Now that I think about it, whenever we see videos recorded in old camera from the 90s it early 2000s, the distortions that come up occur along lines instead of the whole picture
Thank you! I watched three explanations on this before your video, and you are the FIRST person to explicitly state that the "half frames" indeed do not play at the same time in interlaced video.
Just a little addition: LCD TVs don't turn off the inactive lines in interlaced mode anymore. They just keep the last frame. Old CRT monitors did that this way due to technological reasons.
You actually made it understandable. I can't understand anything from other channels explaining it as if I already know what it is wich makes no sense but these channels have million of views and its not Worth the views at all whereas you sir made it "explaining friendly" in a way that made me understand more than I expected with just a white board and your hands. I have to thank you for that. Thanks for the video 🙏🏼
Thank you for this rich video, although I’m working in tv industry, yet couple of days ago I came across these two words (Progressive & Interlaced). I’ve asked the person who dropped these words on us “what do they mean?” Unfortunately he didn’t have an answer for me. But now you came and simplified it to us and added a great knowledge to my experience. Big like and subscribe to your valuable channel.
Your videos are amazing. You make a concept I thought would be really complicated, very easy to understand.
5 месяцев назад
Thanks my man, all this sleight of hand🤲 was going on while I was trying to understand why my provider was recommending I view a program in, 720p, or higher (P) when I thought 1080i was much better range of quality!
Your channel is amazing, keep up the good informative work. I learned a lot by just watching 2 videos. I’ll be keeping my eye on your channel to learn more about tech. 😃 thank you!
Лучшее объяснение на английском. Уровень терминологии 11 класснику должно быть понятно. Браво! Всё очень доходчиво. Буду смотреть остальные видео с канала. Лллойс однозначно
great info and knowledge watched the viedos explaining 1080p 4k 8k also very good info, i always had a suspion that how can two diffrent size screens have same amount of pixels and claim a specific quality now i know it depends on their definiton of rows and not pixel density which truly makes the diffrence
Love this aswell after just watching you TV resolution video.. thankyou so much! You made it sound so simple and easy. Now to watch the FPS video now lol.
I have acknowledged you as one of the greatest youtuber❣. You have explained this concept crystal clear and your lectures are the only ones I've given 100% of my attention.
very nice video. One question. In conclusion wich is better to leave our TV's on ''1080p'' or change it to ''1080i'' as for the broadcast or satellite channels? If we see at properties 720p 30 we change our TV to progressive and if we see 1080 60i we are choose interlace?
TVs since plasma and LCD are progressive displays just like computer monitors, so they deinterlace all interlaced input - or a cable settop box does that before outputting deinterlaced 1080p signal into TV. Were there ever 1080i CRTs capable of displaying such signal without the need to deinterlace?
How did you come about this knowledge btw? I've found some websites that explain some tv concepts but not all of them. If there are books, please let me know. If you have an engineering degree, I'll take your word for it and leave things there. LoL
@@Babblingboolean But there are no full 1080p channels on cable. So isn't it just a de-interlaced 1080i signal from the cable box sent to the tv as 1080p? I heard that it was better for the tv to do the de-interlacing itself because they have more advanced technology???🤷🏾♂️
Intellectual video....I think 1080p and 1080i are same but that's not... thanks bro ...bro I have a question... 720p @60hz is good option or not for purchasing a TV... please tell me bro
True that I can hardly tell the difference between 4K and 8K, given I compared a 65 inch TV in Electronic Store. The bigger problem I think 8K or more doesn't worth the money is that, our TV shows, Blu-Ray Disc, Netflix, Games etc are all recorded/designed under 1080P or 4K max today. Buying 8K TV but still playing the same 1080P or 4K content seems idiotic to me.
I can definitely tell (over the years) the HD quality between different channels. The BBC, ITV, C4 & C5 channel quality is becoming better than Sky, apart from the nature docs for some reason.
IIRC there is no problem broadcasting with different fps; lower fps will be maintained, anything higher will be cut down. Higher fps just means sharper pictures during movement (and less blur when paused). Built-in video decoders in displays will extrapolate the frames and render the videos accordingly.
It saves on data transmission. Broadcasting in progressive means broadcasting full frames and more data. Investing into broadcasting more data can get quite expensive.
Another thing to mention about interlaced vs progressive: If you have DVDs, they ALL contain interlaced content. That's because when DVD standard was created, 99% of TVs were still the old, heavy boxes that millenials never saw and could only display interlaced content.
no. he means that there are 1080 lines of 1920 pixels. it scans as many times per second, as the frame rate of the broadcast. 25 times in europe and 30 in u.s. are the typical ones. for sports usually duobel that - 50 in europe and 60 in the stares.
The visual quality on a smaller screen is impossible for the human eye to tell a difference. It’s not worth making. It’s like...colouring a black piece of paper with a black marker. No real point.
@@jamessmyth3952 why i got that doubt is. we have mobile phones with 6.4 , 6.7 inch SAMOLED displays with 2340 X 1080 , 1080x2400 resolutions . So why can't we make 32 inch 4k TV with 1920 X 1080 , 3840 X 2160 resolutions.
@@jamessmyth3952 I don't think it will be expensive , because we have phones with 6GB Ram , 128GB storage , 64 mp rear camera , 32 front camera , SAMOLED display 6.4 inch , Snapdragon 730g processor , 7000mah battery for 23000 Indian rupees(Samsung M51). For TV we don't want that much of ram , storage , camera , processor . I think cost will be less. Sorry if I am wrong , it's just a doubt . I thought you are Wright person to ask these doubts.
James is correct. You can get phones with all these nice parts, features and specs because people continue to buy phones but not many people buy small TVs. Most people nowadays want bigger screens.
I don’t agree with you in something... in 1080p the P stands for pixels, if you turn 90degrees your explanation you have 1080 pixels repeated 1920 times. So for me the p is related for pixels. Although it does not mean that your screen has 1080 pixels, but 1080 pixels repeated 1920 times ;)
Even though “p” doesn’t stand for “pixel”, it’s not “100% incorrect”. It’s still true that there are 1080 PIXELS down. And then 1920 pixels across. So I don’t see the difference between calling it “progressive” or “pixels”.
And that's when the confusion starts about P's and the I's. I didn't know until I watch this video. It ended up in my feed for some reason, but that's ok. I used to wonder about the difference. I'm not changing my TV any time soon, but this information will help me to decide in the distant future when I get my 1st smart TV. Yes, I'm still using a dumb TV.
