Vantage Coverage: A Call for Clarity, Objectivity, and Humanitarianism Introduction: In contemporary times, media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion and disseminating information. However, the quality and integrity of media coverage have often been questioned. This essay aims to address concerns regarding media bias, lack of support for Palestine, the portrayal of Russia, and the need for increased transparency and humanitarian focus in media reporting. Support for Palestine: One area where media coverage falls short is in providing adequate support for the plea of Palestine. It is essential for media organizations to make a conscious effort to shed light on the struggles and aspirations of the Palestinian people. By doing so, media can help raise awareness and foster empathy, ultimately contributing to the resolution of this longstanding conflict. Indian-Israel Collaboration: The notion that India offered to work in Israel to replace Palestine is a mischaracterization. It is important to clarify that India's collaboration with Israel is based on bilateral trade, technology exchange, and defense cooperation. Such partnerships are not intended to undermine or replace the legitimate rights and aspirations of the Palestinian people. Humanitarian Concerns: The question arises: where is humanity going when media fails to prioritize humanitarian issues? Media outlets have a social responsibility to shed light on global humanitarian crises, including conflicts, poverty, and human rights violations. By highlighting these issues, media can foster a sense of collective responsibility and promote global solidarity. Media Bias and Ukraine Crisis: Accusations of media bias in portraying Russia as an enemy while neglecting corruption in Ukraine are valid concerns. Media organizations should strive for objectivity and fairness in their reporting. It is essential to cover all aspects of a conflict, including the actions and mistakes of all parties involved, without favoring one side over the other. By doing so, media can play a constructive role in promoting peace, understanding, and accountability. The Need for Transparency: The average media standards can be improved by promoting transparency. Media outlets should adhere to ethical journalism practices and provide accurate, verified information to the public. It is crucial for media organizations to maintain accountability and avoid sensationalism, ensuring that the truth is presented objectively and without distortion. Conclusion: Media plays a significant role in shaping public opinion and informing the masses. To fulfill its responsibility, media organizations must strive for clarity, objectivity, and humanitarian focus in their coverage. By providing comprehensive and unbiased reporting, media can contribute to global understanding, empathy, and the pursuit of truth. It is imperative that media outlets across the world embrace these principles, opening themselves up to the world and presenting the truth for all to see. Palkisharma vantage is his and hides truth and need to improve
I will say this I'm on my wife's RU-vid. the US and that's where I live but China has the largest Navy in the world but here's the catch to that largest navy a larger part of their vessels are small vessels they're not like destroyers in aircraft carriers and you know stuff like that it's basically smaller vessels which can do damage don't get me wrong but the US is still number one power when it comes to the Sea and are as far as the Navy goes and it's helped with Australia and when it comes to India and anybody else who is poked at by any other country in the world whether whether it be Russia or China or North Korea or any country that has wrongful doings towards us allies the US will always stand by other allies and fight beside them if we have to so that being said to me I've always look at India Australia South Korea Japan in Europe Israel and now Ukraine in Taiwan and and saying all of this I just have to stress that my country in the US has stated and stated very firmly that if China does go in and start a war with Taiwan we will back Taiwan 100% and that means with our military with our Navy and our air force and I hope that does not come to this I hope that we can find a way for peace just as I say when it comes to stability and the South China Sea where you have also the India Navy and Air Force and vessels traveling through and I don't know how the stability is around with Indian China but if it's anything like it is that your I pray for you guys because China is really starting to be aggressive with these other countries they act as if they are ready the only superpower in the world when the US is still a superpower itself and its allies that we consider our friends know that we stand beside them and as a superpower Nation when we stand beside any Nation in war we stand beside them 100% and as far as Ukraine goes I believe that they should still have more weaponry but I was scared to hear because I know that eventually their manpower would start running out they don't have as many people to put in the military as Russia does Russia is a country that they're not going to have a blitzkrieg in a war it's going to be a war of nutrition a war of who can last the longest and when they see one side is starting to get weak they're going to use that to their advantage the only way to defeat Russia is to keep on taking out every piece of artillery and equipment that they bring to the front lines that is the only way you're going to stop Russia winning. and just keep that going but I pray for a end to all these wars and pray for peace and stability throughout the world and I also hope that there comes a end to this wars😊 in both of Ukraine and Russia and in Israel in the Middle East when we all know that the only reason Hamas went in and did what they did was because first of all they hate the Israeli people secondly they were backed by Iran who boasted them up saying that they would stand behind them when knowing very well that Iran is not going to go to war with Israel in the Palestine sanctuary of word Hamas considered their and I think that that's what Hamas was expecting was it they were expecting Iran Jordan Egypt all these countries to stand up and say we're not going to have this and we're going to start fighting Israel ourself and it's just going to be a big warm we're going to win it all went at the end of the day none of them stood up they stand for the people to be safe in Palestine but as far as the Hamas leadership and soldiers I have no remorse for what they've done and killing those innocent people and I know that when Israel invaded and started killing the Hamas warriors and leadership that some civilians would get caught in some of these bombs because they live literally a room beside a regular everyday family and I think that when Israel does choked out the Hamas leadership and soldiers and if they can get a leadership to start a new and true good way of leading their country I think Israel would eventually give them back their border and give them back their home and their identity but as long as the Moses and power I see no peace with Israel and people seem to forget Israel might be very small country but look at the war they had back that people forget about they took out what it was three different countries in 7 days and that's never been done before by any superpower country is like the us or England or China or India any country that has a major military power or and navy and Air Force has never took on multiple countries and beat them within days other than Israel and the reason I say this is because people will not come back at me on this comment and say oh well the US they done it no we didn't when we went into desert Storm the first time we had a coalition that was all of our allies with us just like we had a coalition in the last war we had in Afghanistan and in Iraq we had our allies with us and we stayed that way we stayed at course all throughout world war 2 and ever since world war II are allies including India have always had America when it comes to any time that they need our help with anything now I know that there's some things that they might need some disagreements on but at the end of day the US still backs their allies in any possible way that we and I'm proud of that we might have our disagreements with things but other than that I'm proud of the us and what we have can accomplish in this world when it comes to this time of unstable this with Russia and Ukraine and China poking with Taiwan and also they poked at India at the border which I think at the end of the day I think if that war would have broke out or if that were does break out I think the Indian army would the repel China very I don't really believe that China is as good as they think as far as war goes that's just my opinion yes they do have good weaponry now but that doesn't mean that they're a great army they've never been tested the last war they thought was Vietnam and they but we also lost in Vietnam so you know that's not saying much but at the same time it shows you that a small country can defeat a great country it all comes down to what the people truly believe in and what they want for their their Nation God bless and I pray for peace around this world.
Ukraine was promised help for invasion for giving up nuclear weapons and they were invaded without warning by Russia. Educate yourself before commenting anything.
It doesn't mean that meglamaniac Putin had the right to attack a sovereign state. Lesson to learn here never give up your weapons and trust others with your security. ( Re Ukraine gave up Nuclear deterent.)
If supports NATO to ukraine but i think rusia now has built very important partnership(china,india,north korea ,africa ,etc...)because of economic growth and technology ,would not lose rusia anyone
So many lies! They started the attack on Avdiivka in October, they lost close to 100 000 soldiers to conquer a small village that was encircled for over 2 years.
avdiivka was fortified since 2014 as well, it is the most fortified base of Ukraine defense. West should help and send help now, they dont have anything like Bakhmut and Avdiivka left in Ukraine where they can scare advancing russian forces.
The China Taiwan issue is historical & should be leftvto China to resolve. Just the way America does not want external influence by an alternative Super power close to regions on its borders ( Monroe Doctrine) they should not overly engage with Taiwanese leadership. Most US allies cannot defend themselves, that makes US spend unnecessarily. Let them focus on their internal problems & there will be less global tension.
India and China should settle their disputes, and progress in peace and amity, without falling into traps set by former Colonial powers to keep us embroiled in interminable war ! India and China are compatible Asian countries; give up ths foolish muscle flexing and focus on going forward together !
The West is afraid of India China cooperation, and, therefore, foment misunderstanding and mistrust between the two Asian giants. However, it's up to China and India to be smart and figure out the way to solve the problem and embark on elevating the status of Asia.
For that both parties should be willing to settle. India is only defending, the offenders are the Chinese. They were on good terms once but Chinese army conducted surprise attacks and expanded their territories. And India does not want to be laid back regarding this and want to be prepared this time.
Not with chinas current thinking.They have a huge chip on their shoulder trying to make up for past humiliation but ultimately if they continue on the military path they will crash and burn because they dont have a lick of combat experience across the whole of they're military and they are going to pick a fight with america....Thats like a college kid training for his first fight and they throw him in the ring with Tyson fury.
My brother, China has not the slightest interest in or intention of settling its boundary dispute with India. It assumes that, as a bigger power, it will just grab Indian territory at will, as using Pakistan, keep India tied down. India just has to make the cost of Chinese aggression high enough.
Today's Narrative is so wrong and biased in itself. All we hear is "Chinese Aggression". Have never heard of American Aggression anywhere. In reality they are the real culprits. Period.
The West has spent hundreds of billions only for Ukraine to lose in the end.....Russia will have gained major territory....I think they're the winners in the end. @@kacperzimowski4626
Wrong … the Ukraine President is just a puppet. The puppet master is in control of his decision & neutral was never in the agenda. Geopolitics in play have disregarded the lives of Ukrainian people.
total bullshit, putin wants to expand russia, russia has no right to determing an independant countries right to decide for itself; if youre not a propaganda bot and you believe what you say ur a fool
@@lancecahill5486 Eventhough Putin said that collapse of the Soviet empire “was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century” and wants to reverse it?
Russia capturing Avdeevka is not its biggest win since Bakhmut. People seem to forget that Russia captured Marinka not too long ago, and moreover the Ukrainian counteroffensive didn't fail, Russia stopped that offensive, which is a great victory. Capturing towns and cities isn't how Russia is winning this war, although it may look that way on the surface. They are winning this war because they've been able to destroy the Ukrainian army. That is how you win a war, by destroying your enemy's army and not by capturing territory.
I agree totally. That is why smaller nations use guerilla warfare to defend their nations becuse in that case the doctrine does not apply. Examples: Vietnam,Afghanistan.Zhelensky, by opting for conventional warfare has destroyed his country and left behind mountains of potential debt required to rebuild his ruined cities for succeeding generations of Ukrainians to grapple with.
Avdiivka is strategic because its the next most fortified city after Bakhmut, the Ukrainians don't have the luxury of time to build another key fortification at the rear of Avdiivka so the Russians will continue to advance while Ukrainians retreat as they are exposed to direct Russia fire. Avdiivka have heabily fortified trenches and bunkers for troop protection
Ukraine will lose the war, but the major reason is not that western aid is drying up, rather it’s because Ukraine simply runs out of soldiers to fight. The average age of a Ukrainian soldier is in the 40’s. The most motivated people already volunteered 2 years ago, but most of them are already dead.
Ukraine has a population of 43 million. It has a lot of people. I've seen plenty videos from the front line. The average age is not 40. Lets not forget that Russia recruited inmates and about 1 year ago, more than 1 million russians fled to Georgia and the neighboring countries to avoid forced conscription. Russia now holds less land that it did at the beginning of the war and they are entering the third year. The only thing that can make Russia win is the lack of USA support for Ukraine. And let's not forget that Putin had to ask North Korea for help. That tells us how strong it is
Not really, thanks to this stupid war started by putin, democratic countries took this as a chance to get commies economy (both Russia and China) are having one hell of a economic crisis now
Ukraine Armed Forces has a manpower deficit, which no amount of Western funding can fix. The United States and its allies cannot fix Ukraine’s acute manpower problems without direct involvement in the conflict. The conflict is not trending toward a stable stalemate, but toward Ukraine's eventual collapse. Russia has withstood sanctions and improved its military, whereas Ukraine has gradually exhausted its forces. There is little realistic prospect of future Ukrainian territorial gains. Ukraine’s best hope lies in a negotiated settlement that prevents future escalation and bolsters regional and global security. If either side in the Russia/Ukraine conflict eventually cracks, it seems likely to be Ukraine. U.S. public rhetoric should demonstrate openness to peace talks instead of a belief that the conflict ought to continue indefinitely.
From Egypt... fantastic palki you're presenting impressive information and you're making me excited when you're beginning your topics... it's impressive issues today.. super analysis
Thr British decided the border without Beijing's consent. Britain planted the seeds of quite a few conflicts. This is the truth that the biased western media doesn't mention. In 1962, the PLA could have reach New Delhi, but turned back. China has no interest in taking any part of India. Just certain border areas they think should be theirs. I hope both sides can freeze their disagreements.
Don't worry. Won't be anything big this time. But after the Pacific War... ... India will be dealing with a might that can crush against US and Japan forces... ... That's when India will have to put up a good show. And only when China will turn its attention to India, and concentrate its might to the challenges of India. So for now, you will have your peace.
I think the loser has been established now that Russia has found its footing in the horrible conflict.The only question remaining are how much territory the Ukraine is willing to lose .
how much territory will be TAKEN from it. And the russians are not interested in anything that did not belong to Novorussia before. Nobody in his right mind (and I mean Putin) would want to take over Ukraine, it is a basket case
@@dorienberteletti2129 Yeh that problem originates &could end in Brussels/DC . When it dawns on them that Putin has successfully pushed Ukraine borders back across the Dnipro it pretty much becomes mute .That whole area will become a DMZ &the Ukrainien inhabitants can choose to live in relative peace as before or be exiled across to the newly created boundaries . Russia will never have a hostile NATO aligned country on its borders regardless of who runs the Kremlin .That was always known &respected by the old conservite cold war types but changed with the liberalization of Euro&DC idioligs ie:Globalist.
And even then, if Europe overdid it and attacks Russia, Putin would turn Europe into a pile of dust. Don't shit next to bear cave it's dangerous. Unfortunately we live in world when a lot of important people feign hearing loss or dementia...
Thank you for this important information. Very impressive news script. In the role of supporters, let's recognize the extensive talent, time, and effort invested in this project. This is an opportunity to express thanks to the esteemed Bagramon rescue team for their exceptional efforts. Your dedication adds greater meaning, significance, and hope, and we truly appreciate your commitment. The professionalism and articulate reporting by credible and intelligent journalists provide the best coverage, delivering crucial, recent, and relevant information. Their fair and unbiased reports, objective analysis, and comprehensive reporting are truly admirable. The level of professionalism and immaculate reporting is beyond words.
oh, i thought putin was getting arrested, russia lost half of their troops, that ukraine will win at the end of 2023... where did all of those claims suddenly go?😂
Ukraine was ALWAYS going to lose, no matter how many weapons and munitions the western powers sent it. Russia is fighting for her national security and will never give up until it is secured.
😂😂Russians with shovels, washing machines, rusty rifles beat NATO, and the USA or NATO with the most modern best weapons, with billions of dollars, lost all wars against shepherds with hunting rifles from Vietnam, Korea, Laos, Somalia, Serbia, Afghanistan.... strange times😂😂
And what makes you think putin keeps threatening nukes if truly that is NATO and USA fighting on the ground? It takes a wise analyst to tell who is the strongest; the one fighting with support for equipment from sympathizers, and the one who actually provides equipment for themselves. Or should we also say Ukraine is fighting against Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and South Africa ?
@@alimamybangura1399 not a single statement has Putin threatening nuclear weapons he said a hundred times that Russia has a law that provides for the use of nuclear weapons only in cases when the state is threatened by an attack by another nuclear state with nuclear weapons and when there is a danger that the enemy will destroy Russia..... no one has ever seen a single Korean, Chinese, Iranian...soldier in the Russian forces... no one has ever seen a single tank, armored vehicle, missile system....from the mentioned countries.... except BBC CNN pentagon....there is only one problem there is not a single video....and the drones are filming day and night...
@warukraine9650 he did not threaten nukes but had deployed some in Belarus. This is how we we know lazy and weak people. NATO is the last organization he will mess up with he knows that. A three days military operation is now entering a three year war with just a small Ukraine. That was how you dug Sadam Husaine's grave.
The US soldiers fighting in Vietnam were not allowed to advance and hold ground but were stopped short by their commanders who ordered them to leave their hard won positions unguarded and move around continually, as it was a depopulation tactic politicians and their puppet masters had schemed up. It only enriched the manufacturers of weapons and their supporters/politicians through lobbyists. That's what I was told by those who fought there. Wars are fought for the rich and powerful, not for our freedoms.
Isn't this what many objective, unbiased commentators and experts were saying from day one itself? Joining in just now is rather late, but anyway, never too late.
India are you still getting cheap oil from your buddy PooTin. You need to tell the full story of Avdiivka, you are having amnesia about how many Russians orcs died fighting in the meat grinder. Like PooTin you don’t talk to your audience about this 🤬
It's our choice from whom we should buy oil. You keep on buying the same from us. Also death of Navalnay is not by Putin because there is no reason for Putin to kill his opponent as it will only create more issues for him. But who killed Putin Aide's Son? Keep your bullshit with yourself.
@@jonathanbryant7166 It won't be a game changer of anything, because UNSC permanent membership only gives you the right to veto something that is passed already. And that's not happening anytime soon due to already conflicted interest between the US and the rest of the world. It's more of an ego and respect thing to have India in there but exactly what do you think will happen? Divine Intervention?
Unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given, and the Government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counsellor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of peace. 😊
Russia had already won the war with Ukraine. However, the NATO can't accept the defeat. Instead, they deployed NATO forces in the guise of volunteers. Therefore, Russia is now fighting NATO forces, and Ukraine would be the battle ground of EU/ West against Russia.
The Comedian foolish Zelensky , lost the war before it began…NATO countries are BROKE…hahaha sending Uk. all of their old outdated war machinery…hahahaha
Despite Russia massive spending in Ukraine War Russia's GDP rose to more than 5%. Why because of their oil and gas exports. US GDP and economy continue falling down. Why? The stop in oil production and oil drilling inside the US. US was even begging oil from Venezuela.
SEND HELP TO Ukraine,it's very urgent.that is all they are asking for those brave men's are dieing for freedom and for the world send them help help they need
Give aid to both Ukraine and Botswana, as Botswana will likely send 20,000 elephants to Germany, well after ww2. This may help modern soldiers of NATO countries cross the Alps like Hannibal 2000 years ago. The elephant can be used in wars too. This is what Botswana will bring to the table of NATO offices after the fall of communism. This qualifies Botswana to immediately apply for membership of the NATO war group of nations, as this is after the fall of communism. This additionally qualifies Botswana to get unlimited aid from rich NATO countries after the fall of communism. To be a member, Botswana has to be situated north of the equator though, in the North of Atlantic Ocean. Libya qualifies to be a member. I would say, make Botswana a member of NATO after the fall of communism. So, after the fall of communism, any country which gifts any NATO country with 20,000 elephants should be immediately made a member of NATO group, regardless of racism. The US constitution guarantees that there is no membership discriminations or employment discrimination based on race and national origin. The government of the US can push for membership of Botswana to NATO group, and other groups. This way the US can push for lots of aid to Botswana from all countries of NATO.
Если бы Украина при Порошенко соблюдала Минский договор , то она бы не потеряла бы свои територии . Но Украина слушала запад так как не имела своих мозгов и получила то что получила . Даже сама Ванна за мног лет предсказывала войну на Украина . И если война начнется зимой то она будет длится очень долго . Слушайте предсказания о РОССИИ многих предсказателей давнейших . Даже сам мольфар Нечай говорил , что Украина потеряет очень мног своих территорий , а особенно западных частей Украина .
Rich corporations, banks and tycoons, make billions from major crises. The entire system in the US is designed that way and favors the extremely rich. Everything goes in a circle from one pocket to the other one. When Congress approves billions of dollars in aid to Ukraine or Israel, they borrow that money from big corporations or banks. Companies provide this money from their profits, which they would otherwise have to pay taxes on. In this way, they skip paying taxes and the state repays the debt to them with interest! Can it get any better!? The same corporations and tycoons sponsor political election campaigns. Politicians, more or less puppets, return favors by creating jobs for them by wars, Covid and other crises....and it's all nicely packaged and served as a democratic lie.
