Not enough credit goes out to this channel! Absolutely love it, content is amazing, please keep doing this! You clearly have a passion for this Data Draft and I applaud your efforts!
youre funny,thats a bonus. i didnt expect msl to play matheson 25 minutes a night .i also have a rule in place about not taking players from teams i root for.because i might overvalue the pick. but i see jersey just lost a guy.matheson makes around 5 mil a year .hes not getting 9 . could be a destination if the fans dont like a early season swoon. everyone is hot and bothered about a 5 foot 9 inch 160 pound d around here atm.if you wanna roll the dice could get him late,or someone takes him earlier than they should.id keep an eye out anyhoo. im not into smallish players so ill be passing hoping hes overvalued.i want one 1 and two 2s this year.last year i had to drop forsling.guys got hurt and his production was iffy.wish i had him in the second half. im looking at raddysh late.depends what im missing . gohabsgo.
He has the 9th highest 3 Year average in goals. This was used to find guys who have a track record of scoring goals and trying to account for outlier seasons and find consistent goal production on the back end and see the difference between the top end guys and the value guys
@@joshgravel9596 I feel like they brought Gus in For a reason, I'd like him later in the draft but there's obviously risk if he doesn't get Pp1 and he does have a lower ceiling than mo based on peripherals
I usually love his shot volume and goal scoring potential, he could have been on this list if he stayed healthy. They need to fix that powerplay though
@@shakeypudding6563 if a player puts up a career year and you draft them thinking they'll improve on that you're more likely to get screwed. If you base your pick on a larger sample size you have a better idea of the range a player should be in and you can hope for better production but if it's around the average or slightly lower it won't destroy your team
