설레는 맘으로 100미터 처음 간 날이 2008년 1월 이니 벌써 14년 전 이네요 컨디션이 매번 같을수 없으니 체크 잘하셔서 항상 안따 즐따 하세요 포비 한*영(트레이너), 박*덕(트레이너), 우*혁(대표님), 허*도(트레이너) 반*규(트레이너) 인솔하신 성*원(트레이너) 정*욱(본부장님) 다들 건강하게 잘 들 지내신지 모르겠네요
Hi and thanks for the answer. On the video the computer shows that you are using trimix 11/63 i.e. only 26% of N2. At a depth of 100m, a trimix up to 36% still has an END of 40m and would be cheaper. May I ask why you prefer using a higher % of expensive He. I am not a tec diver yet, my questions are to better understand tec diving. Please also inform about this dive profile. It seems the computer shows a first decostop at 30m ? Most probabbly a deep stop. PS : what was the price for the gases for each diver. Thanks for your answers and wish you nice bubbles
@@louis840 there are two *** reasons for lowering the N2% of inspired gas when diving deep. 1, as you say, to lower the narcotic effect, and 2, to reduce the gas density (GD). Higher GD can lead to a higher "work of breathing" (WOB) and can result in CO2 retention. Ideally the GD should be lower than 6.3 Grams/Litre, if they were using 11/63 at 100m as you stated, the GD here would have been 6.55 G/L. I personally would have used less O2 and even more He to reduce the GD further (something like 10/70) - END is only part of the equation when diving deep. *** With the omitted obvious one to reduce the amount of N2 available to be absorbed by the tissues under pressure.
사실 전 한국에서의 트라이믹스 대심도에는 좀 회의적인 편입니다~ 차가운 수온과 어두운 시야에서 단지 수심에 대한 기록만으로 다이빙 한다는것이 과연 얼마나 큰 의미가 있을까? 하는 생각이... 물론 지극히 개인적인 의견 입니다~ 우리가 즐기는 트라이믹스 다이빙도 결국 펀다이빙이기에 한국 바다에서 과연 정말 편안하게 즐길수가 있을까? 하는 생각이 많이 들었습니다! 저야 동해에서 70M 다이빙이 고작 입니다만 동해에서도 요즘 100 다이빙 하시는 분들 종종 볼수 있죠~ 특별한 목적이 있다면 해볼만하나 팀원들과 좀더 따뜻한 수온에서 그리고 좋은 시야에서 즐겁게 다이빙 하는것이 좀더 편안한것 같습니다~^^ 동해에서 장비들 짊어지고 보트에 탱크 나르고 기를쓰며 입수 하다보면 필리핀에서의 편안함이 항상 그리웠었구요~ 허나 동해도 동해 나름의 매력은 분명 있습니다.
So funny seeing people use sidemount in open water, especially with this many bottles… totally wrong use of this configuration, when there was no reason to not to use backmount
@@teammaxlee205 for this dive, yes. Sidemount has it’s benefits, in some caves and wrecks, but in open water makes no sense. Bigger possibility of making a wrong gas switch because of the multiple cylinders, and having them at the same place. For this dive backmounted twins and three stages would be the optimal. Well, actually a rebreather would be optimal.
If you're writing this, I'm assuming you don't know much about gas switches. I'm already a cave diving instructor and ccr is also an instructor. You have a poor understanding of side mounts
I don't enjoy talking about diving with you because I don't know who you are and I don't know your level of diving. Sidemounts have the advantage of using independent first stages, but I don't think I need to tell you that the arrangement and arrangement of my equipment is wrong.
