The function and order of the court is on the basis of law, not dependent on public opinion. The public can control the court by the election and by the parliament.
Judgements are passed in accordance with law enacted by parliament. You have a problem with the law? Take it up with the parliament- law makers. The judges can’t interfere with the voice of the people
Zero tolerance for all these collegium nepotism, self appointed, you scratch my back, I scratch yours Judges.public has no respect for these respect demanding judges.
Our judges are rather delicate and sensitive; I was once told that putting my hand in the pocket of my own trousers is showing disrespect to the judge. I replied that in India judges are there to protect the rights of people who put their hands in other's pockets.
its all over the world, you have to behave in front of judges, stay in discipline, show great respect to judges. wear nice suit etc. Judges give you justice, if you are a nice person, be polite, respect judges, respect the law.
The judiciary has itself descended to absolute low. They either have to earn respect and trust of people by streamlining the judicial process or keep this mockery going.
Judges are ok with innocent people behind bars, and criminals roaming free and loads of dragging cases. But attire, food habit makes them so sensitive 🤮 With such senseless priorities of judges, our country is surely judicially ruined.
UPSC should be the only gateway to become the court judge.Why not in judiciary Where every appointment done through competitive examinations?Not only that proper vigilance clearance is required to prevent the entry of tented and corrupted person,
Most of our countrymen don't have food, clothes, and shelter: SC should clarify their position w r. t. their stand on impropriety of attire in the courtroom. The days of calling judges lords and ladies should be over.
Why Supreme court wanted 1 month leave when 24 lakhs students suffering.including Supreme Court no body really bothered to give quick solution to suffered genuine students. When essential service works 24x7, 365x12 like doctors police etc what supreme court done for student over 1 month.India's legal system should be changed first
The case going to supreme court shows incapability of the government to fix any issue. The government and NTA refused to acknowledge any malpractice and paper leak in this exam while the evidence was right infront of their eyes. We just cannot go to supreme court for every issue but there is no other option
Proper attire in the Supreme Court and in general is crucial for showing respect, maintaining professionalism, ensuring equality, minimizing distractions, and adhering to cultural norms. It influences first impressions, boosts confidence, and can be essential for safety and functionality in specific professions. Overall, proper attire helps uphold the dignity and decorum of professional and social settings.
Are these judges here to provide justice or judge people on their attire. Tomorrow a Judge gets offended by someone's face, is that person is expected to get a face lift. Just do your job judges.
Seriously ,Judges are passing judgements on mangalsutra ,bindi ,Pandit, sathpathi and what not and just because these judges have absolute power they are threatening people .I lost respect for judges when I saw some judges made vogue judgements ,Judges behaves like gods and public often trapped in vicious cycle of lawyers .Common citizen should be allowed to fight his own case as lawyers always manipulate .I am studying law from past 4 years and have read a lots of rulings and most were unfair .I don’t have lawyer certificate 😂.I know the law but I can never reach the judge as I will always need middleman .
I have never seen any judge (former or present), commenting about inappropriate clothing of a women. As soon as we speak about women's proper clothing, it sparks a heavy backlash regarding misogyny and patriarchy. But when men dress inappropriately, it's game over .
Indian judiciary system must be changed, secondly appoint judges as against population ratio so that quick relief and disposal could be achieved , this is the only alternative,
@@aparnahungund5633Arnab Goswami May be a sycophant of Modi. But not atankwadi. Yes. He’s supported Pulwama attack without questioning, that doesn’t make him pro enemy. He’s a man who sold himself for a price
@@prasadm5873where did he support pulwama attack? Matlab kuch bhi 😂😂. Those who call Hafiz sayid as sahab, terrorists as bhatka hua naujawan, maoists as Martyrs and what's more army chief as sadak ka gunda are patriot acc to you. Typical chamchagiri 😂😂
This is shameful and disrespect towards judiciary and most them are aware of these incidents,i have attended court for MLC cases we have to wear apron and put mobile phone on silent and we have to enter court room and greet the judges,my interaction with most of them was good,they will give respect to doctors and in my cases judges were like polite and respectful towards me ,once a young judge saw me and he told to take my case first, being q doctor my time is precious, to treat the needful people, I'm greaful for those judges who are so polite and as a young doctor it created good impact on me , thankyou sir and madam
Why respect should be given , now judgement is no more honest , judges are loosing their dignity as they give decisions which are suitable for govt and getting Jobs after retirement.
Tarik pe tarik is a mental harassment for the petitioner. Judges must empathise this and act accordingly. If not, all the trust from the judiciary system will become less day by day
Court should take action only against the culprits of misconduct just because of these incidents court should not ban video conferencing hearing because thousands of poors who are Party-in-persons who do not have money to travel to delhi for attending hearing in courts are benefiting the facility of video conference hearing. so Court should take action as and when such incidents occurs and court should never even imagine to ban video conference hearing
I, really appreciate that the actions, taken against Advocates & Senior Officials of Government, for their misbehaviour and attitudes., by the Judges. Many of them think, they are the Boss of everything. Some of them really doesn't know how to behave with their customer & public.
CJI???? A MAN HEARING 370 ??? FOR ZINHA AND NEHRU AND ANGREZ IF IT WAS EMERGENCY OF INDIRA UNDER EARLY RETIREMENT POLICY OF HER TIME THIS MAN DESRVED THAT
@@student_of_God You observe he knows nothing ??? USNE SALAM MARA (as they usually said in Bombay in 1968 In a restaurant owner said to waiter Saab ko Pani Maro but waiter was respectful to put Glass of water and Jug full in front of me) He knows this only NOT NAMASTE MARO NOT SALUTE MARO
@@Economics365 it was during corona lockdown when the court trials were held online. During that time after putting forward his point the lawyer forgot to off his camera and he assumed that the camera was off but it was on so he was having his lunch in the zoom meeting infront of the Solicitor general and the General came to know the lawyer has forgotten to off his camera so he called the lawyer and said about his camera and later on when the lawyer was found hurrying to switch off his camera the Solicitor general was found mocking the Lawyer
Reason lies in Judicial Fallibility!🇮🇳🙏 Because National Motto is Truth Alone Triumphs and Conduct of business of Government machinery, including Judiciary, is not adherant to the National Motto!. Jaisi karni waisi bharni!.🇮🇳🙏💯%✓
Achi Baat Hai, logo ne izzat dena band kardiya judiciary ku karan yahi janata bhi hai, jo court apne hi parivar ka sadasya judge loyal ku insaf nahi dila saka to uska mazak bhi udana swabhabik hai ye maat kahna ki sabut nahi mila magar hatya to hui na bhai.
I think court should show respect towards citizens of country. Judges are not kings but servent like any other government employees. So instead of focusing clothes of people they should focus on work. Also I want to clear one thing I am not against courts and judges but this is just not right...
Except for the last clip baki sab toh punishment mang hi rahe the. Tho i agree ki punishment might have gone too severe prr tum ek court ke samne ho toh proper attire dalke bethna toh basic manner hai
@@GladwinBenjamin I agree. But court and judges have more responsibilities. They should not have to manage these things. This type of things should be managed by other staff members. And if clothes are really important then court should give judgement or ask government to pass bill which address this dress code issue in court.
It is simple respect of following dress code, dicopline, body language and submissivness and safeguarding the interest of clients - being lawyers, pleader,etc.,
OMG ! As it is people are concerned about jurisprudence issues in country . Now on top of that , to know clients and lawyers and police could be seen in all sorts of unbecoming situations when they dispense justice , just adds one more layer of disbelief in jurisprudence . Shame .
@2:02..Wearing jeans is disrespect ?!?! Jeans is a material, which is also a decent full pant..what kind of disrespect will it show up to the judges and tye judiciary, if worn ?!?! Are Women lawyers restricted to wear only casual cotton saree and not any other kind of saree ??
IT IS MUST THAT DECORUM OF DRESS IS NEEDED OTHERWISE PEOPLE WILL ATTEND IN ANDYS AND BARE BODIES. THIS SHOWS THAT THESE RIF RAFFS SHOULD BE PUT IN PRISON OTHERWISE THE DECENCY AND DECORUM WILL BE IN JEOPARDY.
Acha to court apna advocates k case pe busy hai wo bhi attire related and gareebo k paas paise nhi 100th hearing k liye. 👏🏻 Well done. Agar dhoti kurta hota to koi baat tha. Its too much with the ego of adapted judicial culture. 😡
Courts should take decisions without any bias, some times courts are deciding decisions at late night for high profile people's like Satalwad,Aravind Kejriwal, Soran etc. When lakes of cases pending more than 10 years old. There is no equality before law Judges thinking that they are more superior than other human beings.
Every important place atleast a place of justice should should be held and taken as a place of sanctity. Not as a chai tapri or a bedroom..Thats the problem with law coming live as there is no fear and respect left.Mary John
Lawyers should be *appropriately clad* , whether appearing in person or through video conferencing. Decorum is important. Every small thing matters in upholding the seriousness of justice dispensation. In today's noisy and often rebellious Democracy, Courts remain the last bastion of decorum and dignity. We should not allow the whim of a lawyer to overwhelm the writ of the SC. NOTHING can be too small in the arduous quest for Justice.
Court should be strict with regulations it's right but when people hear some judgements which are bias or one sided only then the respect of courts & judges deprives in the view of public thats why courts also must try to give judgments which are more sticked with justice whatever the conditions as well as public also should understand court is the only place where they can have justice nowhere else. Mutual understanding & respect is necessary for eachother between Court & Public
Quite an amusing, different and educative video. Hats off. Btw the word 'faux pas' is pronounced as 'fo pa' I think. No offense meant. I wanted to point out because I quite like your clear voice and diction in general.
