Excellent comprehensive review. I have ordered these as I can’t get on with in ear buds and I understand what you say about sound being better with that type. However I intend to use them mainly outdoors either walking or cycling just to keep me entertained and I won’t be looking for ultra fidelity. Of course you were right to point this out and thanks for your review.
You seem to be somehow missing the point. You continually say these buds "are not immersive". They are not designed to be. These are open-ear, designed to listen to music whilst also being aware of your surroundings. If you want immersive then there are traditional earbuds that block the ear canal.
Actually,as I also mentioned in the review,my point in stressing that these aren't "immersive" is because many individuals from the audience are norlt familiar with what an open-ear design is. They might go into it thinking it'll provide the same impact as in-ears do. THAT was my point.
@@Purecast9 But...after describing what open-ear buds are, what they are for, that they are not immersive, and that you will base your verdict and judgement based on this, you then go on to review them compared to in-ear, criticizing their sound relentlessly because they are not immersive. Even saying you pressed them to your ears to try to make them more immersive. They are not supposed to be immersive. That is the whole point of open-ear. An informative review would be comparing their sound to other open-ear buds surely.
I have to agree with you. Just as you should not compare ear buds to true around ear headphones, you should not compare in-ear. buds to open-air buds or even bone-conducting buds. You should also not compare wired to wireless. It’s like comparing gala apples to granny smith.
@@Sphinx5779 I completely disagree with the assumption that open-ear buds are designed for non-immersive audio experience. There are many different reasons people might be interested in them. One of the biggest reasons is probably comfort. Many people are interested in the non-claustrophobic experience of open-ear buds _while_ having immersive audio. There are even open ear buds that include ANC technology.
@@NLspartan117 It's not an assumption.. it is the inherent nature of the design. Open ear designs will never be able to match the immersiveness of IEMs, for example. There are options that try to bridge the gap, but they will never be on par, and it does not make sense to go with an open-ear design when there are more immersive designs available. The only reason I could suggest an open-ear design that *tries* to be immersive is if you have a sensitive ear canal and cannot do in-ear headphones. @Purecast9, I agree with Sphinx. It's a valid point that should be stressed in the beginning of the video, but repeatedly comparing them to in-ear options, and repeatedly talking about their sound when you 'press them in' is not helpful. Discuss the sound quality from the perspective of open-ear headphones, not from the perspective of other options. Make the point and move on to discussing actual audio quality.
These would be best for either out and active and needing to hear your environment, or (in my case) working from an office and hearing colleagues while making calls - for which the mic is a crucial part - would be great for you to do mic samples, inside/outside. I can't make a decision without that test
Bro can you suggest me a bluetooth speaker with best audio quality under Rs2500, I will be using it mainly for watching movies and will sometime listen to music also. Actually I am asking this again because in the last video someone else asked another question as a reply to my comment , so I didn't understand, will you mind telling again? Please 🙏
While i think sound quality is important to emphasize, the use case of the headphones is as important for purchasing recommendations. Regarding SQ, these headphones should be compared with bone conduction and other open ear headphones.
