TIER 10 IS BAD!!! 

Well. It is. Lol.

@@AwesomeEpicGuys play world of tanks console to see that it sucks,you complain about the garbage and matchmaker kkkkk,that you didn't see on the console that Everything sucks

Do not worry, tire IX will be fucked too, when it will be flooded with new OP'ed premium tanks.

Platoons vs platoons on ranked would be fun 3 foch b vs chieftains would rebalance chieftains?

@@AwesomeEpicGuys Well let's say now a days Wot turned in to a pile of garbage and wargaming looked at thoose mistakes and let them there. I moved to Wot Blitz ( Lol) because, of arty, unbalanced tanks, and gold spam. Now a quick story, My favourite tank was T62A, after all that shit, and I moved to Wotb, I saw that the T62A was actually better with 7 degrees of gun depression and better mobility. Also all tanks have weak spots.

sadly they realized that and now they are introducing new tier 9

Tier X is hell but gucci hahaha

Maybe tier 8: almost hell. There are op tanks, but you can counter them pretty easy

i think tier 8 is best tier, then tier 9, then tier 7, tier 5, tier 6, tier 4, tier 2, tier 3, tier 1 then tier 10

@@detroitsucks5222 in the Asian server Tier VII, VIII, and X are Hell

Team Clash was good for E100. Get to the front quick, cap, sponge, spot with allies close . Much more useful than trying to hold a flank in random battles when it only takes 2 enemy to take you down with your reload.

If you're not playing at a fast hold-down auto loading heavy or medium or light tank then you're screwed. And that's the issue. All the skill has been removed from the game and it's just whoever can stab the tookie or load premium the fastest and use the meta will win the game.

small

I got used to it. For me 3 arty per match is worse.

Yeah bro, I'm from NA/SA server and this are the biggest problem. But most players don't care about it, they will say 3 arties are the biggest problem (I agree it's also a problem, my simple solution: decrease the limit for 2 arties). Imagine you in a server where half players usually spam gold, don't matter the tier what they plays. The premium market is cheapest for us and this give a big incentive for being a pay-to-win player, unfortunately

They should rebalance shell mechanics in this game, for instance not letting a sub caliber apcr do the same freaking damage as a full size ap. There should be some tactical decisions going on with the different rounds in this game. Maybe something like what we saw in Steel Hunt event.

I enjoy playing tier 10 personally due to it's competitive nature. To out play enemies knowing your at the disadvantage of not using premium ammo is what makes tier 10 fun for me personally. This is just how I see it as a high level player on NA.

I never have tiver 10 :(

WoT is a hugely complex game, so any significant fix would likely have unwanted side effects. A "spechul ammo" change would be an unwarranted buff to (some high performing) heavily armored tanks. These would have to be addressed/nerfed, perhaps best done as a package deal for the indirect ammo buffs. There should be less outcry among the community who love their OP toys.

@@RansomMemoryAccess I agree in the sense that whatever changes are made will disrupt something or other, and require further balancing changes. I personally would like to see gold ammo removed and tanks just balanced around standard ammo/he. You could argue it may simplify the game slightly but it may actually lead to a more balanced game. Tanks can't be balanced against standard ammo, AND gold ammo. It simply can't work

@@justjosh11 All they have to do is limit the amount of premium ammo a given tank can bring into the battle (say 5 rounds per tank, but they won't do that because money). Adding weak spots to the op tanks that can be penned with regular ammo would balance things as well. They can be small and hard to hit, but at least make them pennable.

I'd argue that when it comes to ammo (AP, SAP and HE), World of Warships has the correct idea/implementation. Balancing ships in other parameters without drastic overhauls and much more consistent.

@@misot90 yes in world of warships the shimakaze and carriers the bloody fucking carriers has gotten indirect buffs to the point if you have a MVR on your team and the enemy team has a midway your team would win cause the MVR is so op and shouldnt have a turtleback armor its absurd bullshit, I personally want shimakaze torp alpha to be nerfed to the alpha of the Holland and the MVR to have a stripped turtleback armor scheme, along with WG returning the old AA where for example a carrier was to focus a Montana the Montana would be a "No Fly Zone" but all wargaming wants is money so they wont listen

No.

SSCCHHÖÖVVEELL!

Not sssshhawööölll? (in hungary we say *ásó*)

'Spechul!!!!!

Here in Romania is called "Lopata"

True

@@juriszzzgaming8837 nope

Very true! You can have fun, but it’ll cost ya!

Thats not true.. if u do a shit ton of dmg u are gonna get like +5 k credits

@@milosilic8639 the problem is how often are you going to do a shit ton of damage

No.

Are you trying to be funny or what

Dont go past tier 7 theres no point

@@fullgetsu4171 you are soooo right m8

@@doctoberfest1487 I quit world of tanks due to 2 simple factors, EBR105s and artillery stun

Many things are correct here. I got around 140 premium tanks in my garage and since this shit of power creep came. 95% of they become garbage in tier 8. And tier X omfg it's something toxic to play and more with all #gold noobs. I don't consider try hard people than only spam gold. Really skilled people never use those. Tier 8 sucks now due all new premium's than are better and also unbalanced tanks in tier 8-10. I remember when I buy my kv-5 everybody was saying was bad i didn't was going to enjoy. Well after I buy it (and was my first premium tank) i was fascinated about the tank i was enjoying it. Not was a lower or t-34 in 2014. But was something really fun and enjoying to play i was bouncing 6K DMG. But now it's a lame to use 3-4 shots with gold and you are out. And the most painful it's than you can't pen with AP. You required only gold ammo

30 minutes plus? well youre not wrong... its close to an hour

@@ChadTanker Who's talking about 30 minutes?

The Problem with the special ammo is, that it is more expensive, if they're both the same price but you have the decision between premium and standart ammo it would be better, but also tanks like Maus and E100 with their useless standart ammo would have suck even more than already with the new ammo patch, because they literary have no other choice but using gold cuz they have worse standart pen that most tier 9 heavies. So, the patch would have been the opposite of a buff for superheavies cuz they'll deal less damage with premium and can't pen anything with their useless standart ammo But still most important is the price difference between standart and premium ammo, if they're the same then the damage/penetration choosing would be fine

Easy progression I do not agree

STAHP CLICKING!

@@AwesomeEpicGuys Incoming!!!

whats the unicorn

That is actually not the case, if you play the game you should know that

@@hambourje just tell him man

@@Rururudenko that's what i just did, you need to play the game to know that i can't do much more

@@hambourje Well i play the game daily, and mainly in tier 8, and for that reason i do get games with tier 10's, and i will say that about 75% of the rounds i get hit by are prem/gold rounds

Also, imo it was bad that they didnt reduce the price of the "special" rounds.

It was only to test the concept, price changes could be adjusted during PTS. And the other thing about not reducing the price is to make people more careful about ammo choice(not really working against "goldspammers" tho).

Yeah exactly

This is true. They wanted to nerf he. Why? Because of wheels shooting he that’s WAY op. Simple solution... lower pen on JUST wheel tank he... leave the rest of he alone. Omg... I said nerf wheels so I’m sure every employee at WG will miss this since their company firewall will block the suggestion like China blocks T.S. References.

Tonk Wars, The Meme Battle

and mines WHY is mines the only map that gets to bein EVERY teir rotation itsa fish bowl at teir 10

@@homelessEh I never got why people complained about Mines map size and not Mines imbalance where South was clearly the weaker spawn by far. Okay, I get why people complain about Mines map size, because of the positions near spawn on both bases were able to cover 30-40% of the map from a safe position and it made the map so crammed and not fun to play. I feel like there's a "more WG" solution than removing mines for tier 9-10 tanks, that would be - giving more bannable map slots to all players.

U dont need one. I play without.

@@cocoardo4394 if you want to keep buying new tanks and not just constantly lose credits then you do need a premium accounts

What do you mean by current mechanics? Since the game's release the system has been designed to encourage you to have a premium account at the higher tiers. That's how this free to play game makes money.

@@leno7492 I dont.

@@leno7492 Nope. You earn cash with lower tier tanks and you don't even need a tier 8 premium for that. Or git gud enough to earn cash in tier 9 and 10. It is not impossible.

Honestly, WG have spun so many criss crossing tangled webs that it would be just easier to just grab the scissors and cut themselves out and start from scratch, then apologize, yes they'll lose the diehard fans but at the moment they are loosing the core demograhic which is the Casual gamer, the kind of person who'll play because they love tanks, but if the casuals are getting pushed into spending more and more time and money, most will just up and leave.

I hate the ebrs more then arty at this point

Fair but in all honesty it's the reward tanks and the ebrs that are the problem arty isn't really a big deal

People are only shooting gold because tanks are introduced with the expectation that they will be shot at with gold a lot, perpetuating a self defeating cycle of more Prem and more Armor. The idea is for a global change of worse Prem ammo, it also needs to take apart and re-examine the balance of tanks with super armor (and maybe the maps that make it hard to flank). Then, Prem ammo will only be used as a last resort when all the other options to use Standard ammo have been exhausted, not the first and only option.

Yes, the idea with the ammo change is that since it is a global change, you're going to have exceptions that need to be individually rebalanced. Like, imagine OG Maus players when Prem rounds were introduced. Tanks got more armor when Prem rounds became easier to access. In turn, armor should be removed when Prem ammo is made worse. Also, tanks that only function when they spam gold is not good design.

tier 10 med and td was not here in 2011 , in christmas 2011 the french tech tree came out

Wow, it took me 12 years XD

HAHAHAHAHA!

Happy to hear :)

made a second comment explaining my fix for gold and would like to elaborate(discord/teamspeak) if you find it useful

give all tanks a percentage that they can carry gold for random games if i remember correctly wg said a long time ago 5% gold ammo is being fired LOL... well that changed quickly consider a percentage cap/roof level of gold ammo a tank is able to carry say your tank has 40 shells and the following percentages gold standard/HE 10% /90% 40*0,10=4 gold shells and 36 standard/HE 15% /85% 40*0,15=6 gold shells and 34 standard/HE or 20% /80% 40*0,20=8 gold shells and 32 standard/HE these are rough values and all tanks carry different amounts of ammo (type 5 and german heavies carry a shitload of ammo but almost never use it all) also meaning that the percentage might be 20% but if they carry something around 100 shells we would get the following calculation 100*0,20=20 gold shells and 80 standard/HE this is broken because of the following E100 alpha=530 and 530*20=10600 dmg with gold i do not remember their exact ammo counts but you will very rarely run out of ammo in: MAUS E100 TYPE 4/5 JGPZ E100 FV 183/shitbarn/manticore/BC carry "few" shells and would need to be studied more closely anyways what i wanted to say is if you limit the number of gold shells a tank can carry the comander/player must think about when to use his ammo capacity that can kill that dumb type 5 with very few and still strong "weakspots" say now i remember the type 5 to have 2900 HP typical tank to have HEAT AMMO are russians and derp guns/E100 268 +v4 and others with 15cm+ guns the most effective shell to kill a type 5 would be the heat because it does not ricochet until you exceed 85 degrees and hitting a 85 degree angle is very very hard this essentially means the type 5 must overangle/hide his side armor to not get heatspammed but his frontal would now be flat and weak(armor angling meta dead for super heavies nowadays) back to the 2900 HP say if i play the 277 and i do 490 dmg per shot with heat i can deal with 4 shells 4*490=2k dmg+internal crit dmg alive type 5 6 shells 6*490=3k dmg+internal crit dmg DEAD type 5 8 shells 8*490=4k dmg+internal crit dmg an overkilled type 5 he died after the 6 th shell so why are you still spamming you retard!!! with movement he can make a shell or two bounce if he confuses the enemy "gunner" enough to hit somewhere dumb 430U is a medium tank that like the 268V4 is/can be to simple to play in randoms, as long as your front is facing the enemy they must either shoot a small weakspot(cupola) or hit your lower plate to deal dmg to you killing their effective dpm(430U and 268V4 still have strong lower plates) and keep their mobility unlike the tank designs of WW2 finally i will remind you the majority of all battles played in this game are randoms and amount to between thousands and 10s of thousands of games daily with a high server population on EU 100k players in the weekend peek per server. and that is why i think it is so important to limit how many of the "special" rounds are being fired/dispensed on the battlefield for random games because it is disruptive to the intelligent use of armor meta instance given trying to play your superheavy correctly save the special ammo/gold for your competitive gaming clan wars/advance/stronghold or at least a higher cap/roof for those game modes

that would be interesting, a game with only tech tree tanks is much more balanced

Think it would then start balancing the tech tree tatrs

Tanks

@@maxedace3487 yeah in that game mode it will be way easier to balance things. as most tech tree tanks can really fight against each other on more leveled grounds, only need some fine tuning with meta tech tree tanks (like fixing the EBRs and balancing tanks like S.Conq Obj. 277 and some more meta tanks). the reward tanks are much more complicated to fix.

they could also make the change that reward tanks can't meed tier 8s.

Grosstraktor will come back !

The flaw in your logic is the assumption that Wargaming actually acts upon player feedback.

Or arty should be removed because they have no place as they aren't a support tank anymore just a Troll Tank

@@TheRedskys96 i feel like it is a needed evil in wot cuz what do u do if the enemies have 5 strvs in the back?

@@TheRedskys96 but they could just make it have fixed dmg when it hits someone lets say 300 for a hit 100-200 for a splash

If enemy has 5 Strvs in the bag the game would be over as nobody would be able to Spot Strvs and even if they did Arty would rather hit lights meds and heavies because they are always spotted and always in places out in the open, Arty has no counter at the moment unless perticularly skilled arty players start countering other Arty players, Heavies have TD'S and Meds arty. Meds have Lights, heavies and Arty. lights have Arty, TD and heavies. TD has Lights, Meds and Arty. While arty only can only be afraid of a Brave or stupid EBR.

@@TheRedskys96 I disagree but that is your opinion

I sure did ;)

Yea wotb did and look at it now

@@OwleLeg The change was good, but now Blitz is a cancer. More than PC. Also, the +1/-1 mm helped that change to work.

;)

you have the most terrible fucking opinions ever 😐😐😐😐😐

Anyone who says rng is rigged is just a bad player. There is certainly some games where my rng has been terrible, but that doesn't mean it's rigged. The only thing that decides the game is how good or bad your team is. Sometimes you carry, sometimes you don't. That's the nature of a multiplayer PVP game. I agree with everything AEG said but rng isn't rigged man. Just accept that some games just won't go well. (Keep in mind, my favorite tank is the FV4005. The PINNACLE of RNG deciding your game 🤣)

Bruh