Trump's Beatdown in the 11th Circuit (Cannon Rebuked)

Подписаться 3,2 млн

Просмотров 1,4 млн

50% 1

⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! legaleagle.link/eagleteam ⚖️
Judge Cannon and Trump rebuked. 💡Go to legaleagle.link/brilliant and be one of the first 200 people to sign up and get 20% off your subscription with Brilliant.org!
Welcome back to LegalEagle. The most avian legal analysis on the internets.
🚀 Watch my next video early & ad-free on Nebula! legaleagle.link/watchnebula
👔 Suits by Indochino! legaleagle.link/indochino
GOT A VIDEO IDEA? TELL ME!
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Send me an email: devin@legaleagle.show
MY COURSES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my guide to law school! legaleagle.link/lawguide
Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you! legaleagle.link/copyrightcourse
SOCIAL MEDIA & DISCUSSIONS
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Twitter: legaleagle.link/twitter
Facebook: legaleagle.link/facebook
Tik Tok: legaleagle.link/tiktok
Instagram: legaleagle.link/instagram
Reddit: legaleagle.link/reddit
Podcast: legaleagle.link/podcast
OnlyFans legaleagle.link/onlyfans
Patreon legaleagle.link/patreon
BUSINESS INQUIRIES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Please email my agent & manager at legaleagle@standard.tv
LEGAL-ISH DISCLAIMER
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Sorry, occupational hazard: This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos! All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Special thanks:
Stock video and imagery provided by Getty Images and AP Archives
Music provided by Epidemic Sound
Short links by pixelme.me (pxle.me/eagle)
Maps provided by MapTiler/Geolayers

Опубликовано:

28 сен 2022

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 3,5 тыс.

@LegalEagle Год назад

⚖ Late breaking: Seems like Dearie is taking his job seriously and putting the screws to Trump's team. 💡Learn interactively with Brilliant! legaleagle.link/brilliant

@ignitionfrn2223 Год назад

I don't know if that might be interesting but why not doing an episode on self defense with martial arts and how much you can use it without severe repercussions ? Also, can we fire the cannon ?

@golach420 Год назад

@@ignitionfrn2223 You do realise planning a crime can lead to a more severe sentence... LOL

@ignitionfrn2223 Год назад

@@golach420 Well i have noticed people were pretty triggered by Kyle Rittenhouse being declared "Not Guilty" on ground of self-defence: but that was for gun usage. I'm curious when it comes about Hand to hand combat...

@Witchlord Год назад

Ive read a lot from non-lawyers that he never expected to win this case and that this is just a delay tactic to stall until midterms where he hopes the GOP will retake the house and senate. Is this a sound theory or has trump hurt himself more than helped with the special master?

@nemesislygr8960 Год назад

@@ignitionfrn2223 same here cause before that case I was under the impression self defense meant that- defense, so when you're no longer defending but are actively offending you've crossed the line. Now you can call me a bitch, but I'm not willing to put that to the test, so I'll keep running from fights until I get a clear answer cause I like my freedom and not being bent over against my will.

@CityPlannerPlaysChair Год назад

Dearie has done a phenomenal job showing how a Judge should actually rule on this case. Cannon should be removed from the bench for her nonsense.

@notme2day Год назад

Yup ... she just tried to tie judge Dearie's hand again in a new ruling. Wish that was included on this video.

@defective6811 Год назад

There will almost certainly be behind the scenes actions that will all but end her career progression after this. This was her application for a political position from Trump in the future. Now, unless he wins again, she will never move forward professionally. I sure as sh*t hope, at least.

@wynonasbigbrowndragon6121 Год назад

While I agree, what a sad bar. A judge asking for evidence is a brave move 🤦‍♂️

@Woozlewuzzleable Год назад

Common sense and facts win.

@garymay9134 Год назад

Judge Cannon needs to be charged with obstructing justice and she needs to be impeached and removed as a judge

@gregwillett8051 Год назад

Hopefully, this is ends up as step in the right direction to holding United States' politicians accountable for their crimes. Too many politicians get so prolific and powerful that they are above the enforcement of the laws that would have every other normal citizen put away for years.

@carissashley Год назад

All politicians! I’ve been doing history digging and and holy schmolly, I do not like what I find. 🥴😳😤

@Briaaanz Год назад

Like the alcohol salesman that sold alcohol to members of Congress throughout Prohibition.

@allasar Год назад

Trump did a lot of crimes before he became president, so it is rich people as a whole who are not held accountable. If Trump was treated like everyone else, he would be in jail and never could have run for president.

@Fausto_4841 Год назад

They had prescriptions for that alcohol.

@decrulez Год назад

@@Fausto_4841 Churchill sure did when visiting

@WackoMcGoose Год назад

I hope the Law & Order writers are taking notes, because they're gonna need to update their definition of "reality being stranger than fiction" on a weekly basis at this point.

@FearHimself666 Год назад

I love that he thinks declassifying works the same way as when Michael Scott declared bankruptcy

@JoshSweetvale Год назад

Even Michael Scott made sure he had a room full of witnesses.

@_Aemse Год назад

trumps gonna have to hire creed to be his lawyer pretty soon lol

@ajtronic Год назад

The Creed defense council 😂

@DarthShande Год назад

I think it’s clear that Cannon was letting her personal opinion of Trump override what should have been common sense. Ruling in favor of Trump and aiding him should be enough to remove her from the bench.

@richardscottmills Год назад

You wonder how many appointees he selected specifically because he has some sort of dirt or leverage on them.

@ronrendon Год назад

Bingo.

@johndoe6032 Год назад

@@richardscottmills She probably has a letter form trump in her back pocket that says do what you can for me and I'll put you on the supreme court when reelected. Her big mistakes were 1. helping trump, and 2. thinking he'll keep his word.

@johndoe6032 Год назад

I think that would require an impeachment, which in our political climate is almost impossible. The only way an impeachment can happen any more is if the judge does something really bad and one party holds the majority of the house and senate as well as the WH to impeach and appoint whoever they want to replace.

@erikdayne5429 Год назад

I don’t see how anyone can come to any other conclusion. She made an unprecedented ruling to defend the person who appointed her. The corruption and conflict of interest is glaring and obvious.

@Roguefem76 Год назад

10:30 The last paragraph is _gold._ "Second, we find unpersuasive the Plaintiff's insistence that he would be harmed by a criminal investigation." That's legalese for "Tough s--t, suck it up."

@demoncorejunior Год назад

would love to see the opinion read “why would this one be bad when the other 30 didn’t bother you”

@cronobactersakazakii5133 Год назад

Yup, criminals are always harmed by criminal investigation

@nvelsen1975 Год назад

I'd hold a more accurate translation would be "That's the point of criminal investigations, you dumb twat". 😉

@johndododoe1411 Год назад

They even quoted a 1940 ruling that directly said that.

@erikdayne5429 Год назад

That’s a neat argument. “Yeah judge this investigation could harm me because I’m totally guilty”. Uh, thanks, good to know.

@DunantheDefender Год назад

Her reasoning for the documents being possibly damaging reminds me of that bit in Liar Liar when Fletcher objects and the judge asks him under what grounds and he says "because it's damning to my case!"

@NinjaGidget Год назад

"Classified documents are classified." What a groundbreaking legal ruling.

@bryanbenaway5411 Год назад

Documents with classified markings are not necessarily classified. They are only classified until they are unclassified. And all classifications flow out of the power of one single elected office/official. That officer’s decisions are not reviewable.

@bryanbenaway5411 Год назад

@Ericwvb2 Год назад

@@bryanbenaway5411 "all classifications flow out of the power of one single elected office/official" - Is that single elected official the CURRENT or FORMER President? Because I am willing to bet that according to the CURRENT President those documents marked classified are in fact classified. Do you have some evidence that the CURRENT administration considers these documents declassified? Because the DOJ, FBI, etc., are not acting like they are.

@geoffreysorkin5774 Год назад

@@bryanbenaway5411 Classified documents are only declassified when they have been marked as such. You can't "declassify" with telepathy or mere words, no matter who you are. Those procedures were from an Obama EO that Trump never rescinded (you also can't rescind EO's from prior Presidents with telepathy).

@lottasunshine1325 Год назад

@@bryanbenaway5411 That's not the way it's done. However, aren't we are discussing documents still marked "classified?" So why were they still marked classified if they weren't? Trump hasn't been in office since Jan 2021, so he has no right to them anyway. In addition, some of the documents found in Mar-a-:Lago are highly sensitive documents that only belong in a SCIF which stands for Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. They should never have been kept at Mar-a-Lago. In any case, all of the thousands of documents, classified or not (except for the former president's personal property) belong to the government. Period, end of story.

@JLF201 Год назад

I read the document. It was great, a real blow by blow of how laws and logic are supposed to work and all the ways Cannon and Trump failed to understand both.

@whocares9033 Год назад

"Failed to understand" is a strange way to say "willfully perverted"

@marmac83 Год назад

@@whocares9033 failing to understand is to willfully pervert

@1776stubborn Год назад

LOL..........Trump is playing you like he played Biden/Garland and the rest of the FBI Gestapo. Just wait for it. How many times have you thought you FINALLY GOT HIM!!!!!

@liontron8317 Год назад

Throwing shit at walls to see what sticks is still throwing shit

@icin4d Год назад

@@marmac83 No, not really. Failing to understand sounds like ignorance - your average village idiot. Willfully pervert sounds like corruption and intent.

@apokalypsecow9756 Год назад

So with Mike Lindell probably going to trial soon, does this mean we'll soon be discussing... ...the Pillow Case?

@warlordofbritannia Год назад

I guess you could say Lindell is going to be…pillowried!

@drunkenfarmerjohn42 Год назад

Get. Out.

@AskMia411 Год назад

YES thank you for this pun!!!! Legal Eagle needs to have that in the title if he covers that case!!!!

@zappababe8577 Год назад

Oh, you!

@qwkimball Год назад

It's more of a Sham.

@-Bill. Год назад

Cannon just overruled Dearie and moved the deadlines back to December. Is there no remedy for such a blatantly corrupt judge? She is practically acting as Trump's defense counsel.

@undine120 Год назад

Pingpong appealing to the 11th circuit seems to be how this will go: Cannon: Approves nonsense 11th: No, that's dumb Cannon: Approves new nonsense 11th: No, that's dumb ...repeat ad naseum.

@henrylake9294 Год назад

This is her audition for Supreme Court justice

@Metrion77 Год назад

@@henrylake9294 And if trump wins in 2024, she'll be at the top of the list, even if that means trump expands the supreme court.

@coopidge3372 Год назад

Congress can impeach her

@RandomFandomDragon Год назад

@@coopidge3372 that assumes there are enough members of congress who are not corrupt.

@dorpth Год назад

It really is insane how our country is the only developed democracy that has election officials and judges picked by politicians. In most other countries, elections are run by independent commissions and judges picked by independent legal experts. Of course, ANY system can be corrupted, but I guarantee you that no Judge Cannon's ever would have made it to a federal bench if the American Bar association was in charge of approving judges (or at least had a veto).

@Kathy-kr1sv Год назад

Exactly. And sanely.... The USA way... Is nuts Seems set up to fail. Or be corrupted or manipulated Stupid I add my now country Australia and birth country New Zealand have COMPULSORY VOTING SO non of this stupid time wasting and corruptible B. S.

@bobbun9630 Год назад

I think it's rather odd that Cannon is sticking to Trump at this point. She has a lifetime appointment. That means that sticking to Trump is optional. Moreover, she's not incredibly old, so she has a long career ahead. Trumpism is unlikely to be how things work out in the long run. She's destroying her credibility now, potentially opening herself up to impeachment, and for what? Surely she isn't dreaming, like some congresscritter, of a dream lobbying job after retirement.

@likealightning4139 Год назад

@@bobbun9630 like others said I think she is hoping Don the Con makes it back into Office in 2024 and basically auditioning for a Supreme Court seat

@danagrey3534 Год назад

@@likealightning4139 Don the Con? 🤣😂🤪😜 He will or someone like DeSantis will thanks to people like you, the hundreds if not thousands of your fellow brainwashed, liberals, Demon Rats. Hell Biden, Harris, Pelosi, Hillary, Schiif, Schumer, and countless Demon Rat governorrs are so bad that you all refuse to even mention mention what a con job they are... 40 yrs high inflation, wild spending sprees that only pad their pockets, open borders in hopes of the minority vote, out of control crime, brainwashing education systems in out schools, abortion and stripping women of their rigged to their own bodies... now you have Devin Stone promoting that we need two legal systems... one for liberals and one for conservatives as Lady Justice is no longer blind and one cannot get fair representation by a liberal attorney or judge. Most are tired to the liberal corruption and I do feel there is going to be a major shift in power thanks to people like you who make comments like yours! Keep it up as you and your fellow Demon Rat supporters are doing an great job!

@JoshSweetvale Год назад

@@likealightning4139 Well, she expects Republicans to regain power at _some_ point, and for them there's no going back to pretending civility, a 100% partisan judge will always be useful to the Republicans.

@tsnap4 Год назад

Was one of the arguments literally "The govt. can't have the documents b/c Trump will come to harm if/when the documents are used to prosecute him for breaking the law"? Like, wouldn't that invalidate literally any search and seizure of any person ever?

@gelinrefira Год назад

Which is exactly why Legal Eagle mentioned there is a supreme court ruling that sometimes it is painful to be a citizen because you have to be subjected to searches in the process of your own prosecution, even if you are later found not guilty.

@0Rookie0 Год назад

"Sir, if you arrest me, the coffee I bought for $0.98 will go cold, stale and eventually expire. That coffee was 10% of my holdings and is required for my borderline good mental state. I will be see you in court about causing me irreparable harm and causing me devastating financial harm. Oh and by the way, I'm claustrophobic and merinthophobic. I cannot be detained, my aunt said so." Trump and Co's roundabout on the fly "this is how it works" attitude reminds me of those skits of a young guy in a show or whatever making shit up as he is being confronted. "Oh, I'm not the thief, this is for my dying sister, she always wanted a VCR, but good luck finding that guy!" But it's not funny because it's true now and a matter of NATIONAL SECURITY. Like how is this even possible again and again.

@annalieff-saxby568 Год назад

@@0Rookie0 Thanks for the new word!

@Beegrene Год назад

Your honor, I object! On what grounds? It's devastating to my case! Overruled. Good call.

@nasis18 Год назад

@@Beegrene lol. I can't remember where that is from, but it's hilarious.

@ronumpleby3517 Год назад

"You have the unenviable task of proving to me that the rules do not apply to you" -Judge Marylin Milian

@huntercoleherr Год назад

It is incredible how there are essentially no requirements to become a judge, and it is nearly impossible to be fired as one.

@ghandimauler Год назад

The fact you can talk about all this surreal insanity without laughing, crying or pulling out your magnificent coiffure shows how effective you are in keeping a straight face... Thanks for your channel. I wish there was a Canadian equivalent as our legal system could really use someone to explain the complexities.

@MostlyElectrolytes Год назад

If you listen to Roger Stone talking about the election months prior where he talks about "our judges" you start to understand why Trump appointed more judges than anyone even after he was fired and why it's problematic.

@ChobinoftheFunk Год назад

@Lexington73300 Only if followed and/or enforced.

@donkrapf Год назад

Trump appointed so many judges because McConnell held up judge appointments for the last two years of Obama's term, not just the POTUS appointment.

@gryjffrs Год назад

What you say is completely true but doesn't get to the root of the issue. The whole confirming of judges at breakneck speed wasn't DT's idea, he as ignorant of that process as I am of performing brain surgery. The plan was/is McConnell's and it's about being able to control the country even when Republicans are out of power inside the beltway like they presently are. Looks to be working to me!

@TheOfficialTarynTots Год назад

Actually, Biden has appointed more judges than Trump at the same point in his term. I think it was as much as Trump, Obama, and George W. Bush together. If Biden keeps the pace up as he has been he will definitely appoint more Judges in his 4 year term than Trump did his.

@aprisia Год назад

@@donkrapf McConnell most certainly stole hundreds of judgeships, including 3 Supreme Court seats. But, at the same time, Obama screwed up by not making appointing judges a major priority for the other 6 years of his presidency.

@jloiben12 Год назад

I do enjoy watching stupid legal professionals get absolutely slapped down. However, it is concerning when the stupid legal professional is a judge

@markgoodwin6266 Год назад

Was a tRump appointed Bimbo, sucking up to Donnie dearest in thanks for the job.

@erikdayne5429 Год назад

She might not be stupid, she might just be corrupt.

@Billsbob Год назад

What about conflicted magistrates who authorized the warrant?

@markgoodwin6266 Год назад

@@Billsbob how was the judge conflicted, the EVIDENCE was there. How's that a conflict?

@erikdayne5429 Год назад

@@markgoodwin6266 lol I think this guy is making the argument that the judge that issued the warrant has a conflict of interest because they want people to follow the law and that conflicts with Trump’s interest to break the law and get away with it.

@carlrosa1130 Год назад

This actually happened: Trump: I want a hearing! Judge Cannon: You got it. Trump: Now, I want a special master! Judge Cannon: You got it. Trump: And the FBI planted documents! Special Master: Okay, provide evidence for it. Trump: Um......The entire system is corrupt!!!!

@MMuraseofSandvich Год назад

Cannon: He's right! Stop it, Dearie!

@Electrodexify Год назад

The system is corrupt NPCs like you are unable to see and trust the institutions blindly and unable to follow the money as well as connect the dots.

@carlrosa1130 Год назад

@Salty Shaco Yeah, no offense, Salty. I can't take you seriously. I don't think you even understand what you just typed.

@carlrosa1130 Год назад

@Off Road Guy Riiiiiiiiiiiight. All of this with Trump is about LIBERALS. LMAO. What a dullard.

@larrylindgren9484 Год назад

@Off Road GuyIt's only bad when you don't like it. Funny how that works.

@genexplore Год назад

Okay, that stock footage of a judge beating someone with a gavel was fantastic.

@CyrusTheFrog 11 месяцев назад

I instantly paused and went to comments to give that clip love if it hadn't been done already, glad I'm not alone.

@GamingWithNikolas 7 месяцев назад

If anyone deserves that treatment it's honestly Alex Jones. I'd say he is even worse than Trump at handling the legal system.

@WillRennar Год назад

"Judge Dearie is asking Trump's team to, in legal speak, _put up or shut up."_ I love this guy.

@elevenm.a.1125 Год назад

Which one? Devin or Dearie?

@oriolgonzalez9328 Год назад

@@elevenm.a.1125 Devin

@daydreamerX200 Год назад

Unfortunately it seems like judge cannon said: not on my watch.

@csnide6702 Год назад

@@daydreamerX200 because she is bought and paid for with Trump money

@williamtell5365 Год назад

I'm an attorney too. Although it was appropriate, I was surprised a bit by the severity of the language in this opinion. It was scolding, even mocking, Trump and the district court judge. It's about time that Trump gets that. It's frustrating seeing him using utterly spurious arguments in court.

@peggyking9543 Год назад

I think the Courts can still actually be shocked that a former President can go so off the rails. The smackdown is a proportional response to the current, and potential future threat level of assertions by Former gov't officials. And thankfully, is already setting precedent with the ruling. (See Mike "Pillow".)

@coryzilligen790 Год назад

"It's frustrating seeing him using utterly spurious arguments in court." Even more than that, it's infuriating seeing how rarely anything happens as a result of it. And even more so the trend of them making misleading to outright slanderous public claims relating to the cases which they are unwilling to make inside the courthouse, and again having nothing happen as a result.

@JLF201 Год назад

If those people (Trump team and Cannon) had any self respect, they would be mortified by that opinion. It's like saying "not only do you not understand how this works in general, you don't have a f'ing clue how to apply the meaning of the most basic parts." BURN!

@neolexiousneolexian6079 Год назад

It's not scolding or mocking. It's simply stating the facts. But when you state the facts about a narcissist that's used to getting away with everything, it inevitably sounds quite harsh.

@Justanotherconsumer Год назад

That’s because even the legal profession has standards. Playing stupid games that support the argument that the system is corrupt and biased needs to be smacked down, hard. If they can’t maintain the veneer of justice and honor and other glittering generalities, who would follow their rulings? Things like Cannon getting smacked should happen much, much more often. Corruption and favoritism are lethal to the credibility of the system, and credibility is the only reason it means anything at all. That lawyers like Powell haven’t been disbarred for their obvious fitness and character issues also raises serious questions. Not that the cynics will ever be convinced that the system is anything more than just “pay enough money and you get the ruling you want.”

@johnchedsey1306 Год назад

It seems like the 11th Circuit dealt with Cannon the same way a law professor would deal with a first year student who just turned in a poorly written exam. She should resign from her post in disgrace. Everyone who appears before her in the future will point out how bad she is at her job and that any decision she makes is suspect.

@jflanglois168 Год назад

As a trial lawyer myself, I truly enjoy your videos and subscribed to your channel for a while now... along with other informational content providers. Your videos and others have convinced me to purchase three Nebula and CuriosityStream bundles for myself, my sister and my parents. Albeit everyone should, in my opinion, stay curious and learn new things all their lives... this is particularly a good skill set (general culture and knowledge) to develop for a trial lawyer. Thank you for your work, it is appreciated.

@Melesniannon Год назад

"Trump keeps inserting himself into the most interesting legal cases in the country". That's a really charitable way of saying, "Former president rich man gets away with nonsense lawsuits that regular people would not even consider seriously or have the resources to attempt." Something about about poo and walls comes to mind. People seriously ought to be legally censured for trivial BS lawsuits.

@onedayatatime007 Год назад

It's really just a nice way of saying everyone is still obsessed with Trump and can't focus on real world issues still.

@logansmall5148 Год назад

@@onedayatatime007 Real world issues like trying to overthrow the government?

@worthythaneofross3925 Год назад

@@onedayatatime007 real world issues like setting a precedent for what happens to treasonous US presidents? Or “real world issues” like a black mermaid?

@peggedyourdad9560 Год назад

The only issue I can see for punishing people for nonsense lawsuits is the question of who's gonna be deciding what counts as a nonsense lawsuit.

@threenumbnuts Год назад

@@peggedyourdad9560 Don't judges already decide what counts as a nonsense lawsuit? They can call it frivolous, dismiss it, and even ask the plaintiff to pay for the defendant's attorney fees.

@lonnyhandwork422 Год назад

Cannon’s initial ruling could conceivably have been bad “judgement”. That said, from an outward perspective, it certainly appears to have been less than impartial. Could she face any of her own legal fallout?

@entropy8634 Год назад

She straight up said she's not impartial before she hear any argument from both sides. As if being failed president is suppose to be granted immunity from rule of law

@caboodles2627 Год назад

I like what happened to the corrupt Persian judge Sisamnes. That really set an example for judges back then 😆

@planswalker Год назад

Unfortunately, she'll likely have to put out years of unethical judging before she is kicked out

@erikdayne5429 Год назад

It was worse than bad judgement it was blatant corruption

@sirmoonslosthismind Год назад

@@caboodles2627 note however that sisamnes's newly-vacated position was then inherited by his son. we may not want to copy that part.

@jedgrahek1426 Год назад

I am so relieved by what this Appeals Court did. I feel exactly like the opening line, like I'm not taking crazy pills anymore. Thank you for the great video.

@inventgineer Год назад

The real question is: why is "Judge" Cannon still allowed to practise law under her current position? She not only knowingly and willingly involved herself in a case in which she has DIRECT conflict of interest (her job being granted to her by the defense), but then also openly sided with him (her employer) in a manner in which basically all other independent judges agree was not actually legal (and furthermore not even well-veiled in its corrupt purpose). If she continues to hold title in her current position, it will be a testament to law ruling over justice in this country, rather than justice ruling the law -a testament to a system that is fundamentally broken, where judges can be openly bought and never challenged in their corrupt actions. And if our courts of law cannot be trusted......well, then we are in total chaos and anarchy, then we are back in the dark again, uncivilized and without greater purpose, no higher ideals to be protected and lived by in pursuit of grand dreams.

@SylviaRustyFae Год назад

3:38 Note for those who arent privy to how the Circuit Courts work, a "unanimous" decision by those courts is not a decision made by all 11 judges. It is a decision made by 3 randomly selected judges out of those 11; in this case, two of them were Trump appointees even.

@SylviaRustyFae Год назад

@@thirdspacemaker9141 Fixed, i get so confused with the govt names for courts and shit cuz even every state has a different name for their things so i can nvr remember even the federal lvl things xD

@GRJ-uz7kf Год назад

Yes, an "En Banc" decision would be even more devastating.

@SylviaRustyFae Год назад

@@GRJ-uz7kf Thanks for the term :3

@pierrecurie Год назад

@ADVENT Insider Even in that case, there is an incentive to pack the court in your favor... it's just less reliable.

@threenumbnuts Год назад

@ADVENT Insider that or turn into a wildly swinging pendulum of judicial retaliation between the liberal and conservative justices. "Shit, we rolled Thomas and Alito, the national abortion ban stands. But we did get Kagan and Sotomayor for the other case, so we'll only allow civilians to own simple handguns, and require them to pass strict mental health and proficiency tests."

@Flexible_photon Год назад

I'm just now realizing that they picked this specific special master not because he was a republican but because he was old and they thought that would allow them to drag out the legal proceedings and stall and delay.

@johndoe6032 Год назад

I still think the special master could be totally in the bag for Trump. I don't believe they would appoint someone they already confirmed would be on their side. My guess is they know the problems with classified stuff is unavoidable at this point, but there is some much heavier incriminating stuff in the seized documents that they are really working to block the DOJ from seeing. The special master is making moves and comments now to create an appearance of objectivity now, but will bend over backwards to block the DOJ from seeing anything else.

@abc123tiktok Год назад

I read some where that they choose him because he was part of the investigation of Trump on whether Russia interfere with 2016. This could play of role of prejudice maybe Trump team could bring up though wouldn't make sense since they picked him. But more importantly the investigation did not really end well for Dearie mostly making mistakes in part of investigation. As we know eventually didn't lead anywhere. So they are probably hoping he makes mistakes and Trump gets away.

@brightemerald3924 Год назад

I also felt this initially as well.🤔

@Visplight Год назад

Yup. He had a reputation for moving slowly - but he ain't dumb, and he ain't corrupt. What's more, he knew that was why he was requested, so it lit a fire under his ass, and he's all "appoint ME cause you think I'm a doddering old coot, will you? Well, kindy garden's over - it's now Surprise Exam day and I am your Professor from hell!" He's not favoring the DOJ, but he IS demanding parties perform at a very high level of speed and legal competence - and it's not a level Trump's Not-Really-A-Lawyer-Just-Play-One-On-TV clowns can hope to reach.

@jamesleonard2754 Год назад

He was the judge that found problems with the Steele documents filed by the FBI during the Russia investigation.. that’s why they wanted him

@perciusmandate Год назад

As great as it is that Dearie is finally putting Trump's legal team to task for their BS, it should have never gotten to this state to begin with. Cannon should have denied even having the motions brought before her. The only positive thing is that the Trump team is finally learning that delays and misdirection can only go so far in the US legal system.

@syav4467 Год назад

Glad to see the special master and the 11th circuit actually doing their job.

@PieManZXY Год назад

Been waiting for this! Judge Cannon's decision goes against decades of precedent and her ruling completely tramples on the known scope of the Executive Branch. Great work on the video.

@haveaday1812 Год назад

Good. Everyone in the executive branch needs to be a the end of a rope anyway, so anything that goes against them is fine by me.

@1776stubborn Год назад

Judge Cannon rendered a perfect decision. The magistrate that the FBI dug up did not.

@Justanotherconsumer Год назад

SCOTUS has declared that precedent is unimportant if it serves GOP political goals. That’s par for the course.

@7DK7DK Год назад

@@Justanotherconsumer dawg you know legal segregation was 60 years of established precedent

@RandyFortier Год назад

We're finding lots of general practices and honor codes that clearly need to become law, after a Donald Trump presidency.

@MLennholm Год назад

12:12 That removal of language didn't just mean that Judge Dearie wasn't required to submit reports and recommendations, it meant he wouldn't be allowed to. It's entirely irrelevant to the 11th circuit ruling, its removal was another disgraceful attempt by Cannon to do Trump's bidding and sneak in a delaying strategy and Judge Dearie just called her out on it.

@warlordofbritannia Год назад

Trump pissing off his own special master is a bold move Let’s see how to plays out for him

@LegoAssassin098 Год назад

Especially with today's order, where she is continuing to basically trying to circumvent her own special master.

@danagrey3534 Год назад

Absolutely... we gotta take the focus off of our party's failures. I really thinks Biden, Harris, Pelosi, the Clinton's, Obama, Sanders and many other W.H. liberals and governors are doing a fantastic job! It is finally about time we have open borders and welcome whoever whenever to the U.S. We still pay far less for fuel than the rest of the world and we should raise gas to at least $15-$20 a gallon! We should do away with all immigration laws and while I live and works in a very upscale areas, as long as they don't come to my areas we need more immigrants! Republicans and Don the Con as you call him... we need more groups like BLM... like Latinos, Asian, Native American, German, Polish, Russian, Dutch, Ukrainian, Irish groups demand the stop of racism Crime is so much better under Biden! We need to do away with arrests and jailing people until they go to court! Despite Trump is a con, he did a ton of positive things for this country and we need to keep him or anyone like him from running in 2024@@@

@karentiger8812 Год назад

Thank you for talking about these cases despite the brainwashed people who keep getting mad at you for stating facts.

@coreysierchio4650 Год назад

"His three middle-aged children" made me chuckle out loud. *Thanks for the Content* !

@Lanier2369 Год назад

And Trump bringing up Hillary's emails...I know he was trying to deflect but holy crap that was the most insane and most awkward way I've EVER seen someone do the deflection thing I have EVER seen. Very clunky, very awkward... That's the level of something who just heard about the deflection tactic the day before and decided to try it out, not knowing how to slide it in in a natural way.

@Gumduckylee Год назад

That was Windows when you try to open a program, the computer freezes then opens 8.

@peggyking9543 Год назад

Pure comedy gold. Seth or Stephen may have written that as a pretty funny joke, but TFG ACTUALLY said it...🤣🤪😜😂

@johndoe6032 Год назад

It almost makes me wonder if he actually does have them ,and it holding them to keep some kind of leverage over the Clintons or others who he thinks could be implicated. But ironically it would also be illegal for him to knowingly have possession of her emails with classified materials and not tell anyone. How sweet would it be if Trump went to jail for Hillary's emails! I mean, it's a dream with odds right up there with winning the lottery, but just as sweet of a dream.

@akaimizu1 Год назад

Or more so, his Parrot mind. He's entrapped the statement "But Hillary's Emails" so deeply, he often goes on parrot mode just to grab that one. He thinks that is one of those themes, he can bring back, and never gets old. It's basically his "I am rubber you are glue" line. When he has nothing, and can't answer something, but wishes to speak. That is one of those (Pull the string on the talking doll) phrases, he will invariably come up with. Even if it is completely out of context for the question or topic at hand. Person: You know, that is a beautiful sunset today. 45: Yes. And by the time it sets, I hope they find those 3000 Hillary Emails. Person: Awesome, I just got into law school. UCLA. 45: Nice. You see LA, while I'll see about those 3000 Hillary Emails. Parrot: Squawk! Polly wants a cracker! 45: Squawk! I want to see those 3000 Hillary Emails. His catchphrase on his tomb will probably have, "I'll be looking for those 3000 emails from beyond the grave." I've never seen someone so mentally entangled by an opponent they didn't even lose to. For which said opponent doesn't have political power nor relevance enough to even be worried about. If you want the biggest definition of a sore winner and a sore loser, at the same time, his picture needs to go there.

@austenbin4068 Год назад

The sad thing is that there are a lot of REALLY dumb people out there who will buy it wholesale.

@garymay9134 Год назад

The more judge Cannon helps Trump the worse things are going to get for her

@johndoe6032 Год назад

How? I think she would need to be impeached. And that's clearly never going to happen with trump in her corner. If anything she's secured a back door deal with trump to be his next SCOTUS appointment if he's re-elected.

@dr.floridamanphd Год назад

I think after this most recent mushroom stamping from the 11th Circuit she’s going to start hedging her bets.

@markg.7865 Год назад

Let's hope so, she is a disgrace.

@snupjeve Год назад

@Jeffrey Hupf - it will take forever. This is even worse than Roy Pearson, and that took over a decade.

@tonyvelasquez6776 Год назад

@Jeffrey Hupf yo brrodie I'm dropping a massive steamer right now i just wish it was stinking more so I can inhale the scent

@jamescomstock7299 Год назад

I've been eagerly awaiting your analysis of this! Thanks for putting it together and sharing it with us!

@rachelk4805 Год назад

He thought they would never bring a case? I didn't think I could be any more shocked at his entitlement, but that left me gobsmacked.

@raceytray3963 Год назад

The TLDR of the ruling was “Dude, seriously!? They’re classified documents. Of course he doesn’t own them!”

@LegoAssassin098 Год назад

My thing is that even IF they were declassified, they are still property of the US Archives.

@BradBrown95 Год назад

@@LegoAssassin098 Literally every president has done this but you know Orange man bad

@Snugggg Год назад

@@BradBrown95 you've earned your rubles

@Ericwvb2 Год назад

Cannon keeps going back to this loopy notion that he has some sort of rights over ANY of these government documents. He's no longer President. Biden wisely cut off his security clearance right away. Any access he has to ANY of these government documents are on a case by case voluntary basis by agencies like NARA and the CURRENT executive branch can make those decisions.

@tatersalad76 Год назад

@@BradBrown95 no they really haven't

@demeter-the-great Год назад

I was so concerned that the justice system would let me down given the judge’s initial bombshell ruling in Trump’s favor. So happy I was wrong. Although, there is still time for Teflon Don to escape justice … again.

@lukesutton4135 Год назад

Imagine being concerned about nothing while your entire country is being robbed of everything. Communists never cease to amaze me of course, until they are the ones getting robbed.

@caboodles2627 Год назад

He isn’t president anymore. There’s a reason he desperately tried holding onto power for so long. He had protections then.

@troubadour723 Год назад

@UC-ntgBsCxU0xw8TReEO23vg Die? He'll outlive us all. (well, him and Dick Cheney.)

@vanivari359 Год назад

It kinda bothers me how often nowadays people mention, who appointed a judge. Everybody seems to assume that this is important which does not shine a very good light at the justice system. It would be naive to assume that judges are completely objective, but one would hope that laws are clear enough and there are enough checks and balances to prevent a heavy impact.

@radishhat5736 Год назад

@@vanivari359 I mean. the supreme court happened. Fillibusters and etc up he ass. its already super politicized, everything else is just trickle down corruption.

@CarlosRodriguez-dd4sb Год назад

Honestly, I feel like I should be having popcorn and a beer while watching these videos. So entertaining!!

@southwerk Год назад

Very well done, always a pleasure listening to these. (from an old, old lawyer)

@merphul Год назад

the 11th circuits response was brutal. smart move of the DOJ to focus only on the classified docs, made it easier to rule on quickly and if there is going to be an indictment, those docs will bear more with with the grand jury than the 11k public available docs.

@RedRocket4000 Год назад

The laws being used considering defense secret don't require documents to be classified thus Trump declassification changes nothing even if he actually did it which he did not. But the actual charges do depend on documents that would be classified and all the Government needs to convict are them. The other stuff only extra crimes not yet charged or in rare cases something that never was classified but should have been.

@c3mac55 Год назад

It also established the grounds and precedent for all the other docs in the case.

@DiarrheaBubbles Год назад

It feels like the people in the upper ranks of our government are immune to the law. It would make me so happy to see these people held accountable for their crimes.

@KaitouKaiju Год назад

They are the law

@khanhnguyen-tt3ff Год назад

It seem like it cause they know the limit and loophole and smart enought to used them unlike trump who think we are in an absolute monarchy

@johndoe6032 Год назад

They would have to make laws to hold themselves accountable. And as long as it's big money donors and not the people that decide elections, that will never happen. Trump has really shined a light on how little accountability there is in the law for a president, and it's really sad. We are now paying for the hubris of the founding fathers who assumed that having only wealthy land-owning white men allowed to elect leaders would always lead to the election of fair and just leaders. And ironically, it's the fact that elections are still basically being decided by wealthy white men is exactly why we end of with puppet clowns in office instead of good smart and fair people.

@boslyporshy6553 Год назад

Has a crime been committed?

@SonsOfLorgar Год назад

@@boslyporshy6553 does bears shit in the woods?

@crispychrissy Год назад

The weird floating dust speck overlay on the video at 3:04 freaked me out. I thought there were bugs crawling on my phone screen.

@queens.dee.223 Год назад

I love catching up on the news around this stuff through your channel. Also, is that an actual rotary phone?!?!

@slightlycrookedworkshop Год назад

This entire thing is almost Reverse Kafkaesque. It's like Cannon is making Trump's arguments for him. His legal team basically says: We have an argument but we're not telling you what it is. It's the best argument. Many people are saying it's the best legal argument ever made. Don't worry about what that argument is, It's 100% correct and you should just believe it. Therefore, we win.

@warlordofbritannia Год назад

Meanwhile, Dearie is too old to have patience with Trump’s B.S. One of the very special masters Trump specifically asked for is telling him to put up or shut up and treating him more fairly than his own appointee. It’s poetry ☺️

@FoodNerds Год назад

😂😂😂😂 Right!

@prismblack9631 Год назад

Oh no, they’re going to use the Chewbacca defense?

@emlynselene1096 Год назад

That sounds EXACTLY like their legal arguments as to how the 2020 election was "stolen". We have evidence, you should believe we have evidence, but we're not telling you the evidence

@lisaf5303 Год назад

Imagine a judge asking for evidence, what a strange world...

@ronrendon Год назад

😂

@johndododoe1411 Год назад

Judge simply told them what date of the year they should present evidence of X, if they want to do so. In other words, he told them when exactly their day in court will be.

@isaacgleeth3609 Год назад

Trump team: _makes claim_ Judge: "I'm sure you wouldn't give us this fantastic story without some proof." Trump team: _shocked Pikachu face_

@fredsmith4134 Год назад

i am so glad i found this channel, it gives straight forward clear and concise break downs of case i am interested in , well done !!!

@Xgya2000 Год назад

"By just thinking about it" "Your honor, the defendant pleads Jedi"

@ExplodingDarth Год назад

"which isn't legally relevant, but I find it very very funny" Excellent, just perfect. I love the disclaimer, I love the honesty, beautiful!

@slimmccoy8863 Год назад

Devin's comments like this are what keep me coming back to this channel.

@thomasdjonesn Год назад

I said it along with him, and laughed when I realized he'd said the same thing.

@ColinTedford Год назад

The serious delivery really made it.

@lightknight876 Год назад

Trump organization specifically seeking that judge lady should have raised all kinds of red flags and alarm

@JasonBoyce Год назад

he's taken multiple cases directly to her, he also tried to get her on a case where he was suing Hillary Clinton and he's trying to get her on another case to sue Congress he used to describe the SCOTUS judges he appointed as "his" judges, and they turned down his election lawsuits, but Cannon is clearly "his" judge

@paul16451 Год назад

Thankfully thats exactly what happened.

@daviddivad5202 Год назад

It did.. have you not been paying attention?

@johndododoe1411 Год назад

Trump org is in the New York case, this video is about Trump himself.

@Billsbob Год назад

Unlike the FBI doing the same thing by seeking out a specific political magistrate to get the warrant in the first place?

@laparis27th77 Год назад

I peeped the phrasing reference which makes me suspect you're an Archer fan as well. lol. As always thanks for the thorough explanation. your videos always clear the fog for me.

@toddrowe9670 Год назад

Your videos and explanations are brilliant too. Thanks!

@mechmat12345 Год назад

Lots of goofballs on the Special Master video were claiming you were biased against Trump in your analysis, when in fact you gave his case more deference than it deserved. Cannon was completely off her rocker, as has been proven out by both the 11th Circuit and Judge Dearie.

@wareforcoin5780 Год назад

He's very clearly biased against Trump. I say this as another person who's very clearly biased against Trump.

@Jehty21 Год назад

@@wareforcoin5780 but he wasn't biased against Trump *in his analysis* Two completely different things.

@Leith_Crowther Год назад

I’m biased toward reality. Not my fault reality is biased against trump.

@SonsOfLorgar Год назад

@@Leith_Crowther that's the unfortunate consequence for any narcissistic pathological liar like DT🤣

@Ryuujinv01 Год назад

@@wareforcoin5780 He's biased in favor of law, which Trump is brazenly against. Coming to a factual reason to be against a specific person doesn't exactly carry the same implications the word "bias" does. Which implies they hate him because he's him, and then everything was built around that. Instead of just a proper accounting of how truly awful Trump is.

@nr9794 Год назад

“New psychic presidential power” had my stomach hurting 😂

@stewartrussell1951 Год назад

Well laid out presentation. Very professional. Thank you.

@asherikamichaela8425 Год назад

I'm really struggling not to just roll on the ground laughing right after getting off work. 😂🤣 This is hilarious! Thanks for the explanation, LE!

@Blackfire1478 Год назад

I must say I absolutely love how in these videos you can throw a ridiculous amount of information, that is way beyond my station, and yet I always feel like I have come to the end having understood and learned something 😄

@dexteradams6515 Год назад

Objection: Not even Brilliant can fix what's wrong with Trump and his "lawyers".

@GREGGRCO Год назад

Great Segue though.

@almostfm Год назад

Now, if there's a learning platform for them, it's probably called "Stupid".

@patrickjordan2233 Год назад

"truth social" becoming "bankrupt social"? 🤔🤔

@willdejong7763 Год назад

@@almostfm I was thinking “Basic”.

@AndrewAMartin Год назад

@Nic DeGrave Yeah, probably goes something like "Ivanka, come here, Daddy needs your help..."

@Humongous420 Год назад

Judge A Cannon needs to be investigated and removed from her position

@rabbit3212010 Год назад

This is the ONLY contributor who's videos I slow down the speed on! Just because he talks fast doesn't mean I don't want to hear every word.

@nydarisa Год назад

I am continually impressed and amazed at how you can discuss some of these things with a straight face. There is not a fiction writer alive who could have come up with some of the statements that the former president has made.

@jessiehogue. Год назад

I mean, if they were *REALLY* high and drunk...

@wonpilspiano Год назад

They’d write it and readers would rage against the unrealistic nature of the story

@jansmitowiczauthor78 Год назад

Challenge accepted :p

@jansmitowiczauthor78 Год назад

Challenge accepted :p

@jansmitowiczauthor78 Год назад

@@wonpilspiano That's exactly right.

@zeebeeplayz Год назад

Number 1 rule of a judge: be unbiased. Cannon: that sign won't stop me because I can't read!

@AskMia411 Год назад

A+ meme usage!

@deep8538 Год назад

Awesome segue to Brilliant, I might have to subscribe.

@itstheweirdguy Год назад

I like how you are highlighting the words while you talk, very smooth!

@mattcy6591 Год назад

If he is so confident he declassified those documents, why hasn't he publicly disclosed what is in those documents?

@pineforest1442 Год назад

I don’t think he actually read them.

@Krushak8888 Год назад

Just because it's declassified doesn't mean it's up to be viewed by the public

@DusilBWeeklyLeague Год назад

I don't think he can actually read

@violeth2255 Год назад

@Krushak I'm pretty sure that declassification either releases that information to public access automatically or enable public access via a freedom of information request.

@DarkDragonPath Год назад

Oh to be a fly on the wall at the DOJ's FOIA division for the figurative blizzard of FOIA requests being furiously scribbled out and submitted on all those allegedly de-classified documents... 🤣 To be clear, I'm 99.9998% positive they will all get denied buuuuut...

@corporalsoletrain2132 Год назад

Don't think we didn't notice how fast and quiet you said "Cobbledick" You wanted to giggle. We saw everything

@jonathans1759 Год назад

The EMPTY classified folders are more of a worry than any of this.

@RogelioPerea Год назад

Great post as always. I must object though to the brilliant... Brilliant segue 🙂

@Neddyhk Год назад

"That's not relevant, it's just very, very funny." I said the same in a Court hearing and the Judge did not agree with me.

@tomriley5790 Год назад

Pretty rare to see an appeals court take a judge apart quite so thoroughly...

@jeaniebird999 Год назад

It once was a rare thing to see such incompetence...

@Ericwvb2 Год назад

It's also pretty rare (AFAIK) for a judge, before hearing from both parties, to declare ahead of time she'll be ruling in favor of one of the parties.

@_Aemse Год назад

lmao well they're trumps "boys" so its not exactly like they were the most qualified people for the job. it is very gratifying to see them hung up on the cross though.

@herec0mestheCh33f Год назад

@@Ericwvb2 you'll notice the trump stans don't talk about that forbidden fact

@margotrosendorn6371 Год назад

Okay where did you get that clip of the judge using her gavel as a bludgeon? It's HILARIOUS! XD

@JasonSmith-lp6wg Год назад

I do love the seamlessness of your Sponsor Segways.

@acuyra Год назад

It never ceases to amaze me how little Trump seems to understand of what a President can and can’t do, despite being one for four years.

@ShinyAvalon Год назад

When you've spent your life getting whatever you want by being the loudest and most abrasive, learning what "limits" are just doesn't compute.

@williamlulay7982 Год назад

Trump never wanted to be "President." He wanted to be King/ Dictator/ Autocrat/ Whatever, which, in his little pea brain, meant having unlimited power. He has little knowledge of the actual workings of government, never had any interest in learning, and has, indeed, remained remarkably stupid over how the government actually works. He still doesn't realize how proscribed ALL government functions are by rules and regulations, which is why he keeps making totally inappropriate and incriminating statements and actions, which, while they wouldn't affect the average citizen, will get him, as a former government official, in very hot water. Sometimes, a person's stupidity is a blessing!

@lauridsd Год назад

He simply does not / will not / can not acknowledge any limitation to his power or ability, including, you know...the law...reality...whatever.

@_Jake.From.Statefarm_ Год назад

Listen to the Alyssa Griffin PBS interview.. It's insane, the PBS documentary is really good and broken down into interview segments.

@karlr750 Год назад

At the beginning of Trump's presidency, he was given some crib notes on the Bill of Rights, so he could understand them before taking the oath of office. According to what I heard (and this might be partially apocryphal), he got through #4 (unreasonable search & seizure) before he got bored and gave up. If a U.S. office holder lacks the mental fortitude to read the Bill of Rights, plus amendments 11-27, then it does not surprise me that there are significant limitations to his understanding.

@Vesperitis Год назад

Dear Mr. Eagle, There is a big difference between a "Psychic President" and a "Psycho President".

@skipads5141 Год назад

Anyone who claims to be psychic is psycho.

@rhov-anion Год назад

Trump thinks he's the one but is really the other.

@ost2life Год назад

I dunno, these days the main difference seems to be spelling.

@johndododoe1411 Год назад

The argument wasn't a psychic power, but a claim that an unexpressed decision to declassify would be completely valid if its existence could be inferred from subsequent actions, an argument applicable to executive actions of other presidents. When Obama went on national TV to reveal that they just killed Osama bin Laden, Obama was implicitly acting on an unwritten declassification of that previously classified fact. Similarly if president Trump (while still in office) ordered the movement of certain classified documents to a less secure location, he may arguably have acted on an implicit unwritten declassification of those documents. It's a logical argument, that is only slightly stretching the truth.

@vinylrabbit7295 Год назад

I would argue they are the same thing

@KatLovelandVoiceActor Год назад

Been waiting for your vid on this :)

@alexadelaide Год назад

I always feel like the segue to the ad spot leaves the main subject with no closure

@evehatesapples1972 Год назад

That opening line really hit me. I see the news and think, "How is this STILL happening?!"

@gengarzilla1685 Год назад

Mr. Trump will no doubt want it to inconclusively drag for as long as possible. For that man, there's no such thing as bad publicity.

@Tailmonsterfriend Год назад

Oh god that clip of a judge gavelling that dude, MY SIDES!

@endlesssummersky3126 Год назад

It's great to see that when justice is truly needed, it's there.

@terryscott6584 Год назад

A great overview. Thankyou

@justsomeguyinnc473 Год назад

The problem with any argument or statement that starts with "Trump said..." is that it doesn't matter what he says. Frankly, I'm astonished that this keeps getting trotted out. (I'm not really, I know that "news" is really entertainment when there's a profit motive.) TLDR: When a person with no credibility speaks, only a fool listens.

@erikdayne5429 Год назад

Fools, or those who simply want to believe what they’re being told.

@johndoe6032 Год назад

Yeah it doesn't really matter what he says in Fox News. He could say he murdered someone and it wouldn't have any legal weight. Fox "News" is a great example of that. They have news in the title of the channel, but when faced with legal issues, they say in court they're an entertainment company, not a news provider. Additionally, they say under oath that no reasonable person would believe some assertions they "report on" to avoid legal liability. The saddest part is, every one of their viewers could be made aware of this, and still gulp down their kool-aid.

@karlr750 Год назад

It *does* matter what he says. That man is a never-ending fountain of self-incriminating statements and he Just. Cannot. Keep. His. Mouth. Shut.

@pumpkinknight5732 Год назад

@@johndoe6032 pretty sure back in the day it was actually titled as "Fox Entertainment News", can't imagine why they shortened it.

@Nortekman Год назад

It was great beatdown, a big beautiful beat down, a powerful beatdown, even; and frankly, it was the first ever beatdown. I been told it was the first big powerful beatdown. Did you know that? Yeah, not a lot of people know that.

@TheRealScooterGuy Год назад

I see what you did there!

@martinhorner642 Год назад

Congratulations on one of the most brilliant sponsor segways I've ever seen on RU-vid. Perfect. 10 of 10.

@martinboland810 Год назад

the build-up to the segue is like the build-up before the drop in a great dance track

@MrFoxtheSpy Год назад

After watching your channel for a couple of years, I've come to the conclusion that becoming a lawyer is much easier than I thought. I just need some friends in high places.

@rhov-anion Год назад

Nah, that's how you become a JUDGE.

@MrFoxtheSpy Год назад

@@rhov-anion very true, very true. That's also a possibility

@0816M3RC Год назад

@@MrFoxtheSpy All right then go be a lawyer.

@KingBrandonm Год назад

It can't be that difficult if Sidney Powell, Alina Habba, Christina Bobb and all the other bottom feeding dregs of society that Trump appoints to his loser legal team passed the bar.

@neolexiousneolexian6079 Год назад

"I'm not questioning your honour, Ser, I'm denying its existence." ....Y'all should build a Wall to send people who "have friends in high places" to. Maybe not up North, though, speaking as your neighbour.

@ALaz502 Год назад

Dude. Your production quality is getting off the charts good. It has always been good. But this is next level man.

@NighttimeNubbs Год назад

THEY ARE STILL GOING ON ABOUT HILARY'S EMAILS?! I really shouldn't be surprised but here I am.

@dariusslade4953 Год назад

I really, really, really enjoyed your explanations. Thanks!

@craigejacobs Год назад

For future reference, that dude should simply be referred to as "Mike Pillow"

@GRJ-uz7kf Год назад

"Supported by, What's the word? Oh yeah, EVIDENCE." That was nice!

@MATTierial Год назад

I really appreciate the content of this video, and I'm fine watching ads to support your channel. But, when two subsequent, unskippable ads appear every few minutes in the middle of your arguments... It becomes very difficult to follow. Is there anything you can do on your end to better position these ads so they don't interrupt your arguments mid sentence?

@estellemariexo Год назад

Honestly, RU-vid Premium is worth every cent I pay to avoid this exact problem. If it's within your means would definitely recommend it. Hope you're well, friend!

@user-eq9xs5fz9u Год назад

3:12 the glorious scenario of a judge so angry at a Court Attendant (defendant, suspect, lawyer, attorney, bailiff) that they personally stepped down from the seat to Bonk said Attendant.

@TheSteveBoyd Год назад

When you're effortlessly explaining the minutiae of something like this, that I'm genuinely interested in understanding, I find it helps to turn the playback down to 75% speed. This has the unintended (and kind of hilarious) effect of making you sound completely hammered. 😂

@Leith_Crowther Год назад

Knowledgeable people can explain complicated things simply.

@AskMia411 Год назад

Thank you for This knowledge

@thejudgmentalcat Год назад

"You can declassify things just by thinking about it" Two things: 1) NO, 2) Pretty sure he can't think farther than he can yeet a Big Mac

@Aredel Год назад

Pretty sure he can't think at all. His expression reminds me of an emu that found a camera.

@warlordofbritannia Год назад

@@Aredel That’s insulting Emus are capable enough to successfully wage war against a modern state

@tanker00v25 Год назад

@@warlordofbritannia Australia wasn't a modern state, the year was 1931 after all

@AskMia411 Год назад

@@warlordofbritannia one thing trump does have in common with the emus of the emu war- they’re both REALLY hard to get rid of!

@AskMia411 Год назад

Thank you for the mental image of trump trying to yeet a Big Mac, and it flying maybe two feet and plopping sadly on the ground. There’s something delightfully funny in that