Tucker Carlson Blows Up at Rutger Bregman in Unaired Fox News Interview | NowThis 

He speaks English better than most Americans

It's not really a second language for dutch people since they don't have the movies in their language and have a good education

@@laurenz4528 Even if you’re good at it, it’s still a second language

@@liekeh2184 yeah sure but this guy is just very smart and was educated by a good system I wouldn't set americans as Standard for how good anybody else is at languages

@@laurenz4528 they definitely have movies in their language but you’re right most Dutch people do speak English and most of them are pretty good at it

This needs to get shared again.

I've never heard this phrase, but I love it.

And that's why we love the Dutch. Well done, mijnheer Bregman.

Ach joh, we doen wat we kunnen. Iemand nog een klomp?

I'm Dutch. I had noticed in London how many people said "Sorry" as a short-hand for "Get out of the way/ I don't care...."-

fox loses every debate....

@@reneolguin1081 The letter "W" in "Fox" stands for winning.

@@xraptor94x And the "H" in "Fox" stands for honesty.

@@ihateexcessivelylongandpoi4490 And the "I" in Fox stands for Team.

@@xraptor94x the T in fox news stands for truth

Tucker lost the plot, but those sort of cheap slogans are just as populist as anything Trump pumped out in his tenure. It conjures up a notion of class warfare, when actually society is much too complex for that one to work, in the same way as other demagogues may seek to exploit race relations. It was an ad hominem attack, and like many ad hominems it was both true and irrelevant.

@RustyBoysGaming he’s pointing out clear hypocrisy on Tucker’s part and you’re comparing that bit of legitimate criticism to Tucker calling a historian “tiny brain” lol. You know those aren’t comparable but you have to justify it so you can defend your boy Tucker lmao

It is not an insult to point out that he's a millionaire funded by billionaires anymore than if I call out a doctor who believes in using essential oils. Calling out hypocrisy isn't an insult, it's how free speech works.

@RustyBoysGaming Well you are objectively wrong about the billionaires part. They receive a ton of money through billionaires who want right wing misinformation spread to the public. Fox News isn't some small town News group funded by middle class lemonade stands. Also "taking it to a personal place" isn't the same as calling someone a name lmaooo. You are such a little snowflake like you can't even differentiate an insult and point out a character flaw. Should I not tell an alcoholic that they are an alcoholic because it could hurt their feelings? You seem to think so.

@RustyBoysGaming Also Tucker's parents literally own one of the largest frozen food corps in America. Tucker has never not gotten handouts from the rich.

right. The stupidity of tucker. (I don't even capitalize his name). Unlike Rutger, tucker and his crew didn't do their homework about how intelligent the historian was.

What happens when you preach the "free marketplace of ideas" but can't handle a debate they aren't controlling

Hey Tucker, The Truth hurts....Doesn't it? At least you can rest on your bed of dirty money from the billionaire owner of Fox. Do any Fox News hosts have a heart and soul in them anymore? I think they sold them to the Devil to get rich and to spread lie after lie after lie...

😂😂😂😂😂😂

@@GetUnrealistic sounds like you may be racist…

Facts don't care about your income! :P

@@KarlSnarks or the feelings of precious right wing snowflakes.

he is not a real historian. he didnt really study, since taxpayers payed for his university degree, as for his professors salary. guess how lame such education is. cheers from a social democratic run country. ;)

@@nm-com "he didnt really study, since taxpayers payed for his university degree" tax payers paid for most of my engineering degree. am i somehow not a real engineer? that makes no sense.

@@nm-com um and he is a tax payer and his professor is a taxpayer so by your own analogy they paid for their own salary and education.

TC got his ivy league education based on his trust fund wealth, not on his critical thinking skills. Don't know if he has ever had an original thought in that fat head of his.

Thinking isn't Tucker's strong suit

I think Tucker's donors put Bregman on his show just to punk him hahahaha

Actually utilizing that squishy thing in your skull is not something you can associate with Fox.

Well he knew he didn’t have to air it.. If it worked to his advantage he could air it seem open minded and further his image of being anti elite. If it didn’t he wouldn’t have to air it.

Read in the news today Tucker is being talked about as a possible 2024 presidential candidate! WTF has happened to America?!

@Drinker_Of_ Milk uhhhh how is that ad hominem? Tucker's monetary motivation is not ad hominem when it comes to discussing taxes on the elite.

Ad hominem debate isn’t necessarily bad. In this case Tucker did have a history of being (1) against high tax rates in California (2) complacent about Trumps past tax avoidance (3) complacent about opacity of Trumps tax returns. Now when it’s convenient for Tucker, he blames Netflix and others that are not politically loyal for the very same issues. He got called out for it. I found it especially hilarious when Tucker tried to elevate himself and his show to his guests level and Bregman refused to let him.

Speaks truth to power

He wouldnt let Tucker speak and thats the issue. One way ticket 2 no where

Tommy Tarantilis rubbish! Carlson has never had any problem cutting off his guests whenever he wants. His problem here is that he didn’t have a convincing rebuttal to his guest’s remarks and ended up swearing at him instead. Very intelligent and professional (sarcasm).

Ok

But Fox caters to ignorant masses who are proud of their ignorance. They would sit baffled and dumbstruck (unironically) by someone with actual intelligence sharing actual Truth. Fox has helped program their viewers into mindless schlubs that feed at the troth of ignorance and celebrate it, all while Fox laughs on its way to the bank. If they were actually intelligent, they wouldn't watch Fox "News".

And publishing this segment while it's not being aired is an example of playing by fair rules where you're not trying to debate and than have one party decide if it will be put on air or not.

@@AWWinBlu maybe you've just spent to much time on 4chan

But it did now! this is the power of the internet.

If we didn't have the internet we would've never found out about this.

How did this person get a recording of it though.

He was offered a prime time interview but decided to insult his way out of it.

@@finjakke i need you to look up the definition of "insult" because what he did was objective based criticism. Him saying "you're a millionaire backed by billionaires so you won't objectively talk about higher taxes" isn't insulting the interviewer.

@Amranskino You're either a bootlicker or a billionaire. I doubt there's many billionaires in the comment section of youtube, so that leaves bootlicker. Go away, bootlicker.

Amranskino Sorry dude but CEOs aren’t going to give you a reach around because you support them. They’ll laugh since they’ve managed to brainwash you so easily. Fox manages to divide the working class by focusing on nationality. Go figure.

@Amranskino Yes corporations are overwhelmingly left leaning, like Trump resorts.

@Amranskino So you really think low income 'peasants' are a larger drain on the economy than these huge mega corporations that dont pay their taxes? These companies make revenues of 50 billion dollars per year.

@@xstoofpeer you dont understand man, these immigrants working for often illegally low wages are stealing all our good paying jobs and dragging us down! /s

Yes fox is keeping people poor ha

David Fisher wear a helmet bud

That's stupid

Sounds like South Korea to me lol

There are now four classes in our plutonomy society: billionaires, millionaires, the poor, and the homeless.

His ego collapsed, he's not used to smart opposition

Tucker found out that the truth hurts!

"Brain circuit malfunctioning. Does. Not. Compute. Must. have. talking points!" - Tucker Carlson

He didn’t even realize he got called out until he said it twice lol

Hahah I think he just threw in AOC like a safety word

you should be smart enough to know your country (remember there was no unified indonesia before the dutch) was only partially colonized for about 50 years no i dont care what your teacher told you; it was a lie

@@bishplis7226 it wasn’t called Indonesia yet, but we were united at first with the Sriwijaya Empire (671-1288), Majapahit Empire (1293-1527), Mataram Sultanate (1586-1755), way before the Dutch Empire came in 1595.

@@bishplis7226 You're stupid for bringing up 'only partially' and he's a bit stupid for bringing up the colonisation out of the blue, for a backhanded compliment Both of you, do better next time.

We need Connections! We have leaders and followers and that's why we're in a massive conga line that ends at the bottom of a volcano. We're all equal! We have to actually believe and act upon that to be able to reorganize as necessary. Meaning, no one knows everything. Everyone is making it up as they go along. Even Tucker Carlson has value as a human. The dude needs some DMTx and counseling

When your opponent resorts to insults and name-calling, that's when you know you've won the argument.

Yeah but his facial expressions tell a different story.

You wish you could be as manly as him, huh.

All virtue signaling advocates never look bad it is just they have their facts over simplified and easy to brainwash the hoi polloi with. There is much more to the tax system than just a talk on a brief show segment . He was condescending and insulting towards Carlson and up himself I suppose he doesn't earn much a a humble historian. Tucker gets paid well because he is very good at what he does and well we love him.

I think he was waiting for this very oppurtunity to call out Tucker. You can see it was his plan all along.

It's called projection.

@@dianehall4959 And distraction.

underrated comment xD

That's bcoz u are.

You are.

Underrated comment of the year

You mean privately owned!

Can you give actual Proof of that? or this just another lie to make your self feel better

Yes underrated comment of the year. You sir is why I sometimes visit the treacherous RU-vid comment section

Dayyyyyyyyymn

the guy is a communist tool

Tbh he was a bit too unsavory and rude for me although I agree with his point,

@@deletedchannel3021 yeah, let's do communism one more time, right? What is it with you people that you like totalitarian regimes so much?

@@ResurrectingJiriki Dude taxing the rich is not communism wth.

@@thisusernamehasalreadybeen9831 no, you're right, it's even more delusional.

😂

I want to be him

BARS!

BRAVOO!!

@@Xavier-kq9hp lmao

He's a clever lad.

That Bern was great !

Not really. Fox is aired only in America. The internet is global so it being on the internet is inevitable, it's originally aired to the states.

@@jrno93 i`m dutch and i can see fox live from where i live no problem... even turkish networks/channels.. most of the people own a reciever box for thier tv.. and they can see every network around the world if they want to

Ben Dover You just said “not really,” then proceeded to explain how the og comment was right lmao.

Ben Dover this is such a “fox” way of answering something lol

lmao open borders, which bregman loves, is whats supported by biollionares.

And in an age where nothing is sacred, no one is to blame.

That quote is from famous anti semite Kevin Alfred Strom, not Voltaire.

@@DoubleUProds Interestingly enough .. it still rings true.

Very true. It’s why anyone to the right of Marx is getting banned and censored whereas leftist domestic terrorists, such as Antifa, are protected by police and sponsored by corporations.

@@Sorakeyblademaster37 In which country are the Antifa and other left groups protected by police? I'm from Germany and the aftermath of G20 is still going on - silently and mostly behind the curtain. And everything you dig up about it turns my stomach.

Rutger surely provoked him on purpose (he seems to enjoy his reaction a lot, which is understandable), but the only reason Tucker fell for the bait is because he can't handle blunt honesty.

Think about how many other times this could have happened and we just never saw it.

He let Tucker taste his own food.

@@KarlSnarks Tucker Carlson, a millionaire who has 'attacked' elitism: "How DARE you call me a millionaire who has attacked elitism!"

Fox didn't blame the guest for Tucker's behavior. They blamed him for turning an interview into a platform for personal attacks.

👍

😂😂😂😂👍👍

Glad to help. Hello algorithm pls recommend this video to my fellow humans, especially the tucker fans. Maybe they can get healed from the brain washing

LMFAO IKR YIKES THIS WAS BRUTAL

@@user-nr1vz9hz8n Amen. :)

@John Daliere '21 no he' s actually not calling for 90 percent, he points out that in the 50s and 60s such tax rates existed. There is much to be said for higher tax rates for the rich. Simply for one that a lot of that wealth is gained not by working but by things as powerplay, misusing weaknesses of others and the like. The rich cannot ignore the world around them. If it is by taxes or by paying fair salaries for jobs, a part of their gained wealth works better for everybody including these rich people themselves if it's paid back. If you see that a once great country as the USA is moving backwards and becoming more and more a third world country, wherein the really rich, who are becoming an increasing smaller percent of the population and not or hardly at all pay taxes, are more and more hardly or not involved in the welfare of their country.... is it so strange to put higher taxes on them? I would think not.

What's a GOAT?

@John Daliere '21 look in the dictionary what "marginal" actually means. Your lack of education is showing.

@John Daliere '21 thanks for ecplaining GOAT. But... yeah, we' ve differences. To be clear, I'm from the Netherlands. And I have maybe not all the insights to understand the ins outs of socio-economics from the USA, but I really try to follow the developments. I think our greatest difference is where the balance between taxation and private income lies and how that works out for all the income groups. I don't have a problem per se with that, but imo the rich do not by far enough to give people in the lower income classes a fair change to keep up. For a government taxes are the prime instrument to correct those imbalances. What we see the last fifty years, roughly from the Reagan administration up till now, that the middle class has eroded away and that poverty numbers are growing increasingly, while at the same time rich people get richer. Esspecially the very rich. And taxation plays a very peculiar role in that story. We in the Netherlands always had a view of solidarity, which laid the foundation for a system of taxation and premiums (for instance umemployement after working a year or longer is for the first six months reimbursed up to 100 percent of your last earned pay check for the first six months. After that the percentage builds off and the unemployment pay stops). It looks like socialism or communism but that's not the case. It's our long standing and deep rooted nationwide solidarity. A great factor in this is, that our internal market has always been small, so opportunities for job security are always small. And... the companies always needed a well fed and well educated eork force. That's the hidtoric basis for our social contract. The richer owners of the companies had an interest for keeping poverty csused by unemployment from the doors of the work force, FOR THEIR OWN BENEFIT. It's a historic model that had a very long standing history. Up till now we succeeded in maintaining our socio-economic solidarity while making adjustments to keep up with a vastly changing market where worldwide influences are getting more dominant. So, our starting points are very different. Also the way we view solidarity and individualism. Up till now we fo it better than the USA not only for social benefits and better healthcare, but also in level of education, job participation and so on. But... because we are a small nation witj a solidarity moral... differences between income groups are way smaller and bonusses... well they are smaller and mostly frowned upon. If I had to choose? Netherlands! I hope I have worded the essentials of my story in a wsy you understand them in the way I meant them.

John Daliere '21 I actually want to say one thing. There have actually been studies of what the best tax rate is for the wealthy, which tries to take the biggest share of the pie without discouraging the wealthy to work less. The result of the study were that the best tax rate for that was around 73% There hasn’t been a study at wealth taxes have been proposed

Then Tucker has yet to win an argument in the entirety of his career. I still go back and watch Jon Stewart clean the floor with his bowtie when I'm feeling blue 😉

Cenk already wiped the floor with him plenty of times.

@MegaSkilla actaully if u weren't an ignorant trumptard that follows whatever fox says this Dutch man actually gave 100% facts

MegaSkilla lol ad hominem. Coming from a Trump supporter. I see you’ve been listening to your hero Mr shapiro on big words.

@H MAX he is a troll and not a good one, so obvious I literally laughed out loud at the stupidity

Unfortunately in debates, people are hardly won over by fact.

Leonard Breau well I mean he’s from Fox News so what do you expect, honestly.

@@johnjingleheimerschmitt9356 I agree... They are a political advertisement "News Station"

lol, Carlson was screaming? this euroclown never shut up. can me kooky, but guests don't control airtime. he literally just kept talking and talking and talking saying nothing specific at all, refusing to allow carlson to answer anything. I've never seen someone so confrontational about someone AGREEING with them... "you have made something of yourself and are incredibly wealthy.. well.. guess your the evil in the world. hur hur." guest hijacking interviews from the interviewer typically dont get aired. this is basic TV. btw... wtf was that guy? never heard of him at all until i came across this video. kudos to tucker for giving him his 15 mins.

@@chrishorning7853 are you deaf?? or just ignorant to the truth

That's the funniest part of it all. Everything Tucker and his producers did in response to Bregman's criticism just gave evidence to it.

"They don't have to burn the books. They just remove them." Zack de la Rocha

Jon Stewart did this to tucker on crossfire over a decade ago as well

To be more specific: Crony capitalism & Laissez-faire capitalism. Not so much the gentle capitalism used in e.g. the Netherlands.

@@skabbigkossa It's a pretty slow process then, since it's been over 100 years of soft capitalism in Finland and it's still to develop there.

4 Dub 👏🏼👏🏼😂😂😂

I laughed out loud at that part! HAHAHA

And btw, we are actually able to get Fox and FoxNews here. People at Fox apperantly don't even know that😂

Haha 🤣🤣😭

@Richard Peck uk stopped airing false news in 2017 when the viewership dropped to 2k in a country of 60 million.

He's mad he knows it's 100% true

Truth hurts lol!

What a snowflake! Such a brittle spirit!

Bergman is not a politician and what he said was not very clever or subtle but that's why it was so effective. That kind of aloof blunt rebuttal is something Tucker was completely unprepared to deal with. Usually even the people he brings in that officially disagree with him show him massive deference and act in a very submissive way. A foreigner just bluntly stating "This is the problem and this is how you fit into it" is a level of pushback he just can't handle.

@Jiminy Christmas are you dumb...? it's "you don't talk about this because *if* you would, *they'd* stop keeping you rich - this makes *you* part of the problem". it's a case of _not telling the entire truth has the same evil effects as directly lying would have._

@@Dichtsau And what gets lost when Tucker takes it too personally is the naivete of Rutger's idea that higher taxes will increase governmental revenues with no undesirable side effects. In actuality billiionaires and milliionaires can manipulate their affairs to avoid having taxable income (e.g., by buying stocks that don't pay dividends, so there is no tax until you sell them). When you hear Tucker lose his cool, it's easy to conclude that "Rutger must be onto something."

When people on ALL sides of the political spectrum claim a solution is "simple" or "easy", run for your lives!

@Andrew Barnett i mean, the classic problematization here is capital flight, right? You raise taxes, cooperations oursource. Its really a 'under capitalism they have us at our balls' situation. And I know, they make it a bigger thing than it actually is, meaning that fewer cooperations would actually shut down than they make you believe now. But it is, after all, an issue. To crack down on it, you would have to have one thing above all - international cooperation. neoliberalism has split us in hundreds of competing political entities, while completly eradicating borders for capital. *that* is the major issue. technically, it could be fixed easily, yes, but _politically_ its really a tough one.

You didn’t watch the segment, but that didn’t stop you from making an uninformed comment. Gfy

Yes, what an absolutely not cliché and totally original statement!

Actually Tucker talked about it in his own show..

@@snow-rm3jx correction: people found out about this and he had to tuck his tail under & apologetically eat crow. I'm going to call him tuck tail from now on

@M A no dont share your country's stupidity worldwide

@Droid Modz That this vid has gone viral.

Well yeah it was his actual wish. He even mentions it in a later airing that everything he said was full sincerity.

Yes, Tucker is pretty incredible. /s

He knows he won't be arrested for speaking the truth. He's lucky to be from a country where free speech is possible.

@@mattdavis9601 How can you watch this video and still say 'Tucker is pretty incredible' with a straight face?

His book "utopia for Realists" was, for the most part, a great and highly accessible read. I pretty much agreed with most of it but sadly it doesn't quite factor in the Tucker Carlsons of this world lol

John Daliere '21 *marginal* tax rate. Yes, workers deserve more of the money they create for rich capitalists.

Mainstream media still dreams of the time where the internet did not exist. LOL

It is much smarter to not air this. As the average fox viewer is incapable of surfing the web.

@@PeaceToUsAll so so so so true!!! But they have words, belive me the best words. Greetings from germany ;)

Exactly Fox lies and tries to make their audience believe they’re unbiased.

@@nicklang7670 i think hes talking about when back in the day people "blindly" belives in everything in the media/ newpaper and access to info wasnt as easy to obtain as it is now. This is just a guess though

It was so mature, actually. It was not smug. It was..... I can not describe it. It was a we both know the truth laugh.

LMAO

Carlson's still thinking of this man in the shower and coming up with witty comebacks

Vietnam Veterans hear the trees and remember the smell of napalm in the morning. Tucker remembers that smile and like the trees,he'll never forget it.

It's that special, special smile you get only rarely when you get the jump on someone who was planning to use you as a propaganda tool and instead realized that they couldn't just talk over you - your logic was too loud.

It doesn't play here in the UK because no bugger was watching it. 2k audience per day. I've only just spotted it's been gone for 18 months. We only ever see Carlson for a laugh.

@@chrisraistrick7428 you're really chill in this context 😂

He tried to use that line on his show last night. Pathetic.

It was Tucker’s way to try and discredit.

Jesse Brennan How can this be 2019 and your that oblivious to the words “dirty money”? “money obtained unlawfully or immorally.” "the bank was found to have been laundering dirty money"

Turned more into a cherry face bomb there😅🤣😂

Silas the Nihilist Most of them speak English quite well. But his proficiency of English is above average. He almost sounds like a native speaker.

T B He sounds VERY Dutch to me as a Dutch person (I would dare to call it steenkolenengels). Not native at all. The Dutch accent just doesn’t sound very ‘foreign’ to native speakers I guess...

TSAOH! Steenkolenengels is Engels met een zwaar accent en veel grammaticale fouten. Bregman is hoorbaar een Nederlander, maar spreekt verder gewoon netjes Engels

@@tsaoh5572 they way he pronounces for example 'inheritance'' is not typical Dutch at all. Most of us would have failed there.

Hidde Luchtenbelt Okay ik ging een beetje ver met steenkolenengels, klopt. Maar toch... ga naar de gemiddelde student op een Nederlandse universiteit die een (semi)-internationale studie doet, en je zal zien dat iedereen daar beter Engels praat dan Bregman. Om te zeggen dat hij bovengemiddeld is voor een nederlander gaat me echt te ver. Ik zou zeggen dat zijn niveau gemiddeld is, met daarbovenop een erg duidelijk Nederlands accent.

i think because he knew tucker is not worthy of his emotions

In Dutch we call that "falling right through the basket".

@@Millbrook1974powderedwater Door de mand vallen?

@@yourrightiamwrong9643 Yep!

@@Millbrook1974powderedwater in German it would be doorgg den Korb vallen, durch den Korb fallen.

@Frits Bos Carlson's has always been like this or at least for a long time.

Tucker Carlson made up only 20-40% facts. The rest is imagination show. Fox even stated that Tucker is not to be believed 100%

It's hard to fight facts with facts when you're on the wrong side of the argument.

That’s all republicans. Did you see Ben Shapiro’s interview with a REAL conservative Andrew Neil from BBC? Ben broke down like a child. When they realize they have no talking points or comebacks, they hurl insults and break down

Tuck wouldn't know facts if it ate his kids then ran for president

Why would it get taken down?

@Edge Knows Everything No I don't lol

For the same reason why they didn't air it

@@nochtizzle7 because RU-vid is so conservative, gotcha.

The cuts against the right... It ain't going anywhere buddy.

@Joe Smith -- Tucker seems to be pretty quick to call other people morons when they see through him. I think he's off balance whenever he realizes he's not the smartest guy in the conversation. Which is often, apparently.

Hahah, I'm seeing this in Germany and I come from Brazil. It is worldwide. Tucker is the only true absolut moron.

The fact it is trending shows you that it is exactly what google and the government want

johan koridon -- that implies that Google controls what people see and the government controls Google. Neither of those things is true. The more people click on something, the more visible it becomes. If people didn't KEEP clicking, it wouldn't STAY visible.

@@Grizabeebles project veritas as explained by the people at google literally contradicts you. And that is directly from the mouth of google 🤦🏻‍♂️

That's what guilty people do when being confronted with the truth haha.

He was triggered , but he wasn’t aware of it . When you notice you are triggered , you wil never be derailed . Not easy . 😩

godisbollocks He spoke truth to power, not saying Carlson is powerful but his owners and their influential poison is quite

@@Th3Snipe By that logic CNNs jeff Zucker dictates to his biased fake reporters what to say, and jeffrey katzenberg dictates to TYT Cenk uygur what he says... Tuckers reaction was dumb, he couldve called him out on unsubstantiated claims instead of insulting him, true, but that doesnt make what the guy said right.

@@Th3Snipe That's also how some people react when attacked three times ad hominem and at the same time being one of the very few persons in the MSM who do not deserve it.

v

And yet, it's entirely logical... But, in fact, Fox didn't air this!

Yes, but there is something going on. He gets more and more under pressure.

That’s because his audience are a bunch of numbskulls!!

@@jameses4413 Whilst Tucker should not have lost his temper (who doesn’t occasionally?) the audience will be aware that the top 1% of earners pay 40% of all federal tax, meaning they hold up the 47% of the population who pay zero tax. That matters more to the average person than the fact that Tucker lost it for a moment.

@@thesethreekings No. You missed the point. The point is that the ones who should be paying 40% tax AREN'T PAYING IT. That means programs designed to to take the people paying 0% into earning enough to actually pay taxes aren't being funded or don't exist at all. When Netflix, Google, and Amazon don't pay full taxes on their profits, the people working 2 or 3 jobs are just getting a punch in the face. When mother's who want to work can't because they would never afford childcare, they're getting a punch in the face. When someone is trapped in a job with a sh%tty boss, or a dead end career, or pathetic wages because if they leave, they'll lose their healthcare insurance cover for them or their children, and there is no free healthcare to allow them to improve their lives and the economy, it's a punch to the face. And people avoiding tax, or paying pathetic rates of tax at the top - crying the whole time "but if we pay more tax, the economy will starve" - they're the ones punching us in the face. And they pay the wages of people who've TAUGHT you that to pay more tax will hurt you. Well...they would say that, wouldn't they? Yet the most successful period of American history economically (other than Clinton) was under a 90% upper tax bracket. You're being lied to, and being taught to protect your very oppressors because they don't want you to blame them. They want you to blame the poor for not being rich.

@HeavierThanLight That's what we are if you like it or not :)

We're not always sober though ;-)

@Henk I am...:)

@@emmyboeijink3788 I now transfer over at Schiphol now instead of Heathrow if I want to travel to asia or africa because the dutch are straightforward, friendly and don't act like the clowns at Heathrow.

Ohh fun fact I learned while visiting Amsterdam last year. Less people there smoke weed than in the US. Ik hou van jou Amsterdam! I hope that’s right.

Tucker Carlson owned with facts and logic.

It has the same effect on the dumbest right-wingers, starting with their leader Trump.

How dare he use facts on Fox whose viewer base has been proven to be the least informed.

No trumptard likes facts

11 million immigrants who cost the country billions in months

Poetry to my ears!

All Tucker does is criticize! Can't even take what he dishes out smh...

He should be upset for making millions of dollars and not being poor?

stephen barter he should be upset that he’s a soulless puppet that says whatever his master tells him to say. I guess it shows you would take any amount of money to be used for someone else’s needs ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

stephen barter so that’s really what you gathered from this.

This guy said aoc wasn't controlled a year later aoc votes for Pelosi and undermines the left again lmao tucker made him like like the weak soy boy he is

@@fredogee8108 Okay, but we're talking about Carlson being triggered by this.

@@fredogee8108 imagine unironically saying things like “soy boy”... yikes

@@fredogee8108 also, wouldn’t Tucker be the “soy boy” because he chose not to air this on his show?

That's how it works. He learned from his hero Donald Trump, I guess.

Projectionism

How did he own him? By vomiting the most inane and inaccurate drivel about how raising taxes is good? Do u understand ppl like Bill Gates will never pay taxes, ever. These ppl and corporations are beyond taxation bc for one they own too many stakes on banks and for two they get the lesser riche people's taxes and YOUR tax money funnelled through governmental corrupted agendas which pay their multiple fraudulent ONGs and so on.

@@krystal7958 Do you...know what an ad hominem is? What was said about Carlson's character were statements of fact that are directly relevant to the conversation that was being had. That is, by definition, NOT an ad hominem argument.

@@moatef1886 How are they relevant?

That silence is so unnatural I doubted it's nature immediately...

"Hello darkness, my old friend..." Someone should make a meme of that.

Carlson get's very flustered and inarticulate twice very quickly in this clip. As many people here have already said, Carlson should really have thought through where this interview was likely to go.

Nah, he was just bumping into those fat soft belly's of the billionaires surrounding him ;-)

Tucker is the best, he only talks to idiots the way he does with this one

I lost it!! Old man Tucker did NOT like being spanked like a baby intellectually by this dude!! Thank you Rutger Bregman!

@@allisond2689 if you think that's what happened there. Your just as Dutch brained as the sheep.

@@libtardtearmaker9312 Lol, trying to use being "Dutch-brained" as an insult? Facts are usually more effective than name-calling. Remember that next time you try to do any more self-castigating internet exchanges.

@@libtardtearmaker9312 you poor snowflake

ApatheticSaiyan i

Putin vows to target US with nukes if Trump deploys missiles in Europe The Sun news.. Talk about timing!!???

Jack Veneno yeah, this and the silence in Pence's Munich speech, are a fun relief

can't

you lefties have REALY sad if that is therapeutic, no wonder you are on drugs and suicidal

@@kinggg376 Truth hurts right? LOL

What's bad about that?

TWD1176 he’s saying what the billionaires pay him too

The historian is also a millionaire funded by billi9nairs though.....

Cool and your point?

@@laxhiggins that if you were actually using your brain you'd realize that's not an argument and doesn't mean anything?

😂 well said!

I'm a simple man, I see Dutch blunts and I upvote.

I love it how cool and well spoken he was

His arguments could work in perfect world. There is max point when high taxes make less revenue. Information and value can also flow between countries. Soon even more in tokenised form. How to self correct from escalating taxing when there is no one left to tax? Only if we allow governments to control everything there can be totally fair taxing. I prefer using inflation as more fair "taxation" device and it doesn't need police state to work.

@Cynthia Drangus Lady, ahh are you unhappy with Tucker, poor little you. Now back to your safe space.

He should of aired it, he didn't get "owned" but did lose his cool

@WEEDLORD BERNIE SANDERS 2020 lmao you are quite large-brained aren't you?

@Martien de Jong For example that one time Richard Dawkins (I think it was him) lost his temper with some zealous fanatic.

Martien de Jong what specifically was dishonest about Bergman’s “tactics”?

Sounds like every discussion I've ever had with a leftist, illiberal liberal, or the all too numerous, intolerant "Preachers of Tolerance" ... & then they run off, because they've suddenly developed a time constraint, of the most dismissive nature. How true, How true. KOut