Тёмный

Unconventional imaging using entangled photons 

MEMO Student Chapter
Подписаться 47
Просмотров 696
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

15 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 8   
@MuhammadYamin-m1x
@MuhammadYamin-m1x Месяц назад
thank you so much for nice explanation
@jessegonsalves5412
@jessegonsalves5412 Год назад
Oouu. I would like to ask a question. I know this recording is almost 2 years old so I don't know if I'd get a response. Without diving into the maths I would just like to know how the interplay between distinguishability and indistinguishability of the discarded idler, plays a roll in producing the image. Like the theory behind it. Thank you @andres vega
@tictacX1
@tictacX1 3 года назад
Interesting presentation , thank you. Question: in the first experiment (before 19:00), the red photon coming from the top goes through the sample and onto the dichroic filter and into the non-linear crystal but then gets deflected out. What's the purpose of sending it through the bottom crystal? It's not supposed to produce any extra photons as I guess only the pump photon can. So does it have a role in the outcome?
@castaway1889
@castaway1889 3 года назад
Hi, thanks for the question. The purpose of sending the red photon of the first source (idler A) through the bottom crystal is to introduce indistinguishability between the idler photons that could come out of the bottom crystal. If the paths of the idlers are aligned, there is no way to know from which crystal it was produced, this means that the states are interfering with each other. This is the key concept of the scheme. The object introduces an interplay between distinguishability and indistinguishability of the red photons, which combined with the fact that there these are tightly correlated to the green photons (signal photons), allows the green photons to produce an image of the object, non-locally. Best, Andres Vega
@tictacX1
@tictacX1 3 года назад
@@castaway1889 thanks for the clarification. In your picture, you have a 50/50 splitter before the camera and only one camera to its right. In the Zeilinger paper, there are two cameras after the splitter, one for each output. Is that an oversight in your picture or is there actually just one camera? In case there are two cameras, is the image generated by recording only coincident photons? Regards
@castaway1889
@castaway1889 3 года назад
@@tictacX1 One camera is enough to record the image in either output of the beam splitter. Coincidences are not necessary to retrieve the image, as occurs in the case of ghost imaging. In the Zeilinger paper there is one camera in each output because if both recorded images are subtracted, it is possible to get rid of the background that does not carry information of the object. Cheers, Andres
@tictacX1
@tictacX1 3 года назад
@@castaway1889 do you have a paper that goes with the presentation? It's better I read it to get the details. Thanks
@castaway1889
@castaway1889 3 года назад
@@tictacX1 Lemos, Gabriela Barreto, et al. "Quantum imaging with undetected photons." Nature 512.7515 (2014): 409-412. Lahiri, Mayukh, et al. "Theory of quantum imaging with undetected photons." Physical Review A 92.1 (2015): 013832.
Далее
10.1 Hanbury Brown-Twiss Experiment with Photons
43:18
Куда пропали ЗДРАЙВЕРЫ?
11:38
Просмотров 599 тыс.
МАМА И КОММУНАЛКА
00:59
Просмотров 119 тыс.
EEVblog #869 - Counting LED Photons!
32:22
Просмотров 78 тыс.
13  Invisible Photon Is God
48:40
Просмотров 14 тыс.
QRC Seminar Series - Prof. Darrick Chang
1:14:14
How to Produce Entanglement
7:36
Просмотров 157 тыс.
Куда пропали ЗДРАЙВЕРЫ?
11:38
Просмотров 599 тыс.