Тёмный

TI-66 Programmable from 1983 

Calculator Culture
Подписаться 6 тыс.
Просмотров 6 тыс.
50% 1

This video is about the TI-66, the successor to TI-58/59 from the late 70s.
The TI-66 was manufactured by Toshiba, after the failure of Texas Instrument's own TI-88 project which was originally slated to be the TI-58 and TI-59's successor. See www.datamath.org/Sci/Slanted/T...
For more information about the TI-66 check out the following links:
- edspi31415.blogspot.com/2019/0...
- www.datamath.org/Sci/Galaxy/TI...
- ganjatron.net/retrocomputing/t...
For more calculator videos, check out my channel / calculatorculture

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

3 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 27   
@theedspage
@theedspage 2 года назад
It's always a help when you can see the key you pressed during keystroke programming.
@MrM6d
@MrM6d 4 месяца назад
Still have mine, bought at RIT in 1985. TI-55-II bit the dust after Expository Writing Class demonstration on how to disassemble things..oops. Still have the my 1959 Picket N4-T slide rule my father gave me too. I was using the TI-66 tonight and forgot how to program the keys....thank you. I have the Quick Ref Guide and cover pouch I carried it in college. Dang that was 40 yrs ago. (Also still have my Sinclair ZX81 from England).
@CalculatorCulture
@CalculatorCulture 3 месяца назад
Thanks, glad the video was useful.
@NuGanjaTron
@NuGanjaTron Год назад
Looking at the comments here, I'm glad it wasn't just me that thought this calc feels more than just a _little_ slow. And by that I mean _glacial_ ... 😩😴 I'd like to see a followup video on overclocking this baby! I've seen some hints of such a mod online, and it's apparently quite simple. But so far my research hasn't turned up a howto. Thanks again for this excellent review, mate!
@NuGanjaTron
@NuGanjaTron Год назад
Did I mention this calc is awesome? 😁
@NuGanjaTron
@NuGanjaTron 7 месяцев назад
1 year later, and it's _still_ awesome! 🤣
@johnnyjimj
@johnnyjimj 7 месяцев назад
I have one that still works perfectly 40 years after I purchased it - The keys significantly yellowed over time but the screen still looks great and batteries last forever, at some point I had forgotten about it and they had bulged badly but were still working 10 years after I had installed them... I also had the unwieldy PC-200 printer that I purchased for printing programs that would eat batteries and used difficult to obtain special thermal paper, and that I positively hated to use... At some point I misplaced it and may have thrown it away, I don't remember, sorry for those here who are looking for one, I only used it for making program printouts that I still have in my old, pre-computer archives, but after 40 years they have become so faded they are almost impossible to read now with my declining eyesight.
@walnuthills11
@walnuthills11 2 года назад
Very nice! Thanks for the review. I love mine for the most part (I wish there was better, prompted I/O) despite its slowness.
@CalculatorCulture
@CalculatorCulture 2 года назад
Yeah I wish I had one that was in a little better condition, it is a really beautiful calculator.
@NuGanjaTron
@NuGanjaTron Год назад
Thanks for reviewing this fantastic calc, and for providing the link to my webpage! A small correction: the HP series you're comparing it to are the venerable Voyagers, not the Pioneers. I bought my TI-66 for just 10€ or so at a fleamarket _many_ years ago, not knowing what it was other than something programmable by TI (at the time I wasn't even familiar with the TI-58/59). I was pleasantly surprised -- THIS CALC IS AWESOME!!! As a bonus, it's beautifully designed too! Infact, it's probably my absolute fave from my collection. Compared to its ancestors, it boasts constant memory, alphanumeric display of program mnemonics (instead of numeric codes) and a mindbuggeringly colossal battery life -- I suspect mine still runs on its original Toshiba cells! On the downside, expandability is practically non-existent, save for a 2-line serial interface to the unobtainium PC-200 printer (I've only seen one on eBay in the last 15 years). But the biggest problem with this calc, as you point out here, is its ABYSMAL performance. It's without a doubt the slowest calc I've ever used, and by a huge margin, I guess that's the price to pay for the low battery drain. Many thanks again for this great review from a former Melburnian!
@johnnyjimj
@johnnyjimj 7 месяцев назад
I had the PC-200 printer and am not sure I still have it, it was a very cumbersome piece of equipment that used specialized thermal paper that was very expensive and difficult to find, even at the time I purchased that printer (that sold for twice the price of the calculator!), back in the mid 80s. On the bright side, it did make it possible for me to keep a record of the programs I wrote for the calculator, that I still have a copy of somewhere but were faded and almost impossible to read out when I last looked at them. Thanks for reminding me, it will give me an incentive to rummage through my boxes of old stuff, hopefully I'll be able to transcribe these old programs for posterity ☺
@NuGanjaTron
@NuGanjaTron 7 месяцев назад
@@johnnyjimj Thanks for replying! Yeah, the PC-200 is elusive, and fading is pretty much my experience too with all thermal printouts I've seen. Btw, I've grown really fond of the Galaxy series, and now have a TI-65 Technical Analyst, several TI-62s, and a few variants of the non-programmable (and otherwise quite unremarkable, save for the design) TI-30. This series as really underappreciated and still quite cheap. They'll never be as collectible as HPs, which is a bonus. 😉
@waynethorburn5712
@waynethorburn5712 2 года назад
I purchased my TI-66 when it first entered the market and it is still in good shape including all 4 rubber pads. I was wondering about the algorithm behind the program listing you supplied. I can't quite make out the name you spoke even though you said it twice. Could you please write it down. Thanks.
@CalculatorCulture
@CalculatorCulture 2 года назад
It's the solution to the N-Queens chess puzzle. It's a common way to benchmark calculators, see www.hpmuseum.org/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/hpmuseum/articles.cgi?read=700
@pacomarcel7949
@pacomarcel7949 Год назад
Thanks for the review, following the program you use as an example, once I reach step 007 and I hit the R/S key, it takes me back to the "0" screen. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
@jamesschoning9097
@jamesschoning9097 Год назад
Excellent channel! Love to know where you source your calculators from in New Zealand! International I suppose. Been collecting vintage HP RPN calculators for a while now.
@CalculatorCulture
@CalculatorCulture Год назад
Hi, I am a kiwi but I live in Melbourne. Most things I find locally but some I have got from Japan Yahoo! auctions. Good luck with the collecting, it’s a fun hobby.
@laurenth7187
@laurenth7187 Год назад
Mine doesn't start, only if i remove the batterie and install them again. The On button must be faulty.
@johnnyjimj
@johnnyjimj 7 месяцев назад
If you are technically savvy you may look under the keyboard membrane. With use the rubberized carbon surface becomes shiny and the contact traces can oxidize. With isopropyl alcohol to clean the membrane carbon contacts and a rubber eraser to make the board contacts shiny again one can rejuvenate the keyboard. Just take a picture of the keyborad before taking the calculator apart to make sure you replace the keys in the proper order 😄
@MrWaalkman
@MrWaalkman 2 года назад
Following along at home with my TI-66, mine seems to be a tad bit slower. It does feel good in my hands, and the build quality seems solid. One thing that I do find unforgivable is the lack of marker on the screen showing when you've hit the 2nd or the INV keys. Really guys?, how did you let that one slip through? As for the speed, I may have to bust mine open and do a RC time hack to speed things up. The HP Museum site has some teardown pictures: www.hpmuseum.org/forum/thread-2837.html?highlight=texas+ti-66 I only see two caps, giving me a fifty-fifty chance of getting the right one from the get-go (I'll probe it with my scope to see which cap is emitting the square wave). I also have the PC-200 printer that I'll have to try out one of these days. Apparently this is a rare-ish item? And my TI-66 is missing the same two rubber feet on the back. :) I bought mine in 2020 for 16.80 Euros and 4.90 Euros for shipping (why I bought this from a guy in France is anybody's guess) it was advertised as broken, but it works just fine. Excellent review as always. :)
@CalculatorCulture
@CalculatorCulture 2 года назад
I do think a lot of people are quite fond of the TI-66. Thanks for the kind comments.
@NuGanjaTron
@NuGanjaTron Год назад
Wow, you actually managed to get your hands on a PC-200 -- these are indeed ULTRA-RARE! I agree a 2nd indicator would help, and also find it an inexcusable omission. A "running" indicator as on the HP Voyagers would have helped too. But IMHO these omissions pale next to the speed (or lack thereof). I'm curious to see if you manage to overclock your TI-66! Might actually probe mine one day too.
@lucianoxx9210
@lucianoxx9210 Год назад
Hi. I bought a Texas TI 66 in 1986 and it is new, because I take care of my electronics very well. But recently my calculator's batteries ran out. I would like to buy new batteries, but I don't know if I can take the risk of putting batteries with different voltage and amperage, because I couldn't find the calculator's specifications in the manual. Then, I would like to know if you may help me about the specifications of new batteries.
@kumaFJ
@kumaFJ Год назад
LR-44
@lucianoxx9210
@lucianoxx9210 Год назад
@kumaFJ Thank you very much.
@johnnyjimj
@johnnyjimj 7 месяцев назад
As others have said, they take standard LR-44s, just make sure to replace them more often than the original Toshiba branded ones that used to last years, as the new ones don't!
@lucianoxx9210
@lucianoxx9210 7 месяцев назад
@@johnnyjimj I bought my calculator in 1986. My calculator has two original batteries with the following printed writing : + Toshiba LR 44 Japan. In percentage terms, comparing the original batteries with the new ones, do you have any idea how much less durable the new batteries are? Exact numbers are not necessary, but only an approximation.
Далее
TI-58C Scientific Calculator from 1978
16:58
Просмотров 4,4 тыс.
Sinclair Cambridge Programmable from 1975
13:46
Просмотров 3,5 тыс.
TI-68 - Scientific calculator from 1989
13:39
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.
TI-74 Basicalc Pocket Computer from 1985
11:06
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.
Sharp EL-5150 Scientific Calculator from 1985
9:48
Просмотров 2,8 тыс.
TI Galaxy 67 Scientific Calculator from 1992
8:33
Просмотров 3 тыс.
EEVblog #1159 - World's Most Precise Pocket Calculator
17:57
Trying to FIX a Faulty 34+ year old Calculator
14:37
Просмотров 41 тыс.
Это спасёт камеру iPhone
0:32
Просмотров 433 тыс.
Кто производит iPhone?
0:59
Просмотров 465 тыс.
Best mobile of all time💥🗿 [Troll Face]
0:24