Trijicon MRO vs Aimpoint T1 Micro 

You use a $700 dollar optic for airsoft??? Why??? I hope your kidding!

@@justanotherinternetexpert7743 some people just want that realism or if you, believe it or not, have a gbb or pts rifle where some cheap optics might not be able to hold zero

🤘🏽

@@justanotherinternetexpert7743 $700?!?! Dude, you need some new websites to shop!

hell yea brother

this guy right here is operator af! lol

what about ur buiss'

I just came so fucking hard reading that

c1utchmatic reading your comment gave me a freedom boner

c1utchmatic Hey guys i just wrote a coment regarding AR15 reddots, could somebody help me out ? : ] Thanks

Dang I was watching at 2x 😕

LOL

@@Alittlebitoflife1337 if you watch at 2x you can watch it twice in the same amount of time. Papa thumb more efficiently than ever before.

I probably shat off of that limb several times in1997.

carbon2rh Trijicon is a Michigan company? Say whaaaaa? Are they hiring? I'll sweep the floors.

carbon2rh Dude, only the cooperate office is in Michigan. Wixom by the way. Everything is made in Stafford Virginia.

My bad, i knew they were out of Wixom. Made in the good ole USA either way.

Oskar Dirlewanger We do have quite a few up here, solid observation.

It's usually the "buy 'murican" type that are the first ones to go to Walmart (mostly stocked with Chinese goods) to buy most of their daily toiletries and consumables.

WickedSensation guess you could say, you didn't give a shit lol

Joshua Chen lol

WickedSensation that's the funniest fucking thing I've read in quite some time.. Lol

Classic Gentleman post it here, I can't find it in the 300 other questions.

Classic Gentleman on my rifle I have an MRO and a surefire. I can hit 300m all day with it and I am by no means a long distance shooter. Between the aimpoint and MRO it's all a matter of preference. I just prefer the MRO. If you can get a hold of the optics try them out, see how each one feels.

I have an astigmatism as well and was actually debating buying the MRO due to this. It’s doesn’t flair up to bad?

Even if he's a lumberjack and he's ok?

sam hyde fanbasee technically it's just a plaid shirt. Flannel is a type of material. But thumps up on the comment anyway.

what does your husband think about that?

@@Tremulousnut Every time I start a Daddy Garand video, and he is wearing a plaid flannel shirt, I get that damned Monty Python song stuck in my head.

I know your comment is 3 years old, but I just read it and it is much appreciated. I’m red/green deficient/colorblind also.

every tuesday!

appreciate the support!

I'm bummed they discontinued the rx34. I wanted another

Arguing in favor of an optic due to FOV with red dots tells me you don't know shit. Open your other eye and it becomes a non-issue.

That's my jam.

I feel like you'd prefer a forced entry scenario...

Song in Silence we talking about penises?

Or insertion?

Flash bang

Andrew MARGOLIN they fixed this. Serial numbers 89000+ are true 1x.

Fuck me.

Cumming in hot.

"something to think about"

try to slip in "safety is paramount" at some point in your meeting

Mikael all that matters is looking cool 😎

Just when I thought America can't get any dumber

ive done 3 tours on my couch. in that time, ive got 14 confirmed salsbury steaks k.i.a., so yeah, im pretty sure i know what im talking about.

Try comparing parallax with the mro at 50 yards, it's worse than the old trs 25... kinds crazy that it's a thing at all.

@@marcusborderlands6177 I will do that. I took it to the range and I've had great success so far at 50 yards. I really have not done any parallax testing at all. I'm intrigued...

Arty x2

Arty The black and white is from Duluth trading

Can confirm it's JCPenney

When you're from the PNW (born/raised, no transplants) they just appear in your closet... True story.

Dee-Bee Kooper I can confirm this.

1911Drew lithium batteries are better in general for optics

Ur mom is over priced.

I’ve never used the mro but I have the t1 on my ar and it’s amazing.

You you were giving advice who zero experience? Stop talking out of your ass

@Star Fiche The parallax shift on the MRO isn't any worse than the Aimpoint T1. It's just that when you move both rifles the same distance off of center: the red dot on the MRO moves to the edge (but not out) of the optic's field of view; while the red dot on the Aimpoint T1 moves completely out of the T1's field of view and you have to adjust so the red dot is visible in the confines of the Aimpoint's tube again. The MRO does have an optical aberration running the full circumference on its objective lens. When the red dot is moved into the narrow field of the objective lens, where this aberration lives and breeds, the point of impact will be off from the point of aim: This is the noted parallax shift. If you keep the red dot inside the objective lens, but not into the optical aberration, then the parallax shift is near zero. When you are indoors, look through the MRO at a blank wall, movie screen, door, or any flat light-colored surface. You will see the often spoke of "blue tint" on the objective lens. You will also notice what appears to be a darker tinted blue ring around the inside edge of objective lens. This is that "fisheye" everyone is talking about. Keep the red dot inside that darker tinted, blue ring and your point of impact will be very much aligned with your point of aim. As for myself, and many others making comments about the use and abuse of the MRO (and the EOTechs for that matter), we like the extra field of view afforded by these optics. It makes some shots possible, that would not be possible, under the same conditions: i.e. shooting from around a tire, under a vehicle, at a target that does not allow you to get squarely behind your optic. With smaller fields of view, you can't even see the red dot from your position. While using an MRO, EOTech or other optic with a larger field of view, you might not be able to get square behind your optic, but you may very well still be able to see the red dot, on target, closer to the edge of the field of view afforded by these optics. With this "less than idea" sight picture, you still have a better chance of actually hitting your target, than you do if you can't see the red dot at all. That is where these optics with the greater fields of view really shine. They are also much quicker to use when engaging multiple threats at shorter distances. Don't get me wrong, I love Aimpoint's optics! They are some of the best made, highest quality RDS's in existence. I remember using some of Trijicon's first reflex sights that the Army issued back in the 1980's. Some were huge, some were very small, and subsequently hard to use. Back then, they mostly used amber colored triangles that were somewhere in the neighborhood of 20 MOA. They used a "fiber optic" type of weird solar panel looking plastic panel, but no batteries or any other power source we could see. These were not used on any personal type of weapon, like a rifle, pistol, shotgun, etc.. They were mounted to weapons that were used for mass suppressive fire, or mass-destruction, equipment-smashing, etc., etc.; but we never saw anything like them before. We couldn't even see how they would mount to anything, but the quality was obvious. Now that I have more experience with such things, I have come to appreciate many different types of sights/sighting systems. Our war fighters have a better selection of everything than they had when I was still active duty. Now, they can be selective and choose the weapon/weapon systems, optics, sights, and anything else that is more mission oriented than ever before. I am fortunate to have been in positions that gave me exposure to a lot of the weapons/systems/optics/targeting software/night vision/thermal sights, etc. that we are using today. Nothing is best for everything, but the stuff we are working with now is very high quality and a joy to work with! With companies like Aimpoint, Trijicon, EOTech, Elcan, B.A.E., Raytheon, Leupold, Steiner, Schmitt & Bender, U.S. Optics, Nightforce, Sig Sauer, and many, many more; we have more, high quality equipment available to us than at any time before. Having people like Garand Daddy, Mr. Guns & Gear, Military Arms Channel, Twang & Bang, and others showing the differences between all of the different devices out there, and us how to use these wonderful toys, we have never had a knowledge base this extensive before either. It's a good time to be alive! Thanks, all of you!

@@roadapple66 excellent comment. Thanks

MrTryAnotherOne YES

I might, there are so many guys in way way better shape than me

Garand Thumb maybe so, but we'd click the hell out of that like button. Keep up the good work!

Alternate topics: Shooting (alone / team) under conditions of limited visibility (night, fog, smoke, etc.) or shooting after physical stress or shooting / training / equipment under / for different climate conditions.

How has it held up?

@@coleyeaux MRO gets lite use but has been fine. I know it gets some flak for some short comings but it’s been fine for me

David Cundiff I like tactical turtles

Too stupid to relize hes being made fun of

Yeah. They are cool.

Yes

Will you?

I'm refining things as I go, more action in the future for you bae

Anime is for children

Lee JC we’re all children in the eyes of god.

gonna use that in a video

I'm here for u bae

I unsubscribed because of that silly intro

hmm, maybe in the future