Doge Guy grow up mate, there’s 132k comments and I read about 3 but if you think I’m sad enough to scroll through and copy another comment then fine but I can assure you you’re wrong. Jealousy at its finest.
I'd imagine the views presented by the RU-vid API are what are also used to show end users. All of the view fudging and aggregation will happen in the background before it's presented anywhere.
I'm convinced that someone at RU-vid is a fan of Tom Scott and has been constantly lobbying to keep the API up to date so that this doesn't stop working years later.
I wrote some code for a company that no longer exists "Bankers Trust". Many years later I came across a small pocket of people I used to work with at BT and found that the remnants have been bought sold traded for around 13 years. At that moment I got introduced as the "Guy who wrote the zzz system". I was mostly shocked that they still had it running. It was written in vb4 using DCOM and MTS in the lat 90's. AFAIK it's still going.
i did not expect this video to make me feel hopeful and warm inside. thank you so much, i'll make sure to rewatch it in the future when i feel down. the concept of entropy is the closest thing to a divine entity to me, so hear that humanities' goal is to defeat it changed my brain chemistry in a happy and motivated sort of way. even if your code breaks eventually, thank you for making this video. it had value to me
It depends, you can give them the title if you give it before it updates. And does it matter? No. You can search “This video has views - Tom Scott”. Or send the link
I wonder if this is one of those videos where RU-vid themselves customized it to display a specific way? Like that Numberphile video about why RU-vid views stop at 301. And it seems like there's another one but I can't think of it off the top of my head.
I see 56,662,598 in title. 56,662,956 in description That is scarily accurate, especially since I have seen this video 17 times and it was right on the money the other 16. That program is really good.
It baffles me how seemingly no one seems to understand what Scott meant by saying that. The title is simply identical to the youtube's own viewcount, which doesn't keep track of views in real time, only every minute or so. Which means it isn't accurate, and therefore neither is the title.
I'm getting rather a lot of emails telling me that it's working (by my standards, miraculously well)! Which is great, thank you! -- but for the sake of my inbox: the code's also keeping logs for me, don't worry about it :)
I got it spot on after one single refresh! Guess it's more likely to get it right now that the video is years old and doesn't get as many concurrent views all the time.