Trump vs. Starmer: the end of the "special relationship"? | The New Statesman podcast

Подписаться 121 тыс.

Просмотров 26 тыс.

50% 1

If Keir Starmer becomes prime minister of the UK and Donald Trump is re-elected president, what does that mean for UK-US relations?
Subscribe here: / @newstatesman
Anoosh Chakelian and Freddie Hayward answer a listener's question.
Read Anoosh's interview with John Healey: www.newstatesman.com/encounte...
And the interview with J.D. Vance www.newstatesman.com/ns-inter...
--
The New Statesman podcast is now on RU-vid. Anoosh Chakelian and New Statesman colleagues including political editor Andrew Marr discuss the latest in UK politics news, helping you understand the forces shaping British politics today.
Watch all the latest episodes of the New Statesman podcast here: • The New Statesman Podcast
--
The New Statesman brings you unrivalled analysis of of the latest UK and international politics. On our RU-vid channel you’ll find insight on the top news and global current affairs stories, as well as insightful interviews with politicians, advisers and leading political thinkers, to help you understand the political and economic forces shaping the world.
With regular contributions from our writers including Political Editor Andrew Marr and Anoosh Chakelian - host of the New Statesman podcast - we’ll help you understand the world of politics and global affairs from Westminster to Washington and beyond.
Subscribe on RU-vid: / @newstatesman
Sign up to Morning Call, the daily UK politics newsletter from the New Statesman: morningcall.substack.com
Subscribe to the New Statesman from just £1 per week: www.newstatesman.com/podcasto...

Опубликовано:

13 апр 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 187

@catgladwell5684 Месяц назад

Alistair Cooke, back in the 70s or 80s in one of his Letters From America said the "special" relationship was a one-sided thing, perceived only by the UK. It's a fallacy and always has been.

@tonymcgray9599 Месяц назад

It’s time this one sided relationship ended.

@ineedmoreflavour1955 Месяц назад

What a smart cookie you are Tony.

@Borishal Месяц назад

Was just about to say the same thing!

@AF2277S Месяц назад

ahh yes, because the UK needs more of an issue with it's economy.

@combatrevolved Месяц назад

@@AF2277Strade with the US is minor

@stevec6232 Месяц назад

Nothing special about that relationship anymore...

@normanchristie4524 Месяц назад

Never was. A Churchhill dream.....nothing more but the Tory party had free lunches for the last sixty years!

@aurockscastillo5460 Месяц назад

Anymore? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@carolthomas8528 Месяц назад

Maybe, but the West generally needs a strong America .

@kbqvist Месяц назад

What special relationship???😂

@ineedmoreflavour1955 Месяц назад

I mean, do you actually need somebody to explain that to you?

@gio-oz8gf Месяц назад

@@ineedmoreflavour1955 I do, explain away.

@peterteagleteagle9958 Месяц назад

One of the biggest lies ,there never as been a special relationship, complete cobblers

@ineedmoreflavour1955 Месяц назад

Evidence?

@gio-oz8gf Месяц назад

@@ineedmoreflavour1955 You're that person who has to say something even though he has nothing to say. You are, aren't you? Let's try it the other way around. Where's your evidence that there ever was a special relationship?

@RobBCactive Месяц назад

It really refers to the intelligence cooperation begun in WW2, which still exists.

@gio-oz8gf Месяц назад

@@RobBCactive If you're talking about intelligence then you have to include Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Nobody refers to those countries in the same way because that isn't what they mean by "special relationship." There is a special relationship when it comes to intelligence sharing and defence, but that is also true for the UK and many other countries, and that is where it ends. The US has a more special relationship with Ireland than with the United Kingdom.

@GallumArtemi Месяц назад

@@gio-oz8gf We pay far less tax to invest in the US stock market. They defend the UK abroad, interchange with our military in outposts, we call on each other's special forces in different situations. We also speak the same first language, which is quite a big deal still. This world is global now, that's just reality whether we would have voted for it or not, and the US is vital to any country that wants a place in the future. Whether you care this way or that way, the US is still the strongest economic power in the world and the UK should be a part of that, considering we invented the system which allowed for it.

@skinwalker_ Месяц назад

The special relationship is like someone trying to appease a bully. It's the UK begging for a relationship. We are European and the sooner we put the Trump loving Tories and brexiters back in their box and rejoin our closest allies and neighbors the better. I am married to and American and do business with a lot of Americans and I can tell you the relationship is one way unless the Americans need another county to back them up in a lie then and only then do they call on the UK.

@RobBCactive Месяц назад

Yes, but It really refers to the intelligence cooperation begun in WW2, which still exists.

@IT-ut6zu Месяц назад

Hope you're not including your marriage in those one sided relationships

@martinhommel9967 16 дней назад

@@RobBCactivesince Kim Philby even that’s quite restrictive

@robertmaccallum8390 Месяц назад

The 'Special Relationship' stopped being anything other than a convenient myth when Atlee and Truman were in office.

@xavierhucklenbruch1798 Месяц назад

What relationship is that?

@Phillip_Reese Месяц назад

What relationship? The facts have been telling us for a LONG time that we are just a small pawn in their hands (Tony for example) and we have been humiliated by them many times before and since. When it comes to personal relationships, it was a good one between Margaret and Ronald, but what a showdown when Trump was/is involved. We will continue to be pragmatic and our security will work with them, we know it is above those personal humiliating relationships.

@olaflieser3812 Месяц назад

Tony Blair was George W Bush's "poodle"....

@Phillip_Reese Месяц назад

@@olaflieser3812 Our special relationship.

@townsendv58 Месяц назад

It doesn't exist.

@davidjames2083 Месяц назад

*Terrific analysis Freddie!* 👍😎🍺

@mandead Месяц назад

I certainly hope so.

@roconnor01 Месяц назад

It's only 'special' to the UK. We are simply a close ally to the United States, and I'm comfortable with that. After all we are supposed to be grown-ups and realists.

@user-oj4xp2lh4d Месяц назад

How much longer will we refer to the Special Relationship?There's not one.

@charleswindsor1184 Месяц назад

It's always always always been a one way love affair.

@ianworley8169 Месяц назад

We can only hope so. Look what happened to the last Labour leader who did a US President's bidding.

@dondoodat Месяц назад

I was very much against the UK going into Iraq, but I hope that by being involved we restrained the Americans from their Shock & Awe style carnage and generally kept them within International Law. Their soldiers had been told that Iraq was responsible for 9/11 and I dread to think what the civilian casualty count would have been like if they had gone in alone.

@emmabird9745 Месяц назад

The Special relationship? We get war debt, Germany gets the Marshal plan.

@ebutuoyYT Месяц назад

Define American? As American states are wildly different to each other, in terms of their outlooks and culture, we probably have a special relationship with some Americans, but definitely not the majority of them.

@robertortiz-wilson1588 19 дней назад

Woah. That's one of the most informed comments I've ever seen a Brit make here on America! I mean this as a compliment.

@luke2346luke Месяц назад

There is no special relationship!

@allovdem Месяц назад

Special relationship 😂😂😂, only we think it's 'special'

@williamhenry8914 Месяц назад

The special relationship where we do what we are told in exchange for the privilege of involving ourselves in endless forever wars. Yay.

@edstacey9335 Месяц назад

Just want to point out the UK cannot made individual trade deals with each individual state in the US as trade deals are handled on a federal level not the state level so there is not point pushing this talking point

@robertortiz-wilson1588 19 дней назад

Ha, True.

@albertbrammer9263 6 дней назад

Lammy's description is 100% accurate.

@neilfletcher4951 Месяц назад

What special relationship.?I remember the trade talks with the US we weren't treated in any way special.... I'd class our relationship as we're the little poodle

@lancewalker5895 Месяц назад

One question I haven't seen and would like to see answered is: even if the PO Horizon data could be manipulated through the 'back door', why & who actually accessed the data and where did that money go?

@greghill7759 Месяц назад

Good question. As I understand it, the money retrieved from various postmasters actually went into the PO coffers. The "phantom" losses? I don't seriously expect anyone from the PO to put their hands up, let alone start an investigation. As for the who and why, the first logical port of call would be to ask Fujitsu.

@robertprice2148 Месяц назад

The special relationship! Haven't even bothered watching this one.

@WedgeOfSpite Месяц назад

Trade agreements don't exist between individual US states and other countries. That is the purview strictly of the Federal level of government through the Commerce Clause. So no, the UK government isn't going to pursue trade agreements with states, letters of intent, or whatever they are, aren't real agreements to do anything outside of the agreement established by Congress.

@josgibbons6777 Месяц назад

Marcus Brigstocke attributed the special relationship to our not wanting to learn French.

@howardrisby9621 Месяц назад

Vraiment?

@reginaldamoah8608 Месяц назад

Look if Trump is elected regardless of if it's a Labour or Tories in government they will do whatever they need to do to keep Trump on side. They will try to explain in more moderate Trump's positions and they'll be rowing back or disassociating themselves from any past criticism

@tamrielspirit3285 Месяц назад

There is no special relationship

@Koudouken Месяц назад

Nice Mario cosplay

@Evemeister12 Месяц назад

Special relationship. America gives it, Britain takes it.

@tomgraham6071 Месяц назад

Starmer completely reversed everything he stood for Labour leader on, so i don't think he'll have any qualms at all about reversing his approach to Trump. The main issue in their relationship would be whether Trump will forgive and forget.

@houseofball0ons Месяц назад

David Lammy won’t say a word about trump once he’s foreign secretary. Absolutely zero conviction

@murkzmontana Месяц назад

There never was a special relationship

@danielwalsh6106 Месяц назад

What special relationship? We don't even have a trade deal.

@carolthomas8528 Месяц назад

NATO and Europe needs to “step up “ its support of Ukraine with or without America. We are burying our heads in the sand if we imagine it will all conveniently go away when this war is over.

@pwallacepugh 23 дня назад

It doesn't matter who the PM is. There is only a one way relationship and if Trump becomes President again he only has a special relationship with himself.

@user-sn1ke7sq2t Месяц назад

It's likely more accurate to say Brexit did more harm to the alleged special relationship than whomever is in charge on either side. As an American I'm often surprised at how ignorant both sides can be regarding how each system works. From the US side it's simply a matter of indifference. How the UK works really makes little difference as it's a question of usefulness. While the UK was a member of the EU and Common Market they were very useful to the US. Now? Not so much. Kemi Badenoch can yammer on about trade agreements with various US states as if that's a thing(spoiler alert: it isn't)(all trade deals are approved through Congress at the federal level). So would Trump in office simultaneously with Starmer make any difference? Unlikely. Biden would likely be more open to dealing with Starmer, though. The UK is increasingly irrelevant to US interests.

@danielbrowne9089 Месяц назад

Special relationship, what a load of bollocks. I’m your bestest friend ever, ever. Let’s go on the bouncy castle!

@djoldschool Месяц назад

‘Special relationship’.. We’ve been in ‘special measures’ since this relationship started and regardless of whoever wins the US and UK elections, we’ll probably still take our lead from the US. Just hope Starmer manages to stand up to Trumps’ nonsense if he gets elected.

@10gimp39 Месяц назад

Don’t hold your breath on Starmer standing for anything He’s the flip flop king

@yampk1 20 дней назад

Peak centrist stuff from the NS there

@nicholasbethell2921 Месяц назад

Who would want a special relationship with Trump?

@alanwatterson2850 Месяц назад

Not even his wife.

@nicholasbethell2921 Месяц назад

@@alanwatterson2850 Good one.

@tonyatthebeach Месяц назад

@@alanwatterson2850 which one?

@user-lu6hx7tw9g Месяц назад

What special relationship. Tories screwed that with Brexit and irlands lost relationship

@grantwallace1882 Месяц назад

I have never considered Trumpy to be a politician.

@imperatorvespasian3125 Месяц назад

the the special relationship is and always has been in the heads of UK politicians only

@danmayberry1185 Месяц назад

Unlike the Bush-Blair love affair, this prospect goes beyond different parties. Every western democracy will cool its US relationship in the event of another Trump term.

@robertortiz-wilson1588 19 дней назад

That sounds wonderful to an American!

@hypercomms2001 Месяц назад

A trump election would end for the United States special relationship with the western world not just the United Kingdom. The special relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom ended with Brexit.

@deadandburied7626 Месяц назад

Brexit made us losers in American eyes.

@robertortiz-wilson1588 19 дней назад

Just Western Europe.

@michaelharrington7656 Месяц назад

The special relationship should have been buried with Churchill in January 1965. He had a special personal relationship with the US and there is still a big Churchill fan club over there which includes movies and TV movies about him.Otherwise it is a rather embarrassing myth which makes us look pathetic. Charles de Gaulle was always more intelligent and realistic on the subject of transatlantic relations. He made sure that the French strategic nuclear force was entirely French, and he would have no American bases on French soil. By the way, since Nigel Farage proclaims his "loyalty to Donald Trump" how can he be understood as a British nationalist?

@terry9819 Месяц назад

Neither one has a backbone or principles they are willing to stand up for. Both just say what they think will make them popular enough to get power, they'll get along fine.

@jackw1901 Месяц назад

There is no such thing as a "special relationship" and there never has been

@breend6714 Месяц назад

Well Trump did lovingly grasp Theresa May's hand - if that's not indicative of the famed special relationship I don't know what is! 😝 😝 😝

@valerietorreggiani9973 4 дня назад

The thought that trump wants to work with Starmer makes me reassess my vote for the Labour Party if they confirm they are happily willing to work with trump…..Trump not the USA, just hope the man doesn’t win!

@venmis137 Месяц назад

France should be our closest ally. In fact the idea of a "special relationship" with France makes much more sense than one with the US. The Entente was a much healthier arrangement than this disgusting dependency we have on the US.

@robertortiz-wilson1588 19 дней назад

Frogs.

@JuliusFawcett Месяц назад

What relationship?

@alexandertmackay Месяц назад

What special relationship?

@SamuelParish 20 дней назад

Erm. No, it won't. You can disagree politically, but still have a good relationship. Hard to believe in 2024 I know.

@aurockscastillo5460 Месяц назад

What special relationship? How special can a relationship be if only one side is constantly talking about it ?

@fToo Месяц назад

@6:26 those MoUs with individual US states are pretty ropey - hardly worth the paper they're written on !

@buzzukfiftythree Месяц назад

The thought of another 4 years of Trump is thoroughly depressing. If it happens and Starmer (as expected) becomes PM then it’s likely that the age-old ‘special relationship’ will end. That’s about the only silver lining to the dark cloud that hangs over World peace. To be honest, it’s long overdue. The more I look at the state of the USA today, the more I wish we’d stayed in the EU.

@harrypainter7472 Месяц назад

Would you prefer Biden?

@hugosaurus Месяц назад

Come on let’s be real, we are just their dog and we will do what we’re told. Trump got annoyed by these comments but he won’t get rid of his main foothold in Europe, and our government have no choice but to cooperate.

@nigelalanwood6781 Месяц назад

When David lammy reaches the position he's in you know the country is fucked. You have to vote reform it's the only hope.

@davidhodgson3901 Месяц назад

Agreements with individual states? Get a grip, man - there’s no such thing 🤷‍♂️

@californiadreamin8423 Месяц назад

What “Special Relationship “ ? It’s a fallacy.

@MkVenner1975 Месяц назад

The one where the UK *currently* allows US early warning systems, missile defence, listening posts and bases on UK sovereign territory.

@californiadreamin8423 Месяц назад

@@MkVenner1975 Is that the one where British citizens can be extradited to the US but the US does not reciprocate ? As for the military systems on U.K. soil, let’s face it is for the defence of the US , as much as the U.K. “sovereign territory “. Then we have the spectre of a raving lunatic as US President in the form of Trump.

@californiadreamin8423 Месяц назад

@@MkVenner1975 It’s that special that U.K. citizens can be extradited from UK sovereign territory, but the reverse does not exist. Admit it , the relationship you describe, is to defend the US first and foremost.

@MkVenner1975 Месяц назад

@@californiadreamin8423it is one way yes.

@BobSmith-fx9sz Месяц назад

There's no such thing as a "global south." 15% of the population live below the equator which includes rich countries like Australia, South Africa, Argentina. The errors in these talks get a little irritating.

@robertortiz-wilson1588 19 дней назад

Lol, so true.

@dereks1264 Месяц назад

trump is not the least bit interested in diplomacy or any putative "special relationship".

@liaminwales Месяц назад

Id like a follow up on Xi Jinping, he makes Trump look like an angle. It feels like it's chasing trends over moral views.

@tonyatthebeach Месяц назад

Moronic question. The US -UK relationship isn't about party politics. Remember Bush-Blair? Next!

@Minos-Charge Месяц назад

American cant even move to UK freely

@goonerboz6023 Месяц назад

No starmer will do as hes told by the usa hes a good poodle

@tonyatthebeach Месяц назад

Forgotten Sunak's US passport already? Just like you've forgotten commas

@ClannCholmain Месяц назад

I’m fairly certain that relationship is with the Irish people.

@olaflieser3812 Месяц назад

The latest news from Donald Trump is somewhat surprising: He is getting more pragmatic and trying to become a politician in the positive sense. The abortion theme (a biggie in the US) as well as the Ukraine topic brought some surprising statements: Trump wants the middle ground in both of them. I've read that multiple times on policial sites that are not overly partisan such as Politico. - Trump supports easing the most stringent abortion restrictions (as they are deeply unpopular) - Trump might support US House speaker Johnson in getting an Ukraine package through (!) Conversely, a Labour politician that hurled insult after insult on Donald Trump and now wants to be the *foreign secretary* (of all UK government posts) will have some back pedaling to do if he wants to deal effectively with the most powerful western country (should the Orange Haired Man win)...

@shaunm3206 Месяц назад

He did say that and the very next day Arizona reinstated a law from 1864. That’s what happens when you hand it back to the states to decide.Fortunately there are numerous clips of him bragging about doing away with roe v wade for the Democrats to play on a loop in the run up to the next election. Ditto his sycophants like Kari Lake. Now they are frantically trying to back pedal, Lake even calling on the Democrat Katie Hobbs to try and intervene. They’re twisting themselves into pretzels over it. They now know it’s a massive vote loser. Biden was ahead by 4 points and that was before the 1864 law was re instated. The next polls will highlight just what an issue this is at the next election.

@carlharding5311 Месяц назад

If you think this election version of Trump is the version we’ll actually get in the White House, you’re a sucker.

@shaunm3206 Месяц назад

@olaflieser3812 Trump said he will be a dictator on day one.

@olaflieser3812 Месяц назад

@@carlharding5311 You can call me what you like - that is about you not me then. Before 2016 Trump was the obnoxious lowly person during the campaign that he was as the president. The same. Now you frame it like he is gonna be the opposite of what he is now, once he is in office. There is no merit in seeing everything just black and white. Also, the professionals at the top of western govts will have to be pragmatic to get things done - and they will, including working well with Donald Trump. That's what they are paid for, not for ranting. So, again, Labour politiians will have some pack pedaling to do. And they will.

@chrishartley4553 Месяц назад

@@carlharding5311 Hard not to disagree. Trumpy might actually be listening to advisers to try and secure more votes. But he'll be back to his authortarian instincts come Jan '25.

@samuelmelton8353 Месяц назад

Work with Europe

@robertortiz-wilson1588 19 дней назад

*Eastern Europe

@alanwatterson2850 Месяц назад

A Trump win will spell the end to all relationships.

@danmayberry1185 Месяц назад

Exactly. The world's sympathy for the US was good for one Trump term only.

@alanwatterson2850 Месяц назад

@@danmayberry1185 Not even. I think it lasted until his address to the UN, when he had them rolling in the aisles.😅

@robertortiz-wilson1588 19 дней назад

@alanwatterson2850 that was a good speech. One of his best was at the WEF though. Also Eastern Europe and the reat of the world doesn't even like Western Europe. You're who's outnumbered.

@alanwatterson2850 18 дней назад

@@robertortiz-wilson1588 So a good speech is when the world is laughing in derision and disbelief? BTW there's not much left of Eastern Europe that hasn't joined the EU. If he rest of the world doesn't like W Europe why is it always flooded with tourists?

@robertortiz-wilson1588 18 дней назад

@@alanwatterson2850 They talk bad about you behind your back all the time. You're a nice novel to look at though. The history and other sights are nice to look at. Just while ignoring the people.

@tomrees4812 Месяц назад

Is this a serious question? Have you seen Trump lately. I give up.

@daraghokane4236 Месяц назад

Trump should win then as a F you to the UK.

@bernardmaasdijk734 Месяц назад

Is that the relationship where friend B does exactly what friend A wants friend B to do. That'a very special relationship indeed. In international affairs there's no such thing as special relationships, only interests.

@marcusdosh408 Месяц назад

Starmer wont ever be PM

@henkduym9430 Месяц назад

There is no special relationship between the usa and little britain

@user-ln3lh2pz8h Месяц назад

Trump should be treated as a persona non grata. Labour should end the relationship on Day One.. Otherwise Britain will be treated as a doormat.by Trump

@Schiltron Месяц назад

"Would a Trump and Starmer win end the special relationship?" Henry Kissinger once said that "America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests".

@gio-oz8gf Месяц назад

I do wish my fellow Brits would stop talking about "the special relationship." It sounds needy and is bloody embarrassing. You are talking about Americans; for God's sake, have you ever observed them?

@jamesm.9285 Месяц назад

Starmer will destroy a lot of things. Edit: British stability, civil liberty, and the economy for a start. FAR worse than Tories. Labour aren't destroying the Tories - they're doing that themselves with a big hand from Reform. But Labour will be worse than anything you've seen over the past few years.