I could not understand half of what you are saying. But whatever I could understand, it was interesting. Please publish your theories in peer-reviewed authentic relevant good journal. If it's true, it will get published. If it is published then it proves that your theories are correct, and you don't have work hard in convincing others, they will approach you instead. The impact of getting published in a good impact factor journal is amazing. Your audience and people following your work will increase exponentially. That's how it works in medical field. I hope it works in physics also. Good luck.
I am also researcher of three time theory but no one believe me because of my country and my education i am from nepal and i study in class 9 . I find out something new in time and i wrote my own theory the three time and next theory is reality of time line in time travel
धेरै बधाई छ दुई युवा नयाँ अन्वेषकहरुलाई NASA पुगेर यहाँहरुको सपना साकार होस। मेरो नम्र गुनासो रुपा खड्का जि को प्रयास कार्यक्रम हरेक भाग प्रतिक्षा गरेर हेर्छु, यो भागमा चाहिँ अलि तयारी कम भएको जस्तो महसुस भयो? ISRO को बारेमा नसुन्न भएको जस्तो लाग्यो? अमेरिकाको NASA जस्तै भारतको ISRO ले हालै UK को OneWeb कम्पनीको ३६ वटा भरी भु-उपग्रहहरु प्रक्षेपण गरी दिएर लाखौं डलर कमाएको खबर छ। धन्यवाद
As a layman it is beyond understanding of gravitation related to 4D.but you beeing a science student how would you be able to generate power in term of substitute the traditional fuels. Solar, wind ,hydrolic too were not regular source of fuel.Could you introduce the new one through 4 D. Suggested you both scientist better not be migrated to America,Europe and Japan thinking better opportunity . You both are proud of Nepal. Also suggested to make coordination with Dr.Mahabir Pun of Science and technology innovation.
After reading the preprints, I think that it is the rewording of Einstein's space-time because the assumption of constant speed 'c' in fourth dimension lead to the same conclusion, be the fourth dimension a spatial one or a temporal one. Nevertheless it is an interesting perspective for visualizing einstein's theory. It is not a ToE combining quantum theories with classical theories.
@Ludum Dare The "new" spatial dimension is not new, even in the relativity theory, we already have Minkowski space and 4-vectors. There's nothing new in their theory, see that the time dimension is a spatial dimension, the only difference being motion restricted to only one direction(so far that we know). This has kept all matter, almost consistent within the future light cone of the space-time. The fourth spatial dimension, these people are claiming can't allow motion in all directions, because that would rip apart the world that we see(within seconds), which is not true. So esentially, i haven't found anything new in their theory.
@Ludum Dare The expression(eqn 33) for orbital velocity around the central body has no mass of the central body in it. Do you believe such an equation? The current that has been referred to distort the space hasn't in any way been linked to the fourth velocity(the fourth velocity is actually nowhere in the mathematics), which in the first place has been described as a cause of the current. WASTED!
Your paper is not peer reviewed yet! Its just a pre print which means you have written the paper and posted it online. Its better to come to media after the paper is accepted and published in a credible journal.
@Sam Bajrachaya All i am saying is publish it first in a good journal and then do the media conference. Thats the norm. Only if it is published in a peer reviewed journal then it is considered to be endorsed or accepted by the scientific community which increases the credibility of their work. If your paper is good there are many open access journals who can publish for free if you are from a developing country. For me this is too much media before the actual science is accepted by the scientific community.
