Toyota Tundra 3.5L I-Force V6 Engine FUEL ECONOMY Test | Better then FORD F150 3.5L EcoBoost??

Подписаться 62 тыс.

Просмотров 45 тыс.

50% 1

I review the 2023 Toyota Tundra 3.5L I-Force V6 twin turbo charged engine and test the real world fuel economy of this newer engine. the Tundra with the 3.4L I-force engine is rated for a combined 20 mpg with a 18 mpg city rating and 23 mpg highway fuel economy rating. I compare the tundra with the I-force engine to the notorious ford f150 3.5L ecoboost enigne to see which truck gets better real world fuel economy.
What I Use:
Engine Oil - amzn.to/3sVnAoX
Engine Oil Filter - amzn.to/44Vk3nG
Engine Air Filter - amzn.to/3JMmMVV
Cabin Air Filter - amzn.to/3JMZAHh
Gear Oil - amzn.to/3PoIcxa
Penetrating fluid - amzn.to/3EOclkx
Rust protection - amzn.to/3Zo0Rh6
Towing Gear:
10 ton Pintle hitch (2.5" receiver) - amzn.to/3r7Axvm
7 Ton Adjustable hitch (2" receiver) - amzn.to/46i2iAf
Adjustable Pintle hitch mount (2.5" receiver) - amzn.to/3RqHGS3
15 Ton Pintle hitch - amzn.to/45SaCqv
10,000lbs Tie Down Straps - amzn.to/3ZBnxeh
My Camera Gear:
Go Pro Hero 10 - amzn.to/3ObZdJJ
Go Pro Hero 8 - amzn.to/36grzkM
Go Pro Accessories - amzn.to/3JLhlXo
Sony A6400 - amzn.to/3vkqzob
I hope everyone is doing well. I am certainly happy to upload this video and keep looking forward. but I was pretty excited to compare both of these engines in terms of fuel economy. both the tundra and the f150 have a 3.5L twin turbo charged V6 engine with dual over cams so in theory these engines should be very close in fuel economy and why I wanted to test out both truck.
we are running the same fuel economy loop with both trucks and doing it on the same day with the same driving conditions. so this should be a very fair real world fuel economy test.
I like to include both city, country and highway on my fuel economy run because I think that makes for a fair test between all engines in pick up truck.
as you guys saw I was surprised to see how well the ford f150 ecoboost engine did in comparison to the tundra Iforce engine. the ecoboost was much more fuel efficiency beating the tundra by over mpg which was a little shocking. I thought both these engines would be very close.
let me know why you guys think both these trucks got the fuel economy rating they did and why you think the ford was so much better!
Hope you liked the video!

Авто/Мото

Опубликовано:

18 мар 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 458

@TheGettyAdventures 3 месяца назад

Both these trucks come with 10 speed transmissions and 3.31 gears. So the drivelines are also very similar.

@dima-nabut 3 месяца назад

@@redrider7730 these things would matter and explain the difference within 0.5 litre but not over 2.2 litre difference. Absolutely irrelevant here.

@Back_door_bandit_98 3 месяца назад

What happened to the last video you posted I saved it to watch later and now it’s gone what a bummer.

@chadedwards6643 3 месяца назад

Drive the same route in normal mode. I bet it's better.

@user-kq7gi7eh1s 3 месяца назад

@@redrider7730🙄

@oldmancigars1869 3 месяца назад

@@redrider7730....yeahhhhh.....WOULDA, COULDA, SHOULDA......

@poppyneese1811 3 месяца назад

I now have my 2nd 2.7 Ecoboost powered F150, the first I traded in at 94,000 miles and not the first problem, life of the truck in the mountains of Southern West Virginia got 20.4 mpg and my second truck it getting the exact same thing with the 10 speed and 3.73 rear compared to the 3.55. I Love the Ford’s, but you know the Toyota is going to be a great truck too, if it doesn’t rust away like past Toyota’s, had two Tacoma’s that rusted really bad. I’m going to say there ain’t a bad full-size pickup out there no matter what you buy because that’s where the manufacturers profits come from. I’m 61 and my next truck will probably be a Maverick, as you age you ain’t as limber as you use to be!

@logicalrationalfishing7481 3 месяца назад

As a driver of a hooptie with no money coming in the future, I would gladly pick either. Good content, and though I will never be able to buy a truck like this, it is still fun to watch!

@trackpackgt877 3 месяца назад

Don't say that buddy you never know I've been driving 1998 Ford Ranger for 10 years it's an old worn-out truck but a good truck. I have never had a nice truck. But I just bought a 2018 2.7 EcoBoost 4x4 80k Miles on it for 22k!! Truck prices are coming down dealers are sitting with hundreds of trucks on the lot they can't move there's deals out there to be had and banks are more lenient on loaning. I did put a some cash down but I didn't have to and my payment is $300 a month. Point is I never thought I would be in a position to buy a nice pickup truck but prices are coming down lots are desperate to sell and banks are desperate to loan. i wish u all the best and hope u can get one someday brother

@YerBoyTroy 3 месяца назад

F150 is a lighter truck by a noticeable margin, also the ecoboost is over-squared vs under-squared in the tundra. This should mean longer and heavier piston rods and crank pins in the Tundra which adds to more rotating mass in the block. I think these things would give the f150 an advantage in efficiency. Trans tuning could also be a factor. Also no one mentions the aerodynamics of the vehicle, tundra front end looks more boxy with a larger grill which should equate to more drag. Great channel love the video

@tylough 3 месяца назад

Yeah Tundra is about 500lbs heavier than an equivalent F-150. That's about 10% heavier.

@dmandman9 3 месяца назад

All of those could be viable explanations. I’m sure you already know this. I’m just stating the obvious 😅At the end of the day, If fuel economy is a major consideration, the customer doesn’t care WHY one gets better economy than the other. They just want to know WHICH gets better economy.

@JamesMcLaren1000 3 месяца назад

I think you’re right. I was just looking at the thumbnail and the Ford has a significantly lower air dam at the front. That would make a big difference to the aerodynamics.

@ZishanMalik 3 месяца назад

Google says tundra 5390 and Ecoboost 4200 ish. Almost 1,000 pound difference.

@imnotusingmyrealname4566 3 месяца назад

Weight only matters for stop-and-go city traffic. The F-150 was more efficient by a greater margin on country roads and the highway than the Tundra. On the highway it's about engine efficiency, rolling resistance and aerodynamics.

@jesse.e.martin 3 месяца назад

While the Ecoboost has been around awhile, it has also been through several iterations of design changes, so technically the current engine just as modern and likely more refined than the I-Force.

@RedWingsninetyone 3 месяца назад

It's definitely more refined. Although this engine isn't new for Toyota though. But definitely new in this application.

@joseeduardo4327 3 месяца назад

the ford is better for sure

@scottbet4504 3 месяца назад

I like your videos. You are a very knowledgeable person. My 2019 3.5 eco has gotten close to 790 miles to the tank on long vacation trips. Your numbers are on par with mine. Like 22.5, 22.6 per gallon. 👍

@kevingeezy5176 3 месяца назад

I've got a 2013 f150 and on long trips I avg about 22mpg. She's still kicking at 288k miles

@Syringe666 3 месяца назад

Had the same experience with the older V8s. We had a couple of half tons - the Toyota had the 5.7L, and the F-150 the 5.4L. On the same trips the Toyota would return 16 - 18 mpg [at best & rare], while the F-150 would be 19 - 21 mpg, and sometimes better than that. Similar rear end ratios. The F-150 had an 8 ft bed - Tundra had the 6.5', both crew cabs like this test.

@martinlebreton6391 3 месяца назад

They dont make an f150 crew cab with an 8ft bed. Nobody does. Gotta get a 3/4 to get that.

@J_S_246 3 месяца назад

The perfect video before I pull the trigger in April 😊

@garyhunchak1857 3 месяца назад

you'll love your ecoboost.

@kb9oak749 3 месяца назад

Ford may have had the Ecoboost since 2011, but they have continued to update/upgrade both the 3.5 and 2.7 throughout. I've had mixed luck with Fords over the years, but my current 2.7 F150 is pretty good.

@mickeybrumfield764 3 месяца назад

Your right on target, poor fuel economy hasn't stopped people from buying an otherwise good vehicle. Just take a look at the success of the 4Runner. To me, 15% difference is very close to being a deal breaker if they are sold at about the same price.

@pementerprises7706 3 месяца назад

They both have 10 speeds transmissions however, after having a ford 2.7 for a number of years the trans sits in overdrive gears far more often. Ford is in 7th-8th gear at 33-40 mph. The new Tundra is in 4th to 5th gear for a comparison at the same speed…

@imnotusingmyrealname4566 3 месяца назад

As long as it downshifts quickly that should be no problem.

@josephcetar9202 3 месяца назад

Have the 3.5 eco boost in our Expedition. Good fuel economy and fast, best purchase ever!

@christianmonteith8568 3 месяца назад

Been watching for a while, great stuff! Suddenly I just realized you're out the Hanwell road haha nice! Mind blown. Cheers from Mactaquac!

@christianmonteith8568 3 месяца назад

Let me know if you ever need an old gen 1 tundra for a comparing video or something haha

@paultruesdale7680 3 месяца назад

Kudos to Toyota on delivering on improved efficiency and power output. So far it has been a bumpy start for the new Turbo motor. I’m sure many of the iforce 5.7 owners are agonizing leaving the reliability, though very thirsty V8. Ford should be proud of making the investment into the high aluminum content, not to mention its 10 speed transmission. 4 mpg difference is substantial. Top marks Ford. Toyota is moving away from simplistic designs and into the opposite. The turbo location defies common sense for long term ownership, and the overall design is overly complicated. Great review without any bias. 👍

@jeanclaude7018 Месяц назад

You mean cab removal is not a friendly design?

@mrjim1973 3 месяца назад

My naturally aspirated 3.7 F-150 is getting 18 MPG on E85!

@alanschmidt3460 3 месяца назад

So with that, your F150 is a 2011?

@michaelpopp6340 3 месяца назад

I could get 25 mpg rhighway when my crew cab 3.5 eb 4x4 9:50 f150 was stock. I am amazed at how powerful and fuel efficient the 3.5 ecoboost is. I loved my old 5.7 tundras, but the fuel economy sucked. I expected crappy ecoboost fuel economy towing a camp trailer, but I get the same 10 mpg that I've got out of every other gas powered truck, and have much more power than any other half ton that I have towed with.

@hphillips7425 3 месяца назад

Interesting 👍🏻. New to the channel and subscribed

@GuyonaMoose 3 месяца назад

Good test dude. My 23 3.0L duramax rst will get 6.6l-7.5L/100 driving on the hanwell. At 110 it raises up to around 8-9L. Around the city it will do high 10s low 11s. Your very right when the engine is on the turbo the economy goes down allot faster than an n/a engine. Absolutely loving my minimax. The milage is insane.

@playanddisplay3636 3 месяца назад

My 2013 EcoBoost took 60,000miles to fully break in and get over 20mpg consistently in mixed driving conditions on the continental divide and 80mph interstate speed limits.

@jayt620 3 месяца назад

i’ve got a 2018 with the 3.3 non turbo and i’m not quite getting 20 .

@CJColvin 3 месяца назад

What job do you have and how much money do you make to afford that Ecoboost F150?

@playanddisplay3636 3 месяца назад

@@CJColvin Independent contractor and so far as how much I make. What are you an IRS agent? I have two EcoBoost F-1shitties(2x4 and 4x4), a 91 Dodge 3/4 ton Cummins 5speed 4x4, Studebaker 1 ton DRW 2wd, 62 International 1600 dump truck 2wd, 81 F-1shitty with the 300 and 4 speed. 99 F-3shitty 7.3 6spd 4x4, 2000 Ford F-2shitty 7.3 automatic 4x4. I move a lot of dirt, gravel, and building materials with the little fleet I got. Have a great day.

@CJColvin 3 месяца назад

@@playanddisplay3636 Nice

@playanddisplay3636 3 месяца назад

@@jayt620 If it is a 4x4 they do weigh about 6,000lbs. That is a good amount of truck for a N/A v-6 to move around. The elevation, terrain, and driving style can really affect MPG. Ie. When I let my 2014 Ecoboost warm up on a -20 -30-degree F morning the mileage goes from about 18 on winter fuel to about 15-16mpg.

@whitelancery 2 месяца назад

Alex, I can't express enough how amazing your videos are! They are so informative and to the point. Thank you for your reviews and information! I would also love to see a review and comparison of the hybrid I-Force Max if you can find one of those around. I'm especially interested in how they drive (torque curve) and whether they do add any better mileage, even though they are tuned for "performance". Seems like they have to add a little bit of efficiency somewhere, and the lifespan extension of the starter seems a useful benefit, if the technology is sufficiently bulletproof.

@corradettimotorsports360 3 месяца назад

I just did a Fuel Economy Test on my 2023 Tundra SR with stock wheels and winter tires, it was snowy, icy and cold (but not brutally cold) I averaged 11.7L per 100km on a 500+KM road trip from Pincher Creek Alberta to Edmonton Alberta! good reviews!

@TS-ic1ol 3 месяца назад

I have the base ‘23 F150 Raptor and am more than happy with the 16.8 I got going on😂

@vegasfordguy 3 месяца назад

I own a 2012 F150 super crew platinum 5.0 liter V-8 with the 6 speed automatic transmission. I have no problem achieving 19.7 mpg both small town/highway driving at 65 mph. If I slow down to 60 mph then I can actually achieve 22-24 mpg. I keep my tires correctly aired up and maintain my vehicles. I drive with a light foot and use cruise control. Most people don't drive easy and seem to waste a lot of fuel. My numbers are calculated every time I fuel up doing the actual math. These new turbocharged mpg numbers aren't very impressive compared to a 12 year old V-8.

@jerryjeromehawkins1712 3 месяца назад

Same here, Vegas. '17 F150 5.0 6spd 4x4 Supercab 3.55 gears. 19+ in town is common for me... 22 on the highway is no problem at all to achieve. MPG is calculated at the pump. Like you, I'm pretty easy on the throttle and the brakes, gentle starts off the lights... but I do give her an "Italian Tune-up" from time to time, lol. Just a fantastic truck... zero issues since new. 🇺🇸 👍🏾 🇨🇦 Edit: This channel is quickly becoming one of my favorite YT subscriptions!

@jeffreygoss8109 3 месяца назад

I think this a benefit to your driving. I would guess you would get better than the top end of the turbo’s mpg range. Most truck drivers are full throttle to slam on the brakes.

@19xtrip 3 месяца назад

depends on the weather too, during canadia winter, with 18 winter tires, my 2016 5.0, 3.55 ..with mix driving 50/50 i get about 15-16 mpg, normal driving ..only highway at 70-75 mph, I get 17-18 mpg

@techsing3037 3 месяца назад

Add another '17 supercrew 4x4 5.0 to the mix. Taking it easy on the highway I can pull high 23mpg runs. With the 32 gal tank, i feel like I can go forever between fill-ups. Ford is good at this game and this comparison video proves it, eco-boost or otherwise.

@TheGettyAdventures 3 месяца назад

You don't have to argue with me sir. the 5L is one of the best 1500 engines in my books, partly exactly for that reason, it gets incredible fuel economy for being a N/A v8. not to mention it puts down some nice power when you need it to.

@Costanza009 3 месяца назад

I got 22mpg in my 23 f150 with the 5.0 and 3.73 gears on a 2.5 hour trip.

@chrismills4213 3 месяца назад

Loving the Tundra series…awesome work👍

@993mike 3 месяца назад

I personally would bet driving 100K plus miles with both these trucks that the Toyota will have way less issues with both the engine and the truck itself over the long term. I have several friends with newer F150's, and it's just one recall and repair after another.

@pwgrmi 5 дней назад

@@993mike that might be a bad bet. The NHTSA web site has some years of the Tundra as the most recalled vehicle sold in the US.

@1kukini 3 месяца назад

It’s nice to see testing trucks on Irving fuel for a change.

@TheGettyAdventures 3 месяца назад

that stop is close to my shop and the highway. makes it almost perfect for this time of stuff.

@Johnsmith46392 3 месяца назад

Ford is 16% more fuel efficient than tundra. Wow!

@pauldickson1495 3 месяца назад

Makes no difference in cost of ownership. The Ford will eat the savings in gas up with parts .And there is no resale on a ford . I’ve had both trucks . Dodge as well . I’m not brand specific. Stating the facts . Drive what you all like . They all suck and are a poor investment

@Terminxman 3 месяца назад

@@pauldickson1495 We'll see how the new Tundra holds it's value, I highly doubt it'll be as good as the old Tundra or even 2nd gen Tacoma. I've owned 3 Toyotas, a camry, 4runner, and 3rd gen Tacoma. My newest vehicle now is a '21 f150 with the 5.0 at 46k miles. I would trust Ford's ecoboosts at this point though just as much as I would the Toyota engine. What I don't understand is the switch to a tt v6 for such little gain. The fuel economy is still not very good. twin turbo gassers get awful fuel economy loaded down too, the 5.0 does better on fuel while towing than any of them but obviously has a less desirable torque curve being naturally aspirated. Regardless, I haven't owned any Fords that killed me in costs. The value of some of the toyota models is purely based on perception and fanboyism and not reality. People have this impression that a Toyota with 400k miles on it is somehow magically going to go forever, any more so than any other mfg. Toyota does make better cars, but I don't think their Trucks are that great anymore and the reputation seems to be dropping.

@Johnsmith46392 3 месяца назад

Assuming $4 gas it’s almost $2,900 every 100,000 miles.

@ryane6719 3 месяца назад

@@pauldickson1495you’re drunk, these tundras are crap. Not only is the Ford more efficient it feels 20% more powerful when towing. I drove both, the tundra felt dead. The Ford felt like you couldn’t put enough weight on it. I’m on my second eco boost.. I traded my last one in with 146,000 miles, it used zero oil and had zero issues. My current one is 40,000 miles while I’ve had a few recalls that are annoying as all hell, it has been just as reliable.

@pauldickson1495 3 месяца назад

@@ryane6719 sorry I don’t drink ford boy . You’re sensitive like the rest of the ford fan boys . Drive your fords . I’ll drive what I want . 😂😂😂 you guys are so predictable.

@jeanlarose2343 3 месяца назад

Do you have snow tires on ? What is the differential gear ratio on these trucks ?

@jw8578 3 месяца назад

@getty thanks for this review.... rated at 18 and 22 I'm averaging 14 mpg in my Ram. Disappointed. These other trucks were on my list. Huge difference between these two. F150 weighs 400 or so pounds less but that shouldn't matter much on highway.

@user-ny5gw1nv6f Месяц назад

Great video, always informative. Quick point on the MPG though, you seem to be converting L/100km to US MPG, not Imperial / Canadian. If Toyota is quoting 23mpg in Cdn terms, that 12.3L/100km is pretty bang on. I have a 2019 F150 3.5 Ecoboost with 3.55 gears, and can confirm it runs daily driving town / country in the 22-24mpg Imperial, and longer highway trips in the 100-105km/hr range in the 25-26mpg range. All depends on that right foot, and cruising speed.

@LindsayPeters987 2 месяца назад

So knowledgeable!

@teganze 3 месяца назад

Good comparison! Last year of the Nissan Titan, you plan on reviewing one?

@D3rkr4i 3 месяца назад

They don’t sell them in Canada

@drunkinmaster1 3 месяца назад

My 2019 3.5 ecoboost will average 23 mpg across Washington state to Oregon coast. With 34” tires i average 17 mpg highway

@2packs4sure 3 месяца назад

If I was out there shopping right now I think I'd take the Ford I've heard some weird stuff going on with a new Tundra's. Need to give Toyota a couple years to straighten it all out...

@12B0692 3 месяца назад

Tailwind and headwind make a huge difference. My Ridgeline in Eco mode got 25.9 mpg recently on a 700+ mile drive, but headwinds on the return trip lowered that to 25.4. In both cases, exceeding the 24 mpg highway rating. I find that open road mpg is fantastic in Ridgeline. City tends to be much worse...18.2-19mpg is the norm.

@yxz91 3 месяца назад

It'd be interesting to see the the hybrid version in the mix.

@limestonelizard 3 месяца назад

As an owner of a Tacoma, I am not surprised at all by this result.

@orlandomabry2584 3 месяца назад

Very interested in the F-150 and Chevy 1500 but hesitant to buy one used because of the cost of an engine with 80k+ miles (not buying new) and the potential issues. Been looking at the Titans and wanted to see if you have an opinion on this 5.6L V8 in comparison to the Big3. Thanks

@Saku19 3 месяца назад

What happened to the "3.5 I-Force issues" video?

@CTECH-REVIEW 3 месяца назад

Great video! I love the MPG LOOP comparison! Ford still leading the pack for fuel economy!

@theepanrealtorvaratharajan7497 3 месяца назад

Do either of these trucks have cylinder deactivation systems? I love my 2nd Gen Tundra, but mileage is definitely a consideration for next purchase.

@pmbboc 3 месяца назад

No they do not have cylinder deactivation

@patl9364 3 месяца назад

My 24 Tundra I-Force Max get 18mpg around town 23mpg on hwy runs. But I got it for heavy towing. My 2013 Ram 1500 got to 170k before the rear end needed a rebuild. I've had the old Tundra's in the past 5.7 12mg but very reliable. Couple of Ford guy friends who have had F150's are now going with the Silverado 1500 Diesel & reporting 22/33mpg. One has to tow horse trailers the other construction equipment.

@brucemacdonald4672 3 месяца назад

Need to do a test with pulling a trailer with both. ☃️👍👍

@Teddybear46324 3 месяца назад

Alex, what are the axle ratios?

@javienj.2535 3 месяца назад

Can you make a vid on the best truck to buy or that you would buy on a budget? Maybe 10k or 15k whatever you choose

@Mustang-Mike 3 месяца назад

F150 aluminum body vs Tundra steel body . What was the curb weight of both trucks?

@agerardomp 3 месяца назад

Greetings Alex. Gorgeous performance and MPG at FORD. Performance and achievement of energy in FORD is better, weight and yield in turbo, stoichiometric blend, ... is really I think could be the difference. Good job Alex!! Big HUG from CDMX! 😮

@TheGettyAdventures 3 месяца назад

Could very well be true! Appreciate it sir!

@revistadearmas 3 месяца назад

I got the V8 Trd pro The real deal Interested in the V8 raptor R now

@CTECH-REVIEW 3 месяца назад

Raptor R FTW!

@19xtrip 3 месяца назад

Now...can you do a coyote (ur fav Ford engine) comparison vs borh the trucks you had here?

@jeffreygoss8109 3 месяца назад

Still love my 5.7. 13 mpg no matter how I drive it. 300k and never an issue. Never left me stranded so I can easily budget for the atrocious mpg

@TheGettyAdventures 3 месяца назад

can't argue with that sir!

@shivpatel9724 3 месяца назад

Will you make a video on a nissan titan?

@khonesavanhchandara7044 3 месяца назад

I very like to see you talk about f250 with 6.2. If you have a chance

@siwhatscrackn 3 месяца назад

On the Tundra does everyone drive on Eco or Normal setting? I get 17.6 mpg on normal setting in the city on my 22 tundra platinum.

@jpentzien 3 месяца назад

I get better mpg in normal

@mikedebear 3 месяца назад

I'd like to see a towing fuel economy comparison between these two trucks.

@joseeduardo4327 3 месяца назад

Where’d the video go about the negatives of the tundra powertrain?

@brianaustin1328 Месяц назад

I have a 2024 Tundra SR. I get 23 mpg on the highways without a load. With my RV towed behind me, I get about 16 mpg.

@colingoldthorpe5918 3 месяца назад

Was this in IMP Gallons or US Gallons. My Ecoboost 2.7 gets close to the 3.5 Ecoboost maybe a little better but not by that much. I have Driven long term the 5.4 Triton the 5.0 Coyote the 3.5 eco and the 2.7 eco. The 2.7 eco runs the smoothest and better fuel economy than the rest. I had a Ram 1500 with the Hemi it was the same MPG over 200,000 km as the 5.4 Triton. In total about 700,000 km on them all combined. So i guess i would be a good benchmark. Never towed with any of them, they were all work trucks and all highway miles in Western Canada.

@Davidsmith-mc2no 3 месяца назад

Are you going to get the hybrid to test

@damondavis842 3 месяца назад

Did the last tundra video disappear?

@channelnamehere4065 3 месяца назад

@The Getty Adventures You should throw both trucks on the lift and compare each component, from brakes to prop shaft, to see just how overbuilt a typical Tundra really is. And those are just components you can see. That's where there's a weight difference, attributing to MPG.

@AK_Ray 3 месяца назад

That's hilarious, have you actually been underneath a Toyota and an F-150 for yourself? All the components are pretty much the same exact size and if anything a slight edge goes to Ford as far as just total beef.

@channelnamehere4065 3 месяца назад

@@AK_Ray Then you haven't been under either. Typical Ford buyers take the outside and don't consider how things are built together from the inside. The only F150 with components comparable to typical Tundra is the Raptor.

@AK_Ray 3 месяца назад

@@channelnamehere4065 ya dude, I'm the biased one... Coming from a guy with a clapped out Toyota as his profile picture 👌

@channelnamehere4065 3 месяца назад

@@AK_Ray just speaking facts. You claim Ford had bigger components when they really don't. Toyota is used by special forces around the world cus nothing else will do. Fact.

@channelnamehere4065 3 месяца назад

@@AK_Ray you are biased by saying f150 has bigger components when it actually doesn't. Even raptor don't have as big of components but it comes closest. Just stating facts. Toyota is used by special forces around the world in shit countries cus nothing else will do. Fact.

@seaneastman6323 3 месяца назад

Tire pressure and temp outside will be the thing that most people don't consider. However nice video.

@jameszeiger8533 3 месяца назад

it would be interesting to see the fuel numbers when both are towing, say, 5K or 8k lbs. We know from your prior testing that the eco boost, which pulls hard like a beast even under severe loading, does drink fuel like crazy. As well, how Toyota approaches their cooling of forced air induction (low temp liquid cooling) verses Fords more conventional air cooling exchanger, how Toyota uses an explicit and separate cooling circuit for turbo/intercooler, may reveal they don’t need to retard timing under severe loading to keep EGTs down, as Ford does, thus, it drinks a lot of fuel. I am not a zealot and think both are great trucks. But, it would be interesting to see how the new approaches by Toyota and others recently in turbo cooling and intercoolers perform under severe loading. Cheers!

@McBurger29 3 месяца назад

Once you wrap this series up. You gotta compare the Hybrid models. Im going to pick the Ford Power Boost.

@TheGettyAdventures 3 месяца назад

the hybrid battle would be pretty cool.

@mll7674 2 месяца назад

The 3.5 has been around since 2011. But the engine has seen changes since. IE hp and torque ratings and much better all around since the original release. I personally owned 3 and 2 5.0L F150. The past year I’ve been on the powerboost. By far my favorite platform for me. Just like any other product it’s not for everyone. But it fits my lifestyle. I don’t tow anything. But I do need a truck. For me as long as they continue to offer the powerboost it will be my choice. They ever change and remove it. I will go back to the standard 3.5L. Better hp and torque rating than the 5.0. And better fuel efficiency. Powerboost houses the 435 hp and 570 lb ft of torque. Truck is quick. Not raptor r or TRX quick. But no slouch. The other fact of the F150 10 speed is the self learn. You can’t judge the truck until you’ve put a couple hundred miles of your driving habits . The truck will shift better judging your everyday commute. Hence you’ll see better mileage due to learned patterns.

@Shorby99EK 3 месяца назад

Winter time and winter fuel sucks down MPG as well. I always beat the EPA mpg on my vehicles.

@dalea4350 3 месяца назад

For about 5 to 7 years, then the Toyota wins hands down simce it will still be running for 20 years.

@Robert.Youngblood 3 месяца назад

How does that 3.5 ecoboost get that and our ford explorer sport with the same motor gets 15?! Ours is awd and its a transverse engine but still!

@lukestoyz 3 месяца назад

Tires , air pressure in tires, vehicle weight differences also factor in

@gregoryjames7976 3 месяца назад

Absolutely. With the stock tires on my 2018 f150 was getting over 20 mpg. Got sick of the flats and went to a more aggressive E-rated tire and mileage dropped to 17-18

@ThunderRunner 3 месяца назад

Pretty closely mirrors my experience having owned both…comparably equipped there was about a 10% difference in weight of the trucks, my tundra coming in just over 6,000lbs, and I saw about 10% better fuel economy in the 3.5 EB. The transmission gearing does feel a lot different and wanted to rapidly upshift in my f150 at all times which greatly reduced the enjoyment of the drive, so there’s that as well.

@user-rj7qm2ej2s 3 месяца назад

Strange. Mine is 6.5ft Platinum. I drove from Niagara to Chicago and came back. The average is 11.8L/100KM. In the summer.

@ejshelby5460 3 месяца назад

Had a 2022 F150 with the V8, gas overall is great, not amazing, but here’s the fine print: it is VERY sensitive to driving style. As soon as I got on the highway, at 60-80/hr, the mpg started to improve, the more I’m on the highway the longer the range is! Very interesting, like my Volvo Inline 6 made by Ford. Toyota, not sensitive at all, just bad mpg. But I still choose the Toyota for far better power delivery and transmission

@leemorgan9670 3 месяца назад

Ford has been at this a long time, they figured out mpg, however Toyota has always been reliable. That remains to be seen with the new twin turbo tundra. I have heard mixed reviews in terms of engine issues.

@user-ux4iu7us7p 3 месяца назад

Curb weight of trucks? Tires?

@realcdcruze3558 3 месяца назад

Is the Toyota fully broken in? I thought they would be almost identical in fuel economy.

@Wittyusername82 3 месяца назад

I’m surprised actually. Unloaded my tuned gen one 3.5 with the 6 speed sits around 20 mpg in the summer, towing (doesn’t seem to matter the load) is around 15. I expected these new trucks to be better.

@TheGettyAdventures 3 месяца назад

you would like to think the 10 speed would make a big difference but maybe not.

@alexmseu 3 месяца назад

I wonder how broken in each engine in the comparison is. Either way, I think both trucks have their pros and cons. I have a '24 Tundra and average about 18.5 mpg mixed driving. It's about what I was getting in my 2020 Nissan Frontier Pro 4X and .5 mpg off from the EPA numbers listed by Toyota.

@steveweiss8920 3 месяца назад

As a Toyota guy, it's disappointing to see the new Tundra only gets about 19mpg. My gen 1 - 2006 Tundra with the 4.7 averages 18.5 on the interstate.

@danielcull5054 3 месяца назад

My tremor gets about 14L/100K with the 3.5EB on a highway. Those tires make a big difference it seems.

@jeremyloewen4071 Месяц назад

Like to see the same comparison but towing 7000lb through the mountains. My 2018 3.5 eco boost gets about 25-26 l/100km in that scenario

@mtbtrailbuilding6813 3 месяца назад

Something to consider, turbo in colder weather generates more power due to the density of the air coming in. As a result, more fuel is added.

@mtbtrailbuilding6813 3 месяца назад

Also, did the ford having towing package or no? I ask because I had a 3.5 ford out 2 weekends ago from Wood motors and it was 15.2-15.6 over 500km. I ordered a Tundra that same weekend.

@TheGettyAdventures 3 месяца назад

No it didn't have the towing package. the towing package I believe comes with 3.73 gears which would make a difference. especially in the city.

@jayzb7701 3 месяца назад

O2 sensor should adjust to right ratio

@jasonbrushett2005 3 месяца назад

@@TheGettyAdventures the max tow package on the F150 3.5 Ecoboost comes with 3:55 rear axle.I have one

@chrismcphee7866 3 месяца назад

My question is were both engines broken properly at least 10,000 miles

@chadhaire1711 3 месяца назад

3.5 is for towing only. If you are not towing the 2.7 is a far better motor, and actually quicker to 60 mph too.

@mikecoyen4944 3 месяца назад

In my f150 on eco and locked in at 100 km I ran almost a full tank 138L went 900 km and ended with 9.0L/km

@andrewest9791 3 месяца назад

Summer will get you better mileage. Upping tire pressure to the max will improve mileage as well.

@dcooper91g 3 месяца назад

Not hook a 5k lb trailer to em both and see what’s better. Can buy a little car for cheap fuel but most truck owners wanna know what the trucks will do being used as a truck

@cliffh8486 3 месяца назад

I like them both. But I would get the blue oval because I like the styling better

@drdumais 3 месяца назад

Why did your last video in the Tundra get deleted?

@AussieDazza 3 месяца назад

Because he made a major error in it, Alex is going to repost it after editing.

@philipkolatis3611 3 месяца назад

I woukd guess the tundra is heavier in weight also how much miles are on each truck my experience is that the tundra never has good gas mileage till u get over 10k

@Chris-ut6eq 28 дней назад

Correct me if I'm wrong but this video did not test the engine, but tested the whole drive train (with the engine as only one component) for the given vehicle weight & tire rolling resistance. A few years ago, was looking for a new truck and quickly dropped looking at tundra because it's not as efficient as other trucks on the market.

@sprint2648 3 месяца назад

Gonna be hard to beat fords 3.5 ecoboost. They have been around since 2011 and the current one is pretty darn good!

@TheGettyAdventures 3 месяца назад

If you drive them easy they will be good to you. but once you lay into the pedal the fuel economy is gone. depends so much on how you drive them I find.

@carholic-sz3qv 3 месяца назад

who told you that! you forget one thing the ford body is entirely alumnium much lighter than the tundra.

@CJColvin 3 месяца назад

@carholic-sz3qv Yet the Aluminum body will be more expensive to replace once it gets dented.

@toneyo4794 3 месяца назад

Toyota admits they aren’t trying to win the mpg battle but put power where needed. It’s adequate mpg but is a good work truck.

@twinforce_fusion6560 3 месяца назад

Curious on how the Toyota will do with +80k with the gas particulate filters, especially while towing.....

@lukestoyz 3 месяца назад

Doesn’t have filters

@sppeders1 3 месяца назад

He pulled that video down, and did a quick video explaining he made a mistake on that.

@9002-bv9xz 3 месяца назад

@@sppeders1 and he pulled his "quick video explaining" down as well. Honestly...this guy Alex has now officially lost credibility. Hope he has a big lawsuit coming for his defamation on Toyota via false information.

@vitkobylka6432 3 месяца назад

@@9002-bv9xz I believe he quickly acted to fix his mistakes, if he is to get sued for a mistake then I think just about everyone on RU-vid would get sued because of all the mistakes and misinformation that is out there.

@chadedwards6643 3 месяца назад

I have a 23 tundra. Eco mode sux in mine. I've found that normal mode brings about 2 mpg more.

@vitkobylka6432 3 месяца назад

I’ve heard that with some other people, haven’t tried it on mine. It seems to me if I baby the truck I get worse mileage then if I just drive it, I wonder why that would be.

@thomasmcgraw5899 Месяц назад

I have had the same experience with mine. I never use eco mode!

@ethanyates28 3 месяца назад

What tires and pressures are each vehicle using that could be the difference of 3mpg

@garyhunchak1857 3 месяца назад

um no

@ethanyates28 3 месяца назад

@@garyhunchak1857 absolutely I went from all seasons to mud terrain and dropped the pressures from 60 to 45 on my Cummins and lost over 5mpg.

@Johnson13210 2 месяца назад

My 2021 4x4 Tundra has factory 4:30 gears in the pumpkin which hurt fuel mileage but pulls like a mule. That is probably what we are seeing here. The 3rd gen. Tundra may have lower gears vs the ford. Better fuel mileage doesn't mean a better truck or truck engine, but simply gearing. I have seen mid-size trucks with better towing capacity that some full size because of gearing. Hope this helps.

@user-dp3yo1uw9y 3 месяца назад

Do towing test between the two

@ryane6719 3 месяца назад

The ford will mop the floor with the Toyota.

@realjredecop 3 месяца назад

@@ryane6719yup

@parrott350 3 месяца назад

How the mighty have fallen. sad. Good informative video though. Best regards, chuck

@aaronstefan4450 3 месяца назад

I am running a 2023 F150 Lariat with the 2.7 Ecoboost which is at least 500 lbs heavier than the XLT 3.5 Ecoboost tested in this video, it gets similar mpg to the Toyota in this video - I might have a heavier foot than our host….

@weegeemike 3 месяца назад

Turbos, less cylinders, higher price, more components to break...my dads '16 Denali 5.3 2wd will do 21-23 mpg all day on the highway. Maybe 18 or 19mpg in town which is to be expected and is pretty solid as well. Ill take the v8. Thanks

@CJColvin 3 месяца назад

Agreed, I'll stick to my 2011 Ford F150 with a 5.0L Coyote V8 in it