0:27 "capturing the woman basically removes the challenge" --> not really, it removes his queen, but it also removes your ability to move your king (since it can only move closer to his queen, and since his queen does not exist, the king cannot go closer to her). So while it makes the gameplay easier if attacking, it would also make any check to your king very dangerous That being said, the game was pretty interesting this way!
this 100 rated guy seemed so smug about his moves, always moving into a queen blunder, taking things as if he was winning. So satisfying to see him lose lol
White: blunders his queen several moves in a row Simp: but what if he discovers a long range bishop attack that pins my pawn? Therefore I cannot castle. The irony is that white captured that pawn later so if you had castles you would have had to capture the queen ending the video. So it was a good analysis
There's two simps inside you. One is a coward who makes the challenges easier and looses. The other one i s n o t a c o w a r d who makes the challenges harder and wins.
I guess a somewhat easier interpretation would be "If the opponent's queen was captured, your king can only move closer towards the last location of the queen", or "If the opponent's queen was captured, your king can't move at all".
Oh, Star Rail music is listed in the description now. Nice. What was your opponent doing though? If you hadn't power-crept the challenge, that Queen would've been long-gone!
To avoid a foreseeable video ending blunder from the opponent you could change the queen capturing restriction to be that you can capture the opponents queen only with your king.
100-rated chess identity crisis: after any bishop move you must move that bishop to the same file or rank it was previously, and after every rook move you must move that rook to a square which is diagonal to its initial position. The original square is excluded in both cases.
This is another one of those NTR chess games, except that this time, your king doesn't make a move onto the opponent's queen while your queen straight up touched the opponent's king.
I would say, even if you capture the opposing queen, you still have a challenge. Not being able to ever move the king could be a disaster if they throw a random bishop suicide in
4:38 When Simp played Qxg1+ I thought to myself: "Why didn't Simp play Qf2 instead? That would be mate in 1!" Then I realised white would just play Qxf2 afterwards. Maybe I was the real 100 rated all along...
I actually thought this was going to be the first "But who plays like that anyway, right?" ........ -cuts to end music as the queen takes the pawn- It would have been a very short but hilarious video.
I think taking the opponents queen would be fine, but then you can never move your king because said king move is not moving closer to the opponents queen.