TVO S James Gates on Does Reality have a Genetic Basis 

Cris isBliss lol

The sense of standards in teachers could be acknowledged by that statement.. lol

Most teachers don't really know nothing about didactic

have you cheked Johanan Raatz?

That’s a long time

Walter Russell the mystic broke it down in more clearer terms. His images are through mystical perception rather computer 💻 generated images or from Mathematical equations. But Walter Russell wouldn’t be able to explain it as scientific and Scientifically accurate as Dan Winter do, because Walter Russell was just a Mystic, in his time Computers 🖥 didn’t exist which means Walter Russell images was entirely through Mystical perceptions rather than Scientific work or equations , but Walter Russell Books 📚 The Universal One, The Atomic Suicide , The Secret Of Light and A New Concept of the Universe is a good start to learn his teachings and philosophy and Walter Russel was also a great Artist 🖼 . Dan Winter is more like Nikola Tesla because they both were great Electrical Engineers 👩‍💻 , legend has it that Nikola Tesla and Walter Russell was good friends. Rex should also interview with Sevan Bomar.

i love your comment

interesting insight ! :)

Ray SideCarDude Maybe we truly are just running a computer program and is our consciousness an unforeseen side effect, one that creates the sense of choice/free will but in fact merely that, a sense/delusion That would mean we are just in it for the experience and maybe an unexpected source of insight for those that run/ran the whole sim It would truly mean that things are actually maintained/stabilized by a single, (accidentally) aware fractal whose conscious experience is compounded of the "sensations" of every thing with the capacity to react to an other thing, as if those were all reporting their part of the "movie" (a sheer endless number of point of views) And there is philosophy again ;) and yup, the whole thing becomes meaningless

+Ray SideCarDude go drink ayahuasca and you can learn this all :)

+Ray SideCarDude may be in he experiment they is no variable to account for our position in the universe and the universes position in the ether and the movements of galatic bodies and groupings through this and what we are moving through and its effects on everything

looks like the flower of life, what i seen when i drank ayahuasca :)

WORD, but I'm short of cold ones, too bad.

Too funny but true ..All day my friend !

Absolutely 👍👍👍

your an idiot.

This sounds like an online dating profile... 😆

thank you for uploading this

ALwAYs_DRiVing No, you’re way oversimplifying things. I can think of MANY more likely explanations for these things you describe. You can’t jump to a single conclusion without evidence just because it sounds good, that’s not science. I see a simulation as one of the less likely scenarios, computer based simulations anyway. And no, it doesn’t boil down to just 1’s and 0’s, the universe has a much higher resolution than just digital bits. Some things use sets with a lot more values than just off and on, far more than binary. And it’s not all digital, some things being analog in nature with infinite values, vs digital which is always an approximation when attempting to convert analog to digital. There’s always a loss there. (Using those terms to describe values that are encoded digitally in the universe vs those which aren’t; like sound waves which have infinite variation, but if converted to a digital form, those slopes become steps due to the resolution of the digital encoding; those sine waves couldn’t exist if it all came down to digital at its base level). I happen to think he’s referring to the “DNA” of the universe, as you would think it would have some form of code to define it somewhere. That doesn’t have to mean it’s a simulation at all.

How do you think Seth MacFarlane and Matt groening know the the future?! They know the code!

They have its called the quantum computer.

HESSE IS GREAT !!!

The structure of matter fractal ? Read "Struck by Genius"

barbottawa I think fractals are fascinating - not necessarily from an artistic or geometric standpoint, but because their algorithms generate to infinity. I looked at some of Jason Padgett's videos and, while his story is interesting, the concepts he's stating are all already out there. His Tedx video was just him stating very obvious physics concepts and then extrapolating new agey ideas out of them. If you're into movies like "What the Bleep do we know" you might like where he's going, but I thought that movie was ridiculous. I'm really looking for scientists who are willing to question physics' sacred cows - speed of light not a constant, Ether existence, electric universe, validity of the double slit experiment, etc.

Reckless Abandon Wow.. nice insights. It's incredible what the Atomists were able to posit without any modern technology. How did it come to pass that Plato (possibly Egyptian trained?) came to push so much emphasis on the triangle. Loop theory is attractive... I especially like the granular idea of space (since I love Ether / Tesla dynamic theory) It seems those metrics might be able to describe both in a satisfactory manner. (Unless I'm missing something). I've always been really intrigued at the "magnetic lines of force" signature in even the smallest subatomic collisions. Since, like Plato I do believe in God, I like the idea of a fractal structure of the universe (who knows if we get technology to see past those crystal types). It seems to me that God would be infinite (Alpha and Omega) or even circular (starts back over). However I had a very interesting conversation with a Physics "shut in" named Stephen Mooney.. Here is what he wrote in regards to finite nature - "When I realized that the Universe is infinite in space and time (distance and duration) and that it involves finite construction possibilities across cosmology and biology, I explored the idea of a systematic representation of the number of possible types across cosmology and biology. This resulted in an arrangement of numbers and arrows which I called the paradigm of types and is located at home.spin.net.au/paradigm/type.pdf But leaving aside the idea of the paradigm of types, I have no doubt that the all attraction (including gravity and the nuclear forces) is caused by the absorption of emission which is composed of particles and that the gravity of the sun increases over time so that the end of the earth which result from it being drawn towards the sun. I don’t see any prospect of the physics establishment (the practitioners of the abstractionist paradigm) embracing my observations within this particular history of the earth." - Stephen Mooney

debunked

lol

+bmnftw1 more like real life lucius fox

Here's the thing. I've done years and years of research on complexity theory...which is arguably much more elegant and fundamental then Gate's theory. What Complexity theory points too however is the same conclusion...that the universe is a one way computation. This computation seems to have no purpose...it's merely an exploration of all possible states that a system can attain. The consequences of this simple concept, is that all states will eventually be explored, an infinite number of times. The only caveat, is that it takes a HUGE amount of time to actually get to the maximal complex state...on the order of gogle^gogle years. But it means that the life we are experiencing right now, is experienced again, slightly different each time as we go through all the different arrangement of states...there are states in which i am you and you are me, and we live that an infinite number of times...there are states where we don't exist at all in any intelligent form...It means that literally all states we can possibly think to explore are explored. So what is the purpose? There is none, and all of them...because we go through every possible purpose we could ever think of...it just takes a huge period of time. Go and watch Leonard Susskinds 3 lectures on Complexity and Gravity. Think about the implications of that lecture with respect to the universe rather then black holes and you realize that we are at the mercy of the same computational rules.

+d74g0n why would you put that out there the tree of life was the reason man was expelled from eden remember god said if they eat from the tree of life the becomes like us ....that means they cant be killed and they are better than us in all ways and you want the tree that belongs to them found and used all that will get is all of us killed and the human process starts over from zero

+d74g0n why would you put that out there the tree of life was the reason man was expelled from eden remember god said if they eat from the tree of life the becomes like us ....that means they cant be killed and they are better than us in all ways and you want the tree that belongs to them found and used all that will get is all of us killed and the human process starts over from zero

+raquel Ressallat if this is eden, let us be expelled.

+raquel Ressallat EDEN is the fourth dimension on the kabalah tree of life it is YESOD it is call the foundation it also represent the human body which is the sexual organ and also vital body, we can not excise in this place with out the vital body.we are trap in the third dimension because of SEX ,that is the fruit that the ESSENCE within the vital body took part in,but it was not GOOD it was EVIL,which is the ORGASM .The liquid in the vital body was never to be ejaculated out of the body because the liquid is LIFE. an if you wanted to bring forth a being into this place was a very delicate process, the man and the woman will practice SEXUAL MAGIC and the man will release ONE sperm and a grate master will come into this matrix of the third dimension. the ORGASM is FORNICATION. that is casting thousands of sperm into the Virginia

wow..Supersymmetry completely ruled out??? Thats insane! Isn't that Prof. James Gates entire research field. 0_0

SsikG not his entire research, but a lot of it.

Reckless Abandon wow, I didn’t realize that!

we are a different species

I loled a bit

You sat in the back of the class, didn't you. :)

I thought they did that on purpose?

Supersymmetry dear Watson - Supersymmetry,-

lottery teacher then

Lorissa Cook omg the Mandela Effect isn’t a literal thing. Nobody has been able to prove it, but they have been able to show the power of mass suggestion and highlight how poor our memories are about many things. As well as show how we mishear things, even current things. Every video I’ve seen attempts to show “proofs,” and it’s always stupid things like when a phrase is used multiple ways in a movie, or when a corporation changes its branding so that a sign changes. Or, just how many remember things differently. Most of the videos are highly dishonest, showing things they should know full well haven’t changed in the past, attempting to make it look like it has. And people gobble it up with no proof. Mass suggestion, mass hysteria. Also shows why mob rule (true democracy) is a horrible way to run a society (vs a constitutional republic like we have). If this isn’t a full-blown psyop, I’d be surprised. It does show how people will repeat misinterpreted information over and over though, further spreading nonsense.

+Kebra des Bois Because this guy is boring?

Eep Squared that is subjective and have more to do with one's interest/knowledge in the topic than anything else. ^^

Kebra des Bois I'm intersted in the topic but the way Gates presents it is dry, drab, and boring.

Eep Squared well, he's a mathematician... ^^

It all depends on what perspective you take, if you look at things from a matter perspective you'll have one story if you see everything as information/information flow and computation will tell another story both are identical just different pictures due to the perspective of the lens you see looking at things through.

Thanks for that intresting post

LittleBronzeGate even if it were a simulation, it is happening because we’re experiencing it. The pain and suffering isn’t less real if it’s a simulation, and we have to live with the consequences either way. So..

read descartes and baudrillard

I think Gates was onto Complexity Theory as it is today. Though i don't think Super Symmetry exists as it hasn't been shown at the LHC, The adrinkas are similiar to graphs or networks in a graph theory. Look up Wolfram's Hypergraph theory, and Susskind's lectures on Complexity and Gravity. Gates definitely wasn't blowin' smoke with universal computation.

​@@NightmareCourtPictures Dan Winter had great theory on Vortices.

Intelligence is measured by the ability to take a complex matter and simplify it, for others UNDERSTANDING.

Sean Fenn that’s what I was wondering too, it looks a lot like it.

Andrew Deen you did admit as an aside that you were stoopid as you put it. I don't agree with that self deprecating aspect of you necessarily , no one is smarter than you are, since you are all potentialities and stardust...jus sayin.

Bird Dog Nothing he is saying can be used by wicked people for evil. Those in charge already have all the power they need for their purposes anyway. Not sure what you _think_ he’s saying, but it’s nonsensical. There are not that many people who could understand this deep enough to use it for anything viable in the real world anyway, and nobody right now as it’s all just theoretical concepts. He never said we live in a computer simulated world, so if that’s what you’re assuming, you can stop right there.