It's the miseducation system. Ever notice, a preschooler asks a lot of questions and is rarely satisfied with the answer, so they ask another question. Curiosity and questioning everything seems to be innate in kids. But once they go to school, suddenly the questions and curiosity stops. Their homework is memorizing state capitals, so there is no room to explore ideas. Well today their homework seems to be memorizing what LGBTQ+++XYZ stands for.
I literally wrote something very similar to this, but in more detail, about 30 minutes ago and ended up privatizing my post before I finished... It's nice to see others share my observations.
I see myself as a rational skeptical man. Any topic I am told by zombies not to research and given an “official context” I don’t trust it to their narrative.
Great stuff! Did you actually draft up that list yourself, too? This is how I picture myself talking to others but it never results in an execution as calm and rational sounding as this! 😅
Thanks! I did create the list in about 10 minutes, and hoped it would come to ten and it naturally did before I pasted the numbers into the little circles of my screenshot from my journal notes.
This list def serves as a great primer to all of the misconceptions people have of conspiracy theorists. Thank you for sharing! I will say though, that delving into conspiracies led me to becoming an anarchist, but not the nihilistic, vandalizing version that is portrayed on MSM.
This is a downside of this community and that is a lack of epistemology which is the theory of knowledge, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope. Epistemology is the investigation of what distinguishes justified belief from opinion. Humanity is littered with philosophers that have brought truth and wisdom to our consciousness and we need to build on their foundations. The biggest problem with material science is that it only pertains itself with the physical world and not the metaphysical truths. Material sciences are based on axioms that are never challenged and those brave enough to challenge these axioms will suffer but you can't replace the materialist consciousness with opinions but need to dig deep into the core and foundations of the material science. The materialist will reject anything spiritual because you can't weigh and measure spirit so one needs to develop an epistemology so they can build a cosmology.
as long as you dont mix religion into the mix, I think it is a very individual thing, spirituality. Religion is even more of a culprit than materialists, why? Because religion hijacked the spiritual aspect of the natural world, made up rules and scaretactics to coerce people into following. So, people are either locked into a religion, and cant see beyond their own nose. Or, they become hard materialsts, insisting that there is nothing spiritual, and everything is just chemicals and neurons. Then you have those inbetween, like me, who know for a fact , on a personal level, that book religions are a tool to control people, nothing more, but experiences in my life has shown me another aspect of nature that can only be of spirit...it is not material, and it is not all in my head ( lol:P). It has no rules, life is to be lived, love is to be felt and shown, harmfil actions are to be given consequenses by society.. not hell.
@@UAPch is you book published? Does it address the origins of thinking? I have been reading "Interdisciplinary Astronomy: Third Scientific Course (CW 323) (The Collected Works of Rudolf Steiner, 323)" and have been watching breakdowns of each chapter with a group dedicated to this book and other books by Rudolf Steiner. These individuals are eclectic and come from many disciplines and I thought you would be interested in this work because I could imagine you participating in this study group. If you are interested I can send you the name of the RU-vid channel.
@@jameskaplin502 please do share, although I probably don’t have time to read it now, I may get to it. I haven’t published it yet, but I’m working on it a bit almost every day. My intent is to publish it soon but have no idea when I’ll be able to be satisfied enough to freeze it for all time and put my name to it.
We are opposed only to having our thoughts, questions and then our understandings imposed upon. Thanks Douglas I really enjoyed this! ✨🤓👍 Very encouraging
Your right Douglas we don't reject all science, we reject the dumb science that we can just tell it BS and our discernment helps us tremendously at least with me anyway, now I'm not a highly educated or some kind of backyard genius, it's called good old fashioned common sense. Praise to the most high, bro Amen.
Just to explain to any who don't know anarchism is voluntarism if you can't get along with people voluntarily without being extorted and robbed by a criminal ruling class you to are a anarchist it's pretty simple do unto others as you would like to have done to you
language is troublesome, yes. an-archism, "without archons", without rulers--not "without rules". nonetheless, there is the lingering problem that man is built to serve (God); slavery/yoke/yoga is inevitable. the better question is, "how good is the king?"
yes. free will is part of the package, best used with awareness. a benevolent parent-child relationship is instructive. capital-g God: creator/source of the cosmos. "What? Know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you and which ye have from God, and that ye are not your own?" @@Goldenhawk583
