Three approaches to value at risk (VaR) and volatility (FRM T4-1)

Подписаться 98 тыс.

Просмотров 41 тыс.

50% 1

The three approaches are 1. Parametric; aka, analytical; 2. Historical simulation; and 3. Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). The parametric approach assumes a clean function, the other two work with messy data. Historical simulation is betrayed by a histogram, MCS is betrayed by a random number generator. In terms of the PARAMETRIC APPROACH (the 1st of three approaches), the key question is, "How do we estimate current volatility?" and we can take three basic approaches to this question.
💡 Discuss this video here in our FRM forum: trtl.bz/2YBk9PM.
👉 Subscribe here / bionicturtl. .
to be notified of future tutorials on expert finance and data science, including the Financial Risk Manager (FRM), the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA), and R Programming!
❓ If you have questions or want to discuss this video further, please visit our support forum (which has over 50,000 members) located at bionicturtle.com/forum
🐢 You can also register as a member of our site (for free!) at www.bionicturtle.com/register/
📧 Our email contact is support@bionicturtle.com (I can also be personally reached at davidh@bionicturtle.com)
For other videos in our Financial Risk Manager (FRM) series, visit these playlists:
Texas Instruments BA II+ Calculator
ru-vid.com?list...
Risk Foundations (FRM Topic 1)
ru-vid.com?list...
Quantitative Analysis (FRM Topic 2)
ru-vid.com?list...
Financial Markets and Products: Intro to Derivatives (FRM Topic 3, Hull Ch 1-7)
ru-vid.com?list...
Financial Markets and Products: Option Trading Strategies (FRM Topic 3, Hull Ch 10-12)
ru-vid.com?list...
FM&P: Intro to Derivatives: Exotic options (FRM Topic 3)
ru-vid.com?list...
Valuation and Risk Models (FRM Topic 4)
ru-vid.com?list...
Coming Soon ....
Market Risk (FRM Topic 5)
Credit Risk (FRM Topic 6)
Operational Risk (FRM Topic 7)
Investment Risk (FRM Topic 8)
Current Issues (FRM Topic 9)
For videos in our Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) series, visit these playlists:
Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Level 1 Volume 1
ru-vid.com?list...
#bionicturtle #risk #financialriskmanager #FRM #finance #expertfinance
Our videos carefully comply with U.S. copyright law which we take seriously. Any third-party images used in this video honor their specific license agreements. We occasionally purchase images with our account under a royalty-free license at 123rf.com (see www.123rf.com/license.php); we also use free and purchased images from our account at canva.com (see about.canva.com/license-agree.... In particular, the new thumbnails are generated in canva.com. Please contact support@bionicturtle.com or davidh@bionicturtle.com if you have any questions, issues or concerns.

Опубликовано:

22 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 18

@rodlu811 3 года назад

Never seen someone explain this hard subject with so much clarity and simplicity.

@samrathore9396 5 лет назад

Very well explained, its actually tough to explain the mathematical functions using the principles and concepts.

@HARSHBENIWAL23 4 года назад

I was stuck on this chapter for so... Thanks David for helping me out!! Kudos!!

@bionicturtle 4 года назад

You're welcome! We are glad that our video was so helpful :)

@yvesprimeau6031 4 года назад

Exellent explanation. The diagram of volatility help me to get the big picture of the concept. I suggest more diagrams too help us to visualize all the concepts of FRM at large....

@Small1400 3 года назад

Great videos! I was wondering what the best, most appropriate, approach would be to calculate volatility and eventually VaR in electricity markets, where often times prices are negative. Thanks in advance!

@jaylev85 3 года назад

Have you posted any videos that discuss Cholesky decomposition? more specifically the procedure for generating correlated variables from independent Rho's to fatten the tails. I think this is a technique that attemps to sovle some of the limitations of the Var-Covar approach (i.e. the "parameteric" or "historical method" mentioned above).

@adventuresunlimited4483 3 года назад

Amazing Videos.I referred to many sources but this is the first time I understood the concept. Is there an excel sheet for Monte Carlo VaR calculation ?

@viciousbeats8510 5 месяцев назад

Is "r" interpreted as returns squared or (return minus mean of returns) squared?

@lmagz84 2 года назад

How can we measure it using eviews

@ntcuong01ct1 3 года назад

Hello friends, I have a few questions: 1 / Risks will be specified after we have identified the audience, objectives, and operational processes ?. 2 / Risk will be directly integrated into the business process ?. 3 / The Risk department is responsible for determining the VaR (Value at Risk) and presenting it to the Board of Directors seeing the risks and proactively preventing them? 4 / Actively preventing risks will help us improve the value of products / services to customers?

@aslivinschi 2 года назад

Dear professor, what about if I want to understand at 95% confidence what could be my best results instead of the risk of lost.?

@bionicturtle 2 года назад

Hi @Alexel maybe due to language differences, I cannot understand your question (apologies). This video reviews the three basic approaches to VaR, and VaR is the statistical way to answer "What is the worst expected loss with 9X% confidence?" Thanks,

@aslivinschi 2 года назад

@@bionicturtle many thanks! I am looking at the gains instead of losses, is kind of a reverse of VAR. I am trying to figure out at 90% confidence interval the minimum amount to gain instead of loosing. So, I done this formula for the min gains =Mean + (Std * Z-Stat) instead of doing as usual for the VAR= Mean - (STD *Z-Stat). I just changed the sign to plus, is that enough?

@bionicturtle 2 года назад

@@aslivinschi Oh, okay, yes sure you can do that! Maybe we call it "value at [to] gain"? aka, VaG. It would be similarly one-sided such that, if normal, at 95.0% Z = +1.645. And you would add the mean, just as you show, where your format is implicitly P(+)/L(-) which is natural math, gains are positive. So looks good to me

@aslivinschi 2 года назад

@@bionicturtle you are amazing. Thanks David