Torah vs Quran vs Bible | David Wolpe and Lex Fridman 

Child wives though

Or just accept the fact that all book and religions are all the same and all came from astronomy 🤷🏼‍♂️

He should bring on Muhammad Hijab

@@mercuryfillings8576 Mary was 12 when she married Joseph in the bible, Aisha was 17 when she married the prophet.

@@nshar786 That's the LAST person we want representing Islam.

Islam, christianity and jewdism: here you go! m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-INIG636SnU4.html

@@alanbrados2574 watched both parts three years ago.. good watch..

if he knew more about them he wouldn't be a jew

Contrary to the lies and distortions against Islam by the establishment media and now by the so called "alternative media" as well, Islam is NOT a new religion. In fact, Jesus and all the other Prophets in the Bible were Muslims. Here's the proof… 1. Islam = Submission/Peace. 2. Muslim = One who submits to God peacefully. 3. Prostration = The ultimate way to submit to your Creator. 4. Muslims Prostrate by placing their heads on the ground to worship God. So how did Jesus and all the other Prophets prayed to their Lord in the Bible? Let’s take a look... 5. Jesus Matthews 26:39 39 "Going a little farther, he fell with his face to the ground and prayed" 6. Abraham Genesis 17:3 3 "And Abraham fell on his face: and God talked with him." 7. David 1 Samuel 20:41 41 “David got up from the south side of the stone and bowed down before Jonathan three times, with his face to the ground.” 8. Moses and Aaron Numbers 20:6 6 "...they fell upon their faces: and the glory of the Lord appeared unto them." 9. Joshua Joshua 7:6 6 “Then Joshua tore his clothes and fell facedown to the ground before the ark of the Lord, remaining there till evening. The elders of Israel did the same, and sprinkled dust on their heads.” 10. Solomon 2 Chronicles 7:3 3 "When all the Israelites saw the fire coming down and the glory of the Lord above the temple, they knelt on the pavement with their faces to the ground, and they worshiped and gave thanks to the Lord, saying, ‘He is good; his love endures forever.” 11. Ezra Nehemiah 8:6 6 "Ezra praised the Lord, the great God; and all the people lifted their hands and responded, “Amen! Amen!” Then they bowed down and worshiped the Lord with their faces to the ground." 12. Revelation 7:11 11 "All the angels were standing around the throne and around the elders and the four living creatures. They fell down on their faces before the throne and worshiped God." Muslims are just continuing what all the previous Prophets and Messengers in the scriptures did by submitting to Allah only. May Allah continue to have MERCY us, continue to PROTECT us, continue to FORGIVE us, continue to GUIDE us, and continue to BLESS us.

Christians Jesus and Muslims Muhammad is not comparable as in Muslims view Jesus as a prophet n Christians turned him into a God. in simple words Muhammad is to Muslims Like Moses is to Jews...the Lawgiver...warner...prophet...but a man not divine. God dictated to Moses and he wrote it down...as Mr. Wolpe said ...same as Archangel Gabriel dictated to Muhammad on God's command n he recited to people which was later wrote down in parchments or slates in his lifetime and as book after him....the stories are different coz in old testament, in few places there r lewd descriptions of acts done by prophets which any sensible person would reject as unthinkable to b carried out by a holy person ...Quran was sent to correct those misconceptions and add new laws for societal and political conduct as none of Moses and Jesus was able to establish as a state person. apologies for my broken english as its not my 1st language.

Because Christians won’t behead you for insulting Jesus.

It's not hard to when the New testament is a story of one of our people and it contradicts G-d's very words Islam is a faith with STRONG rules and faiths to G-d Your Pope and deemed hell not a thing, than 2 years later gave approval of gay marriage, two VERY things G-d said NO NO NO too.. Islam and jusism have rules and we follow them per G-d's demand not request Christians kind of just make things up or change the story line as it see's fit Odd how the New Testament is 30% foot notes and updates....isn't it?

@@EndlessTravels you're confusing what the NT teaches with what Catholics do. I agree that the Bible doesn't teach what Catholics teach/practice but that doesn't prove anything is wrong with the Bible. I'm not sure I follow on your 30% footnotes/updates comment. If you're referring to the footnotes from something like a study bible, those are just commentary notes, no Christian views those as the Word of God. There are many Jewish writings that act as commentary on the OT, like the Talmud, I wouldn't say that means the OT is somehow wrong. The commentary can be wrong. Not all Bibles are good translations with good footnotes but you can learn Hebrew and Greek and read it in its original language for yourself. Just because even some good translations have updates doesn't prove there is something wrong with the original. A good translation is anything that effectively/accurately communicates the original to its audience. As language changes translations need updating but the original stays the same. You're right that the NT is about a Jewish man. It was written by Jewish men (except maybe Luke/Acts). It is a very Jewish collection of writtings and beautifully fulfills, and is consistent with, the OT. I'd encourage you to study it for yourself to be certain. No offense but it seems like you're not famailiar with NT, if you read it you will see the Catholics aren't very famailiar with it either.

Hmm I wonder why😂

Yeah like none of the books of the new testiment were written by people who knew Jesus in person 😅😂

Yeah I was like…what? This guy knows nothing

Idk what he was talking abt when he said that. That was a major red flag. Peter in particular played a crucial part of the life and trial of Jesus. Matthew and Luke, James, Mark travelled with him. And John baptised Jesus. This man just seems to only understand 1 religion.

Not one of the Gospel writers ever met Jesus. The names are confusing because they are the same/similar to the aposles, but they lived decades after his death. Sorry

Named as M,M,L&J by irenaeus a couple centuries after they are clamied to have been written fwiw

@@JustGeorgeOnRU-vid I’m sorry, but this is factually and historically incorrect. Luke and Paul lived after his death, James, John, Peter, Matthew and James (brother). Their documents indicate that they met him by their own vocabulary. Including external sources. Furthermore, John Mark lived during Jesus time and met him. It’s one thing to not believe in the religion (to each his own), it’s another thing to deny historical evidence. I hope this helps.

Agree

There are so many interpretations of Christianity, who's to say he's wrong on all accounts?

@@Mr9mann kind of the same with Islam and Judaism

@@Mr9mann when he said that all the gospels were written by people who never met Jesus, that is factually wrong. It’s not a matter of interpretation.

@@SmegmaBukaki69 I thought we don’t even know who the actual authors even were?

Islam, christianity and jewdism: here you go! m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-INIG636SnU4.html

Too sad Mohammad Chahrour is dead :(

Everyone will die. Dearh is unavoidable

Christian Jewish Islam... same shit.

Satan made you say it! Your distracted from finding the truth! Read before you judge

when god walking in the garden, which one god? the father? son? or holy spirit?

Islam, christianity and jewdism: here you go! m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-INIG636SnU4.html

@@TheKingofTheUniverse. God the Father. Since the son came in the new testament, and after the departure of Jesus, we were left with the holy spirit as a 'helper'. You can make the argument that it's all 3 in one. Since the word was with God in the beginning, and the word was God (indicating the same, of one) Christ, the Logos, made the word flesh, fulfilling old testament prophecy. And the spirit of God roamed the waters. So all 3 really...

@@Nick-18 do ur bible support the idea that they are 3 in 1? Please go look for it in ur bible, it isnt even there and jesus never claimed to be god, infact there is alot of contrary evidence like jesus not knowing the hour and praying to god and eating like us humans, stop listening to the lies told to u by paul and athor non believers god is 1

@@wassimfriejeh5180 Surah 29 verse 46 " “We believe in what was revealed to us and what was revealed to you. One is our God and your God; and we are those who submit ourselves to Him.” But you will say the bible is corrupted and that we believe in a false god. The bible says God is a trinity (think solid, liquid, gas or time, space, matter) Jesus died on the cross for our sins, and Jesus rose from the dead. So Your belief says that we believe in the same God, but you don't believe any of that. Again, you will say the bible is corrupted, BUT you have a problem, as the word of God is uncorrupt able. Surah 3 verse 3 and 4 says that Jews and Christians received the scripture from allah, as guidance. NONE CAN CHANGE HIS WORDS. Those that follow the torah and the gospel, it is they who will prosper, says the qoran. Surah 10 verse 94 "Now, if you are in doubt (O Muhammad) concerning what We have revealed to you, then ask those who have been reading the Book before you. So you are contradicting yourself. Believe the book or don't believe the book?Word of God is uncorrupt able but is corrupted? How can Muhammad refer to the people of the book when the book that is un corruptible is corrupted? No matter how you spin it, Islam gets it completely wrong my friend.

Also Matthew

Unproven

But there are also theories that there used to be many versions of Quran and different lesser books but some political Islamic powerhouse came to decide what stays together in one book as while other records were burnt. So the idea that the book came wholly to the prophet is a bit flawed because a lot were also written into the account of accepted Quran that was just reports from people who lived close to the prophet

@@olaboyeolanrewaju134 what theories specifically. The last time I did research on this I could not find any credible theories. In fact analysis has been done of manuscripts of the people around Muhammed (PBUH) and none of them contain any extra verses or chapters. Really curious where you are getting this information. Because if you can find a credible source for this then you will have single handedly crushed all that Islam is built on.

@@olaboyeolanrewaju134 Those different "versions" are the personal manuscripts of the people who came forth to confirm and convene on the Quran as revealed to them via the prophet. Often, personal manuscripts are incomplete, containing scribal errors, or contain footnotes and commentaries to explain certain passages as the prophet would also provide explanations sometimes. To prevent these non-Quranic entries from remaining, these copies were burnt. So in reality, these different "versions" didn't contain radically different or contradictory passages. The revelation was recited verbatim as it was received, not through writing. The physical book is only a record of the oral tradition which has been the primary mode of transmission since the beginning.

@@olaboyeolanrewaju134 watch this one by Lex: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BOKCNUqbpH0.html

No, Islam claims to be the restoration of the law, they claim the Jews and Christians corrupted their texts.

Paul never met Jesus, Paul preached the exact opposite of Jesus teachings

@@khaledmerzouk6110 Thats not what the Bible says... If we are basing the info on the Bible, Paul met Jesus after he rose from the dead. And if you dont wnt to except that, then I'll ask what do you think made Paul give up his Status and Wealth amongst his Jewish peers to be a perrenial prisoner writing letters about Christ?

@@kpeezy776 it doesn't matter, he contradicted what Jesus came up with so you should not trust him

Islam, christianity and jewdism: here you go! m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-INIG636SnU4.html

Contrary to the lies and distortions against Islam by the establishment media and now by the so called "alternative media" as well, Islam is NOT a new religion. In fact, Jesus and all the other Prophets in the Bible were Muslims. Here's the proof… 1. Islam = Submission/Peace. 2. Muslim = One who submits to God peacefully. 3. Prostration = The ultimate way to submit to your Creator. 4. Muslims Prostrate by placing their heads on the ground to worship God. So how did Jesus and all the other Prophets prayed to their Lord in the Bible? Let’s take a look... 5. Jesus Matthews 26:39 39 "Going a little farther, he fell with his face to the ground and prayed" 6. Abraham Genesis 17:3 3 "And Abraham fell on his face: and God talked with him." 7. David 1 Samuel 20:41 41 “David got up from the south side of the stone and bowed down before Jonathan three times, with his face to the ground.” 8. Moses and Aaron Numbers 20:6 6 "...they fell upon their faces: and the glory of the Lord appeared unto them." 9. Joshua Joshua 7:6 6 “Then Joshua tore his clothes and fell facedown to the ground before the ark of the Lord, remaining there till evening. The elders of Israel did the same, and sprinkled dust on their heads.” 10. Solomon 2 Chronicles 7:3 3 "When all the Israelites saw the fire coming down and the glory of the Lord above the temple, they knelt on the pavement with their faces to the ground, and they worshiped and gave thanks to the Lord, saying, ‘He is good; his love endures forever.” 11. Ezra Nehemiah 8:6 6 "Ezra praised the Lord, the great God; and all the people lifted their hands and responded, “Amen! Amen!” Then they bowed down and worshiped the Lord with their faces to the ground." 12. Revelation 7:11 11 "All the angels were standing around the throne and around the elders and the four living creatures. They fell down on their faces before the throne and worshiped God." Muslims are just continuing what all the previous Prophets and Messengers in the scriptures did by submitting to Allah only. May Allah continue to have MERCY us, continue to PROTECT us, continue to FORGIVE us, continue to GUIDE us, and continue to BLESS us.

He didn’t know much about any of them. Facts. 💯

@@jacobrodriguez7771 If you have read and studied the Bible.. you would know how little he knew. Please don’t be ignorant when you are a sheep.. who will listen to someone and not check whether he is accurate or it is his opinions. Some of what he said is a flat inaccurate statement. Zip it.

He said none of the gospels were written by people who knew Jesus. That's not even close. I'm not sure where that came from. The most basic scholar knows two of the gospels were written by disciples. Head scratching

But Mark is famously known to be based on Peter's telling of the gospel so that should be counted also

@Buck Yomama Trust historical evidence or trust Buck? 🤔 You should explain why Mr.Buck with some persuasive evidence

@Buck Yomama The guy in the vid made the claim. I don't believe you're informed on this. Paul is actually the writer with the least connection to seeing Jesus. It's the total opposite of what you're saying. Matthew - one of the disciples that followed him for years. Mark - mentions details only Peter would know or that don't make Peter look so bad 😅 John - one of the disciples. Listed as a disciple in every known eye witness account of what happened and the christian tradition. There are also writings of his disciples that give more context Luke - contains information that show that he spoke to particular eye witnesses (e.g.- the only gospel with extra details on things only Jesus' mom would know) Jude - Jesus' brother Peter - one of the Jesus' most famous disciples. I've listened to the claims of Atheists and Muslims who do not believe Jesus was God but none of them question whether Jesus existed or if Paul existed. I'm not sure why you would doubt either. 🤔

@Buck Yomama why are you focusing on reasons you don't need to do anything? Do something Bro... why rest/hide behind that. I heard the claim by the guy in the vid that the books weren't written by someone who saw Jesus. Although the burden of proof should be on this guy, I'm bringing reasons against it. You can do that. It's OK. It's all for the dialogue. If you don't know fully that's fine but we can discuss what you know

Mufti menk

Islam, christianity and jewdism: here you go! m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-INIG636SnU4.html

@@hmsp7799 he's not really a western scholar.

As someone into religions , i have to disagree with you sir, my reason is ,most of Bible was written 300 years after time, by orders from King James and he was supervise it , written by yuhana with no resources mention,and the orginal bible was written by Armani language (wich is not exist today) BTW king James is who start Mason ideology that time and make most of Bible stories Compatible with Masonic thought at that time..

​@@muhammadyounos2769Your opinion regarding the dating of manuscripts does not seem to match the scholarly research. Based on below evidence, we can assume the gospel of Matthew was written before the 2nd century because Iraneus quotes it in 180 AD and we also have manuscripts dated to 175AD. The earliest manuscript bearing the title "according to Matthew" is very likely P64/67 (these fragments are usually considered part of the same original manuscript). This manuscript is typically dated to around AD 175. The earliest statement that is 100% unambiguous on this matter comes from Irenaeus of Lyons, writing approx. AD 180. He attributes the Gospel of Matthew to Matthew, quotes repeatedly from the document, and there is no question that what he has in mind is the document known today as the Gospel of Matthew (see Irenaeus Against Heresies 3.1.1)

@@muhammadyounos2769that not true matthew was written between 70-100 ad stop the lie!

@@muhammadyounos2769 fellow friend, first: according to the book of scholars, christian and non-christian, agree that 4 gospels were written between 70-110 AD (37-77 years After Christ). On 300 the Whole Bible (Old Testiment, the rest of New Testament) Canonised. 2. King James lived in early 1700 centuries, after 1600 years after the First Gospel was written. 3. Jesus did not speak Armani. He spoke Aramean and that language is still Alive and well in the Assyrian/Syriac/Chaldean people and their community. Of course the Aramean language which was spoke 2000 years ago has evolved just like Latin evolving into modern day language. But in these communities they still Pray in Old Aramean. And as Jesus would say, Shalama Lekhom.

Wrong, most of the NT was written decades after JC died. It's all a bunch of fake b.s. they made up for power, because they didn't want people to follow the Law God handed down through Moses, the wanted to trick them I to following nonsense about "trinities" (which came later in nicea) and idol worship of people (JC) I stead of God.

What about being an adulterous woman who becomes pregnant. Allowing her to raise the baby for 2 years and killing her and calling it mercy. In the Bible, Jesus says to the crowd about to stone the adulterous woman and says, "He who is without sin, cast the first stone." Then he tells her to go in peace and stop committing adultery. Also, the shariah law, polygamy, and such are condoned in Islam. I would not say all Muslims are individually misogynistic, but if we want to play that game, that is a silly statement.

surah maryam and surah ali imran ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-K-X0YrHhgq0.html and ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YCZ_oMQnVmE.html answers the last bit, and it does mention jews as well as christians. it mentions 'sold for a paltry sum' meaning stories and doctrines changed here and there over time if paid for. whereas (it argues) Quran will be unchanged, and this has been proven by carbon dating technology at Oxford

Yeah, I kind of thought so too… like let me learn something here… but ultimately one thing like that is all it takes for someone to write something off… sounds silly

4. Cody Lundin

5. Adnan Rashid

Mohammad Hijab! Come on how can one forget him?

Abdul hakim murad

you people only promote youtubers and not great writers and thinkers in the ummah. so lame.

He was delicate because he has to fear potential retribution and/or violence if he dares to either accidentally or purposefully say something that offends an unhinged Islamist. Saying something controversial against Muhammad or Allah can get you killed.

@@rumi108 - Eh, I find your comment lacking in it’s lazy dismissal. I’m far from fearful. Sorry, but Islamists are the only ones cutting people’s heads off in the streets for daring to do things like drawing Muhammad (aka the pedophile narcissist who invented Islam).

@@rumi108 How does simply saying a fact mean he lives in fear?

@@whosyodaddy13 There’s a degree of ignorance, fear, and hate towards Islam in your words, which is undesirable nowadays. But don’t let that fear to grow into something bigger. Many terrible things done out of fear and hate. Don’t let yourself fall into that trap.

@@elchotayewski2788 fear is definitely a trap, but its not unwarranted. Come to my country and live it. Islam is a young religion that is culturally stuck in a cycle of fear and hate. Definitely can't blame the muslims, but villifying the fear of others is equally unjustified. Time will tell.

That would be amazing.

Nonsense the New Testament was written way after Jesus death. You have to state evidence. The New Testament was written around 80-100 AD, although some scholars date it significantly later, and there is evidence that it was still being substantially revised well into the 2nd century. Even more telling is that Jesus and most of those 12 disciples spoke Aramaic and Mishnaic Hebrew. The New Testament was written in Koine Greek.

or; become your own person away from those who birthed you and see who you really are. often Jesus said we are children of god and we are all one on the same.

Exactly not everybodys parents are good and want the best for their children, id love to see the context of the actual quote. This guy seems like a hater of christianity .

Good parents want them to be able to think for themselves And "Leave....

@@rhondabailey9238 True, good parents don't teach, they lead, and also are to learn from their children; with this model, what works and does not work becomes enhanced for further pursuit or nullification.

100%. But they will not understand this. Tradition is important (mother and father) but knowing how to adjust to change is equally important.

it just indicates being ignorant of a subject.

Loool literally, he must’ve skipped over John constantly saying he was there and the one who’s recording this lol

I am pretty sure he is correct. The gospels spent many years playing the telephone game. Spiderman is said to be in NY but that is only in the story. We have good histroy of the canonizatiopn of the bible and how the gospels were added./

@@rullywinkle If you believe that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were written by the apostles then its clear that they were with there according to scripture.

The Koran itself is full of contradictions.

"The word Muslim means the one who surrenders/submits." basically a moslem is a slave of allah. there is no freedom in islam. it is a religion of slavery. all men are slaves of allah.

When holy men of God write or speak by the power of the Holy Ghost, their words “shall be scripture, shall be the will of the Lord, shall be the mind of the Lord, shall be the word of the Lord, shall be the voice of the Lord, and the power of God unto salvation” (Doctrine and Covenants 68:4). The official, canonized scriptures of the Church, often called the standard works, are the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price. The principal purpose of scriptures is to testify of Christ and to guide the children of God so they can come unto Him and receive eternal life (see John 5:39; 20:31; 1 Nephi 6:4; Mosiah 13:33-35). The Book of Mormon prophet Mormon taught: “Whosoever will may lay hold upon the word of God, which is quick and powerful, which shall divide asunder all the cunning and the snares and the wiles of the devil, and lead the man of Christ in a strait and narrow course across that everlasting gulf of misery which is prepared to engulf the wicked- “And land their souls, yea, their immortal souls, at the right hand of God in the kingdom of heaven, to sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and with Jacob, and with all our holy fathers, to go no more out” (Helaman 3:29-30). God, who is the same “yesterday, today, and forever” (2 Nephi 29:9), continues to reveal scripture in modern times as He did in ancient times. Latter-day prophets counsel people everywhere to study the scriptures daily, including the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price. They encourage individual and family scripture study. They encourage us, as Nephi encouraged his brethren, to liken the scriptures to ourselves, finding ways that the sacred accounts of old apply in our lives today (see 1 Nephi 19:23-24). They exhort us to “search the scriptures” (John 5:39) and “feast upon the words of Christ” (2 Nephi 32:3). Daily, meaningful scripture study helps individuals be receptive to the guidance of the Holy Ghost. It builds faith, fortifies against temptation, enlightens, and helps individuals draw near to our Heavenly Father and His Beloved Son. The Bible The Bible is divided into two parts: the Old Testament and the New Testament. The Old Testament is a sacred record of God’s dealings with His covenant people in the Holy Land. It includes the teachings of such prophets as Moses, Joshua, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Daniel. The New Testament records the birth, mortal ministry, and Atonement of the Savior. It concludes with the ministry of the Savior’s disciples. Because the Bible has been translated many times, it is printed in different versions. In English, the King James Version of the Bible is accepted as scripture by the Church. In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, we revere the Bible and its sacred teachings. We can receive strength, comfort, and guidance from the biblical accounts of God’s dealings with His people. The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ The Book of Mormon came forth in this dispensation by the will of the Lord. It is a record of God’s dealings with the people who lived in the ancient Americas. Prophets of the Lord engraved the original records on gold plates. The Lord declared that the Book of Mormon contains “the fulness of the gospel of Jesus Christ” (Doctrine and Covenants 20:9; see also Doctrine and Covenants 42:12). On September 22, 1827, an angel named Moroni-the last Book of Mormon prophet-delivered these records to the Prophet Joseph Smith. By the gift and power of God, the Prophet Joseph translated the record into English. Since then, the Book of Mormon has been translated into many other languages. The primary purpose of the Book of Mormon is to convince all people “that Jesus is the Christ, the Eternal God, manifesting himself unto all nations” (title page of the Book of Mormon). It teaches that all people “must come unto him, or they cannot be saved” (1 Nephi 13:40). Joseph Smith said that the Book of Mormon is “the keystone of our religion, and a man [will] get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book” (introduction to the Book of Mormon). The Book of Mormon is another witness for the truths taught in the Bible. It also restores “plain and precious” truths that have been lost from the Bible through errors in translation or “taken away” in attempts to “pervert the right ways of the Lord” (see 1 Nephi 13:24-27, 38-41). The Bible and the Book of Mormon “shall grow together, unto the confounding of false doctrines and laying down of contentions, and establishing peace” (2 Nephi 3:12). Near the end of the Book of Mormon, the prophet Moroni teaches us how we can know the book is true: “When ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost” (Moroni 10:4; see also Moroni 10:3 and Moroni 10:5). The Doctrine and Covenants The Doctrine and Covenants contains revelations given to the Prophet Joseph Smith. It also includes a few revelations given to other latter-day prophets following Joseph Smith. This book of scripture is unique because it is not a translation of ancient documents. It is a collection of revelations given by the Lord to His chosen prophets in the latter days. The Prophet Joseph Smith said that the Doctrine and Covenants is “the foundation of the Church in these last days, and a benefit to the world, showing that the keys of the mysteries of the kingdom of our Savior are again entrusted to man” (section heading for Doctrine and Covenants 70). The Pearl of Great Price The Pearl of Great Price contains the book of Moses, the book of Abraham, the Prophet Joseph Smith’s inspired translation of Matthew chapter 24, and some writings of the Prophet Joseph. The book of Moses is a small excerpt from Joseph Smith’s inspired translation of the Bible. It is a more complete record of Moses’s writings at the beginning of the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. It contains many doctrines and teachings that were lost from the Bible and gives additional information about the plan of salvation, the creation of the earth, and the Lord’s dealings with Adam and Enoch. The book of Abraham is a translation of ancient records written on papyrus that came into the possession of the Church in 1835. The Prophet Joseph Smith translated the records by revelation. This book contains truths about the premortal Council in Heaven, the creation of the earth, the nature of God, and the priesthood. Joseph Smith-Matthew is an excerpt (Matthew 24) from Joseph Smith’s inspired revision of the Bible and adds to our knowledge of the Savior’s teachings about His Second Coming. The writings of Joseph Smith in the Pearl of Great Price include: Joseph Smith-History, which is an excerpt from the Prophet’s history of the Church. It is a narrative of the events leading to the restoration of the Church, including the First Vision, the visits of Moroni to the Prophet Joseph, the obtaining of the gold plates, and the restoration of the Aaronic Priesthood. The Articles of Faith, which the Prophet Joseph Smith wrote as basic statements of belief and doctrine.

Check out acts 17 apologetics

He didn’t say they didn’t live during his life… he said they didn’t write the gospels themselves. First off, any religious or historical scholar with any credibility state that none of the four gospels in the New Testament were written by their namesakes. The oral tradition was much more prominent at the time and none of the gospels were actually transcribed until at least 50yrs after the death of Jesus, and over a 100yrs later in the case of John. Because the stories were not written down it became difficult for the scribes to attribute particular stories to specific people so they often chose people famous (or well known) during the time of Jesus. It is well documented that over 100 gospels existed but when Emperor Constantine commissioned a version of the bible to be created for the young religion, many gospels were ignored because they were attributed to women, didn’t mesh well with the messaging of the clergy and aristocrats in charge, and lastly because many gospels (including the main four) were transcribed from one language to another over decades, and oftentimes the books were fragmented or didn’t make sense. If you read the main four they actually contradict each other in many parts… this is because of all the aforementioned reasons. Everything I’ve said is agreed upon by top religious scholars… you should take a look. It’s insane that so many think the bible was written by god or by the actual named people… and it was a converted Roman emperor who decided he wanted a New Testament to help solidify his power and a peaceful transition from polytheism to Christianity… which he felt could be more easily managed. Imagine playing the game of telephone with stories as long as the gospels… over decades. Then they get translated from different languages by people with a specific agenda… oops

@@Jealod24 Much (all?) of what you say here is wrong. Sources would help your argument rather than claiming "top religious scholars" agree with you. Traditional church history & conservative Christian scholars today agree that eyewitnesses of Christ wrote the NT. Caveats would be Mark & Luke, but they had Peter & Paul, respectively, for their works.

Exactly. The guest was mistaken (although liberals would agree with him).

@@Kevin-1066 I don't get how people still take theories developed by Jesus mysticists seriously and claim to have investigated these issues. Not even Bart Ehrman would side with the Constantine conspiracy... Plus the guest has to basically ignore Second Temple Judaism scholarship to make an assertion like Jesus founded his own religion like Mohammed

Dude. Constantine had nothing to do with forming the canon. That’s a myth

Source?

@@LångemansLya ru-vid.com-deqyUEGbe8

@@LångemansLya Google is free brother

@@LångemansLya I think (not sure) that he's referring to the dead sea scrolls and/or the lost gospel of Thomas.

@@ColonelFluffles He is referring to the Quran and how it accurately depicted Ancient Egyptian beliefs about what would happen to the Pharaohs when they died. Details that were only discovered long after Rosetta Stone.

Or David Wood

Omer is just a radicalized social activist with American flavor

He had Imam Suileiman on his pod recently

And the fact that orientalist to this day haven’t been able to find contradictions or falsifications in the Quran just proves that if any book was to be the word of GOD, it would be the Quran. Idk how they can talk about religion and not look into the people that are claiming to be holding onto the literal word of GOD

where is the chain of narrations of the koran? muhammad uttered two kind of sayings hadith and koran, but there is no chain of narrations of the koran at all zero.

@@AsifKhan-hf9zy hadith is saying of prophet and quran is a recitation from memory and in prophets time people with good memory memorised the verses told to them by prophet and they memorised. You want to know their names go search it, you will find it.

@@AsifKhan-hf9zy Sorry you think that way. EVERY SINGLE Memorizer of the Qura'n has a full connected chain back to the Prophet. Most of them are given that as a certificate when they are tested for their memorization and approved for it.

What are your thoughts on the murdering of apostates?

@@marcwells03 favourite question of those who haven’t read the Quran and just follows rumours😊 Same as when you kill a criminal at your home while defending your family. Court claims you innocent and then your community spreads rumours that you are a dangerous murderer.

@@denismefaev3983 wow….. I’m guessing you’re embarrassed to answer because you’re ashamed that your holy book tells you to kill people who leave the religion. Shame on you

@@denismefaev3983 wait, so you are equivocating an apostate to a criminal?

@@denismefaev3983 there are literally thousands of people being murdered and raped because they don’t agree with a hijab. How do you justify their actions?

Wish he had done the same with Christianity.

We've seen the patterns now, if he knows much he would've converted to Islam.

@@sorrowseal Really? The more I learned about Islam, the more I realized it was a false religion.

@@bowrudder899 Depends on your intentions, if you’re aim is to seek God’s mercy and live a righteous life, then you’d seek the right resources that will show otherwise.

@@bowrudder899 that’s because nobody cares if he offends christians. That’s the only reason he added all those qualifiers before discussing Islam, don’t wanna deal with the left outrage mob

By whom? Surely not by Chris

​@@mohamedalahmadani5174 😂 Why does a little ant like you ever think they could talk down to someone like Christopher Hitchens? He was 600 times smarter than you ever will be and accomplished more than you ever will. You'll never be anything more than some random "Mohamed" in a youtube comment section.

lol

Actually he wasn’t all that respectful about Christianity. Who reads the entire Bible and takes away from the experience that they only believe in the Old Testament? He knocks on Jesus for saying “leave your father and mother and follow me” which actually isn’t exactly what he said. Jesus did say something along the lines of “you should love me more than your father and mother” which is also obviously fairly radical. In fact, in current translations he actually says something to the effect of you should “hate” your parents. However, in the original Greek, his language wasn’t necessarily that harsh. But like I was saying, if you’re going to be critical of passages from the New Testament you’ve also got to be critical of passages from the Old Testament or the Tanakh and that’s a goldmine for preposterous teachings. Never mind the obvious insanity like all the times God commits genocide or commands the Israelites to commit atrocities. There are also specific passages such as in Leviticus and Deuteronomy that are either malicious or just absurd. God commands the Israelites to stone gay people to death, stone “sorceresses” to death, it says you should be stoned to death if you mix wool and linen, and that’s just getting warmed up. There are all sorts of random rules in the Torah like you should not boil a baby goat in its mother’s milk, you should not eat shellfish, you can eat meat but not the blood or the fat. In Deuteronomy, the punishment for raping a virgin is to pay her father 50 shekels and marry her for life. I really could go on and on about the idiocy of the Old Testament but it would take too long. Really the only two books of the Old Testament that shouldn’t be discarded are Psalms and Proverbs.

Very telling that the True faith found in Christ is the target of falsehoods and deception. I earnestly hope the LORD open your eyes and work on your heart. God is Good!

He’s already had an Imam on - Omar Suleiman . And LOL Tovia is not well educated with the New Testament whatsoever. Any time he debates with an actual Christian scholar he gets smoked , for example Dr. michael brown a Jesus Christian.

@@RyanHReviews You ever consider your own trinity and idolatry against the one true God is the falsehood?

@@kevinp1464 Genesis 2:24 "Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife and they shall become one ("echad") flesh. " It strikes me as deeply ironic that Orthodox Jews cover their eyes after spotting three stars before reciting the Shema. To answer your question though, no, I know I am not committing idolatry by kissing the Son.

@@RyanHReviews You every consider that Jesus was in union with the father like a man and a woman are in union during marriage? John 17:21 I am not asking on behalf of them alone, but also on behalf of those who will believe in Me through their message, that all of them may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I am in You. May they also be in Us, so that the world may believe that You sent Me. Believing in a trinity, and that Jesus is the creator of the universe is the definition of blasphemy according to Judaism (the religion of Jesus). It's always the trinitarians who are the most anti-semitic either way, never the unitarians who understand logic and common sense. So yeah, you're an idolater, but God will tolerate you anyway since your idol is one of his prophets. Ignorance is a forgivable sin, but the truth will never change. God is one. Mark 10:18 As Jesus started on His way, a man ran up and knelt before Him. “Good Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?” “Why do you call Me good?” Jesus replied. “No one is good except God alone." So when you read... John 10:30-38 I and the Father are one. Again his Jewish opponents picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus said to them, “I have shown you many good works from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?” “We are not stoning you for any good work,” they replied, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.” Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I have said you are “gods”? If he called them ‘gods,’ to whom the word of God came-and Scripture cannot be set aside- what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, ‘I am God’s Son’? Do not believe me unless I do the works of my Father. But if I do them, even though you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father.” Remember that Jesus was in union with God, not that he literally was God in the flesh. This is why he defends himself against accusations of blasphemy, since he did not blaspheme. All of the prophets who were sent by God were Elohim, he is yet another Elohim. The law was not broken.

@B Babbich no such thing as golden rule, people follow their emotions. without religion we would have nothing, humanity would have killed itself long time ago with no golden age for anyone and no one to carry humanity into the future. hard pill to swallow cause ironically atheists are also emotional like everyone else. as old saying '' fear the one who has no God to fear'' as a muslim who knows every action will be judged i think twice before even considering hurting someone, it doesn't mean without religion i would be an evil murderer, it just means i have anchorage and this is what the world desperately needs.

Islam, christianity and jewdism: here you go! m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-INIG636SnU4.html

They always say that cause they know they would be refuted to oblivion so they give themselves an out

Islam, christianity and jewdism: here you go! m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-INIG636SnU4.html

dude you're right

They have the same ethnic background so they have certain similarities but they by no means look identical.

Islam, christianity and jewdism: here you go! m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-INIG636SnU4.html

@MisterBigM Basing reality off subjective experience is incredibly dangerous. What about the subjective experience of Nazis, racists, bigots? They have real physiological reactions of hate/ fear if viewed through neuroimaging. Pure subjective experience will be the end of humanity

@MisterBigM I could go less extreme. How about the subjective understanding of reality as espoused by Scientologists? How about Christian/ Jewish/ Muslim/ Hindu fundamentalists? As we live on a planet with fellow human beings who have quiet different outlooks on life, rational thinking is the only way we can get to a collective understanding. The above mentioned individuals have too much *emotionally* invested in their religions and can behave in unpredictable or dangerous ways when questioned about their subjective experiences.

@MisterBigM unfortunately the vast majority of not all human beings suffer from a litany of biases and heuristics that distort our perception of reality. We also don’t tend to live in a vacuum (hermits maybe being an exception) so I don’t buy the individual thing at all. Humans are by and large members of a variety of groups, be they political, sports, religious, artistic, musical etc etc individuals are as easily deluded and unaware of it as groups are.

@MisterBigM Fairly pushing the boat out to say that the Nazi's had scientific beliefs. They had teams that went around the world to validate their theories and when their discoveries didn't, they hid that information. If you ever look at any of their speeches and rallies what you will generally see is an extreme outpouring of emotion and practically no rational behaviour or talk. On the economic side both capitalism and communism emerged from the ending of feudalism. Both economic systems have subsequently failed. Communism in 1991 and capitalism in 2008, the only reason there is an illusion of a capitalist system is that global central banks (FED, BoJ, ECB, BoE etc.) print 10's of billions every single month (printed out of thin air) and dump it into the market. Needless to say it won't end well. Its generally understood that the reason Nietzsche gave for his hatred of Christianity was that it births atheism and existential despair. To see or understand the whole you have to look at both sides of the coin.

@MisterBigM Hitler definitely wasn't an atheist, Stalin sure but he didn't go out of his way to kill people for atheism. There are dangers to be aware of on both sides. In regard to subjective experience its been of immense interest to psychologists from the beginning with Wilhelm Wundt, Ebbinghaus and William James. Mountains of material there to be looked at and analyzed. The main problem there is the lower the 'n' number in a study the less you could say you are getting at a part of the human condition. But if there are tons of similar studies showing the same findings then that lends more weight or credibility to certain phenomena. People who have personality types that lend themselves to fantasy are ideally suited to be artists/ creatives. Personally I love mythology with a passion particularly Celtic mythology because it is so abstract and creative. There are a lot of things we can learn about ourselves and nature by studying it and many of these ideas have been encoded in religions as well to a degree. There are lots of moral and ethical philosophers going back thousands of years that we can learn from. Epicurus, Lucretius, Plato, The Buddha, Democritus, Cicero, Jesus, Epictetus, Spinoza.

Incorrect. These are 3 contradictory gods. This isn’t the same god just because it’s based on similar origin stories . It’s like saying every Marvel comic book hero is the same…

@B Babbich I agree with you, but I just like pointing out that it’s not the same god.

@@marcwells03 they worship the same god it’s just pronounced in a different language. Allah is literally translated as God in Arabic.

@@septemberviral your ignorance of religion is evident. It is 100% not the same God. Just because they share a common origin story, does not make them the same. In fact you'll see that they directly contradict each other

@@marcwells03 what makes the Jewish god or the Islamic god different?

The Quran God is Narrator. Revéale Ed through Gabriel.

The Quran is most accurate because its the actual word GOD. It is also the only religion that can vehemently defend those word. The Quran challenges humanity to produce something as accurate and beautiful in nature and to this day that challenge stands strong as ever

Your forgetting Jesus is the Son of God the disciples saw and lived with him which is better God himself or an angel? Also some Christians do think the Law applies l do.

hahahahahaha

Yes

"but but but.... My imaginary friend cult says this...."

Inshallah!

Let's get Hamza Tzortzis on the podcast!

He didn’t say the disciples never met Jesus. He said none of the books of the New Testament were written by people who met Jesus. This is likely true, as at least the gospels, as we’ve inherited them, were not written by any of the disciples.

@@billbadson7598 Who do you think wrote John and Mathew?

@@weily-why-lee There is in the present day no way whatsoever of confirming who authored those texts

Paul hated Jesus, he even wanted to kill him, after heard Jesus died, he suddenly became a believer(!).

Let’s

That is literally Moses 1st commandment of 10...

@@MKMXN the Qur'aan states it's the continuation and fulfillment of the previous holy books, it's one religion, submission to one God.

@@MKMXN huh? no that is literally not any of the 10 commandments

First off, any religious or historical scholar with any credibility state that none of the four gospels in the New Testament were written by their namesakes. The oral tradition was much more prominent at the time and none of the gospels were actually transcribed until at least 50yrs after the death of Jesus, and over a 100yrs later in the case of John. Because the stories were not written down it became difficult for the scribes to attribute particular stories to specific people so they often chose people famous (or well known) during the time of Jesus. It is well documented that over 100 gospels existed but when Emperor Constantine commissioned a version of the bible to be created for the young religion, many gospels were ignored because they were attributed to women, didn’t mesh well with the messaging of the clergy and aristocrats in charge, and lastly because many gospels (including the main four) were transcribed from one language to another over decades, and oftentimes the books were fragmented or didn’t make sense. If you read the main four they actually contradict each other in many parts… this is because of all the aforementioned reasons. Everything I’ve said is agreed upon by top religious scholars… you should take a look. It’s insane that so many think the bible was written by god or by the actual named people… and it was a converted Roman emperor who decided he wanted a New Testament to help solidify his power and a peaceful transition from polytheism to Christianity… which he felt could be more easily managed. Imagine playing the game of telephone with stories as long as the gospels… over decades. Then they get translated from different languages by people with a specific agenda… oops

@@kentcomer950 First off, any religious or historical scholar with any credibility state that none of the four gospels in the New Testament were written by their namesakes. The oral tradition was much more prominent at the time and none of the gospels were actually transcribed until at least 50yrs after the death of Jesus, and over a 100yrs later in the case of John. Because the stories were not written down it became difficult for the scribes to attribute particular stories to specific people so they often chose people famous (or well known) during the time of Jesus. It is well documented that over 100 gospels existed but when Emperor Constantine commissioned a version of the bible to be created for the young religion, many gospels were ignored because they were attributed to women, didn’t mesh well with the messaging of the clergy and aristocrats in charge, and lastly because many gospels (including the main four) were transcribed from one language to another over decades, and oftentimes the books were fragmented or didn’t make sense. If you read the main four they actually contradict each other in many parts… this is because of all the aforementioned reasons. Everything I’ve said is agreed upon by top religious scholars… you should take a look. It’s insane that so many think the bible was written by god or by the actual named people… and it was a converted Roman emperor who decided he wanted a New Testament to help solidify his power and a peaceful transition from polytheism to Christianity… which he felt could be more easily managed. Imagine playing the game of telephone with stories as long as the gospels… over decades. Then they get translated from different languages by people with a specific agenda… oops

@@Jealod24 what a sloppy mess of weak arguments. All the top religious scholars agree, do they? Might want to revisit your assumptions - there's a lot at stake here. Anyways, back to real life. Cheers, mate!

Islam, christianity and jewdism: here you go! m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-INIG636SnU4.html

I dont get it.. the new testament so its not from god

@@younessm6434 Youness, read it. You'll see.

@@younessm6434 According to the Quran, the Gospel is from God (Quran 3:3).

@@younessm6434 It's rather odd, I've read it a few times with an open mind as a Jewish guy, the idea they took a Jew, Jesus and write a story of it where most of it was written by Peter, a man that was NOT like much at all by Jesus's people not to mention they never really meet personally to Peter going around saying "My faith" is higher than Jesus's words to after Jesus's death he changed the story to Jesus a the G-d thus the new testament And there is a LOT of conflicting things in the New Testament, the biggest one is a Jewish man, Jesus telling people to disown their mother and father to follow HIM(Jesus) makes ZERO sense and breaks every law of the Old Testament (Torah) Men lost and died in Gensis simply for doing this, yet Jesus walked and got away with it in G-d's eyes is weird

First off, any religious or historical scholar with any credibility state that none of the four gospels in the New Testament were written by their namesakes. The oral tradition was much more prominent at the time and none of the gospels were actually transcribed until at least 50yrs after the death of Jesus, and over a 100yrs later in the case of John. Because the stories were not written down it became difficult for the scribes to attribute particular stories to specific people so they often chose people famous (or well known) during the time of Jesus. It is well documented that over 100 gospels existed but when Emperor Constantine commissioned a version of the bible to be created for the young religion, many gospels were ignored because they were attributed to women, didn’t mesh well with the messaging of the clergy and aristocrats in charge, and lastly because many gospels (including the main four) were transcribed from one language to another over decades, and oftentimes the books were fragmented or didn’t make sense. If you read the main four they actually contradict each other in many parts… this is because of all the aforementioned reasons. Everything I’ve said is agreed upon by top religious scholars… you should take a look. It’s insane that so many think the bible was written by god or by the actual named people… and it was a converted Roman emperor who decided he wanted a New Testament to help solidify his power and a peaceful transition from polytheism to Christianity… which he felt could be more easily managed. Imagine playing the game of telephone with stories as long as the gospels… over decades. Then they get translated from different languages by people with a specific agenda… oops

He is wrong in most parts

I invite you to read the Quran

When was it written? And when did jesus die? Mathew for example was not written by Mathew

This is a clip channel lol

bible = new testament and old testament christians dont follow the old testament any of its teaching, they dont even believe in the strict monotheistic God of the old testament. technically the bible of the christians ---> new testament ===== verse 18:20 of Ezekiel in the old testament directly contradicts the very foundation of christianiy.

@@AsifKhan-hf9zy what the Christians did was like when you could buy Terminator and Terminator 2 judgement day on a single VHS tape..... Or Alien and Aliens on a single VHS tape.... It's a good deal and it gives the appearance of legitimacy.... Lol..... Islam to me is like Bollywood fan fiction..... They want it to be in the same vain.... But it's not....

@Sauron aren't they both just allegory for The Silmarillion??

Sorry Luke, I didn't see your post until after I posted mine.

Also James is the brother of Jesus. He saw Jesus grow up.

The irony that escapes him is that in the Old Testament (Deuteronomy) it states to actually stone an unruly son. You wouldn't find a Christian, misrepresenting this verse, to disqualify Judaism, because a thing as context exists. One has to be honest, when making a claim. If the material is not legit, it becomes self evident, without needing to misrepresent it. Amazingly, he went out of his way to make false claims about the New Testament, but then trotted carefully to not slip up around Islam. He has galactic gaps of knowledge, both on Christianity as well as Islam... yet he is sounding dangerously over confident on his assertions.

@@RVMTube what was the NT lie he told?

@@tracktor1979 take for example the claim that the trinity was developed over time and then eventually seeing itself as a monotheistic religion. Christianity was monotheist from the get go. And First century jews believed in the trinity. That is the whole reason why Jesus was killed, he claimed the title of the son, he claimed the title of messiah, he claimed the title of I AM, he promised to send the Comforter just after his death, ie the Holy Spirit. The Trinity is an Old Jewish idea, scattered all through the old testament, it was later on, rejected, post Temple destruction. Many a great Rabbi admit this fact after studying old texts. The claim that none of the Gospels are from first hand eye witness. When John explicitly claims it. When they described things, people and places that have only recently been confirmed through archeology. The claim that Christians believe God died and Jews believe that God is eternal and never came to Earth... he is implying that Christians do not believe that God is eternal, huge misrepresentation, also it bring up another problem... God never came to earth? Didn't Moses interact with God on the mountain? If he claims it was God, then God does enter his creation if he so choses. (And doing so, does not lessen him or make him finite.) If he claims it wasn't the father, but the face of the spirit of the messenger of God, that means it is the second person of the trinity, ie the son, ie Jesus, conforming to old Jewish beliefs and affirming the trinity. (See how he cornered himself.) His need to deny the trinity stems from his need to deny The Triune God, because he does not believe in what first century Jews and prior believed. He is a Rabbinic Jew, a movement started in early 2nd century and fully formed by 6th Century CE... making contemporary with islam's infancy (or so it is claimed, archeology does not agree with any early islamic claims). This makes the Christian books, the oldest to be canonised of the whole lot. (Ironic, don't you think. Considering all the drivel that is spewed by youtube scholars about the texts being corrupted.) The New testament books are all dated textually to 1st Century eye witness, when the oldest copies from all over the Mediterranean are crossed referenced to each other. There are thousands of copies that cross reference and confirm. Making them, the most scientifically and logically reliable. (This is not saying that the parchment is dated 1CE, but the hand copies passed on across the Mediterranean, during the early years, under massive persecution, had no way for checking with each other. And no printing press. Yet the copies of the copies, from all over, match. So the texts were preserved. And we still have those copies.) The old testament can be considered reliable on many accounts based on biblical archeology amongst other things. (He is very dismissive of NT, I can only speculate as to why.)

Islam, christianity and jewdism: here you go! m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-INIG636SnU4.html

I invite you to read the Quran

Jesus' death has great meaning. He truly DIED. That act, giving his life willingly while remaining faithful to God, his Father, gave POWER to his blood. That blood then, that sacrifice then, had MEANING and usefulness as a price to buy us back from the bondage that Adam sold us into. If he really did not die, we have no RANSOM, thus no eternal life prospects. So the scriptures are clear about the true GOD, HE CANNOT DIE. But God's son, Jesus, died and was resurrected to sit at God's right hand in Heaven. There is no trinity, it is a pagan doctrine.

@@janyenyo If he gave his will willingly then he wouldn't have prayed to be saved in the garden of gethsemane and woulnd't have cried out on the cross - Matt.27 (46) And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?

"Christianity is more Jewish then Judaism" christianity ia more pagan than roman paganism would be more correct. and islam is more jewish than judaism is also better than your B/S. "god came to earth as a man and died for your sins" is more jewish than judaism? what are you smoking dude? lol.........

@@AsifKhan-hf9zy Not everyone is educated so you won't understand it. But yes Islam has a lot Jewish influence and very similar in doctrine. If you look at the people who made Christianity they were all Jews who were trying to reform the Jewish faith. They did that by making Christianity at the end, and Jesus as their Savior. Christianity is a reformed Jewish faith in many ways. You don't have to agree, but you should not belittle what you don't understand either.

I invite you to read the Quran

@@zicozico6961 - I have read it. And the Torah and Talmud. What is your point?

@@tubularbill I believe that God is the author of the Qur'an so What do you think of the Qur'an?

@@gregoryt8792 The Bible is full of scientific errors and contradictions And if you are interested in knowing some of them, watch the debate (The Qur’an and the Bible in the Light of Science) It's on RU-vid There are about 30 scientific errors and contradictions in the debate, some of which are specific to mathematics

@Alex Perez (The Hour has drawn near and the moon was split ˹in two˺.)(54:1) I believe that God is the author of the Quran, so I believe this verse Tell me why you don't believe in the Quran

Really? I thought he was aweful.

@@bowrudder899 Fair enough - Care to be a little more specific or does your horror defy explication?

@@genericusername4039 He strawmanned the Christian view, and gave Islam a pass. Not impressive.

@@bowrudder899 I'm guessing the strawman you're referring to is this quote, taken in a vacuum "If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his own father, mother, wife, children, brothers, and sisters-and yes, even his own life-he cannot be My disciple." I just skimmed more of the passage and would probably agree with you, assuming that's the passage he's referring to. Even so, this version of Wolpe we're seeing is an improvement on the one that took on Hitchens way-back-when. Granted, I saw that one an age ago so, should probably rewatch it to be fair. Not to mention the context of a debate is going to generate a very different discussion but I digress. Do keep in mind that he's a Jewish person so, obviously his bias is going to be in that direction. The point that he went on to make "that Christian's, like Jews, interpret their texts in different ways, at different times" - was a good one and showed some level of humility and respect. My GUESS would be - knowing very little about Wolpe beyond the few debates i've seen of him (eons ago) - would be that he probably has stronger disagreements with Islam and was being EXTRA charitable, in light of that. I could be wrong though. I don't know the guy.

There were multiple strawmen in the space of 6 minutes, @@genericusername4039. I was thinking more of authorship and dating of the gospel accounts, but your raised a good one too.

The Dead Sea Scrolls disagree. When compared, there were only marginal errors in spelling, the message has always been the same. The divine written word of God, the Bible has been protected by Him in the face of many attempts to destroy it.

@@janyenyo The topic isn't error but how the alphabetic or semantic characters changed over time. Linguistic scholars refer to the G, L, and I think H when denoting how the books don't match up in terms of writing styles. You can delve into the topic yourself.

If the font of a letter changes the spelling is the same and the word is the same just the font looks different

“They’ve shown scholastically how the written text changed over centuries “ Who’s “they?”

@@duke9410 The obvious fact that the Torah contains events that came some time after Moses' death, making it impossible for him to write the whole thing. Rabbis are unanimously agreed upon this.

I had pause and rewind just to make sure I heard that correctly. I have listened to a lot of debates and have never heard anyone claim something so bold.

I've heard this claim before, and it has zero evidence to support it. Peter, John, James (Jesus's brother)... all people who knew Jesus very well. Paul met Christ on the road to Damascus but didn't follow him while he walked the earth. Luke obviously came later and he admits that in his writings.

​@@isastudios It's not a bold claim. Any catholic priest will tell you that everything in New Testament was passed down verbally first and written down long after apostles were gone.

@@medicharmer The stories of these events were passed down verbally and only written down long after disciples were dead.

What he means is that according to history books, and Catholic church will tell you this, the history of Jesus and apostles was passed down in speech only at first, for (and I might misremember the number but can't google this now) hundreds of years before it was written down. So New Testament didn't exist as a book, script or other piece of writing well until 300 AD.

Yea, gay sex and hormone replacement and mindless consumerism

He says that Muslims don't consider the Torah sacred when they do and he's speaking as a Jew who claims to know little about Islam and the Quran. " It's refreshing to hear someone know what they're talking about" lol.

He said none of the New Testament were written by someone who personally knew Jesus. That’s a laughably ignorant take.

@@pranav5183 Muslims say that the Torah is corrupted though lol. Something can’t be corrupted and sacred simultaneously lol.

@@sjappiyah4071 nah, we believe in the Torah as a sacred book and the Injil (gospel) as well, but only the Torah that came in the time of Moses peace be upon him and the gospel that came in the time of jesus peace be upon him, and after they died those books got corrupted.

+1

He literally said you were going to disagree with him and that you would have your own interpretation. Religious people are dense 🤦

Yes, and I say why. Religious as in not following any religion, as in not believing but to come to understanding by contemplation. If you consider yourself a Jew, Christian, Buddhist, etc. You condition yourself which is limitation to go all the way. I wonder if you can go beyond him and mi and just consider the response, if the response makes sense to you.

Time travel?

@@fullmetalflix5195 ya but not time travel in the way that we’re trained to understand it as in a linear experience through past and future realities on earth. It discusses how we are missing something vital on the DNA strands that will allow us a change in form…and ultimately the condition to travel unrestricted throughout the universe. There’s even a suggestion that we need to examine the octopus more closely, as we can achieve its modalities and more. Sounds bat shit crazy I know. But the book plays with ideas in a way that I haven’t encountered yet.

@@roccosage8508 Marvel, and DC play with ideas as well....just saying...

Islam, christianity and jewdism: here you go! m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-INIG636SnU4.html

@@roccosage8508 smells like bs