Running a IPTV service is like running a drug game, if you shut down one there are 10 more ready to get in the game. Key word is affordability to the mass!!💯
Name one of the type of RU-vid channels that aren't. They all promote and get paid by clicks from their respective VPN sponsors. Ads are where the real money is and these types of sites profit from the ads. Which, btw, I have no problem with. They do a service, get paid by sponsors, and charge you nothing. Besides, you can easily circumvent the ads portion of a vid using FF and you can eliminate the embedded ads in a YT vid with the appropriate YT cloned app.
So the IPTV services expect the legal services to stay in Business so they can run an illegal service and pay no taxes on the money they take from Subscribers along with putting that money into another criminal enterprise.
@trixiek942Dang, that sucks. I got a 3 month sub first. Not only to test everything out, but also knowing the risks of paying for 12 months and them getting shut down. But even if I subbed for a year, it would still be way cheaper than what I would pay to ''legal'' providers for just one month.
I just don't think they can stop it, the genie out of the bottle was the internet, billions of billions of servers talking to each other, my last cable bill from direct TV was 245 dollars, never again.
it's theft, so we should all be happy it's shutdown... the less money the real companies get, the less money goes to our favorite shows and they get cancelled...
Check out our service! I think it might fit you, plus we're local (in FL) and English based with a real support team if you ever have questions/concerns.
huh those bootleg dvds back in the day was always hitting when you didn't have movie ticket money. And these cable and streaming services are never going to stop 3rd party services unless they outlaw vpns. And it's funny you mention UK because they do the most 3rd party streaming and haven't been slowed down at all not even a little bit. All these efforts are useless only way to combat it is dropping prices and stop all the hidden fees and tricks they have in service agreements to raise your bill without notification. 3rd party services are definitely winning the war it's a landslide lol lmao.
It's a pointless battle. I pay for an IPTV service which is solid. It is much less than paying for regular content and it has really good customer service. I agree with your thoughts on making content affordable. Great video UGT!
My Dad has IPTV It Has Netflix Amazon Prime Hulu And More In It He Is Happy With The Services And It Is A Great Service It Has Everything From Every Country
I cut off the cable company because for a few channels that I wanted to watch I was still at to be seventy eighty dollars Now I only pay 17 and I get to watch a unl 8:35 mited channels premium movie. And I do have v p n
1. I might not understand IPTV. I just figured TV over IP, which I what I also get from AT&T Fiber, every streaming device including a phone and computer. As far as VPN is concerned I have one, but that's so I can have an IP from that country when I'm contacting companies and people there so I don't get everything Americanized or shuttled to a site back in the US. I use it to be "in the US" when I'm away for the same reason. In fact, business websites won't even open if their clientele isn't from where you are at. When out of country, a dishwasher went out at home and I couldn't contact a store next to my home because the VPN endpoint was 286 miles away because that store doesn't have customers that far away. From US to Canada is the same situation. You are also advised to use one when traveling and using hot spots. 2. Next is content. Full-length TV shows have been on RU-vid for decades. Recently, they all turned to small snips. How could it be legal for decades and illegal now? Whose digital rights are we talking about here, the content creators or group banding together to restrict the content to promote their own business? There are lots of snip out there now from what was full length. How many of those videos that are being distributed today were downloaded a very long time ago? Windows 7-8.1 can read them all because it is approved. Windows 10 and newer cannot. Should the government then shut down RU-vid and make them pay restitution for being the source...for decades? No amount of boiler plate could shield them from what was so obvious. "Generally, copyright protection lasts for the length of the author's life plus another 70 years." It would be interesting to know if the royalties are actually being paid as well. 3. There are IPTV apps everywhere, including competing in the play store. Google tries to stop you from recording your own phone calls that every other entity has and can be used against you without your knowledge, but cannot have IPTV? It's an app built into my TV. I think anyone with a TV station that streams on the web an not going through a cable provider should sue for damages in a class action suit. 4. I agree that the people who made the content should be rewarded well. I'm sure they made plenty of users and IMO they are like sports figures. They have a more rare skill set and should get what the market will bear. The price is neither here nor there. Buy it or don't and there is a point where it generates more revenue at a lower price. HOWEVER, they need to de-monopolize the TV companies like they did energy providers. Comcast, Spectrum, AT&T, etc. might provide and maintain the infrastructure, but people must be able to buy per-channel. Then the channel owners are beholden to their viewers. Amazon, Apple, Google TV, Netflix, HuLu, Swing, add nauseam, all have a horse in this race as well, so you cannot trust them. 5. I don't want to deal in stolen goods but as things stand, unless it is a recent box office release, it's not obvious. How about watching it more than once from your DVR? You can't do that with a theater. Some things the authors want it distributed far and wide with no royalties. A lot of things need to be ironed out IMO. JAT
I think it works out great, since the beginning of downloading, they stop or block one site then 15 grow. So we'll soon have millions of IPTV services.
Simple quick question, do you know of all the streaming devices does any do RU-vid Music as an app, as per on your phone not mixed in with normal RU-vid. Thanks.
Thank you for yr information. Just wondering yr thoughts on Vsee pro 2. I have that and love it. Supposedly they pay for the rights of their content. I still have firestick less links I've noticed. Anyway yr right too expensive for crapy content and also to many option and you have to pay for each like hbo, Disney ect
You do a video like this right but here's the problem with this UGT. You do not do a video to explain how if you say to use a VPN app on say your Firestick then your IPTV doesn't work as the IPTV provider doesn't allow for you to share your subscription hence your IP address changes once the VPN directs traffic to another address which in turn blocks your subscription automatically as it can't distinguish VPN from say you sharing your username and password with someone else. This brings me to the second point if you decide to go the router route where you have a for example AX3000 Router the complications to installing Open VPN on it, you almost need to be an IT expert. Why not design these speed-style routers to have a simple username password for VPN activation instead of doing your brain in? Why don't we ever touch up on these points and make it clear what's your solution?
The two aren't even related. I take that you've never tried either or only one of them. A VPN is used to privately encrypt and tunnel your internet traffic through so that nobody can see what you're doing online. IPTV is a streaming media service where you can stream live television/movies and video on demand.
