Most worst decisions were given against three Asia teams. Nowadays most of them are blaming that India does wrong things. But at past aus have done better than it. 🇱🇰
The beautiful game of cricket has been absolutely ruined and destroyed by shocking umpiring decisions and cheating over the years and happens at all levels from rural grass roots right through to internationals. Terribly sad indeed.
It boils down to the fact, that he always kept a cool head... I never saw even a single instance of him getting rueful and refusing the decision of the umpires... Even when his co-player started arguing, he would still calmly walk off the pitch... That's some self control...
The last one is wrongly put. The umpire mistakenly called over before the catch was taken in previous over, so as per the rules he had to give him out on this ball
You forgot to add Symonds' stumping blunder in SCG in 2008 when he was clearly out of the crease with nothing even touching the crease and yet third umpire gave not out...worst third umpiring decision ever
#9 is not fault of ABD. If you look at second replay, he was not at all looking behind when catch was taken. So he was conducting as per umpires decision.
That's' y we now have DRS in play ... it's a shame apart from really poor umpiring decisions - bowlers, fielders, or batters will cheat to win the game 'by hook or by crook'
Just assume no drs no third umpire is there now ... And 1 wrong dicision..there will be a war ...so much aggressive players are there now ... But in history ... They are so cool just obey the dicision... Great ..
No 1 is not cheating or umpiring error. If you look at batsman's reaction. Unfortunately no one knows actually what happened. One of the Cricket expert mentioned that it was a friendly match where each batsman would have to walk after certain period of time. Looks logical and only possibility to me.
Last one , the bats man got out already in the previous ball by hit wicket .So only the batsman and the umpire knew since he was out i think they agreed to give out on the very next ball .so thats why the batsman did not hesitate to go. I did not make this up but i have seen it in another video in which one guy is explaining it .iam not sure if its true 😅😅
Highlight of this video is that for the No.1 decision, ( the blind man) when given out by umpire , batsman does not even protest, and that is the biggest wonder. Come on at least show some emotion..
Very nice video.. but No 1 don't deserve the no 1 position.. 😊 because I heard that the same batsman was actually out on the previous delivery but umpire didn't give him out .. later umpire realised his mistake and he rectified it on the next delivery.. since it wasn't an international cricket match, batsman actually walked off..
Thank god we now have the challenges.... If that was there 20 years ago, Tendulkar would be still batting. He was given out every time anyone appealed, sometimes even without an appeal 😅
Last out has a story behind it - lol. That was out (agreed between the fielding team and batsman before the ball is bowled) and batsman walked. Read the story behind it.
Broad was right not to walk bearing in mind some of the catches claimed by Ponting, Clarke and the rest. Wrongly claiming a catch is cheating, whereas accepting the umpire's decision is not. Is Hawkeye definitely correct to show the ball going over the top of Sachin's stumps? He does seem to have kicked it quite low down on his leg.
