Two More Wins with the Nakhmanson Gambit 

Totally agree. I hope Jonathan deletes these videos and never mentions it again. Please don't share! :p

give away one* piece.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8R8h0XU8T-8.html here they do not accept the gambit.

@@chessandmathguy in the beginning you throw away 2 pawns, a Knight, and a Bishop for 1 pawn and a check. To me that's more than a 1 piece difference.

@@andrewadami3920 you win the knight back though

Thank you very much! I'll be uploading our epic game soon.

@@JonathanSchrantz After watching your game which I believe was with Krishnaprasad, I opened up a gambit with some poor soul who I took advantage of two ways. My chess.com rating is not reflecting my true rating yet and I was paired with a weak player. Even after missing a killer move or two as you did, I still came out victorious. What an interesting opening. I can't believe it is practically unknown.

I learned & won my first game with the Danish Gambit yesterday. It felt EPIC haha 👍

Thanks a lot!

I found a solution(I think, just thought of it maybe you can try it out for me?) if they capture with knight instead of pawn you could play bishop g5 pressuring the queen. If it captures you play knight g5. If it makes a move like qf6 then you play rook e1 checking, then they kinda have to move kd8. From there you have a better position(in my head at least) and have their queen in exchange for the pawn and knight you sacrificed!

What'd you play?

Thank you!

Jonathan answers this question in his prior video ... look it up.

@@williamkyburz ok thx

The taylor opening in no way related! It is so clam and slow. This is...scary

My games with the Tayler haven't usually gone that way + have a good record with it so far (13.5/16), with a surprising number of quick wins!

Dense and divergent analysis, with everything presented quite quickly. I have no doubt that for other strong players, it is solid, helpful, and comprehensive. With all due respect, however, for the lesser chess mortals among your (potential) viewership, following along a seemingly never-ending progression of alternate ideas and lines, it becomes quite frustrating. Of course, one could view it over and over, I suppose, stopping and repeating the troublesome sections, until eventually all of the threads begin to take hold and coalesce into a useful set of ideas. If your intention is to target the higher-rated echelon of chess players, no problem. If your intention is to target the vast majority of lesser-rated players, then I believe that this video falls a bit wide of that mark.