@@Alma2525 unfortunately that's seems to be a theme with black men who are criminals, they think they are angels no matter what and it makes the good mom's look bad
@@jaimez8025 not just with black ppl it's with Latinos as well. Except for my parents :) my parents would tell the judge to lock my @ss up. And that's why I love them... no bs
@@Alma2525 my mom once accidentally got me an extra few weeks in jail by something she said to the judge. Saved my life tho, and she definitely meant well. 🤣
@@Debate_Pervert I really hate that they have to let him watch the videos of the “crashes”. In a perfect world he wouldn’t get the opportunity to re-experience his deed.
If you look up Oppositional Defiance Disorder, there is a picture of Darrell Brooks. "Adults with ODD are more than just aggressive and irritating from time to time. They feel mad at the world every day, and lose their temper regularly. This may manifest as verbal abuse or road rage. Adults with ODD defend themselves relentlessly when someone says they’ve done something wrong. They feel misunderstood and disliked, hemmed in, and pushed around. Constant opposition to authority figures makes it difficult for adults with ODD to keep jobs and to maintain relationships and marriages. They are particularly quick to anger, they are impatient, and they have a low tolerance for frustration. They see themselves as mistreated, misunderstood, and unappreciated. They see themselves as the victim rather than the cause of the pain in the family system."
Anti-social personality disorder is very dangerous and often deadly. All 4 psychologists shared that diagnosis. It's not a mental illness, though. He's disgusting and inhumane
@@DNSMLT he also didn't understand that by saying the one cop saying his ex wasn't being "forthcoming" that that meant she flat out lied, not just that she omitted some of the story.
I always thought that too. I honestly believe that certain people with a low IQ or who are mentally stunted have very specific facial expressions and characteristics
Why does DB want to know if victims received compensation for the injuries they suffered? How Dare him ask about the well-being of the victims he purposely injured because of his hate filled tantrum!!! THAT’S SICK AND TWISTED, BUT WHAT ELSE SHOULD WE EXPECT FROM HIM…..
Did you see his face book page. Pure racist. He fought with nick and Corey two white people then went and ran over white people. He knew what he was doing.
He's trying to get them to say that that the state of Wisconsin can not charge bim it has to b a living person person it's got to do with that nonsense
He cross examined so many witnesses with absolutely no reason or point. Never asked anything relevant to one defense what so ever he simply wasted the courts time
He said on his last day he didn't consent to being sentenced 🤣🤣 Yeah, I'm sure no criminal does lol You lose your right to consent once you start committing serious crimes. If you can't keep yourself under control, someone else will. It's been like that throughout human existence in one way or another. People aren't just going to let you run a muck and put everyone else in danger.
The judge is amazing. Keeping her composure to make sure he can never claim a mistrial. Judge and prosecution going out of their way to make this a FAIR trial so that when he gets sentenced he will never be able to retry this or have any hope of getting out of prison. He's making it worse for himself. He is mad he doesn't understand the legal mumbo jumbo, and mad when the judge won't explain......but he's the one who fired his council...ridiculous
Personally I think she was too weak. She played his game and played into his hands far too often and wasted the Jury's, the witnesses, the DA's and the victims time. This trial went on for four weeks when it could have been done in just over one week. Most people blame Brooks for this, but I blame the judge for allowing it. The important thing is that he got the sentence he deserved and he has zero chance of winning an appeal.
@@SteveMHN I agree with you 100% cause the Judge was way too weak and let this clown run the show. She allowed him to object to almost every question instead of shutting it down!!! No other Judge would allow this!!!
“I’m a grown man with grown kids” Sir, you didn’t raise those kids (thank god, by the way, that those children had some limit to their exposure to him). You abandoned your ex girlfriend after impregnating her when you were 24 and she was 16!!!!!
Lives in moms car outside her house drives moms car, jobless ,on government benefits, three kids, three baby moms, pays no child support, lifetime of criminal behavior, sex offender. May be other stuff we don’t know about. So yeah he a grown man………. Not.
@@reccathomson460 and then he wants to drag Erika saying she doesn't have custody of any of her kids.... like HOMIE NEITHER DO YOU! YOU DONT EVEN. PAY FOR EM!
@@reccathomson460 4 kids and 4 baby moms. One baby was born while he was incarcerated. That's why him and Erika got into the fight where he ran her over with his car and broke her leg. She found out he cheated and got another woman pregnant.
The judge is in no way 'weak'. She must give him all the leniency necessary so he cannot successfully claim a mistrial occurred. she is demonstating she went above and beyond (covered all the bases) to make this a 100% fair trial. Even so, it almost goes without saying, that if he is convicted, he will request an appeal on the basis of judicial misconduct or a similar complaint.
I don't know if any lawyer would take the appeals case. To do so, a lawyer would have to review the entire record of this trial (13+ days) and come up with a basis for appeal, and then write a legal brief on the case law about that basis. Since the judge is being so patient with Brooks, there may be nothing a lawyer can appeal.
haha yeah guys she's so smart and totally not a pushover, it's actually all part of a cool strategy, letting him abuse everyone there and gaslight the jury is totally worth it and also if he goes too far, she may give him a 75th warning so he better settle down!
Coming up with the map that showed every minute of his actions from the moment he exited the parade until his arrest is just amazing work by the prosecution. Bravo.
Oh. And that ticked him off SO BAD! I watched that day..yesterday. I had missed that part. He was LIVID and unbelievably hostile and rude to the detective who testified about it. Lol. Just when you think he’s past all limits of despicable behavior….. well… then you see he’s not. A vile creature for sure.
I have sat during many trials, court cases. I have watched a lot of different high profile cases unfold online. This defendant is the absolute worst person who could’ve decided to defend themselves. 80% of his questions aren’t relevant to his case, he’s questioning medical professionals about organ donation, and how diagrams are drawn. Meanwhile he doesn’t understand basic courtroom decorum, basic terminology, and can’t pronounce the simplest of words, despite being exposed to correct pronunciation by the prosecution and Judge. What he did was unthinkable, and all he did here was try to cause a mistrial, or guarantee a retrial, based on ineffective counsel (himself). Ludicrous that any defendant in any case would behave this way, and it’s proof that this was one last hurrah in his pathetic life.
People tell him what to do daily wtf is he talking about… when to eat , when to sleep , when to shower , when to exercise etc . I can’t wait to hear the judge rule on his life sentences . She will throw the book at him .
You got that right and he had the audacity to want the judge to talk to the sheriff department about him getting a shower but he thinks she had no authority over him what a little unbreakable B
He keeps asking about the plaintiff's! Well, you killed all of them so I guess they are unavailable! He makes me sick to my stomach. He is nothing but a heartless SOB!
@@violettagrant2328 I totally get it. This trial has had me so angry and upset it's ridiculous. He is so heartless to be asking every witness the same questions about it. They need to bring back public hanging and put him first in line. I truly hope that you can get calmed down enough to get you some rest.
@@jaymee76 thank you dear. I'm going through Chemotherapie right now and really need to rest.....🙈 But this here gets to me in a way nothing ever has. I don't know what to do with myself😡🤣🤷♀️🤦♀️
evidence shown earlier of one of the interrogations, when he was confronted with the video of the crime, the suffering, horrible injuries, his only response was that "his life was over..." meaning he was going to the big house, no concern at all for the dead and injured, just about him, that tells you all you need to know about this POS's character.
@Im Private you know, the Christian in me feels so sorry for this guy and his soul But hard to feel for him when I think of the victims and their loved ones. The victim impact statements had me in tears over and over again until I just couldn’t watch anymore …
It really annoyed me when his mum and fake nan claimed he had mental health issues. The amount of ppl living day to day with mental health issues yet they never er commit attrocities like this and then show no remorse and act like they rnt even the person who did it.
It's like watching the rantings of a mad man. He thinks he's the smartest one in the room. Not to mention that he has zero remorse or concern for the loss of life and/or injury. Zero respect for the judge, the court or the jury. It's disgusting. They are handling him with kid gloves and he has no appreciation. It's ridiculous. But the judge is a saint. The state is way too generous. I guarantee one thing though, this is gonna stick like glue. He's burying himself. The state isn't having to even try very hard. GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS!!!
he is trying to drag it out as long as possible because he knows once he gets to prison they are going stomp the living shit out of him for what he did
Unfortunately he will be put in protective custody. He was in it when he was in the county jail during his trial because the other inmates were gonna harm him. Attorney opper even mentioned it during the trial.
I can't even begin to tell you the level of respect I have for this judge. Not only do I find her to be so lovely, but she is so respectful to the jury and to her staff. And I remember at one point she even scolded that moron because he was demanding something from her clerk and she apologized to the clerk for him and told him to treat her with respect. She even knows her job so well that she shows the utmost respect to that murderer, even though he is so disrespectful to her and dares to think that he knows more than her. And he's scared Covid? He has a LOT more to be scared about now that he's gonna spend the rest of his criminal ass in jail.
Darrel Brooks apparently never went to English class even though he claims he graduated H.S. He understanding of words, definitions and terminology in general is abysmal. Brooks might hurt himself trying to sound like he is smart.
The way he stares at the judge. That's intimidation. Isn't that against court etiquette ? This sorry pathetic example of a man needs to be dealt with right. Not babysat......
He’s honestly so dumb there is no other way to describe it. He throws big words out and tries to make word salads that make him appear intelligent when in reality he doesn’t know what any of it means. I don’t believe this guy even graduated high school or even grade school.
I'm glad someone else notice that too. It drive me crazy. He did that with the world vague he said vagueness. Like what? He can't pronounce or dosent know the definition to the most simple words in the English language.
Ok. She has proven she is patient and kind and fair. She has given him an inch and now he feels free to take mile after mile. She has taught him that there are no real repercussions when he behaves like a cretin. This guy HATES women. Time to start cracking down HARD on his sorry a$$. Peace, AM
This is unacceptable. The judge has been so patient out of abundant concerns for the outcome of the verdict. DB is an evil person, he kept talking over the judge but she cannot have him removed then the trial is over. She wants a fair trial. He spent so much time trying to disrupt the court room and the bailiff behind him is sleeping. The chance of his being violent is high. Sadly to say that he is a fool. He has no remorse, no empathy for what he did, disruptive behavior. Should be a death sentence if the state allows it.
I'm not one who agrees with death sentence. I think it should apply to Brooks. He snuffed out those life's with no worry. He should live with the spectre of death hanging over him!
If he chose to get violent he couldn't do much. He is shackled to the floor under his table and he has only inches that he can move. It appears there is nothing dangerous enough to injure anyone within his reach. The bailiff should remain alert, but DB is harmless in that situation. He doesn't have access to a motor vehicle to annihilate people.
Darrell brooks has to be the most uneducated man to ever try to defend himself in a court of law. This man makes the entire argument for why public schools need help!
I so love that finally he has to answer for his actions. He doesn’t even REALIZE he’ll never be free. He’s sick enough to believe he’ll get out…or a mistrial…..or something. I’d like to witness the moment it sinks in. As of right now…it still hasn’t hit him. And he’s in prison. But he’s ALWAYS gotten out in the past.
I honestly couldn’t imagine spending the rest of my life behind bars to have my freedom strip for me life would be pointless, and he will never see the light of day ever again. He will never be able to spend time with his family. His children go on vacations travel, none of that he will be stuck in a cell where he should be.
I've yet to hear this pillock make a single valid point. What a waste of taxpayers money, to allow him to indulge his legal-eagle fantasy. This case makes a mockery of the legal system. He should not be allowed to continue.
I have never before witnessed a human being who has this little personal insight. He really had no idea how pathetically he was coming across to the jury
I’m so laughing now at the fact that Brooks……affectionally known by his admission as the “alleged defendant claims that the jury view should not take place because whether or not he waives the right or agrees to be present….. he doesn’t give his consent for it to happen. There’s one thing that the judge made perfectly clear to him and to the prosecution…… the red Ford Escape SUV is evidence. Specifically it is the murder weapon. That being said, the law indicates that this piece of evidence should be viewed by the jury just as any piece evidence is presented before the jury in the court room…… case in point….. the hoodie and sandals that the officer just held up was viewed by the jury. It’s their right in determining the verdict that they will render one way or another. The difference between these pieces of evidence and the vehicle as was clearly stated by the judge is that the vehicle was too big to bring into the court room. But that doesn’t take away from the fact that it is evidence and needs to be seen by the jury. Up to this point the vehicle has been presented in evidence via way of pictures, video cameras, eye witness testimony and clear documentation. Viewing the actual vehicle would tie in any evidence regarding it that has already been presented. I use another case to explain this. During the OJ Simpson trial the jury was taken to Mr. Simpson’s estate where they conducted a said jury view. This is no different. Another point that needs to be made here……. any evidence that is brought into this court is not controlled by either party….. meaning that Mr Brooks doesn’t have the power to prevent any evidence from being brought into court. It doesn’t need his consent. In the same regards, any evidence that Mr Brooks brings in on his defense doesn’t require the consent of the prosecution before being admitted. Evidence is evidence and isn’t controlled by the defense or prosecution even if they don’t agree with it. So Mr. Derrick Brooks defendant…… charged with these crimes is going to be destroyed by the jury….. plain and simple
What pissed me off today is she gave him the option to not see his murder weapon in person. He should’ve been there! I also feel that he has been verbally abuse to Judge Darrow.
Even with him getting one in ten + objections right, does he think he has a prayer against real lawyers and the fact that he has been videotaped committing the crimes and has given no explanation for his actions? I watched the trial live and many times on RU-vid and I am still incensed by this sorry excuse of a human perpetuating his crimes by conducting a charade of a defense in court. He is vile.
For all those people commenting particularly from the states, I'd like to address something... although many, if not most of you find it an anathema that DB is able to defend himself, or treat the town etc with such disdain, this is the democratic rule of law in progress. With the absolute right for him to do this, comes the absolute set of laws that work for both sides in a democracy. There are many, many countries around the world, where judges,juries and constitutions don't even remotely exist. The ability to live in a country that has rules and laws, that allow accusatory,exculpatory and subsequent conviction or acquittal of its citizens, is a right that people should fiercely defend. It may often feel downright unfair, or evil, but it's a system for the people and by the people.
None of that is worth it if he can still cause additional damage and stress to the families like he has. In fact those families could have been subjected to so much more pain it might have been unbearable being called to the stand or forced to watch him insult them. No law is perfect. Laws change. This is one aspect of law that should be.
“I’m not a person I’m a human being” same shit dude. This guy thinks he’s so smart it’s hilarious to watch but I do feel bad for the families effected having to watch him get some freedom to be a jackass.
silly lines reiterated ad nauseam : "would it be fair to say" " I do not recognize that name " , OBJECTION, and "overruled". Most abused lines in this case . - Put his Mom on the stand, she can say what his name is, Under oath. Or get his birth certificate . So fed up with his Who is YOU .
Darrell "Grounds" Brooks: "Have you ever seen the Plaintiff in this matter? Have you yourself ever spoken to the Plaintiff in this matter? Do you recall having a phone conversation with the Plaintiff in this matter?" [yawn] 🙄
He wants to get off on technicalities the judge is doing everything she can to stop this by not showing bias.. this chump will never see the light of day again.. he is talking about his mums car having different peoples dna in it... well of course it has.. so would my car
She gets own my nerves at times when she tries to accommodate him in all his stupid remarks. What is she trying to do get brownie points for the supreme court judge.
She, is doing her upmost , to prevent a mistrial and grounds for appeal, The Law is DB can defend himself, and from day one, he set out to disrupt all the proceedings, Her patience has assured that each and every victim and their familes, get justice, They will never get closure because of the hurt he has caused, But what some people see as weakness I see as Strengh and the end of the trial and her summing up and sentence proves she was right.
Because of Judges reputation and because she is considered to be the chief of chiefs judge they knew she was the right one for this case they knew her personality they knew of her patientence respect for the law and a lot of more good qualities
If you took a shot for every "objection: leading" from Brooks you may almost get as drunk as he wanted to attempt to claim Erika Patterson was on that day.
WTH does he plan on using as his defense? I'm still very confused about this except for possibly saying it wasn't him! Idk how he plans on using that?!?! If I was on this jury he'd be guilty based on his behavior alone. No rush to judgement... actions speak louder than words.
She needs to have solid evidence to back her ruling each time that he's being disruptive. One or two interruptions isn't necessarily disruptive, it could be interpreted as accidental or not intentionally disruptive. People in court interrupt one another pretty often and to forfeit his right to be present he needs to be clearly disruptive
It can be seen as more difficult for him to put on a proper defense. She has to show she has done everything she can to protect his rights. He has a right to be present at trial and a right to defend himself. They are very basic constitutional rights and since he doesn't have attorneys, she's having to walk a thin line.
He shuffled and reshuffled his paperwork - scrutinizing it for opportunities to ask gotcha questions and, obviously, to waste time. He misplaced documents several times - and then blamed others for tampering with his material. Also, I'm guessing he wasn't allowed to use staples and paperclips to help keep things organized.
And I don’t see anything for him to have an ego about! He is SCARY, after todays outbursts toward judge…she just lets him. I can’t imagine what that petite girlfriend he punched in the eye before driving through that parade was going through her mind. This man is so self entitled, acting like he knows the law! Toward a judge and DA!
@@RoyalMasterpiece and he’s only a sovereign citizen when it fits his narrative. Then he’s not, insisting that his constitutional rights are being violated. He expects the people in the court to teach him the law! He has some major issues, I wish the feds would step in due to the mass incident possibly being domestic terrorism
