of money when the land can be repurposed for other uses (roads, housing, industrial estates etc).
@@richardharrold9736 once you repurpose it, you can’t take it back. They might not be used RIGHT NOW, but there’s so many lines across the country that they wish they could reopen now. Shame they were short sighted and put a housing estate on it. Instead, we’ll pay several billion to build HS2, instead of reinstate and rebuild the GCR (for example), which would’ve been much quicker and cheaper than rising bill for HS2. Suddenly the cost of maintaining a few bridges on a disused/disconnected railway for a couple of decades doesn’t seem so bad.
@@LongStripeyScarf GCR was one route that should have been kept open, but it wouldn't have affected the business case for or against HS2 for the simple reason that it took a very indirect route to Manchester and didn't go anywhere near Birmingham. The need for capacity is through the West Midlands, not in the East Midlands where the MML is quite adequate. I was talking, in any case, less of major trunk routes like the GCR and more about the slow, winding rural routes in places like where I live (West Devon, near the Cornish border), which had no prospect of ever being reopened. The Okehampton-Bere Alston route is the only one where there could ever have been an argument for keeping it, but to reinstate it through Tavistock would take a lot of demolition, including of West Devon Council HQ. It will never happen. As for lines like Ilfracombe, Torrington, Bude and Padstow? Forget it. Laughable. Those lines never made a penny's profit in their entire existence, and now the roads are so much improved that there is no economic case for railways in this area, even if the formations hadn't been significantly redeveloped (as they have in Barnstaple, Ilfracombe, Holsworthy, Launceston etc). The remaining structures (bridges, viaducts, tunnels) are mostly in an extremely poor state - Meldon viaduct needs replacing before it can carry anything heavier than bicycles, the viaduct just outside Holsworthy is falling to bits, the Taw Bridge at Barnstaple had to be demolished and several other girder bridges in the area are in an unsafe condition, the Tavistock viaduct would also need extensive work before it could carry trains again... and even once you've done all this, you're left with a restricted loading gauge, tight curves restricting speeds, and routes which never made sense even in period (e.g. why did Okehampton to Launceston go all the way up round via Halwill?!) and mostly inconveniently sited stations miles out of town (Okehampton being one of the worst offenders in this regard, Ilfracombe and Lynton also suffered the same). Ilfracombe Station site is now one of the UK's largest vaccine production facilities, and they've invested a lot of money in jobs and equipment there over the last year. The Chancellor visited it just the other week. There is zero chance of that site ever being made available for railway use again. It's the same story with the south-east too, Sussex in particular was criss-crossed by far too many badly planned railways that never served any useful purpose in reality - the Cranleigh and Shoreham lines, the Bluebell, the Lavender line, the Cuckoo Line... charming bucolic byways, sure, but there remains zero justification for reinstating any of them. All now have housing developments on parts of the route, plus some roads, and that is by far a more worthwhile use of the land. Anyway, thanks to Covid, passenger numbers have crashed, and working from home is here to stay. I would NOT be surprised to see further railway closures - Salisbury to Exeter would be an obvious casualty, it's only single-track, three-coach trains, and mostly duplicates the GWML. If you actually want to travel between the two cities, you can do so via Westbury. For those commuting between Exeter and London, the GWML via Newbury does it better and faster.
In Cheltenham, a Melbourne suburb, the freight siding was converted into a car park and it was landscaped. In the middle of a garden of native shrubs was a dwarf signal showing a red light. I wished I’d taken a photo.
We've got one like that round here. The signal controlling (or more like prohibiting) access to the Weymouth Quay branch still glows red, as it has done since 1987.
There are a quite a few signals like this on the national rail network. Unless a branch is officially closed, the junction to the active line has to protected by a signal, even if it hasn't seen a train in decades. As for the Glazebrook line, it would probably still be open if the Cadishead viaduct wasn't in such a state, they would have to spend millions to replace it.
No, a signal in this situation does not always have to be maintained lit. If the trap points are secured (or better yet, two lengths of rails are removed) then the signal can be powered down. But as all the rails to the junction are present, I suspect that part of the line is used for on tracking road/rail machines.
And it isn't even a British thing. I personally know similar signals in Austria, Germany and Italy. @Mark 1024MAK: some of those are/were on definitely unused tracks. One even stands at a location where the track had already been removed (coordinates 48.73759, 15.38296 if you like to google it, the railway has been converted to a cycle path) and will remain there until they upgrade the responsible signalbox. And that's the actual reason: it's too much hassle to change (and re-certificate!) all the interlocking in the signalbox. It's much easier (and cheaper) to replace a blown lamp every now and then (if lit constantly those lamps basically last forever).
@@stephanweinberger - Yes, I know of a shunting signal that is still connected up and lit and maintained, even though the track on the approach to it has been lifted. Hence no train can get to it. However, it’s an LED type not a tungsten filament lamp type. If a signal is no longer required lit, if it uses a relay for lamp proving, you just strap a ‘stage’ wire across the appropriate relay contacts. If the signal is fed from an electronic computer based module, you connect a suitable load resistor across the appropriate terminals. If lamp proving is not essential, you don’t even need to do either of these things. U.K. tungsten filament lamp types for main aspect signals have a lifespan of 1000 hours for a standard signal lamp, or 8000 hours for a long life type. So they will blow eventually. LED type obviously don’t need changing for at least ten years.
@@Mark1024MAK what exactly would be the advantage of replacing the lamp with a resistor? You still have the power draw plus you have to do the work (and possibly a re-certification). Plus you end up with a non-standard installation. Also: the lifetimes are in operation, where the lamp is switched off and on (which is the moment were lamps usually fail) regularly. When it's lit constantly it usually lasts way longer.
This 'peg' was used in conjunction with the Skelton loop for run-round moves. Pretty sure I did a run-round there with a failed 66 off the Northenden bins in about '00 or '01. Also run-rounds were performed with traffic ex-Northenden Blue Circle cement plant. As far as I'm aware, the spur of the old branch was never declared closed , it's future was always, it seemed, being debated. So it looks like it's status quo since I retired in 2018. And yes, to alter the current signalling and interlocking just to remove the signal would be a biggie. There are other similar signals, but memory is not what it was , so it hurts me head to try and recall 'em ! Happy days working over the Partington branch to Glazebrook and Partington power station , and to Arpley and Fiddlers Ferry , Widnes,Garsto n , Ditton and others back in the day. Better times then.Great evocative vlog.
Here in the USA and I imagine it's similar there in the UK. As long as there is a physical connection to the main line like here. In this case a track switch. There must be working signals to protect the line. Per FRA regulations. My guess is that the line is now being used as a siding for the Maintenance of Way equipment of the Section Gang in that Subdivision. It looks like the Signal Maintainer put in a LED lamp. Because of the way it was flickering with the camera shutter speed.
There is an odd amount of strange signaling around the world. Here in the USA, specifically Atlanta, the beltline bike trail has a brand new signal that is currently lit and operational that protects a would be wye the bike trail now stands on. It is still in the track diagram so has to be signaled.
The stacks of rails and the level section suggests this location could be used for engineering trains and or road/rail engineering equipment as part of maintenance work. If so the connection to the main line would need to be maintained and the connection protected in all directions.
Another example I've seen of a permanently red railway signal was in Weymouth, Dorset. The line that ran through to the Quayside, along public streets, to a station called Weymouth Quay. In a DVD released in 2012, Video 125 briefly talked about the branch that was sometimes nicknamed "the Weymouth Tramway," "Just discernable amongst the undergrowth is a disused railway. A long closed level crossing and permanently red coloured light signal are the remains of the Weymouth Tramway, in fact the old Weymouth Quay branch, which last saw a train in May 1999. Trains used to connect with ferries to France and the Channel Islands, the Boat Trains beIng hauled by Class 33 diesels at a mere walking pace. It's quite likely the branch will never see a train again." Sadly, the last part proved to be prophetic because in 2020/21, work was carried out to remove the tracks that ran through the streets of Weymouth to the Quayside
I seem to remember near Prestonpans there was a cut off line with a red signal active and an old fuel depot on the way to Weston Super Mare past Bristol had a cut off link but still active signalling. I remember the two signals on the down ramp of the Bricklayer's Arms branch, the exit to main line signal remained operative at London Bridge as well as the signal down in what became an industrial unit where the track had disappeared under mud and tarmac and the signal vandalised mercilessly and yet the S&T would faithfully wander down and repair up the lone signal and kept the main line points and motor/signal on the ramp perfect running order. One of the reasons was the SR were interested into turning the old branch into stock sidings having lost the New Cross Gate stables but decided to put it elsewhere so the Bricklayer's was finally lifted, the land flogged off and the two signals disappeared almost as quickly as the old signal box down there.
Thanks for sharing this video. The National Library of Scotland has online maps of the UK showing how things looked going back through many decades. Their OS Six Inch, 1888-1913 map has all the stations, junctions and lines that are mentioned in this video. The desired map is selected using a pop-up window on the main map.
3:42 blinking light music is great, but so is the wonderful tour of the rail. The visual tours are always nice, even when folks really don't understand radios, antennae and other esoteric things.
Fond memories of watching steam trains there as a kid when there was a steady stream of trains taking the Warrington line. The loop on the other side of the bridge was available for use in the mid 2000s as it was used for some steam specials run from Altrincham to Chester although this now seams to be abandoned as well
This looks like exactly the type of place that my friends and I would play around as kids. You cover some fascinating topics and I enjoy your stock footage!
I was going to think it was still lit due to some weird law. Where I am in the US, there are a few level crossings I know of where the track has been torn up on both sides of the road, the rails in the road remain for whatever reason (usually it's a busy road and removing and repaving it takes time and money). Nevertheless, they still have to be marked as active crossings. They'll mark them with just the bare minimum (Just a crossbuck, no lights, gates, etc) but vehicles that need to stop at all railroad crossings (IE, school busses) still need to stop there.
Here in Trenton NJ we have a signal on a branch line downtown that has been disused for 20 years. The branch will eventually become part of the light rail as soon as the politicians can figure out a kickback scheme.
I think DR 205/25 in Weymouth has been the same for 22 years. It's the signal for the old tramway line through the outskirts of the town, which led from the mainline to the quayside and the ferries.
Thanks for this; I never tire of hearing about this legendary place,the nerve centre of the Cheshire Lines Network. As I've mentioned elsewhere, a cab ride from here to Partington was filed on a railtour in 1991 and was published on a VHS tape: 'The Manchester Circular' as one of Tony Cooke's 'North West Cab Rides' which may still be found.
A very eerie sensation that I'm getting from this. The light is signalling to nobody, yet it's still on. You don't expect it to work, but it still does. It's a little liminal in this aspect- There is nothing to stop here, nobody will ever drive their train down these tracks, yet this light still glows.
There is one at cannock mid junction on the chase line in the west midlands that was only put in a few years ago (its LED) and has never seen a train and is unlikely to do so in the near future. Its protecting the main line from a line to nowhere into the Pantelever container terminal. There is no track in rear of the signal The signal and all interlocking etc is in place already it will make it much cheaper to open the yard to rail traffic in the future should it be required
Is this the line from Lichfield ? Was wondering about this on my way back to Burton along the A5 where the line passes an old quarry at chasetown ! There's also a bridge to nowhere over the toll road on the opposite side !
@@johnwalker194 thats a closed line that used to go from lichfield south to where the sutton park line leaves the chase line just north of walsall (Ryecroft junction). Theres a bit of a stub at lichfield of that line called anglesey siding but not used anymore and a steel fence across the track
Despite being a disused branch, it is still connected with the main line. Hence, that signal is still being used to protect that junction point, just in case!
Perhaps if British Rail had adopted the policy of letting lines 'sleep' in the 1960s, we could have revived a number of routes that we are in desperate need of today.
I envy the people who managed to access the track itself. After watching this, I had to see the signal for myself, as I recently moved to Whalley Range. Nothing up close, but I got a shot of it from behind the fences. Very interesting find. If you're a local, have you seen the abandoned gantry at Hadfield for the old Woodhead Line? It's a bit dangerous to access without going beyond the platform, and despite being almost completely hidden by vegetation, it's still there after over 41 years since it last saw a train go past. See for yourself.
In the USAQ, there are many closed closed factories that had rail service. When there is still a switch from the active track its flag and light are maintained even though the operating motor or hand leaver are removed. A few of these are equipped with an active motor or hand leaver when they have a length of a 100 feet or so behind them that could be used as a set-out for Maintence Of WAY CREW OR DISABLED CARS.
The fact there is a large space with a fair amount of neatly stacked rails and sleepers suggest it might still get used as a place to load PW trains for nearby work. It also has a section of track that's set up to Road/Rail Vehicles to go on and off the railway, and an access gate that is clearly still accessable to the ousdie world. Also the plate identifying the signal is *far* too clean for that signal to not get regular maintainence (or at least to have not recently had maintainence), so I suspect that, while the line clearly is unused pass that point, the signal itself and the track between it and the mainaline maywell not be as unused as you think
The feather, on the otherhand, deffinutly is out of use (seeing as both routes are not in a usuable state) however, it's not unusual to leave no longer required feathers in place.
In ohio there is a Diamond where the Pennsy main crossed a B&O branch. The B&O is still used by CSX yet the PRR main to chicago was abandoned.. a dwarf position signal at the cross over just before the diamond is still lit in a clear position. A few position lights within the area are aswell. To cut them off would cost more than to leave them running
I grew up in a house just off to the left of the disused freight line.....I remember many 36/46's sitting there idling before heading off towards the bridge at Moss Lane. In fact, my next door neighbour's (now sadly deceased) dad used to work the signals etc many decades ago for Skelton Junction. I'd never seen the structure until today when I saw an old photo of it.....would've been able to see it out the rear bedroom window had it remained. Many a fond memory of the Black Bridge and walking over the Bridgewater on the way to Broadheath before access was rudely taken away!!
There’s a couple (well one now) on my routes. One by Windmill lane tunnel leaving Chester towards the racecourse. And then one, that’s very recently been reinstated at Penmaenmawr (PR19 I think). Both can be seen on the Holyhead video on the Don Coffey channel.
This is quite common even outside the UK. It's easier to leave the signal in place than alter the interlocking (and that may also require a formal close order for the branch, instead of just service suspended'). I've heard of a case where the mainline signals failed to all stop because the relay that controlled the branch failed. And it took ages for the signal electricians on-site to realise the system had failed due to the relay that drove the long removed signal was the actual fault. As some have suggested in this forum, they can just bridge out the signal lamp proving with appropriate resistors, but the logic is still there and logic relays can fail too.
Bridging out the lamp with a resistor will just make things more complicated (because non-standard). And the electricity bill will be exactly the same.
@@PottersVideos2 what? A lamp, or bridging it out with a resistor? I guess you could construct a case where a signal lamp (or resistor bridging it, which wouldn't make much difference in terms of temperature) could somehow cause a wildfire (e.g. some vine sneaking its way into the lamp housing, then drying out and catching on fire) - but the same could happen at any of the thousands of other signals in the country, which are also only visited by maintenance crew when a lamp dies. It doesn't seem to be a big problem in practice.
Having read through the comments I get that there are certain reasons why the light is kept on, but I see this and cannot help thinking that we keep being told not to leave our electronic devices on standby because of climate change! As for the video itself, it was very well put together. I especially liked the waste train passing through as there were two of these that passed through my home town of Bicester on a daily basis before the East-West Rail project started. Well done.
"Having read through the comments I get that there are certain reasons why the light is kept on, but I see this and cannot help thinking that we keep being told not to leave our electronic devices on standby because of climate change!" Here it's a matter of safety not negligence.
Leaving electronic devices on standby will not have any measurable effect on the climate. Some people are simply obsessed with controlling what everybody else does, and they do it through fear.
Similar setup at Selsdon on the old junction from the Oxted - Woodside Line. Passenger line closed 1983, freight continued until 1991ish. Ground signal with double red lights strongly illuminated. More complex to remove than leave in situ apparently. Very obvious from the passing trains.
I used to be a shunting engineer at Schaarbeek in Belgium. Underneath the Goods siding there used to be an industrial line wiggling its way into Vilvoorde, it must have been out of order ever since the 80's I suppose. Thick vegetation started growing into the tracks. forming what was basically a small forest with trees already 30 cm thick and the tracks running true them. somewhere, in the middle of that forest stood a simplified entry signal, still glowing its red light. It was a surreal sight when you drove your car by at night. somewhere in 2017, the signalling at Schaarbeek was digitalised and in one weekend, all lights where changed to leds. That is when they must have cut the cable. To this day i regret not taking a picture of that signal and its futile purpose.
Another 'LONG-LIT' signal - spotted in thick and thorny, almost impassable undergrowth - stood past the east end of Newton-le-Willows station, which I was surveying just a little over 20 years ago. This controlled the exit from the old, long-abandoned Motorail sidings (a car-loading ramp was located at the eastern extremity of the Manchester-bound platform). The same reason (the potential costs of a "rationalisation re-design" of the local signalling installation there made it cheaper to just maintain the status quo). However, within a dozen years of my visit, the site had been cleared and practically no traces remain visible).
Nice video. It looked for a bit like the light was a flickering lightbulb about to burn up but my guess is that it's an LED based lamp with some frequency based controls creating an interference pattern with the camera shutter
@@Detroit8V92tta Sorry mate, but it will! When I worked in a cinema, the optical sound tracks had to have smoothed DC lamps in the readers and the photocells had to be carefully screened against pickup of hum from the projection room lighting.
how is the lamp controlled? where is it obtaining the power? where are the signal switches that control the lamp? what type of lamp is it, and why has it continued to function and not burn out? These are but a few of the questions you could have answered...
Hi, here in the USA, there are combinations of signals and or tracks left operational or at least looking like in many parts of the country. I have an old branch line near me that is still considered in service even though it’s impossible to operate a train on it due to large sections of missing track. Also there are many crossing signals and gates missing or broken. Time will only tell if a train will ever operate on it again.
Despite what Network rail say it is perfectly legal to fly a drone that weighs less than 250g close tomor over an operational railway line. CAP722 is the appropriate document to refer to for the regulations.
Well, that 1 light bulb is a lot cheaper than driving a solitary loco down the tracks every week or two, which is what I've seen is necessary to keep a line "active" (though that was for a branch line running down the middle of a street.)
There's one like near Shirebrook and was on one of the Colliery branch's that joins and protects the mainline, the signal is still showing a red and is totally surrounded in trees.
Interesting little film. Shame to see a piece of railway line go into disuse. I can only think the line is officially kept open in case they want to run trains again in the future. Also I would imagine signalling technicians, or S&T as they are known, regularly keep up maintenance as the signal will be fitted with a first filament failure safety device whereby two filaments are fitted into the bulb and one fails the other comes into play, unless it’s an led. An alarm would sound in the Signalbox to alert the signaller of a filament failure.
When you mentioned the reason for not removing the line my first thought was is that why the line from Gillingham to Chatham docks still exists and has some network rail activity along with the warning signs for trains but then I remembered that the Chatham waters development plans never included a place for a station
BR was so pennyless they had to close entire rail lines to keep afloat, now they can't even afford to pull seven yards of track up and remove a switch? Wow.
There was a great little swamp in a badly drained area in the junction . I spend many happy hours there in the 1950s and '60s playing on rafts made of old wooden sleepers. It was a great place to catch newts. Now a highly protected species of course. I wonder if Skelly Junction still has a swamp area and if so do the newts still survive?. I hope so! Another great little swamp was in a corner caused where the Warrington line crossed the Bridgewater Canal at West Timperly next to where Timperly Brook was culverted under the canal. Another spot for happy hours getting water in my wellies!
government said 2 weeks ago that the Warrington to Stockport railway to reopen to Passengers, the full line went from Garston to warrington to timperley
I'm in the US, and I find this story somewhat spooky and interesting. I love stories and actual video footage of abandoned places and things. Would it be ever possible for you to get some video of this lit signal lamp at night? Either from the ground or directly head on with a drone? It is so spookily hypnotizing even during the daylight, but a nighttime ambience would be so much more. I truly would appreciate it if this task can be done. I will subscribe and check out your other videos, as well! Blessings from Texas!
I was on a railtour on leap year day (29/Feb/1992) that did Partington! I think we got the righthand feather on returning. There’s no ‘main route’ off that signal.