The idea that someone would be allowed to be a candidate in an election without being required to agree they will accept the election results. One would think that would make no sense. And one would be right!
While it's normal for the opposition to concede defeat, there's no law that to prevent the winner from carrying on without the aforementioned. So that's not even a consideration.
Andrew Neil? Again? Why are Times Radio trying so hard to resurrect Neil's failed career? He's been a national joke since his stint at GBeebies, only Times Radio (Rupert Murdoch) seem prepared to give him any work these days. Run along now Andrew, nobody takes you seriously anymore. We all know that Rupert loves you but the rest of us find you somewhat nauseating.
Ok. Let’s REALLY test the system with a truly extreme hypothetical. Imagine if Trump really broke-down and announced that, if elected, he would nuke Kyiv. Could anything be done?? The answer appears to be 'no'!
Ahh.. Kamala as to sign of on the election.. Double safety net.. Very interesting.. 😂😂.. I can hear a maniacal laugh already.. But Trump will have the last laugh.
@@Steven-vo4ee somewhat correct the answers to the issues were never addressed. The flipping of 10,000 votes in Michigan, quarter of 1 million people more voted in Pennsylvania then were registered, a court case in Georgia. Never heard issues in Arizona, 1000 mules, hijacked, tractor-trailer truck on route to Pennsylvania from New York, etc. etc.
@@rpb583 Podcasts [which are also being utilized by the Harris campaign] and a stunt at a closed McDonalds won't tip the outcome in Trump's direction. The sole policies Trump adheres to are "me, myself and I".
@@Steven-vo4ee inauguration Day 20th January 2021 President Biden became the 46th President of the USA Does that answer your question 🤦♂️ That TDS must be hitting you hard
Incorrect, she telephoned Trump on the night of the election to concede and did so publicly the day after the election. Compare and contrast that to Trump.
