Great video, we have them both and love them both. Simple rules but great depth in each case. We find people we know who like more spatial puzzles prefer UBB while UN’s depth is more about the combined arms as it has more unit types and action choices than UBB every turn. Personally Undaunted Stalingrad has kind of taken over my life though lol, be interested to see you play that!
It's on our list! Although I (Nato) have been a bit frustrated with the game-iness of the system (especially Normandy), I appreciate what it's trying to accomplish. And I quite enjoyed Undaunted Battle of Britain. I wonder if Normandy does better as a campaign game ....?
@@LegendaryTactics Stalingrad really beats them both on that font but it's using the Normandy system which lends itself to campaigns more than UBB does because there are more unit types and actions which makes upgrading the actions and omcining them as Stalingrad does easier. And also having a physical land map tp upgrade (or degrade!) helps give more of a campaign feel.
Thanks for bringing up Fighters of the Pacific, I have that one and love it!! My impression is that this is similar but somehow I feel FotP is more fun if I just want to have the epic feel of a fighter squadron battle with lots of units on the board, esp with the cool naval unit scenarios in that game where you get the aircraft carriers and torpedoes launched by the dive bombers on the board. Would love to try Battle of Britain but probably no need to buy.
