TORQUE vs HORSEPOWER Explained In Less Than 3 Minutes 

Yea I’m aware that HP is a specific unit of power. Torque vs HP is such a common search that obviously that was going to be the topic here. Could’ve added a formula or two, sure

@@WissamSeif Thanks :- )

I think horsepower and torque are both needed for acceleration. You can deliver whatever required torque or speed that you need at your wheels with your gearing. Teslas and EV's have great acceleration b/c electric motors hit their peak torque immediately. That's another aspect; a 300 HP combustion engine is it's peak power. It takes time to reach it, whereas an EV hits its maximum torque immediately, and thus has more torque and HP off the get-go. At higher speeds, HP becomes more important.

On set gear yes + more hp at certain rpm cos gear ratio is fix on 1 gear so even with 1000 hp but at 1000 rpm in scooter with 1 gear 1000 rpm at 10 km/h it dont achieve let say 20 km/h on this gear depedn how rapidly power drop down 👌🏻now than 👉🏻jadea G5 120 nm 3 hp 100 kg 0-40 km/h /0-25 mph in 6 sec watch from 2:30 min 👉🏻 m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-E2xUoO5dptk.html&pp=ygUJeWFkZWEgRzUg vs honda dylan 150 only 14,2 nm but 15,5 hp +clutch and cvt 140 kg rider weight in both case probably similar 80-90 kg 0-40 km/h in 3,0 sec 👉🏻 m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JoMRbPpd__g.html so such vehicle with 8,5 timess less max crank engine torq which alos is heavier with rider on it accelerate 2 times faster from 0-40 km/h thanks much higher power + centrifugal clutch and good gead gearing cvt which transfer those power to the wheel also cvt have huge drove train losess comapre to dorect hub motor in wheel jadea G5 just jadea have so small power that dylan 150 still despatie haveing mich biger drive train loses put more power to the wheel now than which vehicle generate more torq at drive wheel axis ? its honda dylan 150 it delivery waay higher drive wheel axis torq 👌🏻 it must if drive wheel have simialr or even biger radious if it accelerate faster and is heavoer otherwise it would not accelerate fadter 👌🏻but this biger drive wheel axis torq is delivered from much higher engine power 😁👌🏻 torq at engine and torq at wheel despite subcribe the same phenomenom are not at the same level excepet at gear ratio 1:1 in most at 4 gear it happen not including drive trwin losess etc for achieve max sped limited be all putside resist you need peak power rpm for achieve max posible acceleration at set speed you ned peak power rpm for achieve max acceleration at set GEAR now you needpeak tprque engine rpm 👌🏻 torque is leverage dependend thats why at set gear push strongest cos Nm:m= force but power os speed dependend thats why it push strongest at set speed cos power:speed = fprce at end of the day for daily riding you need (or atleast most people including me )as much torq as posible for nice pickup from low rpm without needs to reduce gear constantly and rev engine high but …for race this is irrelevant in race is only one rule assuming grip is enough you hold one peak power rpm or lost race 😎👌🏻

@@WissamSeif Mechanics, thermodynamics and statistical mechanics, quantum physics, and wave optics were some of the classes we took. It was an applied physics degree, we even used MATLAB which is popular in mechanical engineering right?

torque is leverage dependend from less torq if arm lever be enough shorter output force be higher 👌🏻 power is speeddependend the same power at lower speed mean more output force 👌🏻 thats why at set gear biger accelerstion be at max torq aprpm cos speed is diffrent than at the same gear at max power rpm but at set speed and diffrent gear better accelerstion be at max power thats why feg honda cb 500 pc26 with rider 280 kg 57 hp 9500 rpm 47 nm 8000 rpm accelerate to 140 km/h in 10,0 sec rider weight 90 kg 👉🏻 m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-imk3BtPIW6U.html vs feg royal enfield continental 650 gt 280 kg with rider 60 kg 47 hp 7250 rpm 53 nm 5250 rpm need almost 13 sec / accelerste to 140 km/h in 12,7 sec 👉🏻 m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9jWRoS_pd7E.html&pp=ygUqcm95YWwgZW5maWVsZCBjb250aW5lbnRhbCBndCBhY2NlbGVyYXRpb24g 👌🏻 👉🏻power at perfect gearing and clutch setup win race 🌪️👌🏻 but alot torq down low on rpm is good for daily riding for most driver including me 👌🏻 i would rather have in cb 500 55 nm at 5000 rpm and 50 hp at 8000 rpm instead of stock setup 47 nm at 8000 rpm and 57 hp at 9500 rpm for daily riding 😁👌🏻but in race me version setup dont win cos weaker topend 🤷🏻‍♂️ but from idle all the way to like 7000 rpm be much stronger than stock setup and more pleasure to rode for 80-90% of avg rider on road 😎 everything change on track under fast rider where stock 57 hp cb smoked me 50 hp woth better lowend hipothetical version 👍🏻

They shouldn't have different power since it's the same motor for both. Gearing will change the torque and speed at the wheels. So yes you're right, I should've said this vehicle has more torque at the WHEELS than this one because of the different gearing.

Video is faulty like most of the videos on topic. If a cars "gets of the line faster" than the other, it is because its power to weight ratio is higher, with no other option possible. Simply by definition of power. These electric motors have a power curve, and power increases with motor's speed to some point. By adding a reduction gear, we change a ratio between car's speed and its motor speed. The motor now, as we say, works faster (which literally means developing more power) at any speed range of the car, so it accelerates faster.

Wrong and stupid analogies

@@IgorArkin How's it wrong?

@@ricardomilos1784 absolutely. Just read what power and torque is. Or let's start with you proving your point with basic physics and you will see it is not possible in the process. Also violates any logic.

@@IgorArkin OK professor, can you explain it in simple terms? I don't feel like reading the information about what torque and horsepower are.

@@ricardomilos1784 easily. Power is acceleration x speed with a given mass. With the same power output, the slower the speed the better acceleration and vice versa. You trade between acceleration and speed with a gearbox. Torque is not related with performance because it can exist without displacement, and when displacement starts to occur it is described with power.

you need hp for 0-60 torque is irrelevant 👌🏻 feg ola s1 pro 58 nm 8 hp weight 100 kg vs yamaha r15 14 nm 18 hp 140 kg like you see electric with more torq is smoked be combustion on acceleration 🤷🏻‍♂️ m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-CUzfubAUD6U.html hp is what move stuff torq is 💩🥳

@@mociczyczki this engineer should have provided a formula that features torque and acceleration, which doesn't exist. Instead, he is thinking up that torque is force and vuila: "horsepower is speed torque is acceleration". Classic.

@@IgorArkin hehe 😂 yea power is speed tprque is acceleration 🫣

@@WissamSeif @Wissam Seif bad answers, looks like I have to sort it out by myself. 1. You can't feel torque, it is physically non-existent. 2. Or you don't "need lots of torque to get something moving". Or both. 3. You explained power as force times speed. And how gearing changes the balance between them. This means gearbox doesn't need any specific amount of input torque for a vehicle to perform any kind of job. 4. So when it is about electric vs ICE of the same power, electric wins because its torque is reached faster, and when it comes to diesel and gasoline, diesel does not dominate because "it's not just about torque and horsepower". "ICE doesn't hit its peak torque until it's near its max rpm". Ever seen a torque graph of ICE? 5. True that a car needs to overcome some extra static friction from a stand still start. Now get back to your "power is light load faster or higher load slower". 2+2= you need more power if you want to overcome more at/from the same speed. 6. Horsepower is a measurement of power. You mess already at the stage of the basics. 7. Explained in number 5 8. You didn't explain it well enough to yourself before the video was even made.

@@WissamSeif you just don't care in general, why do I have to treat you well? You don't even know the words' meanings and r trying to educate others.

@@IgorArkin dude have you ever taken a physics class? Don’t think so

@@IgorArkin torque is non existent? Are you stupid?

@@mangomanlassi7779 a retard entered the chat.