I would like to say that I made this video when I was 14, before I had really studied physics and I no longer agree with some of the ideas presented. This was mainly made as an exercise in filmmaking by a curious teenager.
I like how aside from the early experiment with filming, this video was the perfect excuse to eat an entire plate of pretzels to illustrate a scientific point.
You did this production at 14? You did an impressive bit of filming. The end when you were in the same scene as both of you was done well. Thanks for sharing this.
... and 'parallel universes' refers to this universe of ours replicating with slight differences. all off these parallel worlds would make up the greater multiverse. therefore i am not saying that there is more than one 'everything' but i am saying that there would be infinite membranes of 'universes/worlds' inside this one 'everything'.
Were you talking about the Everettian formulation or worlds that actually split with decisions rather than quantum superpositions? Feels like you're hinting at the universal wave function but I can't tell
@leftaroundabout @itsminutemaid Thankyou for the discussion, it is interesting to read all sides to this argument. So much of what we know is still theories and caught up in opinions. I agree that the term universe has become hazy as we have discovered so much more outside of it original confines. I refer to 'the universe' as our part of the universe, the part that we know about right now, the part which holds the galaxies and stars that we have given names to...
@@samratpatil8593 I would say that it does exist, since time dilation is a thing. The closer you get to a body of mass, or to the speed of light, the slower time gets. In fact there has been experiments made with synced clocks, of which one went into space, and when it came back, the clock that went into space had gone ahead of the twin clock.
I had my eyes dilated once, and when I left the ophthalmologist's office and started driving away in my car, everything seemed to be moving in slow motion! Then I got pulled over and was told that I was going twice the legal speed limit.
@@samratpatil8593 Quantam Physics are a thing. It already succeeded to teleport small objects, it's going to time teleport people to but it copies the atoms do UMM WE NEED A BETTER WAY SINCE I DONT WANT MY SOUL TO BE RECREATED.
Then there's the fact that both Albert Einstein and the Vedic Scriptures of ancient India say that, while time travel into the future is possible, time travel into the past is not. Therefore, if you travel into the future, you can't come back!
The question though is that even if for someone time goes slower, does the body know that? Our cells have no idea of how fast they go, they just have a finite number of teliomeres. So it could well be that the person you describe, returning after 40 earth years, might be still very young in years.....but that the years have been heard on him/her and that he/she looks just as old as the friend left behind
Hi Tibees, although you say you do not support the ideas in this video, I as a math teacher find it impressive for a 14 year old girl to make such a video and besides that it lay the foundation of your present videoskills
videos as sleds of the past you can't currently "most commonly" time travel, but depending on the person you can have more or less [and of different quality] of these "sleds"
@itsMinuteMaid That's not what I meant. "atom", as well as "universe", is a word whose original meaning isn't quite appliable any more now: atoms are not indivisible, and what we used to call the universe may not include everything that exists - that's why it is not wrong to speak of many universes, meaning "many things-we-used-to-believe-included-everything-there-is". The exact definition of the word universe now varies, not all authors use the same.
Time is not a Dimension. Space is existing, but past and future is not existing. And space itself can only exist, if space-objects can move anyhow. That means that „Time“ is not a dimension, but time is included in space itself. Without time included in space itself, space would not exist. We live IN space, - we don‘t move through „time“. „Time“ is just a „tape measure“.
0:25-0:28 Some people may understand this reference, some may not: “Most people think time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but when looked at from a non-linear, non-subjective veiw point, it’s actually a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey.....stuff.”
People assume that time is a straight progression from cause to effect but actually from a nonlinear, non-subjective viewpoint, it is more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly timey wimey stuff.
Time is a perspective thing. As you explained in this video, living things age biologically and this is the only concept, time is rather ambiguous and man made quantity. Different living things age at different rates, which depends on metabolism. This is also true for non living things, like stars, planets. If we travel near speed of light, all our body and organs travel at same speed, metabolism should therefore increase rather than decrease to keep up with such a fast speed. Thus in my view we will age faster.
The real question is why would anyone in the future want to come back to me specifically? What grand thing have I done to stand out among the rest? Think about it. How many past generations of one's family does the average person know? I'd be willing to bet that the farther back you go the less the average person does know. If I were to guess, and be generous, I'd say most people only know the names of their great grandparents. Any farther than that, barring special circumstances, would take considerable effort on one's own part. So the question, again, is what will you do to stand out amongst your family, past and future?
I can definitely see a curious teenager and an experimental tibees about to become great in near future. The most nerdy RU-vidr I've ever seen. Lol (lots of love)
In the afterlife it is reported that time doesn't exist. How is it to be able to exist as a spirit yet time in this state becomes not something that is measurable?
To understand it, I think you'd have to go to the beginning as an observer. Start with zero space and zero time. Then you have the Planck scale universe. The entire universe now exists in one cubic Planck length and is one Planck time old. You should Google Planck units if you are unfamiliar. Remember, you are an observer outside this universe and you are observing the universe at one Planck time of age. Then another Planck time passes, and you observe the entire universe at two Planck times of age. But because you are outside of it in a higher dimension, you also observe the universe at one Planck time of age. And you also observe the universe at 3, 4, 5, etc. Planck times of age. From your position in the higher dimension, you observe the beginning of the universe, all the way to the end of the universe. And you are able to do this because you are not occupying space time. There is no past, present, or future from your position. You are in a higher dimension. Anyway, that's how I see it.
@leftaroundabout ...As far as what you said concerning time travel, you are still confusing a replicated version of ones existence for their initial existence. If in fact new realms, planes of existence or "universes" (as you state them), are created every time any action is done, then yes, one could travel throughout time by somehow accessing those alternate "places". It would be like being able to go into this girl's youtube video and in her "universe" I would be there, but as well here.
Tibees, is this you? You won't believe this but I am from the future and am your great great great great great great great grandson I harnessed the power of a star and have come back in time to tell you something important! The Time Travel Police are going to cut off my communications so I'll make it quick! So basically whe-
That makes absolutely no sense. What makes you say time is actually a thing? To me time only exists in our minds. Give this thought experiment a try. Lets say you wake up from a deep sleep, where you been out for years and your mind wiped. You start living your life and we assume you learn the fundamental things to function in our society, such as reading, writing, etc. Now lets say your mind gets wiped again, Now you don't have a sense that a past existed. There was no such thing as a past, and thus since there was no past how can time be going forward?
I don't have time to watch this right now, but I'm saving it to my favorites to watch it later, in hopes of it being at least slightly educating/entertaining. If it is not, you are sentenced to five minutes of time-out.
I travelled back in time to your 1st time travelling video lol Very interesting, you've definitely got my brain ticking over on this, Well done and a great job. Thanking the back in time you 👍💛💛💛
Great job with the vid read a comment saying this was made a while ago. But im curious why some people dont ask if time is even real? Isnt it just a measurement system we came up with to accurately track the movement of matter? And its completely up to perspective. And to make sense of things that dont happen or exist anymore? (And so much more)
This is just a guess but I think going through a worm hole in space would take u to another era in time or it would take u to another galaxy or something else idk, y haven't we tried going through a warm hole in space to see where it leads???
cutiegirl60000 because worm holes are just hypothetical,it hasnt been proved that they exist. And even if we could, theoretically, we need a type of exotic matter to keep the worm hole stable, and we dont even know if exotic matter exists.
@leftaroundabout Now, with that theory that every time an action is done a new realm of existence is created, and if one is able to somehow travel to one of those realms that has been created ("travel back in time"), then would you be simultaneously creating a realm of existence, and entering one that already existed. A paradox. So, that's when your "both" comes in. That is, that one would be replicating and old "universe" and simultaneously accessing a new one. Now my head hurts. Thanks.
@itsMinuteMaid "That would not be going back in time, that would be absolute replication of another Universe" - it would be both. According to these theories (Many-worlds interpretation), parallel universes are created every time you do ANYthing, not just when you travel back in time. But travelling back in time is the crucial experiment that could prove or disprove the many-worlds hypothesis. It would still be time travel as well! As for the "universe": what is an atom then?
time travel we do all the time and travel time exists: airplane. i explain it, if you go from San Francisco, Ca to Hong Kong China, you go to the future and when you come back, you to the past, see? simple
KodyXXVll keep in mind she was just 14 when she recorded this, she isnt studying physics at this time. But yes you are right light travels at approximately 300k km
@@restitutororbis964 The speed of light in vacuum, commonly denoted c, is a universal physical constant important in many areas of physics. Its exact value is defined as 299792458 metres per second.
