The base emblem & logo are “wrong” they should have used the same emblem Wonder Woman wears on her bodice. The show nor Lynda Carter had that “WW” emblem on her. They should have utilized the Eagle emblem instead. Aside from that this is an awesome piece.
Yeah, I think you’re right about the logo. I googled it and found they used the wonder woman 1975 TV Series specific text font for her logo (correct me if I am wrong) and may be they decided to use the classic logo rather than the text with Wonder Woman iconic font in the TV Series
An amazing statue But I'm confused by the fact that the base is made of plastic, which I think is worse than polystone, it means saving money, then the price should be lower. Maybe I misunderstood it all, correct me if I did.
Yes, at some points I agree, I think PVC is more durable than Polystone. It could be more expensive for using PVC to sculpt the figure because they have to make the moulding and need more time to be produced. More expensive than polystone. Polystone is easier to make in a huge number of quantities. It is also more durable to the heat, but fragile and easily broken than PVC. So I think, Making Figure by using PVC not always cheaper than the polystone.
@@herointhebox Sorry for the possible bad grammar because I'm using a translator. All that what you have said is very interesting, but still if we take in comparison Polystone and PVC, with its pros and cons, which material do you prefer? Don't get me wrong, I've been dreaming of buying a statue for a while now, I came across this wonder woman. However, I'm not sure if it was appropriate to make the base of PVC and the statue itself of polystone, what is your opinion on this? Thank you.
