Тёмный

Two Guitars, three Blue Chip Picks compared. 

Silly Moustache
Подписаться 9 тыс.
Просмотров 6 тыс.
50% 1

A Sunday morning (I think) just enjoying two of my guitars - a Bright maple bodied l-00 style with light gauge strings, and my Santa Cruz Roy Smeck style which is "all about the bass" (and middle) which, whilst also short scale (in he Gibson fashion) but wears medium gauge strings
This is a very unscientific attempt to compared the initial attack, sharpness, and tonality of the middle and treble tones using three similar picks with varied thicknesses on two very different guitars.
In truth, I'd forgotten that I'd done this and wasn't going to upload it , but yet another "what pick" thread emerged on the AGF so I thought I'd offer this for consideration.
I've done earlier comparisons of different brands and original TS picks - if interested, search for "picks" on my channel and you'll find two more videos, even more boring!

Видеоклипы

Опубликовано:

 

23 июн 2021

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 70   
@Silky-2727
@Silky-2727 3 года назад
In my younger days I preferred the snap of light weight picks. Now not so much. Good morning and thanks for a little back to back fun!
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi Silky, yes I agree, I think that most (not all) go to thicker picks as they develop their style. Thanks for watching. Andy
@steveb9325
@steveb9325 3 года назад
Good to see you Andy. Love your guitars, picks and post! They all sound good from here in Austin Texas home of Collings-Waterloo😊
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi Steve, thanks for the kind words. I have soft spot for Texas - due to my appreciation of Texan Singer-Songwriters: Guy, Townes, Steve, REK, Lyle, Joe, etc., I was invited to visit and stay with like minded folks in DFW, Austin, and Big Bend in 2004, and I was "drug back" again in 2005. I still can't believe that I drove from Austin to Luckenbach, to Alpine and drove right past Collings without realising it! However I did get to meet and chat with Bill whilst he was on a quick visit to the UK a while ago. Thanks for watching.
@steveb9325
@steveb9325 3 года назад
@@SillyMoustache love this story Andy! Well I'm sure you've had many and yet another from me again"...its an open invitation Buddy. We'll get drunk on Bar-b-q-beer. I've got enough guitars to supply Eric Clapton and his guitarist mecca shows. I'm more than sure you'd like a couple of them. So, come on down anytime Buddy!
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
@@steveb9325 Thanks Steve, you invitation is appreciated but I fear that my travelling days are over.
@jeffgrimshaw2480
@jeffgrimshaw2480 3 года назад
Thanks for the comparison! I really didn't expect to hear much difference, but I was very surprised to find that I much prefered the 1.6 in all cases. I use 2.0 myself for bluegreass and old time playing. The mandolin player in our little group swears by her Blue Chip. On a side note, thank you very much for introducing me to 12-fret dreadnaughts! I am now the proud owner of a Larivee D-60. It's very loud, articulate and is able to hold its own in a jam setting.
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi Jeff, the TAD40 -s a 1 m/m, the TAD 50 is 1,25 m/m, and the TAD60 is 1.5 m/m and I think they make them up to 2.,5 m/m. Would that guitar be an SD60 ? I had a 2004 SD50 LSH-TSB - which meant hog B&S with large sound hole and total sunburst. and, of course 1 & 7/8" nut width. It was rather special. I only made one video with it : ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-PRb-CZzVbt4.html Thanks for watching.
@jamesbrulatour6682
@jamesbrulatour6682 7 месяцев назад
I had a TAD48. I gave it to my buddy who plays a Taylor I always thought sounded skinny. He was converted. Ordered a 40 and was much happier. Win win!
@sc5759
@sc5759 3 года назад
I have a TAD40 and a 50. My TAD50 is rarely used but I love the 40 on just about any of my guitars. Great picks and worth the money in my opinion. Great video.
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi Shaun, I use the TAD40s on guitars with lights - 000 and smaller and TAD 50s on dreads etc., with mediums, etc. Email me, let me know how you guys are getting on, Andy
@mojo6778
@mojo6778 3 года назад
I enjoyed your demonstration and comments on the different thickness. I have never gotten to use a blue chip pick, but plan on getting one. I have found a difference in tone when using picks of different material and different shapes. I have noticed what seems to be a brighter tone when using same material but thinner thickness. Also it seems like a thicker pick produces a slight increase in volume if the attack is the same. I have a Bedell '64 OM which is sitka top /mahogony back and sides. I tend to use the more rounded side of the pick when strumming to get a warmer tone and the pointed tip for a brighter tone. For my dreads I normally use the Dunlop Tortex 88mm pick and for my OM I use the Dunlop Ultex Jazz III which is 1.38 mm. I didnt realize the 1.38mm thickness until I just looked it up, but this pick just sounds better on the OM, that may explain why I prefer the rounded corner as it is a thicker pick out of different material. Have a great day!
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi Mojo, thanks for your comments and observations. One of my experiences with my first BC was the large triangle and the benefits of it. I know that you can order BC triangles with one rounded corner - for just the way you mentioned. All the best, Andy
@DubMartin
@DubMartin 3 года назад
Nice “experiment” Andy. This parallels my own observations. I’ve also noticed that string gauge and tension are important factors. You kept those constant in order to focus on the pick differences. I’ve been using Optima VintageFlex low tension strings lately to accommodate my aging fingers and noticed that a heavier pick (BlueChip Jazz LG 60, cut down to a shape I like better) allows me to get the same sound from my Martin Dreadnoughts that I enjoyed with the D’Addario EJ17s. (Nice guitars by the way.)
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi Mark, interesting observation. I've hardly played my dreads in the last year or so , so when I started working up a playlist for a an upcoming open air concert, i was surprised how I found the extra tension hard to adjust to. Still on the EJ17s for the big guys so far though. Thanks for watching.
@philkaelin9779
@philkaelin9779 3 месяца назад
Thanks for this! I preferred the Tad 60 on both guitars. Also great for mandolin. Just depends on what you want to hear. Thanks again!
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 месяца назад
Still discussing this with myself!but I do see myself moving toward the thicker picks as they seem to hurt my arthritic thumb a little less.
@ronchappell216
@ronchappell216 6 месяцев назад
Sorry, but just seeing this now. This is a great comparison and I belatedly appreciate it! A couple of years ago I purchased a Blue Chip and was really disappointed with the pic. I'm a novice player of over 50 years, mostly using flat pick. The one I purchased is the 60 which really seems to mute my Taylor 714 - which tells you a lean toward a bright clear tone. I just pulled it out again to compare again and really wish I'd gotten maybe the 40. I can see that the material in the Blue Chip is very nice and the feel of the bevel feels very well made. My playing probably just doesn't need the improved pick so much. The pick that I do love was given to me a couple of years ago. I'd never seen it before and for me it was something of a revelation. It is the Fender medium gauge with the soft rubber grip. For me the quality is suitable and the tone I get sounds great to my ear. And the obvious best thing is the control I feel holding the pick . . . and hardly ever have to shake a lost pick out of my sound hole! Anyway, thanks for this video. It has always been amazing to me how much the pick can affect the tone of an acoustic guitar.
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 6 месяцев назад
Hi, It might be worth checking out - Blue Chip used to offer to exchange picks - if yours shows no sign of use. I use TAD40s (1 m/m) on smaller strings with light gauge strings and TAD 50 (1.25 m/m) for dreads, and that Roy Smeck Jumbo with mediums. I have a couple of TAD60s which definitely accentuate the bass side of the spectrum. Not familiar with the Fender pick, but remember that we "hold" picks, not "grip" them. This might help : ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8yFXH2wGyfM.html
@jonahswager4892
@jonahswager4892 3 года назад
thank you for all of your videos, I'm a big fan of your channel! I find this video interesting because I've always thought that you used pics that were too heavy for your playing. personally I use a . 9, max.. the heavier the pic, the better the tone and less room for error, as the detail is accentuated... if a heavy pic is not gripped tightly enough, the "pic noise" is more of a scratching sound than with a lighter pic, where the pic noise is more of a controlled and pleasant strumming sound that we associate with acoustic guitar. anyway great video great guitars great pics I appreciate you and keep up the great work!!!
@jonahswager4892
@jonahswager4892 3 года назад
and thank you for turning me on to Eastman!
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi Jonah, firstly, thanks for your kind words. Of course the choice of picks, strings and guitars is always a personal one, and no one option will suit everyone. I'd respectfully disagree that the heavier the pick the better the sound as it "depends" on the variables (Molly uses 2.07 m/m picks). Pick noise (click) also depends a lot on the pick material and the polish and bevelling. One doesn't need to grip a heavier pick harder, something that I often need to school my zoom students about. Overall, I'd say that whilst I think Blue Chip picks are the best available on the market, no single pick, shape, material is going to suit everyone, and its great to read your points of view, thanks, Andy
@herschelrector8218
@herschelrector8218 3 года назад
@@SillyMoustache Thanks for the videos and the sound advice. I have recently "discovered" Blue Chip picks and so far prefer the TAD 40. I think your advice that choices related to guitars are always a personal one. I am currently viewing your video of "Stuff That Works" to learn that song. I like your embellishments to the basic tune. I don't carry a tune well so the additions to the melody are attractive to me and attracts the listeners attention way from my vocals.
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
@@herschelrector8218 Hi Hector, thanks for the kind words, and if you feel you would like one to one zoom lesins/sessions, please let me know - my e-mail addy is on my "about" page.
@2628064379
@2628064379 3 года назад
I think 50 on both guitars. I am amazed at the projection of the Waterloo instrument. I recently acquired a WL-12 and love it. As a fingerstyle player I love it's quick response, unique sound, and my ability to get various tonal colors on it. I wonder it it's lite construction has much to do with it. It reminds me of my lutes which have those same characteristics.
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi Bill, Funny but when I got my WL12 home, I didn't like it at all - it was just so much better than the new Gibsons in the store. So i hung it on the wall in my little office where i spend so much time -with talk radio on. then i started a whole load of hospital appointments for my upcoming cancer treatment, and left it there for some time. After a while, I got it down and it had opened up remarkably. I think that immediate response that you mention is the maple back and sides. Just like with archtops - I "perceive2 that maple is a sort of colourless tonewood - it doesn't change the tone of the top like hog r rose - it just bats it back and out. That's my daft theory anyway. Thanks for watching.
@susanroycroft89
@susanroycroft89 7 месяцев назад
Yes indeed I have experienced the same, so depending on what I want the guitar to do, eg, rhythm or finger/ picking, I make my choice, generally, the harder the pick the brighter the sound I, I'm 73 now been playing since 13,14 years old, & always wondered why some acoustic's sound so different. It reflects of course the way the guitar was made & if fingers or a pick of Some description was used when playing ( Took me years to Finally learn that) and now Just love playing my Acoustic's ( all 10 of 'em) 😊😊😊
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 7 месяцев назад
Yes, everything affects the sound of an acoustic, woods, age, et up, design, strings, picks and of course, the player. I I know a guy that can make almost any instrument sound superb, and some others that can make a guitar want to lay down and die!
@twangmeister
@twangmeister 3 года назад
I like the sound of the thickest pick on both guitars, but then I prefer a fuller, smoother sound anyway. I use a 2mm cheap as chips Dunlop Gator Grip pick myself. I think the Delrex plastic used on those picks smooths the sound out even more.
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi, yes, of course it is down to personal preference, and, I guess we all hear differently, especially old guys like me with age related hearing loss. Thanks for watching.
@sam-ww1wk
@sam-ww1wk Год назад
60 is the pluckiest on the WL, and to my ears the least dynamic in resonance. Like you said, " tad dull" comparatively, but nice tone still. I find the same with my 2mm on my light gauge. Learning a lot from your vids. Thanks
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache Год назад
Thanks for watching Sam,
@texhaines9957
@texhaines9957 3 года назад
Thanks Andy. 5 decades ago I used a light gel pick on my acoustic. Added more finger picking. 3 decades ago, a new guitar, songs and the need for different picks. Your Waterloo sounds good with the light and medium picks for what I would play/ sing on that guitar. I liked the medium pick on the Santa Cruz. Getting older, voice and tune changes, I use a variety of pics from 0.76 to 2.0. I haven't tried the Martin pick yet. You still putting a bevel on those or do they come with one?
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi Tex, no I've given up on the bevelling - BCs and Wegens are all I've needed, but I have been introduced to a couple of other makes that might make an interesting comparison video. Thanks, as always.
@kenschachsieck1357
@kenschachsieck1357 3 года назад
I was taught that the lighter pick should be used when strumming quickly, heavy pick used for notes, melody, i.e. thin for pinball wizard, heavy for roundabout..etc..that's probably bunk..I am primarily fingerstyle so what does it matter..that is a gorgeous Santa Cruz!!
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi, yeah, it probably is, what you said, but then I've never played either of those numbers! i think that we flat pickers just progress up the thickness levels until we fing the optimum and stop. Maybe that's just me tho'! Thanks for watching.
@MountainHomeJerrel
@MountainHomeJerrel 2 года назад
Thanks for the comparison. Does anyone make a multi-thickness pick? One side would be thicker, and if you flip the pick 180 degrees, it would be thinner, to allow a single pick that can be used for both strumming and picking single strings. Am I just having a fever dream and this Frankenstein pick is a terrible idea?
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 2 года назад
Check your temperature, and stop strumming!
@MountainHomeJerrel
@MountainHomeJerrel 2 года назад
@@SillyMoustache Gotcha!
@Gelsenbury
@Gelsenbury 3 года назад
Very interesting to hear this comparison, where the thickness is the only variable. To my ear, the thinner picks bring out more treble and the thicker ones create a mellower but also duller sound with less noise but also less sparkle. They all sound good in their own way, though, so the answer remains "It depends". If you like the Blue Chips, have you tried Hawk picks or the Gravity Gold Series?
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Interesting! Hi, my initial answer was going to be that I've stopped looking for picks, as I've found Blue Chips. .... but you peaked my interest, so I googled to discover that both are British makes. I may order one fromn each to investigate.Which ones do you use?
@Gelsenbury
@Gelsenbury 3 года назад
@@SillyMoustache I think Gravity is based in California, but there's a UK importer now. I play mandolin and I'm not very good, so it probably won't help you to know what I use ... I'm still trying out a lot, but I'd say Hawk and Gravity Gold are of a similar quality to Blue Chip with slightly different tonal characteristics. You like the triangles, so a Gravity Gold Striker or Hawk SB may suit you. I can lend you mine if you like.
@jntroisi
@jntroisi Год назад
50 for me. I have a TAD-1R 80 and a TD 100. Going to pick up, no pun intended, a TAD-1R 50 and TD 50. For really crisp and bright, I've found Graph Tech TUSQ unbeatable
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache Год назад
I believe that choice of picks is as personal as socks or underpants.
@wrightwrjr
@wrightwrjr 4 месяца назад
I know this video is two years old, but I just saw it. I have never used a Bluechip pick, but I when I pIay guitar 95% of my playing is strumming as I sing. I have always been told by other guitarists who are better than I am, and a few of them are professional guitarists, that Bluechip picks aren't for strumming, they are more for flatpicking, or speed picking if you will. I've never seen the need for a $50 pick when mostly what I do is strum a guitar using open chords.
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 4 месяца назад
Hi, I was sure that they were a scam, but they aren't but they aren't mandatory, so if you are happy with what you currently use, then that's fine. All the best, Andy.
@kingrobert1st
@kingrobert1st 3 года назад
Be on your guard...there's a pick coming your way! Robert Pickguard!
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Really? I shall be on pick guard!
@andrewreynolds2647
@andrewreynolds2647 3 года назад
Hi Andy, I have looked into these blue chip picks and my belief is that snake oil is heavily embedded in their advertising, it is all of course a subjective and a personal preference issue, I believe the only three things that affect the tone or attack from any pick is its gauge, surface shape, and the material from which it is manufactured, I do not have your skill or tonal ear so me paying the outrageous sums for these picks for me is a waste of time. I look at it very simply a pick is a pick is a pick, as a player I have found using a harder, thicker, smaller pick is amazing for control on my electric guitar when playing lead lines in particular, on my acoustic a Gordon giltrap gg 2000 I find either a medium or light works equally well but I prefer the slightly heaver pick for chordal strums with picked out lead lines. As I have said hugely personal, I have great respect for your musicianship and knowledge but your tonal ear is much more acute than mine, I honestly, could hear very little difference that couldn't be explained by pick gauge in your demo. No offence intended as I really love your demos, just this one has left me a bit perplexed as to the added value spending this amount of money on a pick, would it in reality contribute anything meaningful to anyone's overall sound. Cheers. Andy Scotland.
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi Andrew, and thanks so much for your honest thoughts. Would you believe that I initially felt exactly the same as you when I first heard of the $35 pick. I'm on record on certain forums as shouting SCAM! on those of us that will pay anything for some miracle accesory. I can't remember how I got my first one, either via ebay or someone sent me a used TAD40 (large triangle). I immediately bought up every similar sized and thickness of pick that was on the market, and learnt to polish and bevel them like the BC. I achieved that, but ... nothing compared to the BC pick. I gave up and bought a couple more,then decided to buy one for every flat top. Many said that they lose picks. You don't mislay $35 ones! and because of the extremely hard wearing material -they'll last a lifetime. BTW - you can buy one and try, and return it for refund if not convinced. (BTW - I am not affiliated to BC or Wegen,or anyone else). All the best, Andy
@andrewreynolds2647
@andrewreynolds2647 3 года назад
@@SillyMoustache Hi Andy, thanks for your thoughts i know full well your not associated with any sales malarkey, you know what, i am going to give one of these picks a go, i will let you know my thoughts, good or bad. Keep em coming i thoroughly enjoy your music and advice, in these very strange times we now find ourselves in. Cheers. Andy. Scotland.
@teeceedee7616
@teeceedee7616 3 года назад
Just wanted you to know in case you missed him & wondered: Arctic Hare said goodbye to this world May 8, 2021.
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Tracey, I'm not familiar with this person, but it is always sad to hear of the loss of a fellow guitar lover. My thoughts to his family and friends.
@joelgevirtz6181
@joelgevirtz6181 3 года назад
Interesting. I think that for both guitars the 60 is the darkest and the 40 is brightest. the 50 is somewhere in the middle. There seems to be more differences in pick weight for the SC. Personally, I like the heavier picks best on my guitars. True one has to work harder to get the attack right, but IMHO is is worth it for the "roundness" as you so aptly put it. It probably depends more on what the player likes in the way of sound and response. Nice video!
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi Joel, thanks for listening so closely to my little video demo. I agree about the dark vs bright analogy. I think it's something subtle that focusses more or less on the voice of each string -a subtle EQ if you will. I'll stay with my TAD 40s for my smaller guitars, and TAD50s for my dreads etc. Strangely, both these very different guitars were the longest I'd experienced to "open up" the SC being the longest, but when it did - makes me smile with every g chord! I have to say that I can't really feel the any difference in "effort" changing from one of these picks to another. Thanks as always.
@joelgevirtz6181
@joelgevirtz6181 3 года назад
@@SillyMoustache I have been using Jim Dunlop 208's. They are 1.5mm I think. Still can't flatpick very well, but the sound of these picks on both the D28 and D18 I have is wonderful! I also play both of these guitars fingerstyle. The Collings I have is really great for fingerstyle, and I don't use a pick with it. Of course, I pay close attention to all of your efforts. After all, you play well and I can learn a lot from you about the styles you play in.
@Turnpike_
@Turnpike_ 3 года назад
As a bluegrass player, I only use 1.0 and 1.5 picks. Anything less is just too floppy to keep Up.
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 3 года назад
Hi, it was probably my bluegrass years that set me in the same path. Thanks for watching.
@thehowlingjoker
@thehowlingjoker Год назад
What exactly is it about Blue Chip picks that people love and are soo willing to pay for? I honestly can't tell much of a difference, though that could be RU-vid.
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache Год назад
Hi Jamie, that is a very reasonable question. Firstly, I'd say that it would be unlikely for anyone, however tonally sensitive to such things would perceive a difference in a BC and another perfectly good pick. But the difference is in the feel and therefore the playing of the player. I have to say that I was very reluctant to accept the notion of the $35 pick, back in whenever it is and probably went into print to declare it a scam - until someone sent me one. Then I had to eat my words. So to answer your initial question as best I can: 1. The "speed bevels" which I first encountered on Wegen Picks, BC make a big thing about this form of polishing and finishing and for good reason, as it "eases" the contact between pick and string, and does, indeed speed the process. 2. The material itself ("vespel") was designed for complex engineering applications where bearings needed to be self lubricating and of very minimal wear, possibly for underwater, aerospace and other such complex applications. This means that they are essentially wear free and although not sticky to the touch easier to hold than other composites. They have, however broken the dam on expensive picks with many emulating them costwise, although no-one can use the material that is the essential ingredient. However, they are not for everyone, and I actually prefer Wegen picks (less flexible but equally well designed and finished) for 12 string and archtops. I hope that lengthy response hasn't bored you, but as did I , the only way to explore them is to get hold of one, and they do offer a returns policy . Thanks for the question.
@thehowlingjoker
@thehowlingjoker Год назад
@@SillyMoustache Ah, so it's more like a car. It's not soo much about how it looks, it's more about how it drives and handles. That makes sense. Thanks very much.
@lordofthemound3890
@lordofthemound3890 Год назад
50 all the way.
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache Год назад
If I only had one, I'd agree.
@jamesbrulatour6682
@jamesbrulatour6682 7 месяцев назад
First of all…I don’t think your moustache is funny. Quite handsome. I wear a grey handlebar under my nose. I use a TAD 40 on my D-28 with 11-54s. And, I am happy with it. But, I’d like to try different tools. What suggestions have you?
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache 7 месяцев назад
Hi James and thanks for the compliment. If your fingers and playing style permit, try putting some EJ17s or MA550s on that dreadnought, and try a tad 50, or maybe a Wegen tf120? - just a thought. Best, Ol'Andy.
@jamesbrulatour6682
@jamesbrulatour6682 7 месяцев назад
Thankee, Andy. I’ll try the one step heavier strings and the one step thicker pick. I’ll let you know!
@dallastoto3189
@dallastoto3189 Год назад
$40. For a pick? 😂
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache Год назад
No, just $35 but there is postage to be allowed for, which of course is quire expensive to the UK ,. However, I understand your point, as I was convinced that it was a scam, until someone sent me one. If you are a strummer who uses thin picks, then they are probably of little value to you, but idf you play more complex styles, then they are invaluable. After many years of trying this and that, and even now that many others have got onto the "boutique" pick market, nothing compares to the material that they use (Vespal) and their speed bevelling and polishing, which truly improves the sound and ease of your picking. I think the minimum thickness is 1 m/m, so if you prefer thinner picks - they aren't for you. If you are concerned about losing one, as was, then I have resolved that - See: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YLXtHaxXk38.html
@jhardworkingcanadiancitize9186
60 on that guitar, if you use heavy strings probly 40
@SillyMoustache
@SillyMoustache Год назад
No, mediums, so a tad50.
Далее
Sweetened Tunings and Capos
12:34
Просмотров 3,4 тыс.
Exceed Expectations: A Blue Chip Story
8:00
Просмотров 48 тыс.
BlueChip Thumbpick Size/Blade Comparison Video
11:56
Просмотров 19 тыс.
I Tried A BlueChip Pick Again!
9:07
Просмотров 4,2 тыс.
Pick comparison: Tortoise Shell, BlueChip, and Dunlop
14:17
Apollo vs Blue Chip Pick Comparison.
7:42
Просмотров 2,1 тыс.
Pick Bevels  - good or not good ?
9:22
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.
Султан Лагучев - Гасишься
3:02
Просмотров 301 тыс.
Stray Kids "Stray Kids" Video
3:25
Просмотров 1,2 млн
Gulinur - Yonor (Audio 2024)
3:11
Просмотров 485 тыс.
СЛОТ - С.М.Г.О.  (Official Music Video)
4:01
Просмотров 255 тыс.