@@user-pu5ey4ch9x да даже если нету т14 есть Т90М "Прорыв" который активно применяется и налажено массовое производство этих машин. Ты щас напишешь, что их уничтожают. Да их уничтожают, но они гораздо лучше защищены чем т72б3 и т80бвм. Соответственно и потерь этих машин меньше. Неуязвимые танки это те которые не воюют
@@user-pu5ey4ch9x И изучи бронирование Челленджера, у него огромный нижний бронелист имеет всего 70 мм брони, который даже панцерфаустом второй мировой каким нибудь пробьется, такая же ситуация возле триплекса механика водителя, ну и тяжёлый он. А вот башня да, снарядами танков России не пробивается
@@crimson7554 in theory it's good, in practicality it's a show piece since during its usage at a parade it has numerous difficulties and had to be 'repaired as a show of demonstration'.
@@crimson7554 No. It’s not. It hasn’t even seen combat yet so we can’t decide if it’s good or bad. But what I’ve seen from posted footage of the tank from Russian bloggers it’s engine sounds like it’s struggling due to the tank’s weight, and it’s reverse speed is super slow ( like 6mph slow). The tank is overhyped. Hell, it stalled during a parade in 2015.
It's funny because I've seen both sides fight exactly like this too lmaoo. Ukrainians just launched a suicide mission and got obliterated by the russians...Ukraine was using Bradley's and leopard 2s.
I'll bet Ukrainians are watching this carefully. A stalemate is (in this scenario) a realistic outcome provided both sides have competent commanders at the helm.
@@vladyslavanufriiev1224 What 30 thousand? Russia today has lost no more than 2 thousand, both killed and wounded. Ukraine today, lost only killed, from 7 to 8 million people. As a matter of fact, now the very last remnants of NATO forces are dying in Ukraine.Very soon Russia will go on the offensive and Berlin, Paris, Madrid and Rome will forever become Russian cities. And soon after that, there will be a great D-Day, somewhere between Seattle and San Francisco. And Russia will finally take back all the west coast of North America, which belongs to her by right.
Фантастика!!!))) Челенджер прям как Царь Танк, не что и не кто его не берёт)))) Только вот правда в том что Армата на Украине не воюет, там Т90 прорыв . Да и + сейчас когда западные танки вошли в строй ВСУ, армия РФ взяла терминатор для ликвидации этих танков. Вы хотя бы читайте новости, а не пропаганду ВСУ и США. Она вам лапши столько навешала, что теперь во Франции революция будет, Китая к России повернулся, и Иран начал по базам США стрелять.
Warbros, I'm trying to make my own little battles on combat mission but I'm very unfamiliar with the custom scenario maker. (Wee bit different from the gem editor) do you guys have a suggestion for a vid or something I could watch/ read in order to make my own scenarios?
In real life it was not necessary to bring the T-14 Armata to the battlefield to stop the Challenger 2: two bold infantry teams with ATGM Fagot, and that was so much for the supposedly invincible UK main battle tank... They did not score any victory against any Russian tank, and taking into account that in real combat the Leopard 2A6 only hit two T-72 but one was destroyed by a T-80BVM, and that one M1A1 Abrams was destroyed by a T-72B3 without any kill on the Abrams side, I doubt very much the Challenger 2 would fare better.
i just saw an interview with a ukranian soldier on WELT (German news) saying their NATO instructors just told them to drive AROUND the 600km long minefield and defensive belt... They literally sent those men to their deaths with utterly out of touch tactics and information.
Interesting but not realistic. The UA soldiers were not covered by IFVs like BMP-3 or BMD-3. This is a must. Also where is UA MLRS? Artillery? This is a must. Granade lounchers are where? The BMPs should support enough fire over the Russian trenches. And the UA infanry must be not gathered together. The attacking side should be like 6x stronger than the defender. You could also ad snipers on both sides and try to get the UA tanks near the buildings, because infantry needs to cover. They need to reach the trenches, and infantry needs to clear them. Conclution: No offensive without artilery and BMPs/BMDs or ACVs. Why the infantry was on feet they could go in ACV over the open area.
@@jet2444 I'm sure you're crying after realizing that Russia is not the second strongest army the world and watching it get destroyed by a much smaller country. Face it, you're cheering for the wrong side.
@@MrDakadaka Is that your only argument? I don't care about the second one or not, the most important thing is that the breakthrough is coming. Ukraine has not been fighting with its weapons for a long time. She uses NATO weapons and tanks too. So there's no point in proving anything to you. Dp fuck there are even NATO mercenaries..
The T-14 is already in service with the Russian Army, until 2021 there were samples for testing, starting from 2021, the tests ended and began to produce combat types of the tank. More than 30 tanks were assembled from 2021 to 2023. But its task is to reconnaissance and support the main T-90 tanks, this is not a tank for breaking through defenses in the first line of fire.
Fun fact t14s we're actually deployed to ukraine and used in indirect Fire missions while challengers are in the west of ukraine being used for propaganda
Well if the Western tanks would have been as great as we thought them to be before the T-14 was sure to be deployed. However it turned out that the Leopard 2A6 is on par with the T-72B3M... So no need for anything much heavier. (and more expensive). The Challenger 2 btw I am still surprised that they weren't deployed in the Ukrainian spring defensive.
@@fridaynight3181 Tell that the guys that drove it and got killed in their superior Leopard tanks... The fact that you don't mention the subversion of the Leopard 2 already signifies the lack of knowledge.
Невыдуманные истории, о которых нельзя не сказать. Только слух прошел, послышался нахрюк на ютубе. Самое смешное, что ТТХ "Арматы" еще никому неизвестны.
@@jet2444 I would be crying too if I was shilling for Russia for worthless rubles. I'm sure deep down you're crying now that Russia is pulling out ancient T-55's out of storage.
Very Funny uses voice bandit's Stalker. I really liked the new models of both sides, the correct title would be against NATO offensive and I really liked you included the volunteers with their uniforms. Sadly, in one or two months we will be able to see the real confrontation of both armored vehicles. The scene of the prisoner was unavoidable, we already know that it is the Ukrainians who really do not comply with the Geneva Convention. Excellent animation I wish you the best
Both sides are taking heavy losses in this crazy war. According to Norwegian military intelligence. Ukraina have killed or wounded around 100 000+ Russia have killed or wounded around 200 000+ By the end of the war they expect the number will probably double for both sides.
it doesn’t really spin about the losses, since we remember the coefficient 1/3, I would say that Russia lost 60-75 thousand people killed and wounded in the region, Ukraine 100-135 thousand people
@@unclesam6641 i know it is but very unnecessary i don't need a RU-vid video to tell me look russia bad they kill an POW if it was ukraine killing russian POWs side i would dislike video too its just why?
@@kelvinkeyn3946 it's a logistical nightmare to the Russian to produce one or even maintain one just like the tiger2 hard to maintain and a nightmare to produce
different from the tiger 2 The t14 is that the Tiger 2 was produced in a year when it was worth more than the t 14 today any tank can hit it head on having people destroyed but the Tiger 2 in its time little
