Times Referees RUINED The Snooker Matches.. 

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-e9GIScTXLsI.html

Whoever put this video together is an absolute amateur. It’s a piece of crap and cheaply done with numerous mistakes. Pathetic effort-F

It could have been so much better if you let people know the reason Jimmy was upset was because the referee choose what Colour ball Jimmy was going for, before Jimmy NOMINATED the Colour ball he was going for which is standard practice.! Also the frame where Ronnie didn't want to pot the Black to get a 147 was because it was only worth 5000 English pounds....!! But what you didn't show and what is most impressive is...??? Ronnie asked the referee how much the prize money was for a 147 after taking just one shot....!! But you never showed that...!! Ronnie predicted he was going to get a 147 after one shot..! But he was also right, 5 grand for a 147 is an insult to snooker!!

@@Joe-cx4mv snookers finished in Britain anyway ,,,,its a chinese sport now . . .Let em have it . . .

​@@alanhargreaves-thevoiceofr2361 Based on what? Your talking nonsense

Definitely. Jimmy could have said nothing and then made a legit complaint about the ref

Yes🖖👍

It's the photo shop at the start of what you would assume is a referee shouting at a player that really gets me. Of all the years of snooker is this really the worst any ref has done? It's nothing

just clickbaits everywhere...

Yeah, agreed. Like in the pink ball placing in 3:33, the players were laughing and nothing was ruined.

Some of these refs think the camera is there for them. Doughnuts

I concur

I cant believe you are that attentive

​@@np9119I can believe it, because it's stupid (I mean, how OTT is that, wondering why a video skipped from number 12 to 10?). I did exactly the same. Not much point having a countdown if you don't include them all.

Agreed!!!

Ronnie actually refused to pot the last black on a 147 twice... both times begged by a ref to pot it for the fans. Since then he became sneaky and just potted one pink instead of a black to make a 146. You cant force a shot choice=)

Exactly man, this AI content spam is wild

Where did the referee force him to pot the black?

exactly, its a different game where he was on for a 147 but there was no reward so he wasnt going to pot it. Then Yan Verhaas told him to pot it. Just shows that AI generated content isnt fully there yet lol

Those two always back each other up.

Better than boxers

Then Alex saying he hadn't heard Thorburn nominate 'green' either. We'll never know whether the Hurricane really did or didn't hear the nomination, but the least he could have done would have been to say that he did. No guy ever played the game straighter-up than Cliff. No wonder he was fuming and wouldn't allow Alex to borrow his cue extension thereafter. That incident left a bitter taste for me.

I think it is very disrespectful.

But the referee is the referee not him, doesn't matter what he THINKS

I was just about to say the same!

seems to me like an AI voice/transcript and filled with bot comments

But the referee is the referee not him, doesn't matter what he THINKS

And great ref

@@Duffyyy94 brilliant she is .. 👍👍

Hahaha was funny that

How exactly was that 'ruining the game'? The rules are very clear as where it should go. What is the alternative, just make something up on the spot? That would give an unfair advantage to one player or the other. The players know they will need to wait for their next shot. If they do not like that, then try to play for another colour.

I agree. This guy is really pedantic. I bet he thinks his own 💩 stinks sweeter than most. Ruining snooker by persuading Ronnie to make a 147? How many people have seen one in such a situation? Dropping a ball? A little bit clumsy, but mistakes happen. I think this guy majors in the minors.

​@@oleggorky906 146, one less than the maximum. It was a bit of a controversy, because some people bet on him getting a 147 and the prize money wasn't enough for him to consider it worthwhile.

@@Threadnaught I hold my hands up. I had totally forgotten that he did that. Oh well. Even better. Just imagine that you’re that good, that you ‘only score 146’ as a protest. And still, that one point makes a statement. A big statement. The ref did his bit. It’s on the organisers for being tight.

You spelled wanker wrong.

​@@ronnieherd9247So you dont like snooker then🤣

He's an absolute prat, being a good snooker player doesn't excuse that

@@GG-ml3vr not since it finished . . . .

@@alanhargreaves-thevoiceofr2361 Care to elaborate?

If the ref was right then Ronnie is a liar and cheat

what was that all about ?

Jimmy declared (verbally nominated) his colour. The ref didn't hear him properly. Players often mumble when declaring colours so this happens occasionally. His response was to deliberately repeat the wrong colour. Referees are encouraged to do this because suggesting a colour could be considered to be helping the player make a decision. Jimmy then re-declared the wrong colour & followed it with a sarcastic remark. It was this remark that incited the laugh. Jimmy was warned for his response to the laugh.

Thank you

It's the thing between Michael's legs. 😂

@@castleanthrax1833 🤣😂🤣😂

I knew judd would be as bald as Ebdon back in 2011 when he had the huge mcfly hair

Also that empathy to the referee when black was spotted after free ball was declared...

Mark Williams proceeded to make a joke by saying "can you clean the pink for me please?" Getting the commentary and audience all laughing.