Thousands of Never Seen Before Galaxies! The Latest James Webb Space Telescope Image Explained in 4K 

on 11th July 2022.

The most interesting project that I would like to see the James Webb Telescope do is to take the deepest image ever, then go to the exact opposite side of the sky, and see if any of the objects in the two deepest ever images actually overlapped, or possibly would be identical.

Better Late Than Never. 👍

Thanks! But please don't mix up 'the observable universe' with 'the age of the universe' and the 'time' of the Big Bang. The two ages are quite different things, and time and distance, as we experience them, have no meaning when you try to observe things which happened very close to the Big Bang.

@@TearyEyesAnderson i like the way you think... agreed I also would like that done.

That's what got me!!!😇

And there may be multiverses.

@@PaulWolfe1 according to Marvel......yes 👈😂😉

@@alexseta9117 and marvel took the idea from stephen hawking's theory

@@misterjack9991 yep. I've rread his book on this. I was just making a joke for those 'unread' out there.

Especially when said frame is the size of a grain of sand held at arm's length.

@@manuelsalinas5705 tf does that even mean, like ik nasa said it hut just sounds dumb

To imagine what forms of life, what trials and philosophies exist out there... It's overwhelming

GOD made space so vast man will never se it all and the earth and the heavens are a little over 6000 years old

@@janicebass5354 ~13.8 billion years old to be more precise

I am 71 & following right from the period it was started to design. I was very much worried whenever a delay happen & was doubting if at all can watch the first pictures during my lifetime. Now I am very happy. Now going to watch, if some exo planets can be located which support life 👍

Sixty years old here. Perfectly expressed sir.

Wow in which year did they start the project?

@@christianswamber2851 more than 20 years. Almost 25 i guess.

@Al 6r Good luck. I'd like to see it, too. I'm sure humans will eventually be on Mars, but until then, sending robots is safer. Might require a cold war of sorts, some sort of competition like we had with the moon.

Well you're a big part of It space time 😁

It's God's creation

@@yasser2768 True

@@yasser2768 Amen

Really not that big. Only about two or three trillion galaxies in the universe. Compare that to our national debt which is over 80 trillion dollars.

At least they showed us some pics from before it was hit by meteorites

@@jontait1095 The degradation in quality is too minuscule to notice. Hubble got absolutely pelted throughout it's life and it was fine for most of it.

Wow

@@FROEZOEN it's still going strong

no its NASA lying once again photoshopping a5 year old photo of hubble... get a grip ffs NOTHING you see or hear is real now

Homie this is HUMANITY. This is what we do. I love it.

@@SECONDQUEST you’re right. Things like this is what we are here for but to this extent, is for sure our greatest achievement.

My Arse!

*expensive Is the first word that comes to mind..

@@72marshflower15 yes… billions

Yes...🤔🕵️

I was wondering, why choose the honey comb mirrors instead of say a circle.

@@moosa1461 I would assume less human repairs since each element can be realigned remotely

@@moosa1461 the Webb has to operate at extremely low temperatures. The honey comb design helps disperse heat.

I thank you and your team for your contributions in helping humans gain knowledge of the cosmos above! 🙏 I’ve been so excited to see the images and I’m not disappointed !!!

I don't know about that. Have you ever seen Eva Mendez's Calvin Klein photos? lol

@@vanavatareight5135 true

Don't be fooled, these are NOT true photos!

@@vanavatareight5135 🤦🏽‍♂️

For now. I'm sure JWST will out-do itself soon enough.

Please let me know what is purpose from this picture ??

​@@trumpameri1638 That the Heavens declare the Glory Of God!! ✝️✝️✝️

Yep. I think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts compared to space

Lol. That poor lady tried... but omg what a mess that live announcement was.

Right?! 🤯🥹

beyond... makes one think about the infinity of creation. and its observable ONLY from OUR vantage point. Imagine if we could travel in ANY direction those 13.7B light years. what would we observe from THERE? and THEN I can't help thinking about the Cern collider.. that's going in the OTHER direction!

With modernisation, we have forgotten looking at the nite sky... everyone is cramped inside their house, watching tv, using social media or video games.. I remember when I was a kid, we would look at the nite sky trying to find a shooting star or identifying constellations n planets.. life was simple back then.

It's humbling for sure, but I don't think it makes us insignificant. It's pretty impressive that we can observe it in the first place

I bought a New Benz this week. I may be insignificant but I will be insignificant in style.

If we where so insignificant we would not be seeing this

What I don’t understand is I get that these galaxies are “billions “ of light years away. But when we are zoomed in so far to see detail wouldn’t that image zoomed in be seeing it as if it were only half as many light years away. This always confuses me.

@@ScrapFatherScrapSon I think no because the lense is still in place, it's not actually moving forward to be closer. Don't quote me though.

Exactly The creator of this mighty ,, thing,, is mightiest

univers dharm 🤔🕵️🕉️

and this hundreds of galaxy in just a tiny patch of sky Webb observed. How many galaxy and stars out there . this universe is freaking so big it's incomprehensible 🤯

@@kks319 God's creation is indeed Awesome! 🙌🏻

@@ralphangel561 don't know god creation or not but it's not more than a miracle that something exists, something so huge out of nothingness exists and life.

Shame that politicians tend to waste most of them.

@@sylwek1177 Waste most of WHAT?

As far as Federal Income taxes are concerned, this is one of the very few things I do not mind funding, especially when there is such a tangible payoff.

@@-Truth-Is-Singular and what payoff would that be?

More like, we taxpayers have footed the bill for these massively expensive projects because that is what we were told we were going to do. 🙄

Wrong There is an end

@@who5301 while I tend to agree that there is an end or edge, saying that as 100% fact is wrong. We cannot determine with zero doubt whether or not there is an end and highly unlikely that even if humans exist until the end of time, that we can ever prove either statement as being correct.

@@chrissede2270 There is no edge, but there will be an end. Eventually all matter will stop vibrating.

@@brandonreed2248 you must be the smartest man alive. You say things as absolutes when not one other scientist would dare make such a statement. 99.99999999999% of everybody else states it as an educated guess or hypothesis. You need to share this technology that you use so the rest of the scientific community can catch up. Even the end is only speculation as to what or how it will occur and that’s assuming there is an actual end. We can’t say with 100% certainty that matter will essentially decay into nothing more than radiation, we can’t prove there will be the Big Crunch. Everything is speculation based on what we can observe and tested. Scientist couldn’t even accurately predict what would happen when the voyager probes passed the heliosphere and that’s still in our backyard.

@@who5301 what's at the end then? wouldn't it be infinite emptiness?

Like you say the possibility of life out there has increased immeasurably. Will we ever be visited by Aliens from outside our solar system? With the knowledge we currently have we can only imagine what propulsion systems they may use Given humanities gread for wealth, and manufacturing mind set, goods are built down to a cost, not built up to a standard Just look at the Voyager craft, well exceeding there expected life span Imagine this, for over 5 thousand years few people have claimed to have conversation with God Yet the trillions of humans that have lived almost noone has seen or heard God So I won't hold my breath waiting for E.T to arrive. Mind you look how technology has advanced over the last 5 thousand years

You're mistaken well in my opinion. The amount of galaxies and planets doesn't equate to more chances of intelligent life. Think about it like this, life is a lottery and the trillions of times life tried to get started it failed due to whatever obstacle that got in the way. So It could be possible only one intelligent life exist. It's a fact that bacteria and microbes exist elsewhere but that's about it. No intelligence but us is a possibility.

@@mef12727 quite possibly. That would makes as Gods

@@mef12727 over billions of years and trillions of planets I confident that life will find a way to succeed, Firstly how would we define intelligence. If you look at Earth, are we intelligent because we are able to effect our surroundings, we are able to think our way through life. It's taken us nearly 200 thousand years to reach were we are today, and that's overpopulation and increasing the speed the speed the planet is dieing by a 100 fold The consequences of our evolution we have been very slowly driving the other life forms we share the planet with to extinction We have destroyed the habitats of millions of other animals, and indirectly pushing others to extinction before there time From a planetary prospective we are like young teenagers allowed to have parties with no ground rules Personally I don't see how we can be called intelligent, we have eliminated built in stops and checks by eradicating diseases, Increasing the life expectancy through improving our knowledge of medicine and we have removed the checks and balances of population control I can only pray that any other intelligence out there hasn't made the same arrogant mistakes as we have. We still haven't finished evolving, perhaps we are one of those planet's that could support life, but we fail as we were not intelligent enough not to screw the planet up

Could be a lot of other reasons that could make us unable to contact them also. I mean we can't even communicate with the other sentient animals on our own planet. What makes us think we can with something completely alien from some distant place, much less the problems involved with time and place. Further, what makes us so sure that they'd communicate using radio waves? That's so slow as to be practically useless. We have animals (mostly in the ocean) which signal their presence to each other using light. An intelligent species which evolved using light as a means of communication would be far ahead of us in terms of the speed of its communications simply because light travels so much faster than radio waves. In fact, as we know, light is the fastest thing there is. Even so, at a distance of only that between our sun and us the message wouldn't get here for eight minutes! A message from the nearest star would take four years. And from those galaxies... at the very least, 4.6 billion years. Those stars no longer exist, and if the galaxies themselves still exist, they are in a far different place. While it is virtually impossible that there isn't life elsewhere, it is also virtually impossible that we will ever communicate with them. Nonetheless, it is fascinating to look, to learn, and to know what we can in the limited time we have to dedicate ourselves to it. From music and the arts, to the hard sciences and everything in between, our lives are far to short for all the fascinating things there are to experience and know. They would be so even if we had a thousand times the number of years. This is why life is so precious and valuable.

And each one of the trillions of galaxies contains trillions of stars within them, stars just like our sun. And each of those suns could have planets revolving around them, like earth. So how can we possibly be alone with statistics like that? Amazing!

Considering the mind-blowing vastness of the universe, to say that we're the only ones to occupy it would be selling it so awfully short. 🌌

It would be wasted space only if space is scarce.

300,000 Km per second. Not 300

Earth wont be there to see the today's light emitted from that galaxies

Actually from the perspective of the light it moves instantly

300000k km per second

@@christianswamber2851 yes... meant to write 300k km/sec

And some distorted images also have spiral structure.

I was so worried about the unfolding part. Especially the sun shield because of how thin the sheets where and how many times they ripped during the testing phase.

@@MADBADBRAD Same here...I know everyone has their own interests, but could anyone not be fascinated by this, or Astronomy period. 🙂🤷🏾‍♂️

For the time being... Imagine technologies 100yr from now.

Gravitational Lensing is The Bomb!

What? No. There have been lots of images of gravitational lensing

@@Pseudo___ Yes since 1985, when Einstein's cross was discovered

@@Pseudo___ For us normies it's new.

@@tangbein that’s not how new works. You’re using that word wrong

Why can’t it go inside one of them and meet aliens ?

Too far away

@@Antonio-uc7vn the james webb? well that's a telescope not a spaceship. nobody's on board. the habitable planets that scientist found is quite far though.

@@Antonio-uc7vn They're billions of light years away. That means it would take light billions of years to reach them, or for their light to reach us. To our knowledge, nothing travels faster than light. About 186,000 miles per second. Even if we could travel at that speed, which we cannot, it would take billions of years to get there.

@@winstonsmith11 they can reach us ..if they can travel speed of light

Amazing view. Astonishing

Amen to that!

Which will never happens. Humans? Really? They are greedy and selfish to the core.

Who created the creator?

Amen and Amen

Amen

They're not stars... they're eyes... muahahahahaha! All kidding aside, I don't think we're evolved enough to save ourselves from ourselves. If we were, things would be a lot different. We are going to cook ourselves because most of us are not in the least worried, and are also not in the least interested in doing the things which will be required to stop it, much less reverse it. Many of us aren't smart enough to understand that it's what's going on. The fact that you and I are posting on our computers is evidence enough of that. Need more? What's at the very root of the problem? It's not that we pollute too much (though that is clearly a problem). It's just that there are way too many of us, and very few of us are willing to do what we need to do to put the breaks on that. If we had a population that was one one thousandth of what it is today, we could pollute quite a bit and not have much of an effect on the planet. But with an ever increasing populations going at the rate it is, we can all reduce our carbon footprint to the point where we are living like like bronze age herdsmen and we'll still poison the planet to the point where it is irretrievable. Our species is finished, and we're going to take a lot of other species down with us. The only questions are how long, how many, and what will be the kinds of things that will survive. Given it's needs are all met, any organism will reproduce until it soils its environment to the point where it can no longer survive. That's been shown to be the case in petri dishes and in all manner of other environments. It's unlikely that we're special enough that we can break that rule. We're certainly not coming close now, even though we know what's happening.

You don't have to wonder, God made worlds with life forms.

A quick doubt.. .Since this images are 13 billions years old , in the real time there is a chance of having a planet similar to us right ?!

I agree, life can adapt to different environments (like adaptability to breathe different types of air besides oxygen, etc). We should keep an open mind that intelligent life could be very different from us humans. I always imagine life out there that could survive living in radiation as if it was just a typical day for them, or breathing carbon dioxide just like we breathe oxygen. It's a hugeee universe and I believe those possibilities could be true.. but thats just my opinion since we don't fully know.

@@tristanfanton2320 you have no evidence of God. quit crying

Imo God is so loving he really allows some civilizations the ability to explore distant galaxies by means of Astral Travel Projection.. you can travel at the speed of thought. Think about it: If you were a loving God wouldn’t you like to let your children explore your creation?

Allhamdulillah Allahu Akbar MashaAllah Subhanallah Wabihamdihi Subhanallahil Adzhim.. Laailahaillallah Astaghfirullahaladzim.. That Enough For Me to Think And Amazed How Great Allah The Almighty One is😍🥰❤🙏 i hope that Allah Forgive all bad deeds we do And We Are Able to enter His Majestic And His Glorious Jannat al Firdaws (Heaven).. Ameen. "So today no soul will be wronged at all, and you will not be recompensed except for what you used to do." (Quran, 36:54) "But those to whom We have already promised blessings will be far away from hell. They will not even hear the slightest sound from it while enjoying the best that they can wish for in their everlasting life. They will not be affected by the great terror. The angels will come to them with this glad news: "This is your day which was promised to you." _*(This will happen) on the day when We roll up the heavens as if it were a written scroll and bring it back into existence just as though We had created it for the first time. This is what We have promised and We have always been true to Our promise. *_ We have written in the psalms which We had revealed after the Torah that the earth will be given to Our righteous servants as their inheritance. This is a lesson for those who worship (God)."(Quran, 21:101-106) ❤❤❤

Duh

Dupluxbloom Man No they wouldn’t, these galaxies are up to 13 billion light years away, their light had been travelling for at least 8.5 billion years before the earth even existed. The dinosaurs lived on earth for 165 mill years, a mere blip on the horizon.

it that were the case, then our entire night sky would be lit up like a roman candle. Every square centimeter.

@@Heart2HeartBooks sounds lit

one? we dont know all the factors involved to allow life to arise on a planet. If there are a million factors, which is plausible, it would reduce the odds to like a few thousand total..

@@krumplethemal8831 Do you have any idea how massive the universe is?

@@luminammusic yes, but the problem is when it comes to this premise, all the factors, not just one or two. For example what if we find a system with a star the exact same size as ours, in the same sequence as ours, with the same luminosity as ours but it has a shorter solar cycle than ours? If you do not understand where I am going with this question, let me explain briefly. We have been analyzing the activity of other stars and have discovered they are far more chaotic than our own. It is as if our star is "special" in that it doesn't go through solar cycles as often as the average star does. Ours takes 12 years to run 1 cycle where as the average is just a few months. This means those stars blast their system planets with far more flares, increasing the amount of radiation those planets take on, than our system. This is just 1 thing and its an important factor. There are millions of factors, not a hundred, not a thousand, a million factors. Such as having a moon, the moon drastically impacts how the Earth system behaves. Tides, wobble, reflected sun light, ect which could have impacted how life first developed on Earth. Without this moon, life might not have even arose. Volcanism, Platectonics, ratio of ocean to land, weather patterns, tilt of the Earth, number of other planets in the system, the list goes on and on. It isn't just as simple as having a planet at the right distance from its host star and water. I bet you we will find thousands of Earth sized planets at the proper distance from their stars with an abundant of water but no life at all. And the annoying response will be, "hunh how come there's no life on these planets?"

@@krumplethemal8831 A typical galaxy has aruond 100 million stars. The majority of these have planets. The observable universe has an estimated 200 billion galaxies, and that's just what's observable. The size of the entire universe is unknown, and it could be infinite. Also consider the fact that there could be different types of exotic life that could evolve in all kinds of conditions. Life on Earth evolved to suit the conditions on Earth. A totally different planet that we consider uninhabitable could harbor an exotic form of life that we can't even comprehend.

@@luminammusic sure but what if the odds of life arising in a galaxy is less than 1 per 300 million stars?

There are other places in the queue by priority and how good we can take photos of said place, for example the first jwst image was a place chosen due to the fact that the cluster of galaxies in the centre are so massive that they bend space such that light is bent around it, meaning it acts as a sort of lens for our images improving the quality and allowing us to see further

Google gravitational lensing for more

Please continue this line of logic I want to confirm something I am not being sarcastic i would have done it by myself but I am afraid I might be biased

Exactly my thoughts. If Proxima b is 4 light-years away, then Webb should be able to see if there is a biosignature.

Yes 👍 it'll be foolish to say that we are alone in this unimaginable vast Universe. Millions of Life supporting planets are out there.

@@alexmothilal6479 It's not foolish as it hasn't been proven yet, mate.

@@AlcatrazorGamer Even if you take the probability of one habitable planet per galaxy, there are billions if habitable planets. After the evolution of humans, it has taken so much long to come to this stage. Definitely in the next 100 years science will find. But I won't be there to see😔