Titan Touchdown 

I am asking for your financial support.

🤣

مثل ماحرمتن من دنيا يحرمك طعت عب

This is so like a "20 life hacks on Titan" music ;-)

This.....and the video is made with stretched out textures as example bye someone using maya 3d for the first time

trust me,. in high school if id shownb this to people theyd call u a nerd and think its not that cool and what not. theyd be more impressed by a rat in new york. because our society sadly has just gotten more and more dumb... Cant explain how incredible something is to those raised on tiktok

​@Eclipse-lw4vf You've got to be joking. You think this is real footage?

@@tufflucal4037 if you think this is fake, then just dont watch it LOL

@@renlowrie I think you missed the point. Lol

@@tufflucal4037 If it was fake they would have added a lot more details. Look how grainy the original stuff is (not this one, which is interpolated) Anyway, not fake, Earth is a globe, and we (well, they) landed on the moon.

You are a genius

Literally the best comment I’ve seen in years

@DANAIS ELTANIN I agree with most of what you wrote up to the point of finding exoplanets like earth. Do you seriously think that our current technology can pick up whether living beings actually exist on said planets many light years away? Your getting way ahead of yourself with that. We can't even tell if life is on proxima centauri b at 4.25 light years. We are in our infancy on determining if there's actual living beings on these incredible distant celestial objects. But keep the faith 👍

@DANAIS ELTANIN how do we know they have no living beings on them?

DANAIS ELTANIN I would like to see the size of your head thank you

Ahhh ok. I just left a comment on how I thought this looks fake. Makes sense now

Up to 2:05 is real video from the lander. No CGI.

Too bad its fake.

+maxi soulcaliber I don't think so.

Your Dad might have well worked on the project that is tracking Bigfoot....

@@SG-jv5zi You might just want to go back to school.

That's great

From every planet, every moon, every asteroid, every comet, every KBO... Dream big. :-)

+insomniacfolder And all with a single spacecraft, carrying four Kerbals and a science lab, bringing back samples from every biome... Wait, I'm thinking of something else.

IstasPumaNevada Guess I know what my next Kerbal Mission will be😉😂

nonicnik Make a compilation video of it! :)

+nonicnik stock mk3 ssto with big turbofan engines

Titan's atmosphere is very dense, the friction does help it slow down quite a lot compared to low density atmosphere satellites and planets

turarwanaa unless nasa gets a bigger budget I don't think Americans will be on the moon any time soon...

Wouldn't this planet be the best potential candidate for an RTG/reactor powered aircraft?

Well I can guaranfreakingty you NASA's budget won't include any more asinine "outreach to islam". 8 days to freedom!

Captain Conformist....we'll just call you idiot and be done with it..... idiot

Dont cap titans got a top 5 defense

Air McNair just rolled in his grave a little from your dad joke.

I remember the Titans

Titanfall irl

indeed

It Fake you fool

@@sylvesterdakatt3150 you got proof that it's fake

@@sylvesterdakatt3150 There's proof that it's real. What are you even saying?

h

Yeah beautiful cook indeed

Would be very cool but also very expensive. NASA just doesn't have the funding for it. We need a global group of all space agencies to work together. Imagine how fast we could explore if we had NASA, ESA, ISRO, FRSA, and others all working together.

@@Henriburger1 US space program is only a measly 0.5% of our budget.

​@@Henriburger1 OR.. Invest that money into feeding the people that are literally dying with famine as we speak

​@@DaggerZ555 i knew this comment would show up lol, its predictable to see these now 😂

@@Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman The way you worded your comment suggests that it is wrong or "unsmart" / "outdated" to care about another human being's suffering? I'm far from being a "tree hugger" person if that's what you think but these are just basic human principles that everyone should have, preserving life must be out top priority

Seid ihr das Essen? Nein, wir sind der Jäger! DAH NANA DER NEH NER NAH DAAH!!!!

I’ll assume it’s something related to that anime “Attack on Titan”. Good one though!

James Sienicki 😒😣😤

SASAGEYO INTENSIFIES*

Something really doesn't make sense. The surface of Titan is not as HD as the Mars photos. For the probe to cost millions of dollars it should have had a better camera!!!

this happened in 2005

yea looks cgi

Firstly, it's late 90s technology and secondly, Titan is covered in thick orange cloud of nitrogen and derivatives which makes it impossible to have clear image of surface, that is why they have enhanced contrast to see details clearly, in reality it's blurry.

Igor Ławicki mate it’s so peeps with bad Vision can see... pls go back to school and don’t have any babies

@@cheezeempire3157 If they can't see the video what good are the huge subtitles to them ? or us...they just block the video...

Ist doch egal sowiso compüteranimation, wie auch fruher Zeichenfilmen mit Mondlandung von Fackenüs.

They don’t want you to notice the video is all cgi fakery

I agree, it's badly stitched

I agree also. Misleading

Where are the real pics tho?

Because it’s fake

The ISS uses better than GoPro today for its HD photography. 19 years ago when the mission launched it used the best available space-tested CCDs of the day - which survived seven years of cosmic rays & radiation from the radioisotopes on board on the journey to Titan. The Huygens to Cassini to Earth bit rate was around 4 KB/s so a higher resolution would have meant far, far fewer than the 350 images captured when you add in the other data too. The main data for the mission was the chemistry & the meteorology all the way down through the atmosphere. Mission a total success.

I hear you. We need to keep in mind that technology improves daily and that, as you pointed out, what's getting to the outer planets today is technology which was state-of-the-art when it was launched . . . a decade or more ago. We're still a long way from the first "Live from Mars!" webcast - but it'll happen. :)

I am against a Mars colonisation until we have a much better assessment of the Mars ecology & possible existing deep subsurface biosphere. We could trample over any evidence with our waste products & introduced Earth micro-organisms. Let's colonise Earth orbit with proper 2001 style colonies first. Then Moon colonisation by people who are prepared to risk life at 1/6 gravity [health effects of low gravity largely unknown - perhaps benefits for the elderly?] - at least the Moon almost certainly is a dead world we can't taint! You probably know about the failures of Biosphere 2 which was more theatre than science. We still have NO CAPABILITY to provide a sustainable enclosed biosphere on Earth never mind Mars. Can you imagine babies born on Mars? They were not given the choice of living in a place worse than the Atacama desert - [a version of that desert, but FOUR times the altitude of Everest to match Mars air pressure & with worse radiation by far than the ISS - no magnetosphere around Mars to speak of] - is it ethical to birth babies in such conditions? The history of small colonies on Earth is they usually fail or turn into hellish tyrannies even with plentiful supplies. The simplest possible sustainable artificial biosphere that doesn't go rogue is many, many years away. It is very difficult to manage a biosphere such that one element or another doesn't become a runaway feedback loop. The "Live from Mars!" webcasts you predict will be from cute little robots for a very long time while they're preparing the way for simple organisms to be tended & grown by robot hand. A self-sustaining colonisation of Mars by people [if that's your objective] is probably at least a hundred years away. Colonists will be spending nearly all of their time underground due to the radiation hazards & Mars soil is dead & packed with perchlorate & other unknown nasties it would be wise to prepare a large sealed environment including a domed region of the surface which can have the soil processed before humans arrive. Even Mars dust is a challenge - all machinery, life support & tools will have to be sealed against this stuff which is finer than talcum powder. The task of maintaining the technology as it ages & wears is truly mind boggling.

No offense, but I'm naming you PROFESSOR Nightjarflying. I have a friend who works at JPL and his take on the manned exploration of Mars is that it'll be similar to the lunar missions: develop the technology to get there and back, do general exploration, then skedaddle back to Earth. As you pointed out, a self-sustaining colony is a long ways off. With all that's required and risked to get even a small amount of cargo to the ISS, it's more likely there will be moon bases before people are having picnics at Bradbury Landing. I appreciate the time you took to type your reply, Prof. Nightjarflying! :)

I'm not offended at all. My comment & your latest reply seem to be in total agreement. I also think that a farside Lunar manned light telescope & radio telescope would be of profound [& unknown] value without destroying the history of the solar system [& possibly the emergence of Earth life began there] which is available on Mars. I think of the guy who discovered Troy was a real place & basically destroyed most of the evidence because he dug for glory rather than keeping painstaking records. From a commercial perspective I suspect that asteroid/comet mining will be the-next-big-thing & that's where private & government space dollars will go - the people who do that will be the kings of Earth & they will not want 'amateurs' colonising Mars - competition that they will not permit.

More like 1500 million kms...

@@Amsztel Mmm I think much more

Cassini was launched in '97, you think we had good digital camera technology back then? Nevermind that images have to travel millions of miles at low transmission speeds to end up with us, which is also a bottleneck.

It's what Cassini would have wanted.

FEs won't give in until they're actually launched into orbit... and even then...!!

It’s cgi, do your research

Is this really video or CGI where are real videos of the universe from space probes? It is CGI

@@jinlee3574 real broadcast from Thanos' home

I get a bit annoyed with people who give flat earthers abuse. There are probably more people in asylums who believe they are Jesus or Napoleon. It's really not worth it. You just give them abuse because it makes you feel superior.

It's alright

They even captured audio recordings of Titan's environment.

It’s all cgi dumdum

@@sylvesterdakatt3150 ur existence is cgi

@@sylvesterdakatt3150 back to grade 1 with you. I suppose you think the earth is flat?

I agree, too bad the money for such things is being spent elsewhere

my understanding is that it could be the atmosphere of titan

the probes main priority wasnt to take pictures it was to study atmosphere of titan as the nasa team didnt know where they were landing or if it would be successful, the probe lost contact after 72 minutes. another comment pointed out that this also is not a video of the landing as it took 2 hours to land but is actually pieced together pictures of the landing similar to zooming in on google earth , the quality of the pictures was always bad but is just more noticeable the closer is smaller features it gets

And timely too.

The pictures have been out since 06. They made the video out of the pictures and renders for the 12th anniversary of the landing tomorrow.

Martin Gregory no I think they meant that the device had left earth in 2005 maybe?

documentary came out in 2011 with all this stuff.

Hunter Eisenhardt That’s because nothing is real it’s never real ever .

Yeah, and this CGI is based on real photos from the probe, happy to see an smart person after so many flattards

Not really simulated either Its a series of images, that they filled in the gaps for

The final image is a real photo Amd yhea, youre rigth on the rest

If you built Orion on earth you'd irradiate half a continent, and cause HUGUE amounts of EMPS Orion would only be practical as a last ditch atemnt to leave earth, or built and used in deep space

Because it was made with cameras of nearly 20 years ago.

Because it is computer generated animation based on real photos from probe. Space probes rarely take a video shot - not from that kind of distances (1.4 billion kilometers), of course. Usually they shot hundreds or thousands photos instead.

Not enough images to have an actual footage. So they have to process them in some ways to create a smooth video. And also, the rocket which sent this lander into space was launched in 1997. Therefore these are digital images with 1997 technology. Which is pretty bad by today's standards.

Because we dont live in a movie where you can just make stuff up on a whim

I honestly want to see the rough images, I myself don’t really care for smooth or color footage.

Beasty Rs dude it's a Camera from the 2000s what do you expect? Plus it needs to survive extreme conditions like please don't use today's standard to judge the tech a decade ago

Mercury The Metallic Liquid do you not think i know that? silly bafoon. all i said was i want hd footage of these missions

Beasty Rs yea I'm telling you in a brutally honest way that there's is no HD footage

Consider that Casini was launched in 2003. No HD cameras at that time.

he was saying that he would like to see this landing shot with modern HD cameras. I would, 4K 60 FPS 360view :D

It’s all cgi dumdum

Content for police men?

Yes ... more content for those who have no brain

It looks fake

@@EvangelistAidan totally fake. These people a Luciferian

@@sylvesterdakatt3150 yes i agree flat earthers do indeed worship lucifer, no wonder they are so insufferable

Cooler than cool, Ice Cold!

Wich one?, ALOT of countries take part in ESA

there is none. this is a slideshow of images which were processed in a computer to make it look like a video. the probe is way the far the transfer video from titan to earth.

It's intentional so you can't see where they filmed this on Earth. Just like they did with the mars rovers.

Something really doesn't make sense. The surface of Titan is not as HD as the Mars photos. For the probe to cost millions of dollars it should have had a better camera!!!

@@MrCidVicious is it also intentional that these cameras are are from the 2000's? Not 2018? Keep believing in your flat Earth fantasies.

@@Angry.General1461 The Hyugens probe was designed in the 90's, Curiosity in the late 2000's, thats over a decade of advances in cammeras

It's in the video moron.

No its not that is CGI composite

It would be cold, wet, dark, and smelly

Cutler Cycles the video is not a cgi composite. It’s a bunch of photos taken from the actual landing stitched together into a video. This is real. That is what titan looks like

Have any of you actually been there? Didn't think so. It is very possible this is not real.

MaJIbIu it’s old camera

90's cammera Only a few images where taken Its using the images along with radar alltitude readings to render and map the images into a 3d render, to them recreate the decent in video form

Because it's a rendering from actual data from Huygens’ Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer (DISR) data, and unfortunately part of the data was missing due to a transmission error.

Jupiter doesn't have a surface.

What do you call a sea of liquid hydrogen?

It is a linear transition from gas to liquid at pressures and temperatures that far exceed anything we could foreseeably construct to survive.

we have our zeus army ships there ready to free us from 13500 years of moon reptilian occupation

Your name has an X in it, there is a hypothetical planet X in the solar system. Therefore, you are a planet.

From 0:29 onwards IT IS REAL still photo footage from the 2005 descent made into a time lapse movie running at 40x speed. Titan is covered in smog so "real footage" using modern cameras would require another 2.5 hour descent into the atmosphere. The original unprocessed stills [hundreds of them] are viewable on the NASA mission page.

***** Explain what is wrong with the stills given that the CCD used on Huygens had an image width of only around 254 pixels?

Because its all fake. "Space may be the final frontier but its made in a hollywood basement" ( Red hot chili peppers/ Californication.

15 year old technology.

jkbear29 "we have better cameras now" says the dude commenting on a probe launched in 1998 sending photographs across effing space.