Stuck at 100 "not if you are willing to buy this" would be more honest. I understand it's how you earn a living but...it isn't "not anymore". It's "if your willing to spend money to improve".
@@Nuffsed81 bro he's just linking his courses chill out it's literally a comment in his comment section it's not like he plugs in his videos none stop in fact he never does so just seriously chill bro
11:40 . This clarified so much as to why I see GMs not take strong pieces when you are simply moving a pawn to take it. Chess is so simple but so complex at the same time. I don't understand the defense and counter side and reading what your opponent is trying to do. I simply think of attack. This is a great video.
I've only recently discovered your channel, it has to be the most underrated chess channel on RU-vid. Thanks for all this great content and amazing advice
great lesson for intuitive players... I get tired of so many videos that requires you to spend 80 hours analyzing variations for a specific line. This lesson is great for when your opening goes way off and you are trying to figure out how to swing the game your way !! Thanks!!!
Great speakers establish common ground with their audience, as well as mentally enlighten their spectators. Nelson is no different, except for the fact that he's doing a chess speech.
Watched a couple of your vids now. Probably the best I’ve seen for anyone up to my level (2100) You squeeze a lot of valuable info that’s easily understandable into each minute. It’s the way you communicate. Good stuff mate
His videos are so informative and strategic, I just started a month ago and watching just a few videos is giving me upper hand over people that gave been playing years.
Mr.Lopez you’re the best chess tutorial maker in RU-vid for me. It’s hard to apply many of them in short time as I often blunder but I feel like I am going somewhere even though I am in lower levels dealing with scholars mate constantly
Your videos are incredibly helpful! I love these type of videos that cover a broad subject that isn't just for very niche uses and I can apply them to every game
Newly come to them, I believe Chess Vibes are the best chess tutorials on RU-vid hands down! Nelson says neither more nor less than is necessary, and the pace is matched to the intended audience (a rare thing) and conducive not only to the consumption of the material at hand, but also to its digestion. His delivery is at all times measured and engaging. Thanks for these! "A good attacker has courage." You've got to have a bit of faith! But more importantly, and often missing from the game these days...is to venture a bit of 'fun' on route to exploring the game's and your opponent's reach. Otherwise what is the point! The goal of any game is not so much to win, but to learn something by measure of the opponents potential to use in assessment 'outside' the game. Sacrifice a game to win an ongoing friendship!
Can you create a playlist that contains all your top n videos? I've watched many of them and it would be nice to have them in one place to go over again. I need frequent refreshers.
thanks Nelson-you explain things better than anyone else you tube. everyone else seems to go on with all these complicated explanations but you have this way of breaking topics down so that they make sense
I’m definitely not as serious of a player as 99% of you here, but would like to improve to beat my brother in law whom I’ve never beat!! Thanks for the great tips and content!!
Awesome video! I learned a lot. My attacks were non-existent. Going to start using things I’ve learned during gameplay now. I made to hit the like and subscribe as well. Off to learn the mating patterns now!
Nelson: One of the most confusing aspects of chess for me is that I’m always reluctant to make a move that will immediately be taken back or captured by my opponent. I can imagine this ahead of time, and imagine one or two moves further, but my mind can’t keep up with so many possible moves that wil/might be coming. Is there a way to practice thinking ahead? It’s the most difficult part of chess for me. Tyvm. RJohnson
In the game you shared (first question), I had decided to do your two moves but in reverse, I moved Ng3 first, hoping to move the bishop, and then add the queen on e7. But I think I know why you sacrifised the rook first, is it because you didn't want them to castle?
Thanks for these super useful tips, great videos, I progressed thanks to your content, can you please post something on the best way to play against the simple/double fiancento, thank you dude ! Stay sharp Play smart 😉
In the immortal game, 14th and 15th principles, white nearly failed in his quest to mate by moving e5 which was completely unnecessary, unless I missed something. Lucky that black wasn't watching and played Na6. Black could have prevented the line leading to checkmate had he played Na6 or even Ba6. Instead of e5, white should have just launched into the winning line with Nxg7+ and proceed as described.
I m bad at attacking but that's not the only reason I am looking at this video I wanna be able to defend too. So I know when opponent is making a poor attack or when opponent has an attack or can create attacks. The usual thing that happens in my game is we both create our attack and IDK how tf victory is determined.
Love the Channel! Re: Immortal game, e5 was not necessary, in fact, a blunder. Could have cost white the game. Anderson was still clearly uncertain about the mate with e5.
