Traditional Mongolian Cavalry performing Horseback Archery . Namnaa Academy archers . 

indians persians koreans vietnamiss afghans caucasians and all of central and western and eastern europe and central asians lol all of them suffred from horse archers nomads attacks

Actually this comes from a long tradition of Horseback Archery that’s commonly found amongst any Y-DNA R1b, R1a and Y-DNA Q men. So this is basically how all of these men’s ancestries used to be. Germanic men for example were not originally from Europe, but were pushed into Europe by invading Hunnic tribes. Imagine that all these tribes are really like rival brothers, cousins and such; much like European Nobility was. Almost entirely related, yet fighting wars to be the dominant family House. It was found that 4 out of the five bodies found in a Royal Burial from Royal members of The Golden Horde were actually R1b and one of them was Y-DNA Q. So most Eastern and Western Europeans (Those who come from these aforementioned Haplogroups) used to live exactly like this. Hence why during WWI the Germans were called Huns by the media at that time. You can even look at the Equestrian Statue of Genghis Khan built in Mongolia, by a Mongolian nonetheless and he has a far more Eurasian depiction. The same goes for his descendants, like the Mongolian Astronomer Prince statue and many seem to have a common characteristic of Red Hair. The original Aryans were mostly Red Haired, mixing with East Asian women gave some darker features and Eye Shapes. I myself am a mixed ancestral lineage of paternal Aryans and Maternal Canaanites/Mycenaeans/Etruscans and Ancient Egyptians who all seemed to share genetic, cultural and historical links and trade routes. Thus, I’m Y-DNA R1b and MtDNA T2 and this is an analysis on the K6 calculator: Ancient Eurasia K6 Ancestral North Eurasian: 17.29% Ancestral South Eurasian: 5.78% East Asian: .99% West European Hunter-Gatherer: 41.24% Natufian: 34.7% Sub-Saharan: 0% As you can see I do have a small portion of East Asian, which seems to be associated with Modern Chinese. This seems to be through Y-DNA Q and MtDNA C, which are both found present in my DNA Autosomal analysis, though at minuscule amounts today.

And the Arabs, and the Bulgarians, and the Persians....

Not all. Because now some Mongols and Turks are part of Russia, so they feel more pride. 😂😂😂

@@Uran_KH-98 I’m pretty sure they’re talking about ethnic Russians, not ethnically Mongolian citizens of the Russian Federation.

Thanks

thanks

@@AltanNergui, the great warriors were skilled with many weapons and hand to hand combat as well. I, too, live and believe in the warrior way.

Although the Turks often comprised the bulk of the Mongol army as well as the bulk of armies opposed to the Mongols, throughout the domains of the Mongol Empire there was a diffusion of military technology, which has already bee and also ethnic groups. In addition to the Mongols and Turks, other ethnicities served in the Mongol military machine and found themselves distant from home. May, T.M., 2012. The Mongol conquests in world history, London: Reaktion Books. p.222

Thanks

Exactly, that's why the ancient Chinese army formed by farmers couldn't defeat PROFESSIONAL ARCHERS formed by nomads although the Chinese army had more men

You have to use a thumb ring to shoot effectively while you are moving

@@aofeizhang8735 The Chinese did beat them plenty of times. But it's still telling that the best tactic they found was to beat the nomads at their own game - making their own cavalry archer corps.

​@@aofeizhang8735455😂❤😊😅

If want to learn just come and train I can teach yu

Thanks

Dynamic horse archery goes back way further than 800 years

They were one of the few cultures who invented a bow where they actually could shoot like that from a horse

@@AltanNergui I love how unified and centralized ancient mongolian life was around horse and archer. A culture seemingly built for mastery of war.

Actually I believe shooting at moving targets were originally meant for hunting. Need to bring in some nice venison. It was later adapted for warfare.

Our Central Asian and First Nations people are related✊✊✊

Hi, sorry for my bizarre question,... How many Native Americans are currently living in the USA?

you are ONLY american others are occupants

​@@bartomiejzakrzewski7220 I don't think you understand what the title is.

no you are not 👏

In XII cent they cant ieven know about europe xD

​@@bartomiejzakrzewski7220 read book 😅

You mean most of the world… Asia was just one continent that they conquered.

Thanks a lot we are trying to save this ancient art

I'm a woman and really want to learn horseback archery. I just started learning archery last year and don't knoe how to ride a horse yet. If there's a war, I want to be a horseback archer

​@@naylisyazwina6836Not sure how useful that might been on modern warfare... It would be a great skill all the same.

@@naylisyazwina6836 Idk where you are but Horses havent been used on the battlefield since 1942. Theyre used more for recon and crowd control nowadays

​@@naylisyazwina6836 Riding a horse is a wonderful experience but to ride well takes much practice. And I recommend that you get used to the fairly terrifying feeling of riding at full gallop before you think about doing it without using your hands, lol!😀

arigato

When you realize that this short horse was still preferred in Ww2 by the soviets.

@@squintz21four dayum,never knew that before

@@idsfxtm5759 It's because they are very sturdy and can withstand hunger, disease and fatigue a lot better.

It whas domina t untile the invention of revolver 😮

Yeah, these short horses are incredibly strong! Arabic/European horses may look good, but Mongolian horses withstand cold, hunger and other hardships much better than them

The rest of Asia, but not Europe. Mongol conquest stopped after the east of Europe. Long thought because of the death of the Khan but more recent study shows it was because Europe had an insane density of more than 10,000 stone castles. Utterly impossible to invade by light cavalry.

@@jonny2954 Yeah but if they didn't have so many castles, the Mongols would've swept through Europe like it was nothing

@@categories5066 Only the lowlands. As soon if they hit more difficult geography it's also over. Steppe tactics don't work in dense forests or mountains, have to get of your horse. Dismounted they would have been wrecked by the Europeans.

​@@jonny2954also because of the weather

@@jonny2954 Bro the Chinese had castles for cities with 40 feet high walls, the mongols were familiar with stone structures lmao

thanks

Yeah. It literally feels like watching WW2 airplane fighters engaging in a dogfight or a low flying helicopter doing a fly by shooting during the Vietnam War.

I think you are right. Definitely would improve the equestrian segment.

Check out the World Nomad Games - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Nomad_Games

Sound nice, but it will be a sport dominated by a very limitade nations from central Asia. People don't practice that much even riding and achery, if you combine them it will be more harder and people will barely show intere

HATTA 100 SENE ONCE KURTULUS SAVASINDA TURK SUVARILERI VARDI YUNANLARI KOVLUYORDU VIDEO VAR GERCEK GORUNTULER :d AYDIN TARAFINDA

thanks

It’s be the last thing you’d ever see

What "heritage" would they leave behind? Just a trail of death, destruction and catastrophe, like a swarm of locusts.

@@ayoubmonno9662 I hear you and understand. They turned Central Asia and much of China into pasture, obliterating millions of lives, many cultures and languages in the process. But, a long time has passed, so we can look back with clearer eyes to see what they wrought, to learn and understand.

@@gregoryluckert9969 I can't imagine what over 120,000 Mongol cavalry looked like in action. Must've sounded like thunder with all those hoofs galloping.

Well, most cultures that faced these Mongols thought they were haunted demons from hell itself. Christians and Muslims and Chinese all believed that it was the literal end of the times.

It was 20k mongols vs 80k cumans and rus. Cumans perhaps had same tactics as mongols, so mongols had to feign retreat and ambush, suddenly attacking with force shocking the enemy.

Because mongols were professional warriors at those times

However, they were so successful only because the Mongols' opponents did not adapt to Mongol tactics. Later the Mongols were defeated by the Arabs and then by the Russians.

However, they were so successful because the Mongols' opponents did not adapt to Mongol tactics. Later the Mongols were defeated by the Muslims and then by the Russians.

@@SerkAk how much later? correct me if im wrong, but i thought they never lost a major battle under Genghis khan, or his generals. The Rus were completely subjugated by the mongols, and the only defeat to any muslim force that I know were the Mamluks but that was already after Genghis Khan died and Hulugu khan was running things.

thanks

Thanks

i heard from another video, there was an archer on horseback who fired three arrows into a man as his horse fell from a fatal injury. three arrows in practically one second

@@wyatt7465 Historical sources love to exaggerate. There’s also records of armies which exceed the total population of the empires raising them, stories of one guy holding a bridge against thousands of men, arrows blocking out the sun, and many other tall tales. It’s possible to loose arrows quickly, but 3 in 1 second is superhuman, aka not possible. The human body just does not move that fast. The rate of fire of a semiautomatic rifle, or the rate at which a human can pull a trigger, is roughly 2 shots per second. That’s a 1/2 inch movement of one finger. Drawing a bow requires the entire arm to move several feet and takes significantly longer than it takes to move the finger 1/2 an inch.

@@QualityPen i didn't say one second, i said Practically one second. from the time his horse got hit to the time it took for him to loose the arrows quickly. historically speaking it takes a trained soldier to fire a flintlock 2-3 times in one minute and though rare can be shot 3-4 times. my point with that being humans who have a certain level of determination or motivation can do impossible things in certain situations. there are stories of parents lifting cars with their bare hands to rescue their kids. and this archer i was referring to was focused on one target and i never said he pulled the arrows back to full draw. and that was a bit contradictory of you to say in one line it's possible then to say in the next line it's not possible.

@@QualityPen actually you'd be surprised how fast one can shoot arrows. look up lars andersen archery, you will be shocked

Thanks

@@AltanNergui I am Sioux and shoot a Tatar bow. If only our ancestors had another 200 years to develop further.

Westerners don't really hate Mongols (at least those to the west of Poland/Hungary), since they never really got a foothold in Central Europe. Tribes like the Huns, Vandals and Goths still have the names of their tribes carry some dark associations to this day, while "Mongol" doesn't really have those associations.

@@haakoflo you have no idea how big tatarophobia in germany is

The Mongols were actually quite weak to Western armies. The Mongol threat against Central Europe was ended by the rapid westernization of the Hungarian and Polish militaries. The Mongols were thoroughly embarrassed when they went up against a reformed Hungarian army in the 1280s, for instance. Nagai Khan lost almost his entire army and barely survived himself.

Mongols raided eastern europe villages and castles, once they arrived to western Europe they retreated since: -their strategy only worked in plains and steppes -there was a big number of fortified castels -the territory was mountainous and hilly -there were no forage to sustain the horses because they needed big plains -plate armor is made to protect from arrows

I was thinking the same

Glow in the dark spray paint and uv lights 😅

That's a lot of metal detectors hours :s

I remember someone saying Cavalry is the equivalent of F-14 in any past medieval nations. Cavalry + archery is the same as F-35 fighter, yet for Mongol this is just their standard average soldier, while for other empires, only the chosen few elite/noble soldiers get to have horse.

It’s worth it for the views. But we get the ones that we can find

thanks welcome to land of the horses

thanks

And i hope to joining turkic cavalry or mamluk

@@danidans4689 me too!

​@Dani Dans the mamluks were turks, & they were also born & bred on the same steppes as the mongols in present day krygz/kazakh, thats why their horse archery was paralleled to the mongols. Before being sold off into slavery by the mongols by Crimea way to Syria then Egypt.

@Mighty Light a bit of history, its the SLAVE MAMLUK TURKS of the kipchack steppes, present day kazakhstan/kyrgyzstan who defeated the mongols under Al Zahir Baybars who is also a Steppe Nomad whom share the same culture as the mongols. thats why their horse archery was paralleled to the mongols bc they're essentially steppe nomad people with the same culture before they were sold off by the mongols into slavery. The mamluks also used feigned & retreat to defeat the mongols. They also looked like mongols too.

This is horse abuse

True! Greeks also said that the Amazonians were Scythian. Scythian women would fight alongside their men in battles in the bronze age so the Greeks mythologized them to be an all female warrior race. The centaurs might've been mythologized Scythian nomads too

@@ThatBuckskinPonyTell that to cavalry 1000 years ago.

@@soysauce4087 Can’t. It was 1000 years ago. But now, humans know that other animals have emotions and that we should respect that

Although the Turks often comprised the bulk of the Mongol army as well as the bulk of armies opposed to the Mongols, throughout the domains of the Mongol Empire there was a diffusion of military technology, which has already bee and also ethnic groups. In addition to the Mongols and Turks, other ethnicities served in the Mongol military machine and found themselves distant from home. May, T.M., 2012. The Mongol conquests in world history, London: Reaktion Books. p.222

thanks soon we wiill post more good monoglian horsebakc archery videos our team trying to save that mongol horseback archery traditions

thanks

Yes, however just a reminder that they aren't the only people who can do that!

@LawyerSean prove it

Core strength from wrestling and riding horses they whole life

They stand in the stirrups using their legs to smooth out the motion, like standing when on a bike. But I think that back in the day the mongols did not use stirrups so that wold have looked a bit different...

They’re communicate with the horse with their knees knocking or body weight leaning to right or left. The horse knows where to go with that body languages.

Non-nomadic people simply couldn't support so much cavalry because they would have to grow all the fodder for the horses on farms, whereas the nomads just had to let them graze. So different civilizations support different types of armies.

@@SSHitMan Parthians and the Sassanids used horse archery so non nomadic Persians used it.

@@robleyusuf2566 They were Parthians (Scythians, Huns, Hungarians).

@@AK-fe1lu no

This is horse abuse

@@ThatBuckskinPonyshut up

@@ThatBuckskinPonyshut up

thanks

I’m in America and am beginning to develop archery skills, I’m trying to develop the same techniques they use in this video, only I don’t have a horse so speed running is my option. Or I could form a Miata war party 🤣, how many archer do you think would fit in a Miata? Lol

" War of the Arrows " 2011 Korean film and excellent

@Kashgari yes (or Sarmatians) but it was the Mongols that took it to Europe

@@Maza675 I stand corrected, and thank you for the information. Have any of you ever tried riding without a saddle or stirrups? I compare it to driving a sports car without power steering or hydraulic brakes. Much better in terms of a sense of real control and feel. However, the burn in the thighs after 30 minutes or so (depending on how you're riding) is noticeable, it's definitely a lot more work to stay on the horse, again depending on how well trained your horse is, and how you're riding it.

Üzengi için Türkler de teşekkürü hak ediyor, Moğollardan bin yıl önce Türkler üzengi kullanıyordu. İskitler/Sakalar ve Hunlar...

Love Asia to the moon and back. Don't care about the West at all, we belong to Asia

Greetings cousin :) another grandson of Great Attila from Türkiye

Tengri biz menen

so fancy that hungarians of today think of themselves as sons of atilla while their dna is mostly mix of slavs and neighbouring people :D

@@hirdbarding3399 depends on the person. the actual person.

HULAGU AND SABUTAI LEADER :)

А почему ты про своих российских тюрков и монголов так не говоришь?

@@Uran_KH-98 а должен?

@@Bodulaw11499 Видимо нет. Вот и пошла утилизация тебе подобных.

@@Uran_KH-98 каких подобных?

@@Uran_KH-98 зачем ему говорить про наших под видео монголов?

Thankz

yes my ancestors build bic empire

there was like hundreds of nations and empires who fought with horse archery not just mongols

@@takachitimur474 hundreds of empires?! For real ? You know what empire means ?

seljuk cavalry acher still better than Mongol

​@Andy Hrp90 you do know the seljuks turks lost to the mongols & were subjugated by the mongols right? Also, the seljuks were also from present day krygyz/Kazakhstan so they looked similar to mongols except by the time they touched Anatolia they Islamicized from assimilating with his arab/kurd/persian neighbors

For 2,000 years, nomads from the Mongolian plateau were a nightmare for the Han Chinese, and the Great Wall was built to keep them out.

Actually ,in the most time of histroy, nomads were defeated by han Chinese . Han chinese defeated the huns, turk and chased them away the far west from China. mogolian success in military didnot keep a long time,just decads of years, then were defeated by chinese ppl again.

they were not the first

Bruh there were plenty of nations used to this tactic

@@thfkmnIII I'm sure there weren't "plenty"

@@dr.shahidkarim8420 chinese dynasties, korean dynasties, japanese dynasties, persian dynasties, manchus, turkic states, northern india, tibetans. I could go on, you're welcome

@@thfkmnIII yeah you can go on .. nobody is confirming voracity

Yup, Calvary is easily countered with spears, but when they are just riding circles around you shooting you with arrows there isn’t much you can do other then break formation and hope for the best, a quick death.

Thanks

Although the Turks often comprised the bulk of the Mongol army as well as the bulk of armies opposed to the Mongols, throughout the domains of the Mongol Empire there was a diffusion of military technology, which has already bee and also ethnic groups. In addition to the Mongols and Turks, other ethnicities served in the Mongol military machine and found themselves distant from home. May, T.M., 2012. The Mongol conquests in world history, London: Reaktion Books. p.222

It had rather to do with Europeans and their 10,000+ stone fortresses. Difficult to take with a bow and horse lol.

Yes most definitely, european knights preferred more close range, hand combat with swords. Steppe nomads could have cared less, would strike you down with their accuracy of arrows & used various forms of feint & retreats & psychological warfare, appearing weak & retreating only to luring enemies further out into unknown territories only to ambushing them & annihilating them completely

I am Korean and we Koreans used to ride and shoot like this a few hundred years ago and I feel the same. This runs in our DNA.

Their bow actually short Range type

They did not.

Nope. Their bows were actually on the shorter range side. They had horses to compensate for their lack of range.

@@jollygoodyo mongol bows were recurve bows,incredibly strong as the bow not only relied on the string but also the wooden body of the bow which was shaped in such a way that it provided additional energy to the shot.only compound bows can match that type of design

@@eonthinker100yrago8im not an expert but what are they comparing it too and like mongols were different groups I can imagine so maybe not all bows very completely similair but ofc in one culture that makes sense

Это может быть интересным исследованием, когда монголы признают, что они учились у гуннов!

Welcome our Namnaa Academy will teach you mongol horseback archery

@@AltanNergui thanks, it might take some time before i can join you but at least i can start to learn the language, thank you for the quick reply

It's powerful yeah.

these are demons that genocided our central asian white cousins

You are hearing the voices of your ancestors in your blood. I call it a DNA memory. Your DNA remembers this.

40#-50#

Welcome

haha

@Mighty Light That allah, also can see Qutaiba's bloodshed in the Middle Asia too ? By the way, there's no allah or something. Nobody can see nothing.

@Mighty-Light Fun fact : some mamluks were mongols (like Al Adil Kitbuga)

Long Live Mongolian and Turkish brotherhood.