Raag kirtan is for creating the environment and the feeling of gurbani. The normal kirtan without raag is for sangat to be able to sing gurbani together. They both are good. Doing both is OK and should be done
@@dhangurupyare there is no such thing as raag kirtan and regular kirtan. Kirtan is kirtan. Problem is we lack discipline and make up our own rules. Kirtan should be sung as our gurus intended. Period. At the rate we are going, tomorrow you will see rap remixes to panj-baaniya dha paatt... Will you justify that too? You are correct in that raag and taal.are meant to set the tone. Raag and classical does not need to over power the baani, but sining to musical tunes and Hindi songs is not how our gurus wrote baani.
Is shabad da actual meaning hai jaddo jiv parmatma da naam japda hai te finally aisi awastha (stage) aa jandi hai jis vich jiv parmatma vich abhedh ho janda hai pher oss jiv ate parmatma vich koi difference nhi rhe janda. ਨਾਨਕ ਲੀਨ ਭਇਓ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿਉ ਜਿਉ ਪਾਨੀ ਸੰਗਿ ਪਾਨੀ ॥੩॥੧੧॥ ਰਾਮ ਕਬੀਰਾ ਏਕ ਭਏ ਹੈ ਕੋਇ ਨ ਸਕੈ ਪਛਾਨੀ ॥੬॥੩॥
This is Sadra, a composition set to Jhaptal sung in Dhrupad style. Mukul ji has sung it so nicely. Waaaaah Pt Yogesh ji. The Dhrupad influence is very strong, because of Agra, Gwalior training. Wahe Guru.
i appreciate the vision to start kirtan to be started in raags again, but according to sikh rehat marayada, only amritdhari sikh is allowed to do kirtan in presence of guru granth sahib.
That is so backward thinking, as well as discriminatory and creates exclusiveness - which the Gurus were against. So...based on that premise, all of the Gurus, Bhagats, GurSikhs that performed kirtan before taking amrit were not allowed?
Guru Nanak Dev ji wasn’t “amritdhari”, I wonder what you would to say to that. Neither was bhai mardana. People like you are the reason why our Kaum lost its virasat. You’re indulged in your haumay and ego. Understand the message before your out here saying silly stuff.
