"Toward Nakba as a Legal Concept": Meet the Palestinian Lawyer Censored by Columbia and Harvard 

Doesn’t Putin pay enough??

"Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities " ~Voltaire.

@@carrerau7138 It is paid by Qatar. May be some by Putin

Where is the link you promised to post????

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

​@@leon19736The war started in 1948, loosing what? hamas is still fighting with a superpower and an atomic country who didn't win even just 27kms of area despite killing more than 1% and of the population. Destroying the whole city and still didn't find its hostages... Blaming for what? Israel once killed its own 3 hostages thinking they are Palestinians

​@@ehtishambwpIsrael in fighting in the most difficult area in a history of the war. A densely built city with tunnels everywhere. Despite this Israel killed 6 brigade commanders, 25 battalion commanders and 102 company commanders in Hamas. Israel killed more than 90 % of brigade and battalion commanders’ lever and more than 80% of company commanders in Hamas. Israel also killed 16 000 Hamas members. Israel lost 290 soldiers. Israel destroyed vast majority of Hamas infrastructure, factories, strategic tunnels, Hamas homes , storages. Russia took one year to take Bahamut with just 60 000 residents city loosing 50 000 soldiers lives. In Musol fight took 9 months against 3000 ISIS members and 10 000 civilians were killed. The only reason that IDF has not crushed Hamas is because they are protecting civilian life. And if Israel were to have no regard for civilian life, she would be condemned by the international community so either way, Israel loses a PR war.

@@leon19736No, Israel is not fighting in the most difficult area of any past war. People have fought for months in more difficult terrain. They are engaging in an ineffective air based war instead. And US officials have come out twice and contradicted their claims, saying that only a third of the enemy has been killed. Mosul killed a fraction of civilians with way less than 65,000 bombs.

​@@leon19736justifying a genocide huh

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

@@leon19736 Leon, you have no education in law or legal ideas. Israelis are afraid of Palestinian babies in incubators. Shame.

@@leon19736 your stupid hasbara lie that palestinians are the aggressor now and in the past is bullshit and no one believes you. more and more people are learning the history and your lies. cope

​@@leon19736What planet did you say you where from ???

@@annfrancis6287 I can ask you the same question. What did i wrote is incorect? Be spesific. Don't be vague. Everything i wrote is true.

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

disservice

​The war started in 1948, loosing what? hamas is still fighting with a superpower and an atomic country who didn't win even just 27kms of area despite killing more than 1% and of the population. Destroying the whole city and still didn't find its hostages... Blaming for what? Israel once killed its own 3 hostages thinking they are Palestinians ​@@leon19736you israeli paid bot

@@leon19736 Start war on non-jews ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Holocaust = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims. Anti-semitism if you point this out".

@@leon19736don’t come and steal someones land and there’s no war. Simple enough

Many of us need to thank CLR, else I would not have learned about this .

Exactly and now it will be shared worldwide. When you’re in a cult, you can’t really think outside the box.

Streisand effect

@@houdiniwhoremove the box, freedom now.

Yes. I wouldn't have heard of it otherwise.

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

@@leon19736reported for spam

But is he wearing his underwear!😂

doesnt he specialize in helping foriegn billionaires lynching the first amendment?

I despise this man. He is the Ultimate Zionist and bigot

well said thank you❤

Did and copied!

I tried and couldn’t get it ,

It has lost its always questionable moral mandate and is dependent on corrupt Western politicians, especially American, to keep gutting the regular American people.

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

I'm sure Hitler would have said that as well ​@@leon19736

​@@leon19736 The war started in 1948, loosing what? hamas is still fighting with a superpower and an atomic country who didn't win even just 27kms of area despite killing more than 1% and of the population. Destroying the whole city and still didn't find its hostages... Blaming for what? Israel once killed its own 3 hostages thinking they are Palestinians

@@leon19736 Isreal striked first. Terrorist state. Pariah state. Apartheid state. Genocidal state.

@@ehtishambwp Israel in fighting in the most difficult area in a history of the war. A densely built city with tunnels everywhere. Despite this Israel killed 6 brigade commanders, 25 battalion commanders and 102 company commanders in Hamas. Israel killed more than 90 % of brigade and battalion commanders’ lever and more than 80% of company commanders in Hamas. Israel also killed 16 000 Hamas members. Israel lost 290 soldiers. Israel destroyed vast majority of Hamas infrastructure, factories, strategic tunnels, Hamas homes , storages. Russia took one year to take Bahamut with just 60 000 residents city loosing 50 000 soldiers lives. In Musol fight took 9 months against 3000 ISIS members and 10 000 civilians were killed. The only reason that IDF has not crushed Hamas is because they are protecting civilian life. And if Israel were to have no regard for civilian life, she would be condemned by the international community so either way, Israel loses a PR war.

​@@jeffreywilheim5970 It's not anti-Semitic, it's a sophisticated argument of Palestine's history and its people struggle for liberation

@@r.p.6452 "It's a pastiche of lies and distortions of history to whitewash an attempted genocide and justify continual violence against Israel." There, I fixed it for you.

@@jeffreywilheim5970 I've read the piece. It's not antisemitic one bit, just the truth. Why do you have a problem with the truth?

@@jeffreywilheim5970 The directions for how to find this piece are being provided to promote the truth. Is that a problem?

@@freddistenbrain8287 The "Nakba" itself is a lie Arabs and "Palestinians" have been telling themselves to whitewash attempted genocide against Israeli Jews. Any article that promotes the idea of the "Nakba" is by definition antisemitic.

So basically you're in favor of a channel giving airtime to an antisemitic charlatan spewing the Big Lie of the "Nakba," a lie that has been used for almost 80 years to whitewash the attempted genocide of Israel's Jews? But thank you for proclaiming your antisemitism so openly. It makes it easier for decent people to avoid you.

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

​@@leon19736known zionist troll

​@@leon19736history didn't start on October 7th

yes.

It is a private institution so it is legal, but it is ruining its reputation as a law school.

@@ryuuguu01 If they paid all taxes as a private corporation, which they do not, they could act as a private corporation. As they are exempt from tax, they are publicly funded, and should he held to suitable standards.

@@DonHavjuan You mean like churches? LOL, Sorry I don't mean to be rude but there are no public standards related to being tax-exempt.

Is this conversation a joke? If you bash Mohammed, you literally will live in hiding or die. Crying over censorship now? 😂

@@ryuuguu01everything about law and order, in America is without doubt a flimsy structure. This is probably the final reveal of how law and order in America is just window dressing and lip service. From Columbia and other institutions, to the Supreme Court (currently under review by Senator Whitehouse and others, to the Lobbyists who bribe lawmakers, then down to the partisan judges and hick-sheriffs in country towns. All of this supported by the likes of MTG, Matt Gaetz, Lauren Boebert, to name a few. No Freedom, no Integrity, no real national pride due to in-fighting, no true education only indoctrination (Israelis good, Chinese bad).

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

@@leon19736 War was started even before Israel was created, back in the 1880s and earlier the zyiolots were plotting to get the land and remove the people. As they get more brutal they are loosing, so yes, you are right - the zo's started it all (with the help of the brits), and will loose some of it, if not all of it at some point. Crying and blaming everyone but themselves is a stuck pattern of behaviour that does them no good

​@@Waitingformartyhe is a programmed ai tho ignore him spamming the same shit

Censorship? If you say one negative thing about Mohammed, your life is in danger everywhere you go, forever. What a joke to be crying about censorship 😂

@@Waitingformarty Palestine was a house owned by the British in which Jews and Muslims lived. The British offered each to own their own flat in the house. The Jews accepted. The Muslims rejected the offer because they wanted the entire house. In 1947, the UN partitioned Palestine into two states based on population - one Jewish, one Arab. If the Arabs had accepted the partition, there would have been no wars, no refugees and the Palestinians would be celebrating their 75th anniversary as an independent state encompassing the entire West Bank, Gaza and a third of pre-1967 Israel instead of the "nakba". The Arabs rejected the partition and launched a war with the stated goal of destroying Israel and annihilating its entire Jewish population and repeating the same thing in 1967. In international law, it states that if an enemy country attack you. Then you have the right to take the country’s land. And since the Arabs attacked Israel in 1948, then the "Land grab" was totally legal. It is really simple, if you start a genocidal war and then lose....ACCEPT it and move on. Arabs would've massacred israeli population had they won. When you make war and lose, you lose territory.

They're part of the EVIL CABAL👹

whoa~~~~ I had a similar experience....I lost my access to UTUBE for 3 months....all I did was give the contact info for UNRWA....in the comment section of utube videos~after 3 months they "apologized"..and allowed my channel to exist again....

damn. they're scared aren't they. But why?

There's no fixing a system/govt this broken. Vive la revolucion ✊

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

@@leon19736 should they have just let Europeans invade without fighting back? would you? if ISIS wins a battle, do they get to keep the land?

@@leon19736 did "the jews" gain or lose land after WW2? why not reward Palestine for losing a war also?

@@christofthedead Palestine was a house owned by the British in which Jews and Muslims lived. The British offered each to own their own flat in the house. The Jews accepted. The Muslims rejected the offer because they wanted the entire house. In 1947, the UN partitioned Palestine into two states based on population - one Jewish, one Arab. If the Arabs had accepted the partition, there would have been no wars, no refugees and the Palestinians would be celebrating their 75th anniversary as an independent state encompassing the entire West Bank, Gaza and a third of pre-1967 Israel instead of the "nakba". The Arabs rejected the partition and launched a war with the stated goal of destroying Israel and annihilating its entire Jewish population and repeating the same thing in 1967. In international law, it states that if an enemy country attack you. Then you have the right to take the country’s land. And since the Arabs attacked Israel in 1948, then the "Land grab" was totally legal. It is really simple, if you start a genocidal war and then lose....ACCEPT it and move on. Arabs would've massacred israeli population had they won. When you make war and lose, you lose territory.

​@@leon19736how did the British aquire this house?

Nope. The "Palestinians" lost their land when Arab armies fought and lost wars of aggression against Israel and failed to commit a genocide of Israel's Jews. They have neither the legal nor the moral right to Israel, yet the world makes them the world's most privileged group of refugees by allowing them to pass their status of "refugee" onto their children, even as they continue to terrorize the good citizens of Israel.

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

If they were "kicked out" why are two million arabs living in Israel with full rights? Even if some were kicked out so what? It was 75 years ago GET A LIFE! Move on. They claimed in 1948 "this invasion will be an annihilation like the mongols...kill all the Jews" They lost! This Nakhba is fake! They LOST and thats it!

Palestinians are far from the only people to lose a war and end up as refugees. They are, however, the only ones treated as refugees despite having started that war, the only ones still treated as refugees nearly 80 years after their defeat in that war, and the only ones who can pass their refugee status on to their children. Spreading the lie of the "Nakba" is antisemitism of the same order as Holocaust denial, and it's about time we started treating those who spread it, like this charlatan, accordingly.

@@leon19736 It's amazing how the "Palestinians" manage to spread that lie, and how many people seem eager to believe it.

An academic journal can make any decisions it wants to about what to publish. Deciding not to publish an article is not "censorship."

@@jeffreywilheim5970 meth is bad don't do meth

@@rhetorical1488 Yes, you really should stop doing meth. Then you might actually understand the historical facts about the founding of the state of Israel instead of believing the filth and lies this charlatan is peddling.

​@@jeffreywilheim5970 It is not state censorship, but it is still censorship. The journal editors did make a decision about what they wanted to publish and the administration found the only way to stop the editors was to ruin the institution's reputation with a ham-handed attempt to silem¥nce them,

@@jeffreywilheim5970 With the censoring he refers to youtube. Also, this wasn't exactly deciding what to publish but more like complete panic.

Equal rights? Does that also include drawing a cartoon of Mohammed?

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

​@@leon19736very true

Nope. They just decided they cared about their professional reputation and refused to peddle antisemitic lies.

@@jeffreywilheim5970 😂😂😂

​@@jeffreywilheim5970well, what about writing a critical review of the article, since supposedly you read it? How did the board of directores know it has "antisemitic lies" if they say they have not read the article? The liar seems to be you.

@@jeffreywilheim5970 Holy shit, be careful. Copium in these large doses can be devastating to one's perception of reality.

@@jeffreywilheim5970 the Jews in the protests don't think they're lies or antisemitic and these are Orthodox rabbis.

Someone else put it in the comments

Like another user said. Just google TOWARD NAKBA AS A LEGAL CONCEPT file:pdf

@@Sarah-said I did :-)

There is nothing that proves the so called Nakba ever happened. A crash course on history proving there has never been a PALESTINIAN STATE: 1. Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state 2. Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 3. Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state. 4. Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid Arab-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state. 5. Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Frankish and Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state. 6. Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state. 7. Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state. 8. Before the Byzantine Empire, there were the Sassanids, not a Palestinian state. 9. Before the Sassanid Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state. 10. Before the Byzantine Empire, there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 11. Before the Roman Empire, there was the Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state. 12. Before the Hasmonean state, there was the Seleucid, not a Palestinian state. 13. Before the Seleucid empire, there was the empire of Alexander the Great, not a Palestinian state. 14. Before the empire of Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state. 15. Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state. 16. Before the Babylonian Empire, there were the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, not a Palestinian state. 17. Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 18. Before the kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 19. Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state. 20. Actually, in this piece of land there has been everything, EXCEPT A PALESTINIAN STATE.

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

Amen, guarantee a Trump victory

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

Sure take votes away from the far lesser of two evils and give Convict Trump the win and then both the US and Israel will be even more fascist. The two party system is horrible but all you're doing is ensuring that we can't help the Palestinians.

​@@leon19736The war started in 1948, loosing what? hamas is still fighting with a superpower and an atomic country who didn't win even just 27kms of area despite killing more than 1% and of the population. Destroying the whole city and still didn't find its hostages... Blaming for what? Israel once killed its own 3 hostages thinking they are Palestinians

@@ehtishambwp Israel in fighting in the most difficult area in a history of the war. A densely built city with tunnels everywhere. Despite this Israel killed 6 brigade commanders, 25 battalion commanders and 102 company commanders in Hamas. Israel killed more than 90 % of brigade and battalion commanders’ lever and more than 80% of company commanders in Hamas. Israel also killed 16 000 Hamas members. Israel lost 290 soldiers. Israel destroyed vast majority of Hamas infrastructure, factories, strategic tunnels, Hamas homes , storages. Russia took one year to take Bahamut with just 60 000 residents city loosing 50 000 soldiers lives. In Musol fight took 9 months against 3000 ISIS members and 10 000 civilians were killed. The only reason that IDF has not crushed Hamas is because they are protecting civilian life. And if Israel were to have no regard for civilian life, she would be condemned by the international community so either way, Israel loses a PR war.

They won't stop until they're stopped. Literally.

We don’t believe it can happen yet we see it every day now

Yemini war 450,000 dead 226,000 from war related starvation and disease. Syrian Civil War 550,000 killed by gassings,torture,.US/SHIITE coalition in Mosul against Isis 14,000 dead civilians versus 4,000 Isis. How many demonstrations did we see? Ahhh none?

Don't start wars

7th of October

@@leon19736was the inevitable consequence of trapping people in a Ghetto, similar to the Warsaw Ghetto uprising against the Germans.

@@leon19736this war started in 1947

We are galvanizing the People, esp the youth, to be well-informed on on the major issues of today AND turn out to vote. The youth electorate (those under 35 yo who are entitled to vote) is around 75 million in 2024. At least 70% of them (53 million) lean progressive. Approximately 4 million young people turn 18 yo each year in the U.S.

Thank you. We need to vote out all captured politicians.

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

Like another user said. Just google TOWARD NAKBA AS A LEGAL CONCEPT file:pdf

Technically no, since there is no front page

Go figure

Law does not apply from the river to the sea.

You can't defend a system of apartheid that doesn't exist in the first place.

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

​@@leon19736The war started in 1948, loosing what? hamas is still fighting with a superpower and an atomic country who didn't win even just 27kms of area despite killing more than 1% and of the population. Destroying the whole city and still didn't find its hostages... Blaming for what? Israel once killed its own 3 hostages thinking they are Palestinians

​@@leon19736 fitting you can't spell. Your loose humanity is why you will lose.

It will be under sharia law

Mercifully decent and intelligent people have the sense to reject the antisemitic claptrap this charlatan is peddling.

As has often been the case, it was Western Europe and this time mostly the British (for once /s) and the US, due to their rampant antisemitism and want for a continued foothold in the region.

You mean gaza?

No such thing as Jewish gangs or mobs except Murder, Inc with Meyer Lansky and Bugsy Siegel etc. Ignorant joke for the nincompoops “The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduce them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim. An individual in a crowd is a grain of sand amid other grains of sand, which the wind stirs up at will.” ― Gustave Le Bon, سيكولوجية الجماهير

Retired? Then please stay away and enjoy your pension

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

@@leon19736 You mean “lose.” 🇵🇸🌍

@@Kimberly_Chappell It is hard to deal with facts. I get you.

@@leon19736 If you don’t know that word in that context has but one ‘O’ I think it’s highly unlikely you have the facts to match. ☝️

​@@leon19736Are you 'special' in your own imagination dear.

Start war ,loose the war , loose the land , cry, blame everyone Nakba = "We tried to kill you all. We failed. We are the victims".

Well said!!!!!

Like another user said. Just google TOWARD NAKBA AS A LEGAL CONCEPT file:pdf

@@Prima-uq3io You're right it's not hard to search for - but DN! should put the link in the description on youtube, they never do 😕

The article is also in the Wayback Machine. Feed in the url of the Columbia Law Review, hits come up in June 2024, pick one, open it, scroll down and see the article excerpt at left. Click on the excerpt title, the whole article pops up.

They are not indigenous to the land. Archeologists find artifacts that are Jewish going back thousand of years but they NEVER find Arab artifacts. Never! A crash course on history proving there has never been a PALESTINIAN STATE: 1. Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state 2. Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 3. Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state. 4. Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid Arab-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state. 5. Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Frankish and Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state. 6. Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state. 7. Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state. 8. Before the Byzantine Empire, there were the Sassanids, not a Palestinian state. 9. Before the Sassanid Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state. 10. Before the Byzantine Empire, there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 11. Before the Roman Empire, there was the Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state. 12. Before the Hasmonean state, there was the Seleucid, not a Palestinian state. 13. Before the Seleucid empire, there was the empire of Alexander the Great, not a Palestinian state. 14. Before the empire of Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state. 15. Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state. 16. Before the Babylonian Empire, there were the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, not a Palestinian state. 17. Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 18. Before the kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 19. Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state. 20. Actually, in this piece of land there has been everything, EXCEPT A PALESTINIAN STATE.

New Zealand isn't that much better, Maori people still were slaughtered and remain largely poor and excluded.